Trade and the Environment Debate—WTO, Kyoto, and Beyond - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Trade and the Environment Debate—WTO, Kyoto, and Beyond

Description:

Trade and the Environment Debate WTO, Kyoto, and Beyond Kristalina Georgieva Director World Bank Russia Office Introduction Introduction New developments and new ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:378
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: siteresour9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trade and the Environment Debate—WTO, Kyoto, and Beyond


1
Trade and the Environment DebateWTO, Kyoto, and
Beyond
  • Kristalina Georgieva
  • Director
  • World Bank Russia Office

2
Introduction
A decade of debates (often contentious) Free
traders feared that talk about environmental
protection will be used as an excuse by some
economic sectors to gain protection for
themselves against competition from
abroad. Environmentalists feared that talk about
free trade will be used as an excuse to give
inadequate weight to environmental goals and
excessive weight to maximization of GDP.
3
Introduction
  • New developments and new challenges
  • Economic integration (globalization) is ongoing
    and unstoppable EU, NAFTA, MERCOSUR, FTAA,
    AFTA.
  • The environmental policy implications are at the
    forefront of public debate (WTO Doha round).
  • Kyoto Protocol (climate change) ratified.
  • Does trade liberalization limit the choice of
    environmental Policies?

4
Some of the common concerns
  • Reducing barriers to trade will reinforce the
    tendency
  • for countries to export commodities that make
    use of
  • resource-intensive production factors
    (pollution havens).
  • Trade liberalization may directly affect
    environmental
  • standards (race to the bottom).
  • Environmental tariffs may be employed against
    trading
  • partners deemed to have inadequate
    environmental
  • standards.

5
But, evidence seems to suggest otherwise
  • Countries that are more open to trade adopt
    cleaner technologies more quickly.
  • Increased real income is often associated with
    increased demand for environmental quality .
  • Greater openness to trade also encourages cleaner
    manufacturing (because protection always tends to
    shelter pollution-intensive
  • heavy industries).

6
Scale, composition, and technique effects
Scale effect It measures the increase in
pollution that would be generated if the economy
were simply scaled up, holding constant the mix
of goods produced and production
techniques. Composition effect Changes in the
relative size of the economic sectors following
a reduction in trade barriers. Technique effect
Refers to changes in production methods that
follow trade liberalization. Example Scale of
Economic Activity by 1 raises pollution
concentrations by 0.25-0.5 , but accompanying
increase in incomes per capita drives
concentration down by 1.25-1.5.
7
Trade, Growth and the Environment (Environmental
Kuznets Curve)
Environmentalist view (all growth is bad!)
Grow-now clean-up later (macroeconomists view?)
Environmental Kuznets Curve literature
8
Environmental Kuznets Curvepolicy implications
  • Quality of policies and institutions can
    significantly reduce
  • environmental degradation at low income levels
    and speed up
  • improvements at high income levels.
  • Those who see economic growth as a way out of
    environmental
  • problems are only partially right, as they
    focus only on abatement
  • (regulatory) effects of higher income ignoring
    the corresponding
  • scale and industrialization effects.

9
WTO and the Environment
  • Preamble Environmental goals recognized
  • No country should be prevented from taking
    measures necessary for the protection of human,
    animal or plant life or health, of the
    environment, at the levels it considers
    appropriate, subject to the requirement that they
    are not applied in a manner which would
    constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable
    discrimination between countries where the same
    conditions prevail or a disguised restriction on
    international trade.
  • Article XX Protect Life and Health
  • Sanitary/Phytosanitary Provisions
  • Technical Barriers To Trade

10
WTO-Environment Disputes (I)
  • Tuna - Dolphin case
  • US imposed embargo on Mexican tuna in support of
    its Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).
  • 1991 GATT ruling MMPA in contravention of trade
    rules restriction based on process methods as
    opposed to product attributes.
  • GATT rules did not allow one country to take
    trade action for the purpose of attempting to
    enforce its own domestic laws in another country
    even to protect animal health or exhaustible
    natural resources.
  • Ruling never imposed, due to NAFTA negotiations.
  • 1998- International Dolphin Conservation Program
    was adopted.

11
WTO-Environment Disputes (II)
  • Shrimp - Turtle case
  • 1998- US closed its market to shrimp caught
    without turtle exclusion devices to support the
    US Endangered Species Act .
  • India, Malaysia, Pakistan and Thailand challenged
    under WTO.
  • WTO ruling and subsequent appeal concluded that
    US is in violation of WTO rules (not under
    Article XX for promoting environmental
    objectives, but because it discriminated between
    WTO members).
  • In essence, legal reasoning acknowledged that in
    some circumstances, countries can use trade
    measures to protect global resources.
  • US still maintains statute, but restricts by
    shipment, not
  • by country.

12
WTO and the Environment (Doha Round)
  • the relationship between existing WTO rules and
    specific trade obligations set out in
    multinational environmental agreements (MEAs).
  • the reduction or, as appropriate, elimination of
    tariff and non-tariff barriers to environmental
    goods and services.
  • clarification and improvement of WTO disciplines
    on fisheries subsidies, taking into account the
    importance of this sector to developing
    countries.
  • clarification of environmental labeling
    (including ecolabeling) policies.

13
Kyoto Protocol
  • The Kyoto Protocol establishes mandatory emission
    reduction targets below 1990 levels but only for
    industrialized (Annex I) countries.
  • 5.2 reduction of emission levels below 1990
    levels by 2008-2012 for all industrialized
    countries.
  • specific targets for various countries.
  • 6 greenhouse Kyoto gases are considered CO2,
    CH4, N2 O, HFC(hexafluorocarbon),
    PFC(perfluocarbon), SF6(sulphur hexaflouride).

14
Kyoto Protocol
  • Emission reductions can be achieved in a variety
    of ways, country specific or through the use of
    the so-called Kyoto flexible mechanisms which
    are
  • Clean Development Mechanism -- Countries earn
    credits by investing in emission reduction
    projects in developing countries.
  • Joint Implementation -- Countries earn credits by
    investing in emission reduction projects in
    industrialized countries.
  • International Emissions Trading -- Countries buy
    and sell emission credits among themselves.

15
Russia and Kyoto
  • The target for Russia is that its combined
    emissions of Kyoto gases should not exceed five
    times their 1990 levels during 2008-1012.
  • As of 1999, Russias combined emissions were
    38.4 below 1990 levels CO2 emissions 32.7
    below 1990 levels.
  • To that extent the constraint is
    non-bindingeven under optimistic estimates of
    GDP growth and conservative estimates of
    declining carbon intensity (Lecocq and Shalizi).
  • Russia stands also to benefit from the sale of
    AAUs and JI.

16
Kyoto and the Carbon Market
  • Ratifying OECD cumulative target reductions will
    be 5 to 5.5 billion tons of carbon dioxide below
    1990 levels by 2012 based on their Kyoto
    obligations.
  • If half emissions reductions are achieved
    domestically, the compliance gap to be met
    through trade with developing countries and
    economies in transition (EITs) through 2012 would
    be 2.5 3 billion tons 10 times current carbon
    purchase contracts.
  • Carbon is currently selling for about 5 ton of
    carbon dioxide, but likely to increase to about
    10 ton.
  • At a selling price of 5-10 per ton carbon
    payments to developing countries and EITs between
    now and 2012, trade value will be between 12.5
    billion and 25 billion.

17
Structure of the Carbon Market
Project-Based Transactions
Allowance Markets
UK Emission Trading Scheme
Kyoto Pre-Compliance
Kyoto Compliance
EU Emission Trading Scheme
Chicago Climate Exchange
New South Wales Certificates
Retail
Not for Kyoto Compliance
18
Main Driver ComplianceVolume traded in
project-based transactions, million tCO2e
80
Kyoto Pre-Compliance
60
Not Kyoto Pre-Compliance
40
20
0
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
(Jan-May)
19
Total Value of Carbon Projects (in million
U.S., nominal)
300
Known
Estimated
200
100
0
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
(Jan-May)
20
Who is Buying? In percent of volume purchased
since Jan.03
Australia New
Canada
USA
Zealand
3
3
3
Other EU
CFB
3
24
Netherlands
23
Japan
41
21
Who is Selling? In percent of volume sold from
2003 to May 2004
OECD
10
Transition
Economies
Latin America
8
27
Africa
4
Asia
51
22
Outlook
  • Major Development EU ETS. Single largest market
    worldwide, potentially major driver.
  • Large scale pledges (by EU governments) to become
    projects in 04, 05.
  • More CDM Methodologies Approved to reduce
    transaction costs.
  • Large sellers continue to dominate the market
    (China, India, Brazil, Indonesia).
  • Russian ratification. Russian energy projects
    will become a key focus.
  • Likely upper limit of contribution of CO2e and
    CH4 assets to OECD compliance gap until 2012
    300 Mt CO2e gap to be filled up by AAUs, HFC23,
    N20 assets.

23
World Bank Carbon Finance Products
Total funds under current management 420 million
  • Prototype Carbon Fund. 180 million.
    Multi-shareholder.
  • Bio Carbon Fund. 15 million - target 40
    million Multi-shareholder.
  • Community Development Carbon Fund. 45 million -
    target of 100 million Multi-shareholder.
  • Dutch Carbon Fund. 125 million, prospect of
    180 million Dutch Government.
  • Italian Carbon Fund. 15 million, with further
    80 million/year under discussion Italian
    Multi-shareholder.
  • Netherlands JI Facility. 40 million. Economies
    in Transition only.

24
Compatibility (of carbon trading) with
international trading regime
  • Another win-win situation that benefits both the
    environment and economy.
  • WTO rules do not apply (so far) emission permits
    are neither goods nor services. No conflict in
    this regard.
  • Trade controls or sanctions not going to be
    used to enforce compliance (within Kyoto) or to
    punish non-members.

25
Kyoto and WTO (mutual respect)
  • The Kyoto Protocol text
  • Parties should strive to implement policies and
    measures...in such a way as to minimize adverse
    effects..on international trade...
  • FCCC features similar language.
  • WTO regime is equally solicitous of environment
  • Article XX allows exceptions for health
    conservation.
  • Preamble to 1995 Marakesh Agreement establishing
    WTO seeks to protect and preserve the
    environment
  • 2001 Doha Communiqué starting new round of
    negotiations the aims of ... open and
    non-discriminatory trading system, and acting for
    the protection of the environment ... must be
    mutually supportive.

26
Kyoto and WTO(potential synergies)
  • Kyoto Protocol text
  • progressive reduction or phasing out of market
    imperfections and subsidies in all greenhouse gas
    emitting sectors.. is consistent with
    multilateral trading arrangements
  • WTO (Doha round) text
  • ..a multilateral liberalization of goods and
    services used in environmental efforts (such as
    air quality improvement).. consistent with Kyoto
    Protocol

27
Kyoto and WTO (potential conflicts)
  • Border tax adjustments
  • A countrys border tax adjustments to offset
    effects of specific domestic GHG taxes on
    competitiveness of its industry vis-à-vis
    foreigners.
  • Legitimate when applied against
  • coal itself, or carbon/energy content of
    manufactures.
  • Not when applied,
  • solely as punishment for free riding, against
    unrelated products of a non-member.

28
Kyoto and WTO (potential conflicts)
  • WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing
    Measures.
  • Payments under environmental programs (e.g.
    agriculture) are exempt from restrictions.
  • Possible conflicts when Kyoto Parties
  • exempt particular favored industries from an
    energy tax, or
  • give out domestic emission permits in a
    non-neutral way, or
  • reward their companies with credits for CDM and
    JI projects.

29
Kyoto and WTO (potential conflicts)
  • WTO Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)
  • TBT agreement clearly allows non-discriminatory
    labeling, e.g., according to energy efficiency.
  • But, it is also possible for such standards to be
    constructed with the aim of favoring domestic
    industries.
  • Emission permits are treated neither as goods nor
    as services No conflict on that so far.
  • But, they will be subject to GATS in case they
    are deemed as services MFN principles will then
    be violated.

30
Kyoto and WTO(potential conflicts)
  • Leakage
  • Kyoto implementation may lead to leakage of all
    carbon-producing activities to non-member
    countries, thus offsetting the reduction in
    emission among members.
  • Can trade measures be directed against CO2
    emissions in other countries, as embodied in
    electricity, or in goods produced with it?
  • Theoretically there is a justification for using
    environmental tariffs, but
  • Use of trade sanctions to enforce PPMs still an
    exception (shrimp-turtle) and not a norm in WTO.

31
Conclusions
  • Globally
  • Both Kyoto, and WTO have enormous potential to
    deliver economic, social, and environmental
    progress.
  • More complete understanding of the linkages
    between global pollution and international
    markets is needed.
  • Within countries
  • There should be increased understanding of the
    issues and potential conflicts/problems in order
    to formulate the necessary legal and regulatory
    framework.
  • The Ministries of Finance/Trade and Environment
    must consider ways and means to elaborate
    coordination of policies and measures taking
    national circumstances and potential effects into
    account.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com