Title: Resource Requirements Planning:
1Chapter 15
- Resource Requirements Planning
- MRP and CRP
2Overview
- Resource Requirements Planning
- Material Requirements Planning (MRP)
- Capacity Requirements Planning (CRP)
- Wrap-Up What World-Class Companies Do
3Resource Requirements Planning
Aggregate Planning
Chapter 13
Master Production Scheduling (MPS)
Resource Requirements Planning
Material Requirements Planning (MRP)
Chapter 15
Capacity Requirements Planning (CRP)
4- Material Requirements Planning (MRP)
5Materials Requirements Planning (MRP)
- Computer based system
- Explodes Master Schedule (MPS) into required
amounts of raw materials and subassemblies to
support MPS - Nets against current orders and inventories to
develop production and purchased material
ordering schedules
6Objectives of MRP
- Improve customer service
- Reduce inventory investment
- Improve plant operating efficiency
7Elements of MRP
Inputs
Outputs
Inventory Transaction Data
Service-Parts Orders and Forecasts
Order Changes Order
Inventory Status File
Planned Order Schedule
MRP System
Master Production Schedule
Planning Report
Performance
Exception Reports
Bill of Materials File
8MRP Computer Program
- Begins with number of end items needed
- Add service parts not included in MPS
- Explode MPS into gross requirements by consulting
bill of materials file - Modify gross requirements to get net
requirements - Net Requirements Gross Requirements
- Allocated Inventory
- Safety Stock
- - Inventory On Hand
- Offset orders to allow for lead time
9Outputs of MRP
- Planned order schedule - quantity of material to
be ordered in each time period - Changes to planned orders - modifications to
previous planned orders - Secondary outputs
- Exception reports
- Performance reports
- Planning reports
10Example MRP Schedule
- LocoMopeds is a manufacturer of off-road
mopeds. The following product structure diagram
represents the bill of materials for its
dual-carburetor Model 442 moped.
MOPED
Level 0
ENGINE ASSEMBLY
GAS TANK
WHEEL ASSEMBLY (2)
FRAME
Level 1
MOTOR
CARBURETOR (2)
HUB ASSEMBLY
TIRE
Level 2
11Example MRP Schedule
- Bill of Material
- Parent Component Level Compon.
- Code Code Code Description Reqd
- 442 0 442 Moped
- 442 EA 1 Engine Assem. 1
- GT 1 Gas Tank 1
- WA 1 Wheel Assem. 2
- F 1 Frame 1
- EA M 2 Motor 1
- C 2 Carburetor 2
- WA HA 2 Hub Assem. 1
- T 2 Tire 1
12Example MRP Schedule
Item Code On- Hand Safety Stock Lot Size Lead Time Sched. Receipts Qnty. Week Sched. Receipts Qnty. Week
442 500 200 LFL 1 -- --
EA 300 100 500 1 1000 10
GT 600 200 LFL 2 900 10
WA 500 400 500 1 2000 10
F 600 0 2000 3 2000 10
M 250 0 LFL 1 -- --
C 150 100 2500 2 -- --
HA 100 0 LFL 1 2400 11
T 500 500 1000 3 3000,2000 11,12
13Example MRP Schedule
- The company is currently planning production
for weeks 10 through 16. Based on existing
orders and demand forecasts, the master
production schedule is as follows - Master Production Schedule 442 Moped
-
- Determine the MRP schedule required to support
the master production schedule for the Model 442
moped in weeks 10-16.
14Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for 442 Mopeds for Weeks 10 - 16,
considering that - Gross Requirements come from the moped MPS
- There is an On-Hand balance of 500 mopeds at the
end of week 9 - There are no Scheduled Receipts for mopeds
- A lot-for-lot rule is used for ordering mopeds
- Safety stock of 200 mopeds is desired
- Lead time for mopeds is one week
15Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for 442 Mopeds . . . Initially
16Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for 442 Mopeds . . . Completed
17Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Gas Tanks for Weeks 10 - 16,
considering that - Gross Requirements come from moped
Planned-Order-Releases - There is an On-Hand balance of 600 gas tanks at
the end of week 9 - There is a Scheduled Receipt for 900 tanks in
week 10 - A lot-for-lot rule is used for ordering gas tanks
- Safety stock of 200 gas tanks is desired
- Lead time for gas tanks is two weeks
18Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Gas Tanks . . . Initially
19Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Gas Tanks . . . Completed
20Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Frames for Weeks 10 - 16,
considering that - Gross Requirements come from moped
Planned-Order-Releases - There is an On-Hand balance of 600 frames at the
end of week 9 - There is a Scheduled Receipt for 2000 frames in
week 10 - The firm uses a Lot Size (multiple) of 2000 for
ordering frames - No safety stock of frames is desired
- Lead time for frames is 3 weeks
21Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Frames . . . Initially
22Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Frames . . . Completed
23Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Engine Assemblies for Weeks 10 -
16, considering that - Gross Requirements come from moped
Planned-Order-Releases - There is an On-Hand balance of 300 engine
assemblies at the end of week 9 - There is a Scheduled Receipt for 1000 engine
assemblies in week 10 - The firm uses a Lot Size (multiple) of 500 for
ordering engine assemblies - Safety Stock of 100 engine assemblies is desired
- Lead time for engine assemblies is 1 week
24Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Engine Assemblies . . . Initially
25Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Engine Assemblies . . . Completed
26Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Motors for Weeks 10 - 16,
considering that - Gross Requirements come from engine assembly
Planned-Order-Releases - There is an On-Hand balance of 250 motors at the
end of week 9 - There are no Scheduled Receipts for motors
- A lot-for-lot rule is used for ordering motors
- No Safety Stock of motors is desired
- Lead time for motors is 1 week
27Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Motors . . . Initially
28Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Motors . . . Completed
29Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Carburetors for Weeks 10 - 16,
considering that - Gross Requirements come from engine assembly
Planned-Order-Releases (times 2) - There is an On-Hand balance of 150 carburetors at
the end of week 9 - There are no Scheduled Receipts for carburetors
- A Lot Size of 2500 is used for ordering
carburetors - Safety Stock of 100 carburetors is desired
- Lead time for carburetors is 2 weeks
30Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Carburetors . . . Initially
31Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Carburetors . . . Completed
32Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Wheel Assemblies for Weeks 10 -
16, considering that - Gross Requirements come from moped
Planned-Order-Releases (times 2) - There is an On-Hand balance of 500 wheel
assemblies at the end of week 9 - There is a Scheduled Receipt for 2000 wheel
assemblies in week 10 - A Lot Size (multiple) of 500 is used for ordering
wheel assemblies - Safety Stock of 400 wheel assemblies is desired
- Lead time for wheel assemblies is 1 week
33Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Wheel Assemblies . . . Initially
34Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Wheel Assemblies . . . Completed
35Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Hub Assemblies for Weeks 10 -
16, considering that - Gross Requirements come from wheel assembly
Planned-Order-Releases - There is an On-Hand balance of 100 hub assemblies
at the end of week 9 - There is a Scheduled Receipt of 2400 hub
assemblies in week 11 - A lot-for-lot rule is used for ordering hub
assemblies - No Safety Stock of hub assemblies is desired
- Lead time for hub assemblies is 1 week
36Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Hub Assemblies . . . Initially
37Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Hub Assemblies . . . Completed
38Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Tires for Weeks 10 - 16,
considering that - Gross Requirements come from wheel assembly
Planned-Order-Releases - There is an On-Hand balance of 500 tires at the
end of week 9 - There are Scheduled Receipts for 3000 and 2000
tires weeks 11 and 12, respectively - A Lot Size (multiple) of 1000 is used for
ordering tires - Safety Stock of 500 tires is desired
- Lead time for tires is 3 weeks
39Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Tires . . . Initially
40Example MRP Schedule
- MRP Schedule for Tires . . . Completed
41Lot-Sizing in MRP
- Lot-size is the quantity ordered/produced at one
time - Large lots are preferred because
- Changeovers cost less and capacity greater
- Annual cost of purchase orders less
- Price breaks and transportation breaks can be
utilized - Small lots are preferred because
- Lower inventory carrying cost
- Reduced risk of obsolescence
- Shorter cycle time to produce customer order
42Lot-Sizing Methods
- Typical MRP methods
- accommodates lumpy demand
- Lot-for-Lot (LFL)
- Period Order Quantity (POQ)
- Comments on Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
- does not consider quantity discounts
- does not always provide the most economical
approach with lumpy demand
43Example Lot-Sizing Decision
- The net requirements for a material from an MRP
schedule are - It costs 400 to change over the machines for
this material in the affected work center. It
costs 0.40 per unit when one unit of this
material must be carried in inventory from one
week to the next. - Identify the lot-sizing method that results in
the least carrying and changeover costs for the
8-week schedule.
44Example Lot-Sizing Decision
- Lot-for-Lot Method
- Carrying Cost 0(.40) 0
- Changeover Cost 6(400) 2,400
- Total 2,400
45Example Lot-Sizing Decision
- Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Method
- S 400.00
- D (Net Req. for 8 wks)/8 weeks)(50
weeks/year) - (6400/8)(50) 40,000
- C (0.40 per week)(50 weeks/year)
- 20.00
46Example Lot-Sizing Decision
- Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Method
- Carrying Cost 4855(.40) 1,942
- Changeover Cost 6(400) 2,400
- Total 4,342
47Example Lot-Sizing Decision
- Period Order Quantity (POQ) Method
- POQ ( Weeks/year)/( Orders/year)
- 50/(D/EOQ)
- 50/(40,000/1,265)
- 1.58 or 2 weeks
48Example Lot-Sizing Decision
- Period Order Quantity (POQ) Method
- Carrying Cost 2900(.40) 1,160
- Changeover Cost 4(400) 1,600
- Total 2,760
49Example Lot-Sizing Decision
- Summary
- Carrying Chg.Ovr. Total
- Method Cost Cost Cost
- LFL 0 2,400 2,400
- EOQ 1,942 2,400 4,342
- POQ 1,160 1,600 2,760
50Issues in MRP
- Lot-Sizing
- Useful at lower levels but may drive excess
inventory when applied at higher levels - Net Change versus Regenerative MRP
- Net change may generate too many action notices
- Regenerative more costly to run but appears to be
easier to manage - . . . more
51Issues in MRP
- Safety Stock
- Use depends on uncertainty of demand..... more
uncertain the greater the need for safety stock - Assemble-to-Order Firms
- MPS and MRP treated separately from Final
Assembly Schedule(FAS) - FAS is prepared 1-2 weeks ahead
- Use Modular Bill of Material
- For each option with a demand forecast
52MRP I to MRP II
- MRP I simply exploded demand (MPS) into required
materials - MRP II became Manufacturing Resource Planning
which provides a closed-loop business management
system - Financial management
- Shop floor control
- Operations management
- Simulation capability
53Evaluation of MRP
- Most beneficial to process-focused systems that
have long processing times and complex multistage
production steps - Lead times must be reliable
- Must freeze MPS for some time before actual
production... certain demand - Difficult to implement
54Capacity Requirements Planning (CRP)
55Capacity Requirements Planning (CRP)
- Tests MPS for feasibility
- Utilizes routings to determine labor/machine
loads - If schedule feasible, recommends freezing
- If schedule overloads resources, points out
processes that are overscheduled
56Load Schedules
- Compares actual labor and machine hours against
available hours - Offsets schedules between successive stages of
production by lead times - Provides feasible MPS and economically loaded
work centers - Promotes system operating efficiency ... lowers
costs!
57HW Chapter 15
- HW 7 and 16 on page 612 and 617.
58End of Chapter 15