Title: Exploring Reading and Writing Connections
1Exploring Reading and Writing Connections
- Natalie G. Olinghouse
- Michigan State University
- August 16, 2007
2Importance of understanding R/W connections
- Reading and writing likely have shared
processes/knowledge and unique processes/knowledge
- Classroom instruction
- Instruction in one is unlikely to replace
instruction in the other (Shanahan, 2006) - Complexity of combining reading and writing in a
productive manner - Can we combine reading and writing to provide
deeper learning? (e.g, McGinley Tierney, 1989) - Is progress in writing determined by reading
development? - Assessment
- High-stakes tests which use constructive response
items to assess either reading or writing (e.g.,
NAEP, state assessments)
3Correlational Research
- Research supporting relationship between reading
and writing quality - Decoding (e.g., Abbott Berninger, 1993 Hogan
Mishler, 1980) - Word reading (e.g., Abbott Berninger, 1993
Kroll, 1983) - Comprehension (e.g., Juel, 1988 Swanson
Berninger, 1996) - From -1 to 1 indicating strength of relationship
between 2 skills - Positive correlation indicates high performance
in one skill is related to high performance in
other skill - Negative correlation indicates high performance
in one skill is related to low performance in
other skill
4Olinghouse Studies
- Grades 2, 3, and 4
- Approximately 100 students in each grade
- Diverse student population
- Reading
- Word reading,
- Reading comprehension (grades 2 4)
- Listening comprehension (grade 3)
- Writing
- Quality
- Vocabulary
- Spelling
- Mechanics (grades 2 4)
5Correlations between Reading and Writing Quality
6Correlations between Reading and Writing
Vocabulary Diversity
7Correlations between Reading and Writing Mechanics
8Correlations between Reading and Compositional
Spelling
9Limitations of Correlational Data
- Cannot indicate causality
- Cannot identify possible instructional approaches
B
A
10Causal possibilities
Reading
Writing
Writing
Reading
Reading
Writing
11Shared Knowledge in Reading and
Writing(Fitzgerald Shanahan, 2000)
- Metaknowledge (pragmatics)
- Functions and purposes of reading/writing
- Monitoring meaning making and knowledge
- Knowing that readers and writers interact
- Example
- I am writing a letter to my aunt, which she will
read. I need to make sure that I consider what my
aunt already knows and doesnt know when I write
my letter.
12Shared Knowledge in Reading and
Writing(Fitzgerald Shanahan, 2000)
- Procedural knowledge
- How to access, use, and generate knowledge in
above areas - Smooth integration of various processes
- Example
- When I am reading and writing, I can use the
strategies I learned about words and sentences to
help me understand what I read and improve what I
write.
13Shared Knowledge in Reading and
Writing(Fitzgerald Shanahan, 2000)
- Universal text attributes
- Word phonological/grapheme awareness, morphology
- Syntax sentences, punctuation
- Text story grammars, text structure and
organization - Example
- I know the s makes the /s/ sound. I can use
this knowledge when I read and write sun. - When I read a story, I look for the characters
and the setting to help me understand the story.
When I write a story, I make sure I include the
characters and the setting.
14Shared Knowledge in Reading and
Writing(Fitzgerald Shanahan, 2000)
- Domain knowledge (prior knowledge, content
knowledge) - Vocabulary
- Meaning created through context of connected text
- Example
- I just read a book about trains and the
different kinds of engines. I can write a report
about engines, using the new vocabulary and
knowledge that I just learned.
15IES Study(PI Donald Compton, Vanderbilt
University)
- Research questions
- General reading comprehension
- Knowledge
- Information
- Vocabulary
- Strategy use
- Vocabulary
- Comprehension
- Target population
- Students with reading difficulties
- Grades 2-6
16- 24 sessions
- 90 minutes/session
- Word reading strategies and fluency 40 minutes
- Text reading and comprehension
- 50 minutes
- Small groups of 2-4 students
- Taught by RA
17Text used in intervention
- Informational text
- Approximately late 2nd grade reading level
- 3 books
- Pioneers
- Rain forests
- Tornados
- Mix of text, pictures, captions, and additional
information
18Young Pioneers text
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21Comprehension Group Teachers Guide
22(No Transcript)
23Vocabulary Group Teachers Guide
24Timeline of Writing Assessments
4 intro sessions
9 sessions
6 sessions
5 sessions
25Hypotheses Report Writing
- Fluency
- Number of words written in text
- Vocabulary
- Taught
- Diversity
- Main ideas and details
Reading
Writing
26Todays sample (number of students 36)
- Demographics
- Age 9.8 (SD 1.2)
- Female 15, Male 21
- African American 20, Caucasian 12,
- Other 4
- Intervention group
- Traditional 10 students
- Comprehension 14 students
- Vocabulary 12 students
27Standardized Achievement Tests
28Preliminary Results
- Fluency
- All students will write more words in their
report after reading the text
29Average Number of Words Written by Intervention
Group
30Preliminary Results
- Vocabulary
- Students receiving the Vocabulary intervention
will include more taught vocabulary in their
report
31Average number of taught words included in
reports by intervention group
32Preliminary Results
- Vocabulary
- What taught vocabulary did students include in
their reports?
33Percentage of students who included specific
taught vocabulary words
34Example of Vocabulary Word Usage Post test
- Pioneer were the people first to do something.
Also the Pioneer traveled to the East from the
West. While they were walking the children had to
walk holding a rooster. When the pioneer finally
got where they were going, they pushed the Native
Americans off the land. When the pioneer got
settled they build a house with sod and mud. - During school years the pioneer hired a teacher,
it was hard to hire a teacher. The students were
sometime older than the teacher. The teacher was
usually 15 or 14 years old. Thats how the
pioneer lived their lives.
African American Female, age 10, Vocabulary
intervention
35Preliminary Results
- Vocabulary
- All students will include greater vocabulary
diversity in their report after reading the text
36Vocabulary diversity in reports by intervention
group
37Preliminary Results
- Main ideas and details
- All students will include more main ideas and
details in their report after reading the texts
38Pretest
Post test
African American female, age 9.5, Comprehension
instruction
39Average number of main ideas by chapter
40Average number of details by chapter
41Future scoring of reports
Pictures/ Captions
Inference
42Conclusions
- Reading and writing are related, although the
specific relationships are not known
word reading comprehension
quality vocabulary mechanics spelling
43Conclusions
- Poor readers can use knowledge gained from
reading for report writing. After reading text,
student reports showed improvements in - length
- number of main ideas and details
- taught vocabulary
- vocabulary diversity
- Caveats
- Transfer from reading to writing was small. For
larger gains, it is likely that writing must be
taught in concert with reading, especially for
poor readers. - It is not known if similar results would be found
for average or good readers
44Pretest
Post test
- 1. Long ago pioneers lived.
- 2. They took wagons around the country.
- 3. They had picnics in the comunity.
- boats
- people
- crops
- foods
- growing
- They grea crops
- crops were thier food
45Classroom Applications
- Include reading and writing connections where
they make sense - Make explicit connections
- Word reading-word spelling
- Text structure and organization
- Vocabulary and ideas
- Teach students about using main ideas, details,
vocabulary, inferences, and additional features
from text to use in their writing - Poor readers
- May transfer more information from reading to
writing when explicitly taught how to do so - Teach summary writing. Students tended to include
more details (as compared to main ideas) from
text in their report writing.
46Thank you!