Title: Comments on CERC
1Comments on CERCs Staff Paper Developing a
Common Platform for Electricity Trading
- S. A. Khaparde, A. R. Abhyankar and V. Sarkar
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
2Topics of suggestions
- Congestion Management
- Issue of congestion surplus
- Utility of market splitting under meshed network
situation - Transmission Pricing
- Compatibility of PX transmission costs with those
of bilateral trades - Ex-ante or ex-post?
- Point-of-connection (POC) scheme
3Suggestions related to Congestion Management
4Proposed approach for handling congestion surplus
150 MW
50 MW
Area A (2000Rs/MWh)
Area B (3000Rs/MWh)
100 MW
150 MW
50 MW
5Proposed approach for handling congestion surplus
(con..)
- Original pricing rule
- Generator at area A is paid a price of 2000Rs/MWh
- Load at area A pays a price of 2000Rs/MWh
- Generator at area B is paid a price of 3000Rs/MWh
- Load at area B pays a price of 3000Rs/MWh
- ISO collects a net congestion surplus of
100000Rs/h
6Proposed approach for handling congestion surplus
(con..)
- Proposed pricing rule
- Generator at area A is paid a price of 2000Rs/MWh
- Load at area A pays a price of 2000Rs/MWh
- Generator at area B is paid a price of 3000Rs/MWh
- Load at area B pays a price of (5030001002000)/
150 2333.33Rs/MWh - ISO collects a net congestion surplus of 0 Rs/h
7problem of power mixing
100 MW
180 MW
Area A (2000Rs/MWh)
Area C (3000Rs/MWh)
100 MW
80 MW
200 MW
100 MW
Area B (2200Rs/MWh)
200 MW
70 MW
120 MW
Area D (3500Rs/MWh)
70 MW
130MW
8Problem of power mixing (con..)
- Area A B are generation surplus areas
- Area C D are generation deficit areas
- 100 MW from area A and 50 MW from area B are
mixed first to form a net surplus amount of 150
MW. - Areas C and D get shares in this mixed amount
in a ratio of 87 - It cant be immediately determined how much power
is delivered from a sending end area to a
receiving end area - Therefore an additional tie-breaking strategy is
required to implement the proposed method - Principle of proportional sharing may be adopted
for the purpose of tie-breaking
9Compatibility of Nord Pool version of area
pricing with Indian system
- Nord Pool approach of market splitting considers
only area power balance and inter-zonal capacity
limit constraints - This approach is mainly applicable to a radial
system where removal of any inter-zonal link
separates the original system into two totally
disconnected systems - In case of a radial system, for a certain zonal
injection and withdrawal pattern, power balance
equations give a unique solution to the
inter-zonal flows - However, for a meshed system, Nord Pool approach
may lead to multiple solutions - Unfortunately, our system is a meshed system
10Structure of the Indian system
NR
NER
ER
WR
SR
11Structure of the Indian system (con..)
- Three loops are there in the system
- NR-WR-SR-ER
- NR-WR-ER
- WR-SR-ER
- There is no synchronous loop in the current
system - However, an additional tie breaking strategy is
to be designed to distribute the net incoming or
outgoing flow of each of the regions NR, WR, SR
ER over the corresponding interfaces - In presence of synchronous loop, Nord Pool
approach will fail!
12Our proposal
- To go for a direct OPF based congestion
management mechanism considering regions as nodes - Joint clearance of power exchange and bilateral
trades for a better utilization of transmission
resources - Financial transmission rights to give financial
security to bilateral traders - Setting up curtailment priority among the
bilateral trades by means of transmission service
request mechanism
13Suggestions related to Transmission Charges
14Compatibility of PX transmission costs with
bilateral trades
- It is not clear whether the transmission charges
for PX in Rs/MW/Hour would be comparable with
prevailing long term rates or short term rates? - The staff paper mentions that the usage of
pre-assigned transmission capacity by PX on
inter-regional corridors shall be akin to long
term usage. - If this is so, whether, the charges would be
comparable with long term rates?
15Compatibility of PX transmission costs with
bilateral trades (con..)
- We believe that the PX trades and short term
bilateral trades would act as two parallel
activities for sale and purchase of power. - It is expected that the PX would help the price
discovery for bilateral transactions - This would hold true only if the entities
involved in both mechanisms are subjected to
common transmission prices - Common platform for transmission capacities
mandates common platform of its pricing - The transmission charges for PX trades and short
term bilateral trades should be comparable
16Ex-ante or Ex-post?
- No specific details about socializing total
transmission cost among the participants are
given in the staff paper - Ex-post scheme of transmission usage charge
- Members of PX would come to know about their
share in transmission cost, only after market
clearance - If the costs are made distance based or direction
sensitive (rightly so!), then participants are
exposed to vagaries of transmission charges - Socializing transmission costs does not
necessarily mean assigning charges based only on
MWs traded
17Our Suggestions
- The transmission pricing scheme should be
ex-ante - The transmission charges should be sensitive to
distance and topology of the network - This gives rise to appropriate price signals for
generator and load investments - The point-of-connection (POC) transmission
tariff provides a good solution to the above
problem
18Point-of-Connection (POC) Scheme
- The payment at one point, the point of
connection, gives access to the whole network
system, and thus the whole electricity market
place - Single charge in Rs/MW/Hr, depending upon the
level of connection - Real power tracing can be employed to arrive at
point charges in POC tariff - Tracing results are topology dependent and hence
give rise to spatially variant price signals - POC scheme can be applied to both, i.e., PX
trades and short term bilateral transactions
19Thank You sak_at_ee.iitb.ac.in