Maximum Total Time for Talk 25 minutes

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Maximum Total Time for Talk 25 minutes

Description:

Charles E. Wyman, Dartmouth College/University ... and flowthrough systems - Charles Wyman, Dartmouth College ... Teymouri F, Laureano-Perez L, Alizadeh H, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Maximum Total Time for Talk 25 minutes


1
Maximum Total Time for Talk 25 minutes
2
Comparative Sugar Recovery Data from Application
of Leading Pretreatment Technologies to Corn
Stover and Poplar
  • Charles E. Wyman, Dartmouth College/University of
    California
  • Bruce E. Dale, Michigan State University
  • Richard T. Elander, National Renewable Energy
    Laboratory
  • Mark T. Holtzapple, Texas AM University
  • Michael R. Ladisch, Purdue University
  • Y. Y. Lee, Auburn University
  • Mohammed Moniruzzaman, Genencor International
  • John N. Saddler, University of British Columbia
  • 28th Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and
    Chemicals
  • Nashville, Tennessee
  • May 1, 2006

Biomass Refining CAFI
3
CAFI Background
  • Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied
    Fundamentals and Innovation organized in late
    1999 and early 2000
  • Included top researchers in biomass hydrolysis
    from Auburn, Dartmouth, Michigan State, Purdue,
    NREL, Texas AM, U. British Columbia, U.
    Sherbrooke
  • Mission
  • Develop information and a fundamental
    understanding of biomass hydrolysis that will
    facilitate commercialization,
  • Accelerate the development of next generation
    technologies that dramatically reduce the cost of
    sugars from cellulosic biomass
  • Train future engineers, scientists, and managers.

Biomass Refining CAFI
4
CAFI Approach
  • Developing data on leading pretreatments using
  • Common feedstocks
  • Shared enzymes
  • Identical analytical methods
  • The same material and energy balance methods
  • The same costing methods
  • Goal is to provide information that helps
    industry select technologies for their
    applications
  • Also seek to understand mechanisms that influence
    performance and differentiate pretreatments
  • Provide technology base to facilitate commercial
    use
  • Identify promising paths to advance pretreatment
    technologies

Biomass Refining CAFI
5
USDA IFAFS Project Overview CAFI 1
  • Multi-institutional effort funded by USDA
    Initiative for Future Agriculture and Food
    Systems Program for 1.2 million to develop
    comparative information on cellulosic biomass
    pretreatment by leading pretreatment options with
    common source of cellulosic biomass (corn stover)
    and identical analytical methods
  • Aqueous ammonia recycle pretreatment - YY Lee,
    Auburn University
  • Water only and dilute acid hydrolysis by
    co-current and flowthrough systems - Charles
    Wyman, Dartmouth College
  • Ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) - Bruce Dale,
    Michigan State University
  • Controlled pH pretreatment - Mike Ladisch, Purdue
    University
  • Lime pretreatment - Mark Holtzapple, Texas AM
    University
  • Logistical support and economic analysis - Rick
    Elander/Tim Eggeman, NREL through DOE Biomass
    Program funding
  • Completed in 2004

Biomass Refining CAFI
6
Hydrolysis Stages
Cellulase enzyme
Stage 2 Enzymatic hydrolysis
Stage 1 Pretreatment
Residual solids cellulose, hemicellulose, ligni
n
Biomass
Solids cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin
Chemicals
Dissolved sugars, oligomers
Dissolved sugars, oligomers, lignin
Biomass Refining CAFI
7
Key Features of CAFI Pretreatments
8
CAFI 1 Feedstock Corn Stover
  • NREL supplied corn stover to all project
    participants (source BioMass AgriProducts,
    Harlan IA)
  • Stover washed and dried in small commercial
    operation, knife milled to pass ¼ inch round
    screen

Biomass Refining CAFI
9
Consistent Mass Balance Approach as Applied to
AFEX
Enzyme (15 FPU/g of Glucan)
Ammonia
Hydrolyzate
99.0 lb
AFEX
Treated
Stover
Liquid
Hydrolysis
Wash
38.5 lb glucose
System
Stover
100 lb
(Ave. of 4 runs)
101.0 lb
18.9 lb
xylose
Residual
(dry basis)
Solids
Solids washed out
36.1 lb glucan
39.2 lb
2 lb
21.4 lb
xylan
Very few solubles from pretreatmentabout 2 of
inlet stover
95.9 glucan conversion to glucose, 77.6 xylan
conversion to xylose
99 mass balance closure includes (solids
glucose xylose arabinose )
Biomass Refining CAFI
10
Calculation of Sugar Yields
  • Comparing the amount of each sugar monomer or
    oligomer released to the maximum potential amount
    for that sugar would give yield of each
  • However, most cellulosic biomass is richer in
    glucose than xylose
  • Consequently, glucose yields have a greater
    impact than for xylose
  • Sugar yields in this project were defined by
    dividing the amount of xylose or glucose or the
    sum of the two recovered in each stage by the
    maximum potential amount of both sugars
  • The maximum xylose yield is 24.3/64.4 or 37.7
  • The maximum glucose yield is 40.1/64.4 or 62.3
  • The maximum amount of total xylose and glucose is
    100.

Biomass Refining CAFI
11
Overall Sugar Yields from Corn Stover at 60 FPU/g
Glucan
Cumulative soluble sugars as total/monomers.
Single number just monomers.
Biomass Refining CAFI
12
Sugar Yields from Corn Stover at 15 FPU/g Glucan
Maximum possible
Dilute acid
Controlled pH
Flowthrough
ARP
Lime
AFEX
Biomass Refining CAFI
13
Sugar Yields from Corn Stover at 15 FPU/g Glucan
Maximum possible
Dilute acid
Controlled pH
Flowthrough
ARP
Lime
AFEX
Biomass Refining CAFI
14
Sugar Yields from Corn Stover at 15 FPU/g Glucan
Maximum possible
Dilute acid
Controlled pH
Flowthrough
ARP
Lime
AFEX
Biomass Refining CAFI
15
Sugar Yields from Corn Stover at 15 FPU/g Glucan
Maximum possible
Dilute acid
Controlled pH
Flowthrough
ARP
Lime
AFEX
Biomass Refining CAFI
16
Sugar Yields from Corn Stover at 15 FPU/g Glucan
Maximum possible
Dilute acid
Controlled pH
Flowthrough
ARP
Lime
AFEX
Biomass Refining CAFI
17
Sugar Yields from Corn Stover at 15 FPU/g Glucan
Maximum possible
Dilute acid
Controlled pH
Flowthrough
ARP
Lime
AFEX
Biomass Refining CAFI
18
Sugar Yields from Corn Stover at 15 FPU/g Glucan
Maximum possible
Dilute acid
Controlled pH
Flowthrough
ARP
Lime
AFEX
Biomass Refining CAFI
19
Sugar Yields from Corn Stover at 15 FPU/g Glucan
Biomass Refining CAFI
20
CAFI Economic Estimates
Thermodynamics
Process Analogies
Chemistry
Design Methods
CAFI Researcher
Updated Model Basis and Feedstock Basis in CAFI
2 Project
Biomass Refining CAFI
21
General Process Flow Diagram
Poplar
Biomass Refining CAFI
22
Capital Cost Estimates
Basis 2000 metric tons (dry basis) corn
stover/day, assumes only monomers fermented
Biomass Refining CAFI
23
Minimum Ethanol Selling Price (MESP)
Assumptions 2.5 years construction, 0.5 years
start up, 20 year plant life, zero net present
value when cash flows are discounted at 10 real
after tax rate
Biomass Refining CAFI
24
Effect of Oligomer Conversion
Biomass Refining CAFI
25
Observations for Corn Stover
  • All pretreatments were effective in making
    cellulose accessible to enzymes
  • Lime, ARP, and flowthrough remove substantial
    amounts of lignin and achieved somewhat higher
    glucose yields from enzymes than dilute acid or
    controlled pH
  • However, AFEX achieved slightly higher yields
    from enzymes even though no lignin was removed
  • Cellulase was effective in releasing residual
    xylose from all pretreated solids during
    enzymatic hydrolysis in Stage 2
  • Xylose release by cellulase was particularly
    important for the high-pH pretreatments by AFEX,
    ARP, and lime, with about half being solubilized
    by enzymes for ARP, two thirds for lime, and
    essentially all for AFEX
  • The projected costs were similar due to the high
    yields and similar capital costs for the overall
    processes

Biomass Refining CAFI
26
Publication of Results from CAFI 1
  • Bruce Dale of the CAFI Team arranged for and
    edited a special December 2005 issue of
    Bioresource Technology entitled Coordinated
    Development of Leading Biomass Pretreatment
    Technologies to document these results
  • Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M,
    Ladisch MR, Lee YY. 2005. Coordinated
    Development of Leading Biomass Pretreatment
    Technologies, Bioresource Technology 96(18)
    1959-1966, invited.
  • Lloyd TA, Wyman CE. 2005. Total Sugar Yields for
    Pretreatment by Hemicellulose Hydrolysis Coupled
    with Enzymatic Hydrolysis of the Remaining
    Solids, Bioresource Technology 96(18)
    1967-1977, invited.
  • Liu C, Wyman CE. 2005. "Partial Flow of
    Compressed-Hot Water Through Corn Stover to
    Enhance Hemicellulose Sugar Recovery and
    Enzymatic Digestibility of Cellulose,
    Bioresource Technology 96(18) 1978-1985,
    invited.
  • Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch
    MR. 2005. Optimization of pH Controlled Liquid
    Hot Water Pretreatment of Corn Stover, Bioresourc
    e Technology 96(18) 1986-1993, invited.
  • Kim S, Holtzapple MT. 2005. Lime Pretreatment
    and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn
    Stover, Bioresource Technology 96(18)
    1994-2006, invited.
  • Kim TH, Lee YY. 2005. Pretreatment and
    Fractionation of Corn Stover by Ammonia Recycle
    Percolation Process, Bioresource Technology
    96(18) 2007-2013, invited.
  •  Teymouri F, Laureano-Perez L, Alizadeh H, Dale
    BE. 2005. Optimization of the Ammonia Fiber
    Explosion (AFEX) Treatment Parameters for
    Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover, Bioresource
    Technology 96(18) 2014-2018, invited.
  • Eggeman T, Elander RT. 2005. Process and
    Economic Analysis of Pretreatment Technologies,
    Bioresource Technology 96(18) 2019-2025,
    invited.
  • Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M,
    Ladisch MR, Lee YY. 2005. Comparative Sugar
    Recovery Data from Laboratory Scale Application
    of Leading Pretreatment Technologies to Corn
    Stover, Bioresource Technology 96(18)
    2026-2032, invited.

Biomass Refining CAFI
27
DOE OBP Project April 2004 Start
  • Funded by DOE Office of the Biomass Program for
    1.88 million through a joint competitive
    solicitation with USDA
  • Using identical analytical methods and feedstock
    sources to develop comparative data for corn
    stover and poplar
  • Determining more depth information on
  • Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and
    hemicellulose in solids
  • Conditioning and fermentation of pretreatment
    hydrolyzate liquids
  • Predictive models
  • Added University of British Columbia to team
    through funding from Natural Resources Canada to
  • Capitalize on their expertise with xylanases for
    better hemicellulose utilization
  • Evaluate sulfur dioxide pretreatment along with
    those previously examined dilute acid,
    controlled pH, AFEX, ARP, lime
  • Augmented by Genencor to supply commercial and
    advanced enzymes

Biomass Refining CAFI
28
Tasks for the DOE OBP Project
  • Pretreat corn stover and poplar by leading
    technologies to improve cellulose accessibility
    to enzymes
  • Enzymatically hydrolyze cellulose and
    hemicellulose in pretreated biomass, as
    appropriate, and develop models to understand the
    relationship between pretreated biomass features,
    advanced enzyme characteristics, and enzymatic
    digestion results
  • Develop conditioning methods as needed to
    maximize fermentation yields by a recombinant
    yeast, determine the cause of inhibition, and
    model fermentations
  • Estimate capital and operating costs for each
    integrated pretreatment, hydrolysis, and
    fermentation system and use to guide research

Biomass Refining CAFI
29
CAFI 2 Corn Stover
  • 2nd pass harvested corn stover from Kramer farm
    (Wray, CO)
  • Collected using high rake setting to avoid soil
    pick-up
  • No washing
  • Milled to pass ¼ inch round screen

Biomass Refining CAFI
30
CAFI 2 Standard Poplar
  • Feedstock USDA-supplied hybrid poplar
    (Alexandria, MN)
  • Debarked, chipped, and milled to pass ¼ inch
    round screen

Biomass Refining CAFI
31
Hydrolysis Stages
Cellulase enzyme
Stage 2 Enzymatic hydrolysis
Stage 1 Pretreatment
Residual solids cellulose, hemicellulose, ligni
n
Biomass
Solids cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin
Chemicals
Dissolved sugars, oligomers
Dissolved sugars, oligomers, lignin
Stage 3 Sugar fermentation
Biomass Refining CAFI
32
CAFI 2 Pretreated Substrate Schedule
Biomass Refining CAFI
33
Overall Yields for Corn Stover at 15 FPU/g Glucan
Cumulative soluble sugars as total/monomers.
Single number just monomers.
Biomass Refining CAFI
34
Effect of Pretreatment Severity on Enzymatic
Hydrolysis of Dilute Acid Pretreated Poplar
CBUFPU 2.0 Digestion time 72hr
2 glucan concentration 50 FPU/ gm original glucan
Biomass Refining CAFI
35
Effect of Protein Loadings on Cellulose
Hydrolysis of Poplar Solids
Digestion time 72hr
Biomass Refining CAFI
36
Effect of Protein Loadings on Cellulose
Hydrolysis of Poplar Solids
Digestion time 72hr
Biomass Refining CAFI
37
Effect of Protein Loadings on Cellulose
Hydrolysis of Poplar Solids
Digestion time 72hr
Biomass Refining CAFI
38
CAFI 2 Initial Poplar
  • Feedstock USDA-supplied hybrid poplar
    (Arlington, WI)
  • Debarked, chipped, and milled to pass ¼ inch
    round screen
  • Not enough to meet needs

Biomass Refining CAFI
39
CAFI 2 Initial Poplar
  • Feedstock USDA-supplied hybrid poplar
    (Arlington, WI)
  • Debarked, chipped, and milled to pass ¼ inch
    round screen
  • Not enough to meet needs

Biomass Refining CAFI
40
C - Cellulase (31.3 mg/g glucan) X -
Xylanase (3.1 mg/g glucan) A - Additive (0.35g/g
glucan)
UT - Untreated AFEX condition 24 h water
soaked 11 (PoplarNH3) 10 min. res. time
AFEX Optimization for High/Low Lignin Poplar
41
Differences Among Poplar Species
Based on information provided by Adam Wiese,
USDA Rheinlander, WI
Biomass Refining CAFI
42
Fermentation of Dilute Acid Treated Corn Stover
Ca(OH)2
S. cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST)
H2SO4
B
corn stover
Fermentation 30?C
Ethanol
175?C
Liquid
A
pH 6.0
pH 1.2
Solids
Cells
pH 1.2
A
B
Stream
g/L
g/L
80 of theoretical
Inhibitor
consumed
consumed
43
Fermentation of Hot Water Treated Corn Stover
Ca(OH)2
S. cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST)
Water
Enzyme
B
corn stover
Fermentation 30?C
Ethanol
190?C
50?C
A
pH 6.0
pH 4.5
Cells Solids
A
B
Stream
g/L
g/L
95 of theoretical
No Xylanase
below threshold
consumed
consumed
44
Fermentation of SO2 Treated Corn Stover
SO2
Enzyme
S. cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST)
Ca(OH)2
Ca(OH)2
B
corn stover
Fermentation 30?C
180?C
50?C
Ethanol
A
pH 1
pH 4.8
pH 6.0
Cells
Solids
A
B
Stream
g/L
g/L
96 of theoretical
No Xylanase
below threshold
consumed
consumed
45
Observations
  • The yields can be further increased for some
    pretreatments with enzymes a potential key
  • Mixed sugar streams will be better used in some
    processes than others
  • Oligomers may require special considerations,
    depending on process configuration and choice of
    fermentative organism
  • Initial data on conditioning and fermentation
    shows mostly good yields
  • All pretreatments gave similar results for corn
    stover
  • Initial hydrolysis results for poplar are not as
    good, with one variety more recalcitrant than
    other

Biomass Refining CAFI
46
Planned Work
  • Maximize yields with standard poplar for each
    pretreatment
  • Evaluate differences with initial poplar at
    optimal conditions for standard poplar
  • Develop fermentation data with hydrolyzate for
    each material
  • Upgrade technoeconomic model with corn stover and
    poplar
  • Identify key features that distinguish
    performance of different pretreatments

Biomass Refining CAFI
47
Acknowledgments
  • US Department of Agriculture Initiative for
    Future Agricultural and Food Systems Program,
    Contract 00-52104-9663
  • US Department of Energy Office of the Biomass
    Program, Contract DE-FG36-04GO14017
  • Natural Resources Canada
  • All of the CAFI Team members, students, and
    others who have been so cooperative

Biomass Refining CAFI
48
CAFI DOE Project AI Advisory BoardMeetings
Every 6 Months
  • Quang Nguyen, Abengoa Bioenergy
  • Mat Peabody, Applied CarboChemicals
  • Gary Welch, Aventinerei
  • Greg Luli, BC International
  • Paris Tsobanakis, Cargill
  • Robert Wooley, Cargill Dow
  • James Hettenhaus, CEA
  • Steve Thomas, CERES
  • Lyman Young, ChevronTexaco
  • Kevin Gray, Diversa
  • Paul Roessler, Dow
  • Julie Friend, DuPont
  • Jack Huttner, Genencor
  • Don Johnson, GPC (Retired)
  • Dale Monceaux, Katzen Engineers
  • Kendall Pye, Lignol
  • Farzaneh Teymouri, MBI
  • Richard Glass, National Corn Growers Association
  • Bill Cruickshank, Natural Resources Canada
  • Robert Goldberg, NIST
  • Joel Cherry, Novozymes
  • Ron Reinsfelder, Shell
  • Andrew Richard, Sunopta
  • Carl Miller, Syngenta
  • Carmela Bailey, USDA
  • Don Riemenschneider, USDA

49
Questions??
Louisiana Rice Hulls Pile
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)