Global Poverty 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Global Poverty 1

Description:

World Development Indicators, 2001. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Why the Income Gap? ... Eliminate LDC Debt. Greater Influence over IMF and World Bank ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: thomas89
Learn more at: http://www.unc.edu
Category:
Tags: bank | global | poverty | world

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Global Poverty 1


1
Global Poverty 1
  • Lecture 22

2
The Problem of Poverty
  • Poverty is Increasingly an International Issue
  • Prior to Postwar Period, the Largest Income Gaps
    Were Within Countries.
  • Since World War II, Inequality Between Countries
    Has Become More Important.

3
Source Peter Lindert and Jeffrey Williamson.
2001. Does Globalization Make the World More
Unequal? NBER Working Paper 8228.
4
Economic Indicators
Source World Bank. 2002. World Development
Indicators, 2001. Washington, D.C. The World
Bank.
5
Quality of Life Indicators
6
People Living on 1 Per Day(Millions)
Source World Bank. 2002. World Development
Indicators, 2001. Washington, D.C. The World
Bank.
7
People Living on 2 Per Day(Millions)
Source World Bank. 2002. World Development
Indicators, 2001. Washington, D.C. The World
Bank.
8
Why the Income Gap?
  • No Mystery to Raising Income
  • Rising Incomes Come From Rising Productivity
  • Productivity Comes From Investment
  • Thus, Portion of Income Must be Saved
  • Savings Must Be Invested in Productivity-Improving
    Things
  • Physical Capital
  • Human Capital
  • Income Gap Thus Suggests a Problem in this
    Mechanism of Wealth Creation.

9
Three Theories of Poverty
  • The Poor are Poor Because they are Powerless and
    Exploited (Marxist Theories).
  • The Poor are Poor Because they are Inefficient
    (Liberal Theories).
  • The Poor are Poor Because they are Poor (Vicious
    Cycle Theories).

10
Powerless and ExploitedThe Structuralist
Argument
  • The World Capitalist System Divided into the Core
    and the Periphery.
  • Core Produce and Export Manufactured Goods
  • Periphery Produce and Export Primary Commodities
  • Capitalist System is Systematically Biased in
    Favor of Core and Against Development of the
    Periphery.
  • International Trade is Primary Mechanism of
    Exploitation.

11
Terms of Trade Between Core and Periphery
  • Terms of Trade Volume of Exports Needed to
    Acquire a Given Volume of Imports.
  • Secular Decline in Terms of Trade
  • Yearly Increase of the Export Cost of Imports.
  • Falling Commodity Prices (Exports) and Stable
    Manufactured Goods Prices (Imports).
  • Caused By...
  • Terms of Trade for Primary Producing Countries
  • 1801-1881 0.87
  • 1882-1913 -0.42
  • 1913-1986 -0.52/ -0.84
  • Reason For Poverty
  • Gains from Productivity Improvements Are
    Transferred to the Core
  • Gains Not Translated into Higher Wages in
    Periphery.
  • No Savings to Finance Investment.

Source for Terms of Trade Data James M. Cypher
and James L. Dietz 1997. The Process of Economic
Development. Page 87.
12
Solutions to Structuralist Diagnosis of Poverty
  • Adopt a Development Strategy That Would
    Restructure Periphery Economies.
  • More Emphasis on Domestic Market, Less on Exports
  • More Emphasis on Producing Manufactured Goods,
    Less on Primary Commodities.
  • Structuralists Believed that Reform and Active
    Government Management Would Be Sufficient.
  • Marxists Believed Radical Break with Global
    Capitalist System Would Be Required.

13
Developing Country Responses, 1945-1980
  • Domestic Response
  • Import Substitution Industrialization.
  • Substitute Local Production for Imports
  • Most Developing Country Governments Adopted this
    Development Strategy.

14
Import Substitution Industrialization
  • Heavy Government Intervention to Shift Resources
    from Agriculture to Industry
  • Taxation of Agricultural Sector
  • Subsidization of Manufacturing Industries
  • Variety of Instruments
  • High Tariffs
  • Exchange Rates
  • Taxes and Subsidies
  • State-Owned Industry

15
International Response, 1960-73
  • Group of 77 Formed in Early 1960s to Press for
    Reform of International Economic System
  • Seek UN Conference to Examine Relationship
    Between Trade and Development.
  • Results in UN Conference on Trade and Development
    (UNCTAD) in 1964
  • Used UNCTAD to
  • Try to Reduce GATTs Role in International Trade
  • Try to Create Greater Role for UN in Trade
  • Preferential Access to Advanced Countries
    Markets
  • Create Commodity Cartels
  • Not Very Successful

16
The New International Economic Order,1973-1982
  • The Oil Shock and Commodity Power
  • Commodity Power Leads to Demands for The New
    International Economic Order (NIEO)
  • Increase LDC Manufacturing to 25 of Total World
    Manufacturing by 2000
  • LDCs Manufactured about 9 in 1978
  • Specific Demands
  • Increase LDC Control of Natural Resources
  • Cheaper and Easier Access to Northern Technology
  • Increased Foreign Aid (.7 of Norths GNP)
  • Eliminate LDC Debt
  • Greater Influence over IMF and World Bank
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com