Infrastructure Assurance Planning Considerations An intergovernmental planning opportunity

1
Infrastructure Assurance Planning Considerations
An intergovernmental planning opportunity
Federal Planning Division APA 19 April 2006
Jerry.C.Zekert, CEMP-DA, [phone], email
Jerry.C.Zekert _at_ hq02.usace.army.mil
2
USACE/ Roles

• MILCON Army and AF
• Base operations
• Environmental restoration
• Geospatial Engineering

Research Development
Military Programs

• Military engineering
• Terrain Geospatial
• Installations Environment
• Water Resources

• DOD, Federal
• State Local
• International

Civil Works
Real Estate
Interagency Support

• Acquire, manage
• dispose
• DOD recruiting facilities
• Contingency operations

• Navigation, Hydropower
• Flood control, Shore Protection
• Disaster response
• Environmental restoration
• Water Supply
• Regulatory
• Recreation

Plus Homeland Security
3
USACE -- MACOM Overview (Civil Works
Boundaries)
North Atlantic Div (EUCOM)
Great Lakes Ohio River Div
Alaska
Seattle
Walla Walla
New England
Northwestern Div
Portland
St. Paul
Buffalo
Detroit
New York
Japan

Rock Island
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Chicago
Baltimore
Omaha
Cincinnati
Far East
Sacramento
Hunting- ton


San Francisco

St. Louis
Kansas City
Norfolk
Afghanistan
South Pacific Div
Louisville

Nashville
Wilmington
Little Rock
Europe
Tulsa
Los Angeles
Southwestern Div (CENTCOM)
Memphis

Charleston
Atlanta
Albuquerque
Honolulu
Vicks- burg
Savannah
Pacific Ocean Div (PACOM)
Mobile
Ft. Worth
Jacksonville
Dallas
New Orleans
Galveston
Gulf Region Div
Mississippi Valley Div
South Atlantic Div (SOUTHCOM)
Districts outside the United States Europe
(Germany) Far East (Korea) Japan
4
USACE DCIP Support to The Army and The
Nation (Leveraging Civil Works Capabilities)

• Strategic deployment
• 299 commercial harbors

• Installation Environmental Restoration
• FUDS
• FUSRAP

Development Management of Water Resources
Infrastructure
Protection, Restoration Management of the
Environment

• 49 Presidential declared disasters to date, 2002
• FEMAs Engineer (ESF 3)

• Infrastructure Assessment/Protection
• Tactical hydrology
• Bridge Assessments

Disaster Response Recovery
Engineering Technical Services
5
USACE Support to The Armyand The
Nation(Disaster Response The Last 10 Years)
Analysis Assessment
Monitoring Reporting
Reconstitution
Mitigation
Response
Remediation
DoDs CIP Phases
6
USACE DCIP Support to the Nation
RAM-D
RAM-T
Leading Edge AT/FP Design
Centers of Expertise
Structural/Window Hazard Analysis
SecurityBarriers
AT Planner
Protective/RetrofitMeasures
Safe Standoff Calculation
Site Definition
Huntsville TAC
7
Purpose of Presentation

• Provide an overview of infrastructure assurance
  process and the linkage to traditional planning
  process
• Identify where inter-governmental planning
  opportunities can enhance Homeland Security
  Planning
• Take Aways

8
Master Planning Background
All DoD Installations are required to implement a
comprehensive Master planning program that
creates a long-term strategy for the planning and
development of the base. Planning practice,
products and methodology follow
traditional Established Planning
protocols DoD/Federal protocols require military
installations to maintain a Sound
inter-governmental planning effort with
surrounding cities, towns and Regional and State
governmental agencies.
9
Typical Master Planning Methodology
10
Master Planning Steps and DCIP Phases
Establish Vision
Collect Analyze Data
Develop Evaluate Alternatives
Select Preferred Plan
Implement Plan
Develop Goals Objectives
Monitor Amend Plan
11
Infrastructure can be Regional in Impact
From Interstate Highway 79 at the PA Border SW
to Charleston, WV and E along the PA border
Maryland
Delaware
West Virginia
Charleston, WV to Highway I-77 at the VA- NC
Border and E to the Atlantic Ocean
Virginia
12
Medical Infrastructure
13
C1 Shape Security Environment
AMC 4/10 MEDCOM 4/27 USACE 26/27
14
Defense Private Sector Infrastructure
15
(No Transcript)
16
Defense Infrastructure Assurance approach

• What?
• The identification, assessment, and as assurance
  of cyber and physical assets essential to the
  mobilization, deployment, and sustainment of U.S.
  military operations interdependencies are the
  key.
• Why?
• Failure of critical assets degrade / disrupt
  operations DCIP identifies functions, systems
  and assets and vulnerabilities of risks to
  missions DCIP will provide situational awareness
  of potential / unfolding mission disruption.
• Who will Benefit?
• Various Stake-holders Military commanders, policy
  makers, DoD counterintelligence security
  forces, and asset owners.

17
Lessons Learned Planning comprehensiveness
Planning Principles Vision Goals Planning Conside
rations
Planning Goals Sustainability Critical
Infrastructure Protection Effective Land
Use Flexible Development- Changing
Missions ..planning principles
18
Critical Infrastructure Protection AT/FP Real
Property Master Plan
Real Property Master Plan Digest Area
Development Plans
Ensure Infrastructure Assurance considered in
RPMP Vision, Goals Objectives ADPs
Installation Design Guide
Ensure IDG standards are defined that meets
CIP- AT/FP standards
Ensure Installation Carrying Capacity and
Utility Capability considered in Regional, Land
Use Plans, Utilities planning, transportation
planning CIP imbedded into ADP efforts
Long-Range Component
Capital Investment Strategy
Ensure investment options, also meet DCIP/ AT/FP
planning goals objectives planning
principles..
Short-Range Component
Ensure design and construction techniques
consider infrastructure assurance
19
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Know whats are critical assets on your
installation Ensure redundant support provided
20
Planning Take-aways

• Infrastructure Assurance provides a planning
  vehicle to look in a holistic manner, what are
  the critical resources, and frame a deliberate
  process to assure resources are available all the
  time.
• Requires both local communities and Federal
  agencies to plan together.
• Build upon existing Regional Planning protocols
  and relationships to build consensus vision and
  direction.
• Replaces fear to failure to communities of hope
  and sustainment

21
QA
22
Points of Contact
Jerry Zekert HQ, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers CEMP-DA 441 G St NE Washington DC (202)
761-7525 Jerry.C.Zekert_at_USACE.ARMY.MIL