Agroterrorism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Agroterrorism

Description:

Knowledge to Go. Possibility or Probability: ... Knowledge to Go. Pennsylvania Law. Mandates payment to the owner of the afflicted animal for: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:195
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Ces122
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Agroterrorism


1
  • Agroterrorism
  • Presented by

2
  • What is it?
  • Agroterrorism involves the act of any person
    knowingly or maliciously using biological agents
    as weapons against the agricultural industry and
    the food supply.

3
  • People and Animal Problems
  • Anthrax
  • Brucellosis
  • Glanders

4
  • Animal Problems
  • Rinderpest
  • Newcastle disease
  • Fowl plague

5
  • Crop Problems
  • Late blight of potato
  • Rice blast
  • Brown spot of rice
  • Rubber leaf blight
  • Southern blight
  • Wheat rusts.

6
  • Agroterrorism
  • Possibility?
  • Probability?

7
  • Possibility or Probability
  • The critical issue with agroterrorism is the
    low level of technical knowledge required to use
    it.

8
  • Possibility or Probability
  • Before Sept. 11 -- the federal government
    allocated almost 40 million to the USDA for
    agroterrorism.

9
  • Motives include
  • Profit
  • Anti-GMO
  • Foreign terrorists

10
  • Concerns before Sept. 11
  • Indiana PL156
  • Pennsylvania SB816

11
  • Indiana Law recognizes agroterrorism as
  • A crime Class C Felony
  • A weapon of mass destruction

12
  • Pennsylvania Law
  • Mandates payment to the owner of the afflicted
    animal for
  • Value of the animal
  • Disposal
  • Testing of the diseased animals
  • Cost of clean up, including soil testing
  • Lost value of production

13
  • Costs?
  • Foot and Mouth -- 2 billion to 24 billion.
    The problem is that this is based on a natural
    outbreak. A terrorist would aim for maximum
    damage.

14
  • Costs?
  • Dioxin contaminated animal feed in Belgium --
    1 billion in damages and trade sanctions. If it
    had been in the US, 140 billion.

15
  • Costs?
  • Leaf blight caused 1 billion in crop damages.
    But if something like it had halted US crop
    exports, it could cost 100 billion.

16
  • Experts agree
  • The cost in terms of damages is directly
    proportional to the time it takes to diagnose the
    problem.

17
  • Proof?
  • It has rarely been proven that terrorism has been
    used against agricultural targets.
  • But lets look at history

18
  • History of agroterrorism
  • WWI Germany spread glanders disease on mules
    and horses destined for Europe.

19
  • History of agroterrorism
  • WWII
  • Canada, Great Britain, Japan, the United States,
    and the USSR had offensive programs.
  • Germany had no offensive program.

20
  • History of agroterrorism
  • Japan is alleged to have used animal and plant
    pathogens, including rinderpest and anthrax,
    against Russia and Mongolia in 1940s.

21
  • History of agroterrorism
  • The U.S. scrubbed its biological weapons
    program in 1969. But, it continued defensive
    research.

22
  • History of agroterrorism
  • In 1972, the US, Soviet Union, Great Britain,
    and Canada agreed to the Biological Weapons
    Convention (BWC).

23
  • History of agroterrorism
  • Soviet BW program grew during the 1970s and
    1980s to include more than 30,000 scientists and
    workers, as well as seven production and two
    storage facilities.

24
  • History of agroterrorism
  • Iraq is also known to have developed a BW
    potential recently, including anti-personnel,
    animal and crop agents.

25
  • History of agroterrorism
  • Since 1915, there have been 19 acts of
    agroterrorism around the world, five of which
    have taken place in the U.S. Sourcehttp//cns.m
    iis.edu/ Center for Nonproliferation Studies

26
  • Five cases in the US
  • 1915-1917 Military animals
  • 1970 Ashville, Alabama
  • 1989 Southern California
  • 1996 Florida
  • 1996 Berlin, Wisconsin

27
  • Conducted by the US
  • 1950 East Germany
  • 1952 Korea
  • 1962-1970 Vietnam
  • 1962-1997 Cuba

28
  • Counterattack
  • Geography
  • Timing
  • Strategy

29
  • USDA Counterattack
  • Organism Level
  • Farm Level
  • National Level

30
  • Organism level
  • Continue defensive research on agroterrorism.

31
  • Farm Level
  • Biosecurity education
  • - farmers
  • - crop and livestock diagnosticians.

32
  • National Level
  • Disease eradication
  • Compensation costs
  • Restore public confidence

33
  • Counterattack
  • Cooperation and consolidation of efforts between
    all agencies and organizations involved.

34
  • Sources
  • Anne Kohnen Responding to the Threat of
    Agroterrorism Specific recommendations for the
    United States Department of Agriculture.
  • May 2001 issue of Purdue Agricultural Economics
    Report (PAER).
  • Center For Nonproliferation Studies at the
    Monterey Institute of International Studies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com