QUAD

1
KE BOOST INDUSTRY DAY BRIEFING-BROAD AGENCY
ANNOUNCEMENT BAA-02-01
10 January 2001 Richard S. Matlock
2
AGENDA

• 900 Welcome
• 915 BMD Program Overview Capability Based
  Acquisition
• 945 KE Boost Program Acquisition Strategy
• 1030 BAA Instructions Review
• 1100 Questions and Answers

3
BMD PROGRAM OVERVIEW CAPABILITIES BASED
ACQUSITION
4
SECDEF DIRECTION

• Defend The U.S., Deployed Forces, Allies and
  Friends
• Employ An Integrated Ballistic Missile Defense
  System (BMDS) That Layers Defenses To Intercept
  Missiles In All Phases of Their Flight Boost,
  Midcourse and Terminal Against All Ranges of
  Threats
• Enable Us To Field Elements of the BMDS As Soon
  As Practicable
• Develop And Test Technologies Using Principals of
  Evolutionary and Spiral Development To Improve
  the Effectiveness of the BMDS by Inserting New
  Technologies When They Become Available
• Be Prepared to Use Test Assets to Provide
  Emergency Capability

5
GOALS OF BMDS PROGRAM

• Single BMD Acquisition Program With Goal Of
  Deploying Incremental Capabilities As Soon As
  Practical
• Start With What We Know Build On The Technical
  Progress Made To Date Without Losing Focus
• Get Reasonable Capability In The 2004-2008 Time
  Frame
• Move To A Layered Defense Soonest

6
ENGAGEMENT PHASES
7
LAYERED MISSILE DEFENSE
Space Sensor
Midcourse Defense Segment (MDS)

• Continuous, Global Coverage

• Defends Wide Regions

Boost Defense Segment (BDS)
Terminal Defense Segment (TDS)
Layered Defenses

• Destroys Missile Regardless of Aim Point
  Potential For Global Defense

• Defends Localized Areas and Critical Assets

• Multiple Engagement Opportunities Increase
  Likelihood Of Success
• Complicates Efforts Of Adversaries
• Overcomes Countermeasures

Launch
Impact
8
BMD EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
CY
2013
2015
2011
2009
2007
2005
2003
Block 2004
Block 2006
Block 2008
Block 2010
Evolutionary Spiral Development
Block 2012

• Add New Capability Based on Technical Maturity
• Upgrade Existing Capability Insert Technology
• Evolve Requirements
• Procure Additional Force Enhance Capability
• Extend to Allies and Friends When Appropriate

Block 2014
9
WHY CAPABILITIES-BASED ACQUSITION ?

• Get And Stay Ahead Of Potential Adversaries
• Cannot Know With Confidence What Nation,
  Combination Of Nations, Or Non-State Actor Will
  Pose Threats To Vital U.S. Interests Or Those Of
  U.S. Allies And Friends
• Can Anticipate Capabilities An Adversary Might
  Employ To Coerce Neighbors, Deter U.S. From
  Acting, Or Directly Attack U.S. Or Its Deployed
  Forces
• Need A Flexible Strategy To Exploit BMD
  Capability Opportunities
• Details To Be Coordinated With Joint Staff,
  Services

Its About Having a Comprehensive Insurance
Policy For Unknown Unknowns
10
CAPABILITY VS REQUIREMENTS
Adversary Capability
Environment
Capability
Equipment
Equipment
Natural
People
People
Operations
Man Made
Operations
Requirements
BMD Performance
11
Missile Defense Agency
November 1, 2001
Director
D
Lt Gen Kadish
DD
Deputy Director
MG Franklin
DX
Executive Director
Mr. Snyder
DB
PEO BMDS
MG Nance
BMDS Technical Director
DT
RADM Paige
Technical Advisor (IPA)
DA
Mr. Hoff
Chief Of Staff
DS
Col Anstine
CS
SB
Chief Scientist
Small Business
Dr. Infosino
Mr. Moss
CT
PI
SE
TE
MP
TR
AC
SA
Force Structure Integration And Deployment
System Engineering Integration
Safety, Quality And Mission Assurance
Advanced Concepts
Program Integration
Producibility And Mantech
Contracting
Brig Gen Obering Dep Mr. Ritter
Mr. Mabey
Dr. Sanders
Mr. Schaefer
Lt Col Myers
Dr. Lamartin
Mr. Hoff (A)
Mr. Englander
AL
BC
TC
SL
KB
SS
SM
GM
TH
LT
IC
CF
IR
AT
Program Director Targets And Countermeasures
Program Director Cooperative Programs Allied
Support
Program Director ABL - Boost
Program Manager KE - Boost
Program Manager SBIRS-L - Sensors
Program Director Sea-Based Midcourse
Program Director Ground-Based Midcourse
Program Manager THAAD - Terminal
Program Manager SBL - Boost
Program Director BM/C2
Joint National Integration Center
Lower Tier
Industrial Relations Ombudsman
Advanced Technology Development
Brig Gen Obering Dep Mr. Ritter Dep COL
Armstrong
BG Holly
Ms. Armbruster
Mr. Matlock
Mr. Sokol
COL Armstrong
Col Falto-Heck
CAPT Grant
Col Pawlikowski
Mr. OSullivan (A)
Col Weidenheimer
COL OReilly
Col Rogers
GC
EA
RM
HR
IN
SR
SC
CI
External Affairs
Resource Management
Workforce Management
Strategic Relations
CIO
Intelligence
Security CM IA
Mr. Cifrino
Ms. Bain
Mr. Love
Mr. Ramos
Mr. Kamin
Dr. Martin
Mr. Peavey
Dr. Bleach
Dual Hatted
12
KE BOOST PROGRAM ACQUISITION STRATEGY
13
KE BOOST PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

• Define Sea-Based Boost Defense Concept Over 2-4
  Years
• Develop and Test Enabling Capabilities
• Reduce Technical and Programmatic Risks
• Prepare for BMDS Product Line Decision (2003-05)
• Define Space-Based Boost Defense Concept Over 2-4
  Years
• Develop and Test Enabling Capabilities
• Reduce Technical and Programmatic Risk
• Prepare for BMDS Product Line Decision (2004-06)
• Conduct Space-Based Kinetic Energy Experiment
  (2005-06)

14
NOTIONAL PROGRAM FRAMEWORK(Out-Year Plan to be
Shaped by Planned FY02 Efforts and Decisions)
Engineering Component Risk Reduction
Integrated Element Prototypes
Initial BMDS Block Opportunity
PHASE II
PHASE I
Block 06
FY02
FY06
FY03
FY05
FY07
FY04
Sea-Based Product Line Capability Spec
Space-Based Product Line Capability Spec

• KE Boost Engineering
• National Team
• KB FFRDC/SETA

Block Capability Definition Assessments
Block Capability Definition Assessments
Space Product Line Decision
Product Line Decision
Block Capability Goals
Current Acquisition Strategy Addresses
Sea-Based Experiment
Sea-Based Block 06 Capability

• Critical Experiments
• Existing Contracts
• BAAs

TOOs
TOOs
Fly-By Experiments
Space-Based Experiment
Titan II
TBD
Block 10/12 Components
Qual Tests
Hot Fire
Axial Stage
PTV

• Risk Reduction
• BAAs
• Existing Contracts

Boosters
Advanced DACS-Sensor
LDACS Hover
Seeker-DACS Ground Tests
Kill Vehicles
TOOs
Fly-By
Prototypes
Sensors/BMC2/Platform
15
NOTES ON PROGRAM FRAMEWORK

• Although there has been considerable study of
  boost phase intercept concepts in the past, the
  current KE boost program is essentially a new
  start
• A new strategy based on the BMDS
• Leverage current state of technology
• Current effort will leverage previous BPI work
  wherever possible
• Much of the detail for the long range KE boost
  plan has yet to be defined
• Activities such as critical experiments,
  technology demonstrations, and concept definition
  and assessment will define out year efforts
• FY02 is a defining year for KE Boost
• Considerable growth in KE boost activities is
  programmed through the FYDP
• Actual activity levels will depend on progress
  toward realizing a useful KE boost capability

16
WHAT ARE WE BUYING?
KE BOOST WBS ITEMS 4.1-4.3

• KE Boost Engineering
• Block Capability Alternatives Definition
• BMDS Concept Assessments of Capability
  Alternatives
• Capability Specifications For Risk Reduction
  Projects, Critical Experiments, and Product
  Lines
• Definition of KE Boost BMDS Interfaces
• Component Risk Reduction
• Capability Development and Assessment (Push
  State-of-the-Art, Lower Risk, Increase Technical
  Maturity)
• Boosters, Kill Vehicles, Sensors, BMC2, Platforms
• Critical Experiments (Integrated Element Risk
  Reduction)
• 02-03 Target-of-Opportunity Tests
• 04 Fly By Experiments with BPI Test System
• 05 Sea Based Prototype Experiment
• 06 Space Based Experiment
• Future Sea and Space Based Experiments

17
CONTRACTING APPROACHES USED

• CONTRACTS
• SETA/FFRDC
• Contracts In-Place
• National Team-Industry Agreements (SEI, BMC2)
• Broad Agency Announcement
• Initial Contract Awards in March
• Multiple Contract Type Options
• Modifications to Existing Contracts
• PMS 422, PMS 400B, AFRL/PR

• WBS FOCUS
• Boost Engineering
• Critical Experiment Support
• Program Management Support
• Boost Engineering
• Concept Definition
• BMDS Integration
• Component Risk Reduction
• SBX Definition
• Innovative Critical Experiments
• Early Critical Experiments
• Boost LDACS Integration

18
CONTRACTING STRATEGY MAPPED TO WBS
WBS Covers All Basing Mode Alternatives Sea
Space (Preferred), Air, Ground
4.0 KE Boost
4.2 KE Boost Engineering
4.3 Critical Experiments Flight Tests
4.1 Risk Reduction
Data Collection Phenomenology
Concept Definition Exploration
Interceptors
Space-Based Experiment
Sensors
Compliance Configuration Control
Sea-Based Experiment
Platform
Platform
Analysis Assessment
BMC2
BMC2
Platform
Government Contracts (FFRDC, SETA)
National Team Agreements
Modifications to Existing Contracts
New BAA (Focus of Briefing)
19
KE BOOST AND THE NATIONAL TEAM
National Team

• 1 KE Boost Sys Eng Team
• SE/BC GOVT/FFRDC/SETA
• Industry SEI BMC2
• KE Boost GOVT/FFRDC/SETA
• Other BMDO GOVT/SETA

• KE Boost Products/Services
• Concept Definition
• Concept Assessments
• System Capability Specifications
• BMDS Interface Definition

System Engineering Integration
1 One Integrated Team, Operates at System Level

• KE Boost Development Team
• KE Boost GOVT/FFRDC/SETA
• Industry Development Contractors

• KE Boost Products/Services
• KE Boost Acquisition Plan
• Element/Component Design Specifications
• Element Integration and ICDs
• Hardware Software Products
• Test Execution and Reporting

Element Development
Define What We Want at System Level, Design,
Build Test at Element Level
20
NEAR TERM KE BOOST INVESTMENT AREAS
Engagement Functions
Investment Areas
KE Boost Investment Areas
Engageability Intercept Point Prediction Containme
nt Plume-to-Hardbody Early Detect, Track and
I.D. Interoperability/BMC2I Aimpoint
Selection Lethality and Kill Assessment

• KV Divert and Attitude Control Systems
• Flexible Operation
• High g Capability

• Interceptor Booster
• High Vbo
• Fast Burn

Space Based Experiment
Critical Experiments and Flight Tests
Sensor Technology (Passive/Active) Lethality
Analysis and Experiments
21
BOOSTER RISK REDUCTION
New Flexible (Solid/Liquid) Upper Stage
Exploit Common Upper Stage Technologies Between
Sea Based and Space Based Boost
New High DV Fast Burn Booster
Technology Demonstrator With Multiple Contractors
22
KILL VEHICLE RISK REDUCTION

• Increased Flexibility
• High Acceleration
• Increased V
• Lighter Weight

• KE BOOST LDACS
• High Performance
• Light Weight

• Higher Performance
• Heavy Weight

• Low Performance
• Light Weight

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
23
NOTIONAL TOO MISSION ARCHITECTURE

DSP
SATCOM
SM-3 Captive Carry Seeker
IR Data
RF Data
IR Data
AFRL KC-135
BITE
RF Data
Ground Based Sensors
AST
HALO 1 / HALO 2
VAFB
Field Operations Center
CAST GLANCE
Range Radars
Uprange Ship
DSP Aegis Radar Track Data
Test Objectives
S-Band X-Band Track Via SATCOM (tentative)

• Assess Performance of Critical Missile Defense
  Concept Functions
• Interoperability/BMC2C
• Early Detect, Track, and ID
• Intercept Point Prediction
• Target Containment/Guidance
• RF and IR Discrimination

• Plume/Hardbody Handover
• Engageability
• Aimpoint Selection
• Missile Performance
• Fusing
• Lethality/Kill Assessment

COBRA JUDY (If available)
Digital Missile and Weapons System Simulation
24
KE BOOST TARGETS OF OPPORTUNITY
2002
2003
LAUNCH
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
Non-Strategic
FEB DMSP Titan II
JUN NOAA-M Titan II
JUL DOD Titan IV
NOV CORIOLIS Titan II
- ATLAS/ TITAN
SEP ICESAT NASA Laser Altimeter Ice Measurements
MAR AQUA-EOS Earth Observation
FEB IS-1 IRIDIUM
OCT GRAVITY PROBE-B Earth Science
- DELTA
Denotes Probable KE Boost TOO
- TAURUS
- OTHER
Strategic Non-Intercept
JUN GT-182GM
20 FEB GT-178
9 MAY GT-31PA
05 JUN GT-179
SEPT GT-180
FEB GT-181
MAY GT-32PA
Strategic Intercept
FEB IFT-8
JUN IFT-9
SEP IFT-10
NOV IFT-11
FEB IFT-12
JUN IFT-13
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
25
CRITICAL EXPERIMENTS AND FLIGHT TESTS
Space Based Experiments
Sea Based Experiments
SBX
26
ENABLING BLOCK CAPABILITIES
Block 06
Block 08
Block 10
SBX
KE Boost Testing Milestones
BLOCK 06 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT EXPERIMENTS
BLOCK 08 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT EXPERIMENT
BLOCK 10 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT EXPERIMENT
EARLY CRITICAL EXPERIMENTS
TESTBED EXPERIMENTS

• Initial Sea-Based Capability Assessment
• Space Based Experiment

• Boost Phase Flyby
• Sea- and Space- Based Engagement Scenarios

• Advanced Sea-Based Capability Experiment
• Fast Burn / High Velocity Booster
• Adv Kill Vehicle
• Launcher System to cope w/high mass flow rate
• Space Based High Fidelity exp.

• Exploit TOOs Connecting with BMDS Testbed

• BMDS Guidelines Driven Assessment
• Sea Based
• Space Based

CRITICAL EXPERIMENTS INFORM BLOCK DECISIONS
27
BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT
28
WHAT ARE WE SEEKING/BUYING WITH BAA?

• Capability Ideas and Proposed Execution Plans for
  4.1, 4.3 WBS Elements (Risk Reduction and
  Critical Experiments.)
• Component Risk Reduction (Booster, Kill Vehicle,
  Sensors, BMC2, Platform)
• Component Design, Hardware and Software, Test
  Plans, Tests, and Reports
• Critical Experiments
• Experiment Descriptions, Hardware and Software,
  Test Plan, Tests, and Reports, Experiment Support
  Services

Data to Enable Future KE Boost Product Line
Decisions
29
HOW DO WE BUY IT?

• STEP 1
• CBD Announcement for BAA Solicit 3-5 Page White
  Papers from Industry, Labs, and Universities
  (Including Proposed Business Approach e.g.
  Contract Type ROM Cost)
• Hold Industry Day on 10 January at APL to Explain
  KE Boost Program and Capability-Based Acquisition
  Approach
• Evaluate White Papers and Identify Candidates for
  Proposal Invitation
• Small Evaluation Team
• Potential government initiated dialogue regarding
  white papers of interest
• STEP 2
• Invite Proposal Submittal (for Selected White
  Papers)
• Proposal Evaluation
• Risk Reduction
• Critical Experiments
• Approval and Contract Award
• Flexibility In Contract Type CPFF, CPAF, FFP,
  Other Transactions, etc.

BAA Remains Open for All of FY02
30
BAA EVALUATION CRITERIA

• Overall Scientific and Technical Merit
• Innovativeness of Proposed Approach and/or
  Techniques
• Assessed Improvement to KE Boost Capabilities
• Reasonableness and Realism of Proposed Cost and
  Fees
• Offerors Capability and Capacity

31
PROPOSED ACTION PLAN
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
March
20
Approve Acquisition Plan
21
Release CBD
10
Industry Day
Receive Evaluate White Papers
Defense Appropriation Bill Passed
Request Formal Proposals
Evaluate Proposals
Award Contracts
32
BAA INSTRUCTIONS REVIEW
33
BAA INSTUCTIONS SUMMARY

• DO NOT SUBMIT A PROPOSAL AT THIS TIME
• White Papers Will Be Accepted Following this
  Briefing
• 3-5 Pages (8 x 11, Single Spaced)
• Section A Title, Period of Performance, Cost of
  Task, Name of Company
• Section B Task Objective
• Section C Technical Summary
• Separate Cover Letter Indicating Business
  Classification
• All Responses to Announcement Sent to ATTN Mr.
  Donald J. Bobby, Solicitation BAA-02-01, Missile
  Defense Agency, 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington
  D.C. 20301-7100
• Government Initiated Dialogue Prior to Proposal
  Request May Occur
• Formal Technical Proposal Will be Requested by
  Government if There is Sufficient Interest in
  White Paper

34
KE BOOST PROGRAM OFFICE

• Richard Matlock KE Boost Program Manager
• Richard.Matlock_at_bmdo.osd.mil
• 703-697-3893
• Commander Gary May Deputy Program Manager
• Gary.May_at_bmdo.osd.mil
• 703-697-3562
• Mr. Donald J. Bobby Contracting Officer
• Donald.Bobby_at_bmdo.osd.mil
• 703-695-9125