Evaluation of Risk and Benefit in Human Subjects Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation of Risk and Benefit in Human Subjects Research

Description:

... and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not ... Some discomfort or stress. Low magnitude. Short duration. Daily life encounters ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: aera
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation of Risk and Benefit in Human Subjects Research


1
Evaluation of Risk and Benefit in Human Subjects
Research
  • Felice Levine, Ph.D.
  • American Educational
  • Research Association

2
What is Risk?
  • CFR, Sec 102 (i)
  • Minimal risk means that the probability and
    magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in
    the research are not greater in and of themselves
    than those ordinarily encountered in daily life
    or during the performance of routine physical or
    psychological examinations or tests.

3
What is Harm?
  • Types of Harm
  • Inconvenience
  • Physical
  • Psychological
  • Social
  • Economic
  • Legal

4
Defining Risk and Harm
  • Risk refers to a probability that some harm
    will occur
  • Harm refers to specific outcome or event
  • CFR conflates the two and assumes minimal for
    both

5
Defining the Daily Life Standard
  • The daily life standard refers to
  • low magnitude harms with a high probability
  • harms that are transient and easily ameliorated
    with time or debriefing

6
Daily Life Standard (continued)
  • Routine physical or psychological tests
  • Some discomfort or stress
  • Low magnitude
  • Short duration
  • Daily life encounters
  • Hassles, arguments, minor accidents
  • Happen to most people over time

7
Decreasing Risk
  • Risk is not fixed ameliorating conditions and
    strategies can alter risk level
  • Protections should be commensurate with risk
    level.

8
SBS Working Group Recommendation
  • Clarify minimal risk
  • Distinguish probability and magnitude of harm
  • Clarify daily life standard
  • Involves low-level harms
  • Involves transient harms that are easily
    ameliorated

9
SBS Working Group Recommendation
  • Examine expedited review categories
  • Considerable variability in interpretation of
    what qualifies
  • Time frame for expedited review

10
Investigator Responsibilities
  • Describe types of harms that may occur
  • State likelihood that such harms occur
  • Describe efforts to minimize risk
  • Select procedure with less risk for subjects
  • Adopt procedures to decrease risk (e.g., methods
    to protect confidentiality of data)
  • Develop procedures to deal with harms that occur
  • Describe expected benefits if any

11
IRB Responsibilities
  • Identify risks to subjects
  • Determine that risks to subjects are minimized
  • Determine that risks are reasonable in relation
    to anticipated benefits (if any)
  • Determine that subjects are informed about any
    foreseeable risks or discomforts, as well as any
    benefits which may be expected

12
IRB Approval
  • Expedited Review
  • Risks are minimal
  • Full Board Review
  • Risks are minimized
  • Risks are reasonable in relation to benefits
  • Should consider differences among subjects and
    subject populations

13
OHRP Guidance
  • Develop educational materials on types of harms
    in SBS research are needed
  • Amendments to the list of expedited review
    categories are needed to account for more minimal
    risk research
  • Distinguish between magnitude and probability of
    harm and clarify relationship to daily life
    standard

14
OHRP Guidance (continued)
  • Provide educational materials on best ways to
  • Safeguard raw data and electronic files
  • Conceal the identities of individuals or groups
  • Evaluate level of harm for different populations
    (some subject populations may be more vulnerable)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com