The Sceptical Observer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

The Sceptical Observer

Description:

No need to panic when the jam pot's half full but halved oil reserves crimp supply ... Strawberry fields. 1973 and 1979 - contrived shortages ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:241
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: chris1077
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Sceptical Observer


1
The Sceptical Observer
  • Does reality accord with theory in the oil
    depletion story?

2
Who am I and what knowledge do I bring?
  • A lifetime working in the industry
  • Half the time as an oil journalist
  • Editing Petroleum Times, Petroleum Economist and
    now Petroleum Review
  • The other half as a planner and analyst for BP
    and for the Saudis in London
  • Old enough to have seen the 1st and 2nd oil
    crises and experienced the impact at first hand

3
What does a journalist bring to the problem?
  • Free of corporate pressure
  • Free of political pressure
  • A healthy scepticism
  • Access to lots of information

4
Meeting Dr Colin Campbell
  • In 1995 it all seemed pretty fantastic
  • Tried hard to prove him wrong
  • Have failed for 9 years
  • Now think hes a bit of an optimist

5
Now, theory is nice
  • But
  • What is actually happening?
  • What are the oil companies really doing?
  • What does the data actually tell us?
  • How long do projects really take?
  • How fast can things change?

6
The UK North Sea a clear warningof just how
fast depletion impacts
  • In 1999 it grew by 3.58
  • But in 2000 it fell by 8.15
  • And in 2001 it fell by 6.81
  • But in 2002 it fell by just 0.52
  • But in 2003 it fell by 8.85
  • And in 2004 (so far) it is 10-11 down

7
Peak oil is counter intuitive
  • No need to panic when the jam pots half full but
    halved oil reserves crimp supply
  • Bucket with holes
  • Ancient plumbing
  • Strawberry fields
  • 1973 and 1979 - contrived shortages

8
Most economists deny depletion but have little
useful to say
  • It doesnt fit with their theories
  • But economics is reactive Not predictive
  • Economics ignores time lags in responses
  • Supply and demand will always balance, but the
    price might be disastrous.
  • Substitution is thought to be the key

9
This economists observation
  • High prices simply signal that more supply is
    needed and may be profitable or that substitutes
    may be attractive and profitable. Economists
    effectively believe a rapid supply response is
    always possible and that constrained supply
    cannot occur for any significant length of time
  • But new supply may not be available (failure to
    discover)
  • Or it may take a long time to materialise
    (extended project times)
  • Or all the substitutes may be uneconomic (wind,
    solar, PV) or environmentally unacceptable
    (nuclear, coal)
  • Then all economics and economists can tell you is
    use up all the oil while the going is good.

10
So how are the oil majors doing on production?
  • Keeps promising production gains
  • Keeps talking about Russia, deepwater
  • But, output mostly flat in last 5 years
  • Still they keep reporting bigger reserves (with
    some setbacks)
  • So how is this magic achieved?

11
Alaskan North Slope Production
12
The Three Wise Monkeys?
  • see no depletion.
  • The Oil Companies -
  • Governments and International Agencies -
  • And all agree it would be best to -
  • hear no depletion.
  • speak no depletion.

13
The Data Providers - All faulty but in different
ways
  • The IEA - a victim of politics
  • The EIA - a victim of optimism
  • The USGS - an academic answer to a practical
    question
  • IHS -knows the answer for 1million
  • Oil companies - lots of data and some of it is
    true (honesty of the stock option holder)

14

Three reasons for denial
  • Do you really want to
  • Kill your career?
  • Head the redundancy list?
  • Be blamed for starting the panic?

15
The first depletion experienceNorth American
gas supply
  • US and Canadian gas production now falling by
    4/year
  • Prices at three times the 1990s average
  • Government is in denial
  • LNG the salvation? But few permits and ports, so
    2006/07 before much arrives
  • Tar sands and Northern pipelines?

16
Back to oil - The drama of 2003
  • Production increased by 2.7mn b/d (3.8)
  • The third biggest gain on record
  • New capacity around 1.2-1.5mn b/d
  • Outright depletion 1.1mn b/d
  • Drawing down spare capacity and stocks
  • By around 1mn b/d

17
The drama of 2003 (continued)
  • On the four previous production surges
  • Opec had significant spare capacity
  • Depletion affected only 1 or 2 countries
  • In 2003 around18 large producers in decline
  • Lost production some 1.14mn b/d (4.9)
  • So the other 32 had to expand by 3.82mn b/d or
    7.5
  • Is this actually sustainable?

18
Oil - The drama of 2004
  • Latest oil growth estimate is 2.6mn b/d
  • This is 3.3, the fourth highest on record
  • In Nov 2003 the estimate was 1.4mn b/d
  • Why so wrong? China, India, depletion?
  • But the effect is there is now no spare, turn on,
    capacity anywhere
  • All additional demand needs new capacity

19
The resolution so far in 2004
  • WTI Crude. Last 12 Months.

20
Oil - the simplest business modelBut, new supply
poses challenges
  • Two gigantic problems - the scale of the
    investment and very long project times
  • We just need to look at finding, evaluating and
    developing

21
Finding oil or rather not finding it
  • No one goes looking for small fields
  • Looking everywhere but finding less
  • Companies can destroy value by looking
  • A probability game rather than treasure hunting
  • If no discovery then no future production

22
Worse to come - dwindling discovery
  • In 2000 there were 16 discoveries of oil and gas
    of over 500mn boe
  • In 2001 there were 9
  • In 2002 there were just 2
  • In 2003 there were 9, oil-dominant in 6
  • In 2003 70 of discovery was in 200 metres of
    water but 65 in 1000metres

23
Evaluating and dreaming
  • Whats left in - North Sea, GoM, Angola, Brazil,
    Caspian area
  • Hoping for more success in Central Asia
  • Dreaming of access to Mexico and Saudi
  • Praying for better terms from everyone
  • Hoping for access to the largest, cheapest,
    undeveloped reserves on the planet Iraq

24
Mega-projects - new productionThe fat years
2003-2007
  • 2003 - 10 projects - peak 1.2 million b/d
  • 2004 - 16 projects - peak 1.2 million b/d
  • 2005 - 17 projects - peak 2.5 million b/d
  • 2006 - 19 projects - peak 2.9 million b/d
  • 2007 - 11 projects - peak 2.9 million b/d
  • Depletion will cost 1.1-1.4 million b/d/yr

25
Mega-projects - new productionThe lean years
2008-2012
  • 2008 - 8 projects - peak 1.6 million b/d
  • 2009 - 3 projects - peak 1.7 million b/d
  • 2010 - 2 projects - peak 0.86 million b/d
  • 2011 - 2 project - peak 0.2 million b/d
  • 2012 - 1 project - peak 0.2 million b/d
  • Depletion now faster 1.4-1.7 mn b/d/yr

26
Key discoveries - Tomorrows Mega-Projects
  • 30 projects listed
  • 11 in Middle East, 8 in Russia, 5 in Caspian,
    Canada 2, 4 other
  • Typically 6 years discovery to first oil
  • Only onshore (18) onstream before 2008
  • More likely 2010 onwards

27
But what about gas?
  • Lots of gas outside North America
  • Lots of LNG and some GTL coming onstream
  • Most has a market so doesnt substitute oil
  • Fairly hard to switch fuels
  • Easy substitutions have all been done
  • UK more gas than oil in fuel mix

28
What about tar sands/heavy oil?
  • Current - 1mn b/d tar sands, 0.6mn b/d Orinoco -
    just 2 of global production
  • No new Orinoco projects at moment
  • Tar sands growing slowly - to double by 2015
  • Unlikely to reach 4 of total oil by 2020
  • Nice to have but little more

29
What about alternatives?
  • Oil has the greatest energy density of any fuel
    known to man, apart from nuclear
  • This means all alternatives are inferior
  • You can cook sausages by collecting and burning
    straw but you may use more calories collecting
    the straw than you get by eating the sausages
  • The energy cost of energy

30
A crisis in less than 4 years?
  • If the economic recovery continues
  • Supply will get very tight from 2008/9
  • Prices will soar
  • Theres very little time
  • There are lots of heads in the sand
  • Governments will be blamed

31
Future oil supply -- a tightening cap on economic
growth?
  • Oil demand in 03 grew 3.8, in 04 by 3.3
  • Supply
  • In 2005 1.7-2.1 will be possible
  • In 2006 2.0-2.5 will be possible
  • In 2007 1.8-2.3 will be possible
  • In 2008 0.3-0.4 is all that is possible
  • In 2009 0.4-0.5 is all that is possible
  • After 2010 oil supply growth will be negative

32
So what can be done?
  • Invest to boost production and slow depletion
  • Increase use of alternative blendstocks,
    preferably renewables
  • Ensure government has the relevant powers and
    controls for when the going gets rough (Remember
    the UK fuel dispute)
  • Boost energy efficiency by every means
  • Start planning now

33
Contact
  • Chris Skrebowski
  • Editor, Petroleum Review
  • cs_at_energyinst.org.uk
  • 44 (0)20 7467 7117
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com