AgriTrade Subsidies: Recommendations to WTO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

AgriTrade Subsidies: Recommendations to WTO

Description:

Brazil states subsidies distort trade by depressing world cotton prices. Brazilian cotton producers claimed they lost out on sales worth $600m in the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: msee
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AgriTrade Subsidies: Recommendations to WTO


1
Agri-Trade Subsidies Recommendations to WTO
Maxwell WTO Team Maithreyi Seetharaman Han Sic
Cho
2
What Are Agricultural Subsidies?
  • Financial assistance through direct payments or
    through indirect means such as price cuts and
    favorable contracts
  • Supplement the income of recipient farmers

3
Agri-Subsidies A Distortion?
  • Trade is distorted if
  • Prices are higher or lower than normal
  • Quantities produced/bought/sold are also higher
    or lower than levels that would usually exist in
    a competitive market.

4
Agri-Subsidies The Argument
  • To make sure that enough food is produced to meet
    the countrys needs
  • To shield farmers from the effects of the weather
    and swings in world prices
  • To preserve rural society

5
Agri-Subsidies The Winners
  • Developed countries determine eligibility based
    on crop production and not income
  • US Corn, wheat, cotton, soybean, rice growers
    receive over 90 of total subsidies ( 40bn)
  • EU Sugar, dairy products, wheat growers receive
    over 60 of total subsidies ( 100bn
    approx. 121bn)

6
The Questionable Winners United States
  • 10 large farms get 65 of subsidies
  • 80 small family farms get 19
  • 13 farms received over 1mn in subsidies

7
The Questionable Winners United States
  • Riceland Foods 110mn in subsidies
  • All farmers in 12 US States 105mn in subsidies

8
The Questionable Winners EU
  • EU total subsidies 100bn
  • 78 farmers get less than 5,000
  • Less than 2,000 large scale farmers receive more
    than 1bn
  • Food processors are major beneficiaries
  • ? 6 major sugar processors receive 819mn out
    of 833mn sugar export subsidies

9
EU A Case of Dumping?
10
Comparative Costs of Sugar Production
11
Comparative World Sugar Exports
12
US Extinction of Small Farmers
13
The Losers Developing World
  • Cant provide the same levels of Subsidies as
    Developed World
  • Subsidy related Global Price Distortion impacts
    exports, domestic market national economy

14
The Losers
  • India
  • 10mn people in 80,000 villages produce 84mn ton
    of milk per annum
  • EU subsidizes
  • 60 of intl price of milk powder
  • 136 of intl price of butter

15
Case In Point Brazil Cotton Dispute
  • Against United States Cotton subsidies
  • US breached subsidy cap
  • Brazil states subsidies distort trade by
    depressing world cotton prices
  • Brazilian cotton producers claimed they lost out
    on sales worth 600m in the 2001-2 season alone
  • US share of world cotton exports had risen from
    under 20 in 1999 to more than 40 in 2004

16
Case In Point Brazil Cotton Dispute
  • If Not For Subsidies, Brazil claims
  • US output would have fallen by 29
  • World prices would have risen by 12.6

17
Case In Point Brazil Cotton Dispute
  • Other Countries
  • Supporting Brazil
  • West African countries, including Burkina Faso,
    Benin and Mali
  • India
  • Indonesia

18
Case In Point Brazil Cotton Dispute
  • US Argues
  • None of the WTOs business
  • Farmers do not get extra for more cotton
  • Farmers paid according to the number of acres
    they planted/cotton produced in the past
  • Do not tempt cotton farmers to overproduce
    therefore subsidies do not artificially inflate
    supply or depress prices

19
Case In Point Brazil Cotton Dispute
  • Panel Findings
  • Some US farm payments cause adverse effects to
    Brazil
  • US measures such as export credit guarantees are
    prohibited for some agricultural commodities.

20
Case In Point Sugar
  • Accusation Against EU
  • Unfair subsidization
  • Over-production dumping
  • Example of Impact Mozambique
  • The single largest source of formal employment
  • Produces refined sugar at far less than EU
    average COP
  • Unable to expand production due to Limited
    access to the EU market Unfair competition from
    dumped EU sugar in Africa

21
Case In Point Sugar
  • WTO panel found
  • EU is violated WTO commitments
  • Exported up to four times as much subsidized
    sugar onto world markets than it is allowed

22
Recommendations to the Panel
  • Subsidies to be retained for small farmers
  • Subsidies to be based on income levels
  • To replace majority of agri-subsidies with a
    subsidized crop insurance program
  • Phase out export subsidies
  • Support the introduction of a Development Box in
    the WTO agreement on Agriculture
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com