Title: '' Light scattering artefacts in
1HUNTING FOR..
- .. Light scattering artefacts in
- a funnel phantom using
- optical CT
Stephen Bosi, Saxby Brown, Sarvenaz Sarabipour,
Yves De Deene and Clive Baldock Institute of
Medical Physics University of Sydney and
University of Ghent
2(No Transcript)
3(No Transcript)
4Laser Optical CT scanner
SLOOOW!
5Cone-beam Optical CT
light panel
FAAAST! but..
dosimeter
camera
diffuser
aquarium
filter wheel
6Vista Optical CT Scanner Modus Medical Devices
Inc.
7Now the ACTUAL point of the work...
- The brief Test the suitability of Vista scanner
for polymer gels
Test exposed gelComplications?depth
dose,polymer saturation etc..
8Faking itOldham Gelatin Finger Phantom
- Use test tube to make finger-shaped cavity
Gelatine food-dye tosimulate exposure
9Oldham Gelatin Finger Phantom Shortcomings
Food-dye diffuses...
10Oldham Gelatin Finger Phantom Shortcomings
Food-dye absorbs light (Beer-Lambert law) I I0
e-xD
- BUT
- Polymer gel scatters light
- B-L breaks down for large conc
- Blurred image boundaries
11Polymer Gel Dosimeters
- Opalescent (Tyndall scattering) scatter
bluish-white, transmission reddish?
colloidal particles radii lt 1 mm
12Simulating Polymer Gels
Must use colloidal, light scattering medium
- Colloidal suspensions when added to water
- e.g. Absinthe, Ouzo, Araq, Pernod, milk
OR "DettolTM"
13Layered Dettol Finger Phantom
- Mix antiseptic with melted gelatinconcentration
determines turbidity - Backfill Oldham-style finger cavity with turbid
gel layers
14Layered Dettol Finger Phantom
15Testing Scanner
- Images scanned
- Feldkamp back projection reconstruction
(VistaReconTM) - Viewed (VistaViewTM)
16Optical density profiles
- Pixel brightness 1000 OD (Optical density)
- Hi OD slices exhibit dishing artefact
17Optical density profiles
- Profiles taken from the reconstruction. (D OD)
- Plots labels are Dettol conc. in mg/g
18Optical density v conc.
- ImageJ to analyse image pixel statstics
- Plot mean OD vs Dettol conc.
- Saturated polymer? Clearly not!
19Spectroscopic Optical Density
- ODs measured spectrometrically
20Compare Optical Density
- Saturation "dose" depends on path length?can't
use OD-dose lookup table to fix it
21Dettol Phantom Compared to PAGAT
22Compare Antiseptic Phantom with PAGAT
- Dose/Conc. equivalence curve for Co-60 ?
- Calibration OpCT phantoms?
23Optical Saturation
- nearly opaque region scattered stray light
- "Transmission" too high - OD low conc. indep.
i.e. saturation
24Modelling Optical Saturation 1
- Assume stray light constant over width of each
slice - Assume transmitted light obeys Beer-Lambert
- Light detected stray transmitted
25Modelling Optical Saturation 2
- Artefact completely explained by stray light
- Obeys Beer-Lambert? Sure does!
26Babushka Finger Phantom
- Finger within a finger
- Outer finger in layers
27OD profiles from reconstruction
- Outer finger dishing
- Inner finger OD too high
28Modelling Babushka 1
- Same model as finger (fit to projection
snapshots) - Fit good - stray light explains all
29Modelling Babushka 2
- Raw reconstruction overestimates OD in central
pith
30Modelling Babushka 3
- Fitted OD in outer shells obeys B-L law ( slope)
31The Uniform OD Funnel Phantom
32OD profiles from the reconstruction
Dishing AND doming!?
33Modelling funnel projections
- "Stray light Beer-Lambert" model again
- Background deliberately higher OD now!... model
now includes stray light in baseline ref. - OH NO! Check out the Penumbras -(
34Reconstructing fitted projections
Synthetic fitted projections,no
penumbra Cupping, no doming
35Adding the penumbra...
Synthetic fitted projections, penumbra added
manually Penumbra explains the doming!
36Conclusions
- Must characterise scanner using artificial
phantom to avoid confusing optical, radiation or
polymer effects - Scattered stray light accounts for all our
artefacts - Can't use OD vs dose lookup table to correct
scattering induced non-linearities - Improvement by including model of stray light in
reconstruction algorithm?
37(No Transcript)