Better Bricks Low Cost/No Cost O

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Better Bricks Low Cost/No Cost O

Description:

Commercial Integration of Solar Power Plants Presented By: Russ Wright Sales Manager, Oregon SunEdison Agenda Objectives Retail Electricity Overview Solar Industry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:8
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: DavidS302

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Better Bricks Low Cost/No Cost O


1
Commercial Integration of Solar Power Plants
Presented By Russ Wright Sales Manager,
Oregon SunEdison
2
Agenda
  • Objectives
  • Retail Electricity Overview
  • Solar Industry Overview
  • About SunEdison Offerings
  • Equipment

3
  • Retail Electricity Overview

4
Electricity prices current
  • Average commercial electricity prices varied from
    3-26 cents/kwh in 2008

Source Energy Information Administration, Form
EIA-826, "Monthly Electric Sales and Revenue
Report with State Distributions Report."
5
U.S. commercial electricity prices
  • On average, prices have increased 4.76 each year
    for the last 8 years
  • Source Electric Power Monthly, DOE/EIA-0226 and
    Electric Power Annual, DOE/EIA-0348.

6
Global energy demand
  • Total world demand to increase 220 by 2030 (2
    each year)
  • When energy demand goes up, energy prices go.

Source DOE International Energy Outlook, June
2008. http//www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/excel/ieoht
ab_1.xls
7
Global Electricity Demand
Global electricity demand to increase 142 by
2030 (1.4 each year)
Source DOE International Energy Outlook, June
2008. http//www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/excel/aeohmt
ab_8.xls
8
Energy demand drives costs
  • Demand drives energy production
  • Energy plants are dispatched by (lowest) variable
    costs
  • Utility rate breakdown
  • Baseload rate
  • Peak rates
  • driven by volatile variable
  • costs
  • Demand charges
  • determined by facilitys
  • highest energy use
  • To save energy ...
  • Reduce peak demand from utility

9
Price volatility of peak energy
  • Cause Effect
  • Lower natural gas (NG) production ? Higher NG
    prices
  • Less new NG drilling ? Higher NG
    prices
  • Oil prices increase ? Higher NG
    prices
  • Higher NG prices ? Utilities
    raise rates

Source http//www.petrostrategies.org/Graphs/Natu
ral_Gas_Futures_Prices.htm
10
Solar reduces your peak demand
11
Proven demand savings
  • Actual demand savings from one of our solar power
    plants

12
  • Solar Industry Overview

13
Demand for affordable green energy
  • Society displeased with
  • Volatile, increasing energy costs
  • Dependence on foreign energy supplies
  • Global warming use of carbon-heavy fossil
    fuels

Source DOE International Energy Outlook, June
2008. http//www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/excel/ieohta
b_12.xls
14
Benefits of solar energy
  • On-peak power
  • Power created when electricity is most expensive
  • Predictable, competitive pricing
  • Doesnt vary with fossil fuel volatility
  • Distributed
  • On-site generation, decreases need for
    transmission
  • Public Support Jobs
  • 90 approval ratings since late 90s1
  • Creates jobs 7 job-years for every MW installed
  • Reliable
  • 20-25 yr warranties can last 45 yrs
  • Clean
  • No CO2 emissions requires little to no water

Source Mason-Dixon Polling Research, Inc.,
Feb 2007
15
Growth of solar industry
  • U.S. solar market grew 57 in 07 1
  • Solar growth predicted at 60 in 08 1
  • Industry has grown 30 per year
  • for last 15 years 2
  • In 2009, photovoltaics will account for
  • 116,000 jobs
  • 20 billion in capital investment 3

1 Rhone Resch http//www.seia.org/breakingnews.php
2 Solar Buzz Fast Facts, June 16, 2008
http//www.solarbuzz.com/FastFactsIndustry.htm 3
Navigant Consulting. http//www.seia.org/breakingn
ews.php
Source Company Analyst Reports, EERE, Solar
Energy Industry Forecast, May 30,
2008 http//www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/solar_ameri
ca/pdfs/solar_market_evolution.pdf
16
Insolation viability of solar
  • Germany has
  • slightly less land than Montana
  • far inferior insolation to the U.S.
  • 57 of the worlds photovoltaic energy (1,328 MW
    vs. 220 MW in U.S. in 2007)

Source Solar Buzz 2007 World PV Industry Report.
http//www.solarbuzz.com/Marketbuzz2008-intro.ht
m
17
Viable Solar States 2009
18
  • Photovoltaic equipment

19
So many technologies which one is best?
  • Thin film
  • Less energy produced / sq ft.
  • Less per kW
  • Better performance in shading heat
  • Flexible and laminate forms
  • Types
  • Amorphous silicon (a-Si)
  • Cadmium telluride (CdTe)
  • Copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS)
  • Crystalline
  • More energy produced / sq. ft.
  • More per kW
  • More prevalent
  • Time-tested
  • Types
  • Mono-crystalline silicon
  • Poly-crystalline silicon

20
We dont invest the best find us
  • Our intentional neutrality makes us a magnet for
    innovative technologies
  • We determine panels, racking, balance
  • of system by analysis design to
  • minimize costs
  • maximize production
  • complement site characteristics
  • Pilot projects with manufacturers
  • 3 studies for unreleased technologies
  • currently underway

21
Space required for 1 MW ground-mount
  • Crystalline
  • Fixed panels, 5 acres
  • Single-axis trackers, 8 acres
  • Thin Film, fixed
  • Fixed panels, 10 acres

Estimates based on latitude of 38 (Washington
DC) module angle of 20
22
Space required for 250 kW roof-mount
  • Crystalline
  • fixed 20 tilt, 37,000 (useable) square feet
  • Thin film
  • fixed 0 tilt, 50,000 (usable) square feet

Estimates based on latitude of 38 (similar to
Washington DC)
23
Mounting solutions roof
  • Tilt angle of 0-20
  • Racking Types
  • Ballasted
  • no penetrations to membrane
  • 5-10 lbs/sq. foot
  • Penetrating
  • Roof penetrations verified by original roofing
    contractor
  • Adhesive (thin film)

24
Mounting solutions ground
  • Fixed
  • No moving parts
  • Takes less space
  • Tracking
  • Rotates on axis
  • Create more kwh
  • More OM (moving parts)
  • Can be more or less economical depending on
    irradiation

25
Inverters
  • Converts direct current (DC) to alternating
    current (AC)
  • UL rated, IEEE approved
  • Outage protection
  • Warranted by manufacturer

26
  • Incentives
  • Financing Models

27
Incentives
  • Federal Investment Tax Credit - 30
  • Currently sunsets at the end of the year
  • Extender bill pending
  • Oregon Business Energy Tax Credit 50
  • Accelerated Depreciation - Modified Accelerated
    Cost Recovery System
  • Federal 50 1st year in 08
  • Energy Trust of Oregon
  • Cash Incentive
  • Paid at completion of project
  • Based on size of project
  • Funded by utility public purpose charges

28
Financing Models
  • Cash Sale
  • Large capital outlay
  • Monetize own tax credits
  • Responsible for Maintenance and Insurance
  • Approx. 5 yr ROI
  • Flip
  • Form LLC with Investor - some capital investment
  • Investor owns 95 initially
  • Host pays for energy produced
  • Ownership interest flips at predetermined point
    in time
  • 6-7 years
  • Host buys out remaining interest
  • Responsible for power production, maintenance and
    insurance

29
Value Proposition of the SPSA
  • Simple
  • Customer just pays for energy
  • Financially efficient
  • Incentives are fully maximized
  • Predictable long-term pricing
  • PPA rate is equal or below
  • utilitys rate
  • Aligns interests
  • We benefit from maximizing
  • system output for entire contract term
  • Service based
  • We perform monitoring, operations, maintenance

Predictable SunEdison prices vs. Volatile energy
prices
30
SPSA Direct sale
  • Purchase energy
  • no capital expenditure
  • SunEdison maximizes incentives
  • sells tax credits, RECs to interested parties
  • provides (discounted) solar rate
  • SunEdison holds responsibility
  • monitors system performance, operations,
    maintenance, etc.
  • Evaluate savings on SPSA rate vs. utility rate
  • Purchase entire PV system
  • pay cash upfront, asset on balance sheet
  • Customer tries to monetize incentives
  • uses incentives to offset capital
  • expenses over appropriate payback period
  • Customer holds responsibility
  • self-performs maintenance operations - or
    hires a servicer
  • Evaluate ROI on PV System
  • vs. ROI on core business investment

31
  • About SunEdison
  • History, Offerings, Experience

32
Marketshare solar energy installers
  • SunEdison holds 37 of the marketshare in the
    U.S.s largest solar market

Source CSI Data, June 2008.
33
SunEdison Today
  • North Americas largest solar energy services
    provider
  • Experience with 36 module types
  • 1.4 billion in supply contracts
  • 153 commercial sized systems installed
  • 47.9 MW under management
  • Operating across a global
  • marketplace
  • 477 employees
  • 11 U.S. offices
  • Offices in Canada and Spain
  • and expanding quickly

SunEdison installation data as of 08.22.08
34
What we do
  • Our fully managed service includes
  • Program design
  • Financing
  • Design
  • Construction
  • REC certification sales
  • Rebate processing
  • Promotional support
  • 24/7 monitoring verification
  • Operations maintenance for term of agreement

35
  • Solar Monitoring

36
Solar monitoring tells you
  • How much energy is produced
  • every 15 minutes
  • Your demand charge savings
  • Level of PV system performance
  • If there is an outage
  • Payback period return on your investment

36
37
Without a solar monitoring solution
  • You wont know about
  • Production losses / lower energy generation
  • Inverter failure or voided warranty
  • Mechanical integrity failure
  • Aluminum/steel rack corrosion, etc.
  • Roof deterioration or voided warranty
  • Safety risks
  • Electrical risk of shock or fire
  • Equipment detachment due to wind

Not a SunEdison Installation
Unattended solar systems can deteriorate beyond
repair, impacting a buildings structural
integrity or worse turning an asset into a
liability
38
Solar Monitoring Benefits Analysis
  • Verify demand offsets (kW)
  • Verify energy savings (kWh)
  • Track environmental benefits

38
39
Thank you! Questions?
Russ Wright rwright_at_sunedison.com 503-297-6408
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)