Title: An Analysis of P3P Deployment
1An Analysis of P3P Deployment
- Hyun Jin Kim
- Sensitive Information
- in a Wired World
- November 11, 2003
2Introduction
- Privacy Policies
- US self-regulatory approach to online privacy
protection - Description of a companys data practices
- What information they collect from individuals
and what they do with it
3P3P Specifications
- Developed by World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) over
5 years of work - Became an official W3C Recommendation just over
a year ago on April 16, 2002
4P3P Specifications
5P3P Evaluation System Design
- Automated process to measure P3P adoption and
gather data from P3P-enabled web sites - By Lorrie Faith Cranor, Simon Byers, and David
Kormann (ATT Labs-Research) - Five major components
- URL Collection Mechanism
- P3P Policy Retriever
- Scripted Interface to the W3C P3P Validator
- P3P Policy Evaluator
- Generic Data Analysis Tools
6URL Collector
- To identify sets of sites of interest
- Existing lists of URLs
- Newly constructed lists that focus on particular
web sites - Web spidering technique
- Gather information from web directories and other
sources
7P3P Policy Retriever
- Pearl Script to retrieve P3P information
- All policies, policy reference files, compact
header policies
8P3P Validator
- W3C P3P Validator
- Fetches P3P policy reference files, policy files
and compact policies - Checks them for compliance with the P3P 1.0
Specification - Stops validation upon encountering an error
- Scripted interface to the W3C P3P Validator
- Retrieve P3P policies from sites with errors in
their policy reference files
9P3P Policy Evaluator
- Compares a web sites policy with a users
privacy preferences - Finds a mismatch between the P3P policy and the
privacy preferences
10Data Analysis
- Outputs of policy evaluations gathered in a
rectangular matrix - Row policy from a web site
- Column APPEL rule set file
- Run a Pearl script over the matrix
- Produce various tabulations
- i.e., number of sites that returned mismatch
between privacy preferences and P3P policies
11Web Site Selection
- Focus on the sites frequently visited by users
- PFF Most Popular
- 85 of the 100 busiest sites determined by the
October 2001 Nielsen/NetRatings ranking of sites
with the most unique visitors per month - Excludes adult sites, childrens sites,
business-to-business sites, and sites not in the
.com top level domain - PFF Random
- Random sample of 302 of the 7821 domains with at
least 39,000 unique monthly visitors in October
2001 by Nielsen/NetRatings - PFF Refined Random
- 209 domains from the PFF Random list that were in
the top 5,625 domains in October 2001 by
Nielsen/NetRatings - Excludes adult sites, childrens sites,
business-to-business sites, and non-dot-coms - Netscore Top 500
- 500 domains with the most unique visitors during
July 2002 by comScore Media Matrix netScore
Standard Traffic Measurement report - Key Measures
- Top 500 domains with the most unique visitors
during July 2002 by comScore Media Matrix Key
Measures report - Includes third-party sites
12Web Site Selection (Cont.)
- Alexia
- Top 500 domains by Alexia Traffic Ranking on
Feb.4, 2003 - Includes non-US domains and adult sites
- Froogle
- 1,017 sites obtained by crawling the
www.froogle.com web sites in April 2003 - Sites offer products for sale
- Yahooligans
- 900 sites obtained by crawling www.yahooligans.com
in April 2003 - Sites for children ages 7-12
- Firstgov
- 344 government sites indexed at www.firstgov.gov
in April 2003 - Includes US federal and state government sites
and sites for some quasi-government organizations - News
- 2,429 sites by news.google.com in April 2003
- Includes a variety of news-reporting
organizations from the US and other countries
13P3P Adoption on May 2003
14P3P Adoption (Cont.)
- P3P adoption increasing over time
- Highest for the most popular web sites
- Key Measures site lists higher than Netscore
- Presence of third-party sites
- To avoid having their cookies blocked by IE6
- Alexa top 500 list lowest
- International nature
- Large number of adults sites
- One third of the P3P-enabled sites had errors
flagged by W3C P3P Validator - 7 had errors that prevented their evaluation by
Privacy Bird evaluation engine - Omit required components of a P3P policy
- Improperly referencing data elements
15Privacy Bird Evaluation
- Definition of not sharing data
- Sites share data only with agents that use it
only to complete the transaction for which it was
provided or with delivery companies - Data sharing occurs only under an opt-in policy
- 3 standard settings
- Low
- Trigger a red bird policy does not match the
preferences - Collects health/medical info
- Share it with other companies
- Use it for analysis, marketing or to make
decisions what content or ads the user sees - Engage in marketing but do not provide a way to
opt-out
16Privacy Bird Evaluation (Cont.)
- Medium
- Same as low
- Sites sharing PII (physical contact info, online
contact info, government-issued identifier),
financial info, or purchase info with other
companies - Sites collecting PII but provide no access
provisions - High
- Same as medium
- Sites sharing any personal info (including
non-identified info) with other companies - Use it to determine the users habits, interests,
or other characteristics - Sites contacting users for marketing
- Sites using financial or purchase info for
analysis, marketing, or to make decisions that
may affect what content or ads the user sees
17Privacy Bird Evaluation (Cont.)
18Privacy Bird Evaluation (Cont.)
- Red bird on 24 of the evaluated sites
- No opt-out of marketing and/or telemarketing
ability offered - Most popular sites receive both green bird on low
setting and red bird on high setting - Green bird - Greater awareness of the importance
of the choice principle - Red bird - Most offer rich ecommerce environments
that rely heavily on targeted marketing and
profiling visitors - Red birds on Froogle and Yahooligans most likely
- Collect health and medical info
19Types of Data Collected
20Types of Data Collected (Cont.)
- Most collected data
- Computer info and click stream info
- HTTP protocol used for retrieving content from
website - Demographic data
- Less by Froogle and govt web sites
- Online contact info, physical contact info,
interactive data, unique ids - Mostly by news web sites
- Preference info, purchase info, and state
management info (cookies) - Fewer collected financial info (excludes purchase
process) - Least collected data
- Content (email msgs, bulletin board postings,
etc.) - Government-issued identifiers
- Health information
- Political information
- Location information (ie. GPS positioning data)
- Information not falling into any other
pre-defined categories - No government websites collect government-issued
identifiers
21Data Usage
22Data Usage (Cont.)
- Almost all websites used data for
- Completion and support of the activity for which
data was provided - Web site and system administration
- Research and development
- Majority of sites used data for
- Email and postal mail marketing
- One-time tailoring of the site content
- Two-forms of pseudonymous profiling
- Fewer sites used data for
- Telemarketing
- Profiling in which individuals are identified by
name or other PII - Very few sites used data for
- Historical preservation (Not by government sites)
- Other purposes that do not fall into these
categories - News web sites use data for almost every purpose.
23Data Recipients and Sharing
24Data Recipients and Sharing (Cont.)
- Half the websites share PII with parties other
than agents who use data for the purpose for
which it was provided - Most likely by
- News web sites
- Froogle list sites with delivery company
- Least likely by
- Government web sites
25Choice Options
26Choice Options (Cont.)
- Top sites most likely to engage in marketing than
less popular sites - Top sites most likely to offer choices
(opt-in/out) - Internal choices (telemarketing and other
marketing) offered more opt-out than opt-in - Third-party choices offered more opt-in than
opt-out
27Access Provisions
28Access Provisions (Cont.)
- 92 of sites collecting identified data provides
some access provisions - Most provides access to both contact info and
other data - Smaller number provides access to only contact
info or to all identified data - Very few provides no access
- None provides access only to non-contact info
29Dispute Resolution Options and Remedies
30Dispute Resolution Options and Remedies
- Individuals can contact customer service to
resolve their disputes on most sites - About one-third offered resolution via
independent organization (ie. Privacy seal
provider) - by most popular sites
- Very few indicated resolution of dispute under an
applicable law - Almost none indicated resolution in court
31Data Retention Policies
32Data Retention Policies (Cont.)
- Majority did not have a data retention policy for
all of the data they collected - Government web sites more likely to have a policy
of not retaining info or to have a retention
policy based on a legal requirement
33Conclusion
- P3P adoption is increasing over time, especially
for the most popular web sites - Yahooligans (sites for children) most likely to
offer opt-in policies - Large number of websites with technical errors in
their P3P policies - Debates continue about the need for further
privacy legislation and the effectiveness of
industry self-regulation in the privacy area. - Essential to have good statistics and privacy
policies - US government web sites began posting P3P
policies to comply with the privacy requirements
of section 208 of the E-Government Act of 2002 - Continue web sweeps of govt web sites to monitor
compliance with these requirements