Pleasure Craft Proposal

1
Pleasure Craft Proposal

• Draft Pleasure Craft Evaporative Emissions
  Regulation and Standards

2
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

3
Objectives

1. Seek public participation in process
2. Share information on control technology testing
3. Seek input on draft proposal

4
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

5
Purpose of ARB Regulation

1. Seek additional emission reductions from category
2. Reduce emissions for ozone attainment
3. Meet existing SIP commitment

6
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

7
Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions

• Breakdown of emissions from a 33 gallon 2006 MY
  Crestliner
• ARB is reducing emissions by improving technology
  to all four sources

8
Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions, cont.
Total Projected HC emissions and reductions
based on current model
9
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

10
Control Technology Test Results Using Proven
Automotive Control Technologies

• Low Permeation Fuel Tank
• (Moeller Marine, lt1.0 g/m2/day, roto-molded two
  layer)
• Carbon Canister
• (Delphi Marine, 0.84 g/liter)
• Low Permeation Fuel Hose
• (Arrow Hose and Tubing, lt5 g/m2/day)
• Fuel Injection
• (Honda FI, 90HP)

11
Controlled Technology Test Results, cont.

• One MY 2006 Crestliner was used for all control
  technology testing

12
Controlled Technology Test Results, cont.
 Fuel Type Average Emissions Reductions
E6 80
E10 77

• Emissions reductions were calculated against an
  uncontrolled 2006 Crestliner with E6
• Averaged over seven 24-hour California summertime
  diurnal profiles

13
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

14
Refueling Emissions

• Current inventory does not account for refueling
  emissions
• Estimated refueling emissions could be as much as
  3 TPD
• Based on
• Population of 1.2 million
• Daily fuel consumption

15
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

16
Draft Proposal Key ElementsOptions for
Certification

• Proposed Pleasure Craft regulation has two
  methods of certification
• Design-Based Standard Requires specific
  components
• fuel injection
• low permeation fuel hoses
• low permeation fuel tank
• passively purged carbon canister
• Performance Alternative One standard for the
  complete system
• Based on a 72-Hour test (California Summer
  Profile)
• ORVR required for both options
• The standard will be based on E10
• 90 California Phase 3 Reformulated Gasoline with
  10 by volume ethanol

17
Draft Proposal Key ElementsStandards

1. Design Based Standards

Design Requirements Section 2791.1(a) Design Requirements Section 2791.1(a) Design Requirements Section 2791.1(a) Design Requirements Section 2791.1(a) Design Requirements Section 2791.1(a) Design Requirements Section 2791.1(a)
Effective Date Model Year Fuel Hose Permeation Grams/m2/day ROG Fuel Tank Permeation Grams/m2/day ROG Carbon Canister Butane Working Capacity Grams/Liter1 Fuel Injection Production Compliance Phase-In
2012 and subsequent 5.0 1.0 1.4 Required All Pleasure Craft

• Fuel Injection will be required for
• Greater than 200HP - MY2012
• Greater than 50HP MY2013
• All Pleasure Craft MY2014

18
Draft Proposal Key ElementsStandards

1. Performance Alternative Standard

Performance Requirements Section 2791.1(b) Performance Requirements Section 2791.1(b) Performance Requirements Section 2791.1(b)
Effective Date Model Year PLEASURE CRAFT Type Diurnal Standard Grams HC/day
2012 All PLEASURE CRAFT Types 0.048 Tank Volume (liters) 0.97
19
Draft Proposal Key ElementsConcept for
Certification

• Evaporative System Builders (boat builders,
  manufacturers, dealers, etc.) must apply for an
  Executive Order of Certification
• Build evaporative system with ARB EO approved
  components
• Reference EO number in application form
• Submit application to MSOD
• EO is automatic upon submittal
• Boat Manufacturer will submit test data for the
  whole system, ARB will issue an EO

20
Concept for Certification- ExampleDealer
Certification

1. Dealer builds evaporative system with EO
   certified components
2. References EO numbers in registration form
3. Submits registration form to MSOD
4. Boat is allowed for sale immediately upon
   submittal
5. Dealer will receive EO of Certification within 45
   days of submittal

21
Draft Proposal Key ElementsRequirements for
ORVR

• Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery (ORVR) is
  required for all Pleasure Craft in 2012
• Fill necks must be compatible with gasoline
  dispensers
• Must control displaced refueling vapor from
  escaping into the atmosphere

22
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

23
Request for Manufacturing Cost

• ARB is seeking cost information from
  manufacturers to refine cost estimates for
• Fuel Tanks
• Fuel Hoses
• Carbon Canisters
• Fuel Injection
• ORVR Compatibility

24
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

25
Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness

• ARB will
• Use cost estimates provided by the boat and
  component manufacturers
• Assume two levels of profit in calculating
  increased retail cost
• Use estimated fuel savings in overall cost
  effectiveness calculation

26
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

27
Pleasure Craft Survey

• Institute for Social Research, CSUS is currently
  performing a California Pleasure Craft usage and
  activity survey
• Preliminary data will be available in March
• Final report will be available in July
• The survey data will be used to update activity
  and usage in the Off-Road Model

28
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

29
Status of Inventory Testing

• Inventory testing is on-going and will be
  completed in 2011
• PTSD will update the Off-Road model when
  inventory testing is finished
• Because of the urgent need for reductions the
  Pleasure Craft regulation will move forward with
  existing estimates

30
Presentation Outline

• Objectives
• Purpose of ARB Regulation
• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions
• Control Technology Test Results
• Refueling Emissions
• Key Elements of Draft Proposal
• Request for Manufacturing Cost
• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
• Pleasure Craft Survey
• Status of Inventory Testing
• Comments and Contact Information

31
Comments?

• We are specifically seeking comment on
• Time needed for technology implementation
• Concepts for certification
• Manufacturing costs
• Definitions in draft regulation

32
ContactsMonitoring and Laboratory Division(For
Questions Concerning the Rule Development)

• Scott Monday
• Project Co-Lead, Evaporative Control,
  Engineering, and Regulatory Development Section
• [phone], smonday_at_arb.ca.gov
• Jim Watson
• Manager, Evaporative Control, Engineering, and
  Regulatory Development Section
• [phone], jwatson_at_arb.ca.gov
• Planning and Technical Support Division
• (For Questions Concerning the Emissions
  Inventory)
• Satya Sardar
• Staff, Off-Road Modeling and Assessment Section
• [phone], ssardar_at_arb.ca.gov