Title: Modeling Earth Processes using Spreadsheets and Commercial Models
1Modeling Earth Processes using Spreadsheets and
Commercial Models
- William Locke/David Mogk
- Dept. of Earth Sciences
- Montana State University, Bozeman MT
2Why Modeling?
- Effective learning is experiential!
- Substitute arithmetic/mathematics for
- Space
- Loess deposition
- Time
- Thrust-belt evolution
- Safety
- Thermohaline circulation
- Money!
3What do modelers do?
- A major purpose of scientific investigation is
to describe reality through models Gauch, 1993,
Am. Sci., 81, 468. - ..what some researchers are calling the third
branch of science - usingcomputers to simulate
physical processes.. Pool, 1993, Science, 260,
1077. - ..predict the future state of a system with
tolerable certainty Denning, 1990, Am. Sci.,
78, 496.
4Caveats(Denning, 1990, American Scientist, 78,
498)
- We must come to understand the domains over
which a given model is reliable.. - Systems whose rules canchange in unpredictable
ways are unlikely to have a reliablemodel. - it is easy to substitute the model for reality
and to confuse our opinions with scientific
facts supported by the model.
5Why Spreadsheets?
- Ubiquitous
- AppleWorks, Microsoft Works, Quattro, Lotus
- Visually Powerful Graphics
- 2-D (XY, Line), 3-D (Ribbon, Surface)
- Translucent - not Black Box
- point-and-click cell contents
- What-if?
- real-time graphical response to changing inputs
6Modeling in ESCI 307 - Principles of
Geomorphology
- Assumption
- One application is Exposure
- Two applications are Familiarization
- Three applications are Competence
- Four applications are Mastery
- How far do you want to get this year?
- Mastery of spreadsheet skills - exposure to and
familiarization with specific applications
7LaboratoryMechanics
- Traphagen 100
- 10 computers (in pairs, out-facing) instrux.
- Teams of 2 or 4
- Face in for lecture, map work, specimens
- One instructor and a teaching assistant are
generally required.
8SCARP1 - Scarp Evolution
- Exposure to spreadsheet practice
- Block operations
- Graphing
- Theory of slope modeling
- Mass redistribution
- Running mean
9(No Transcript)
10Outcomes - SCARP1
- Way-cool graphics!
- I already knew that.
- Oops! I lost it!
- Its not real but Material eroded from the top
accumulates at the bottom. - It looks like chemical diffusion.
- Measure all of the possible variables and the
slope responses.
11Discussion - Scarp1
- Do you use spreadsheets, personally?
- If so, why - what do you find useful?
- Is a lab teaching spreadsheeting worthwhile?
- Is the graphical capability valuable for other
applications than modeling?
12SCARP2 - Scarp Evolution
- Familiarization with
- Block ops. Graphing
- Exposure to
- Absolute cell refs.
- Practice of slope modeling
- Acceleration of gravity
- Disequilibrium - Erosivity
13Outcomes - SCARP2
- It looks just like SCARP!
- You didnt really include all of the variables.
- How do I
- add a resistant layer?
- mimic a deluge?
- model a stream at the toe?
- ?
14Discussion - SCARP2
- Is this a good way to learn about the effects of
gsin?? - Is this a good way to learn about probabilistic
natural processes? - Is it worth doing additional exercises?
15LONGPRO - Stream Evolution
- Competence in block operations graphing
- Familiarization with absolute cell references
- Exposure to equations
- Interrelationships between modeling and
collection of field data.
16Outcomes - LONGPRO
- About 70 of teams succeed - matching real and
modeled profiles (but with unreal parameters -
e.g., a tiny output of m-scale particles). - About 40 of teams succeed.
- Success requires changing one variable away from
the optimal solution, then another one towards it.
17Discussion - LONGPRO
- Is the integration of field data with modeling
worth the investment of two laboratory periods? - Is the failure rate (30 total, 60 partial)
acceptable given the complexity of natural
systems? - Do those who dont succeed, fail?
18GLACPRO - Glacier Reconstruction
- Mastery of block operations and graphing
- Introduction to research
- Team activity
- Resource allocation
- Interaction with other groups
- Quality control
19Outcomes - GLACPRO
- A surprising number of results are incorrect.
- No intuitive knowledge of what a glacier should
look like. - Great difficulty meeting as teams outside of
class. - Inevitable team friction.
- Publishable products (when massaged).
20Discussion - GLACPRO
- Is the difference between glacial extent and
modeled glacial extent clear? - Are team/interactive exercises worth the
degradation of content? - Are exercises with no right answer fair to
students (as for grading purposes)?
21Data Downloading
- Sources
- USGS
- Other?
- Formats
- Parsing
- Web Tables X
- Outcomes
- Trends
- Statistics
22Log10 transformation
23Magnitude/Frequency
24Stream Rating Curves
25Flood Recurrence Intervals
26Discussion - Download
- What numerical data sets exist?
- Does spreadsheet manipulation result in increased
learning effectiveness? - Would a field trip to a stream gauge be a more
effective teaching tool?
27Virtual MODFLOW
- The standard in professional groundwater modeling
- 750 (incl. academic discount!) - The Scientific Software Group http//www.scisoftw
are.com/ - Downloadable demo http//www.scisoftware.com/prod
ucts/visual_modflow_demo/visual_modflow_demo.html
28ModflowGrid
29Discussion of Visual MODFLOW
- Is it appropriate to use a commercial product for
a class activity? - Is black-box modeling a valuable learning tool?
30General Modeling Issues
- At what academic level is modeling critical?
- Relative importance of physical, theoretical and
mathematical models? - Optimal execution - homework, solo lab, team lab,
class demo? - Optimal tradeoff against content, field trips,
map exercises, quizzes?
31General Issues relating to DLESE
- Who should maintain such models?
- Author? DLESE? Other agency?
- How can DLESE promote this activity?
- Action Items?
- User Group?
- White Paper on modeling pedagogy?
- Testing Service for models?