Public Private Partnerships Case Studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Private Partnerships Case Studies

Description:

Nearly 5,500 trucks & buses travel to/from POM through downtown streets ... Roadway work on Dodge and Watson Islands. MacArthur Causeway Bridge widening ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:166
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: jjb9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Private Partnerships Case Studies


1
Public Private PartnershipsCase Studies
Jim HatterInnovative Finance Technical Service
Team
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource
Center
2
Presentation Outline
  • Why PPP
  • Leasing of Public Assets
  • Case Studies
  • Summary

3
Why Public Private Partnerships?
  • Challenges facing the nations highways
  • Age and deterioration
  • Congestion
  • Safety
  • Needed capital improvements
  • Current investment 68 billion/year National
    Highway System
  • Maintain and improve 130-160 billion

4
Impact of Inflation
Provided by AAShTO
5
Public Private Partnerships
JOSHUA LUTZ / REDUX FOR TIME
6
Public Private Partnership (PPP, P3)
  • Contractual agreement between public and private
    partners which allows more private sector
    participation than is traditional.
  • Alphabet soup construction
  • D-B (design-build)
  • D-B-B (design-bid-build)
  • D-B-F (design-build-finance)
  • D-B-O-M-F (design-build-operate-maintain-finance)
  • Concession
  • Long term lease of public facilities to a private
    party the concessionaire

7
Partnering More Than Financial Risk
  • Share and shift risk
  • Private sector expect return for risk
  • Public sector Profit is a bad concept
  • Public sector adjustment
  • Sharing of assets

8
Examples of Compensation Provisions
9
Public Private Financing
  • Case Studies

10

Creative Financing Case Study
T495 Capital Beltway HOT Lanes
  • 14 mile segment of beltway
  • Two HOT lanes each direction
  • Variable tolls HOV-3 free
  • Replacement of ageing infrastructure (50 bridges)

11
Sources Uses of Funds
Includes 19.2 M Contingency Used
Includes 45.8 M Contingency Used
Funded 5 yrs. Post Construction
Includes 65M Contingency Used from TIFIA and
Equity
11
12
TIFIA Debt Service Equity Distributions
T495 Capital Beltway HOT Lanes
Distribution Reserve Release
Assurety Replacement
13
Missouri Safe Sound Bridge Program
  • Public Private Partnership 400-600 million
  • Replacement or rehabilitation of 802 bridges
  • 30 year D-B-O-M-F
  • 25 year availability payments
  • MoDOT Federal-aid bridge funds
  • Missouri Bridge Partners
  • Zachry American Infrastructure
  • Parsons Transportation Group
  • Fred Weber Inc.
  • Clarkson Construction
  • HNTB
  • Infrastructure Corporation of America

14
Missouri Safe Sound Bridge Program
Responsibilities
Missouri Bridge Partners
MoDOT
  • Construction, maintenance, finance
  • Pays ROW purchase price
  • Pays utilities relocation costs
  • Obtains temporary easements
  • Draft third-party agreements
  • Performs public information
  • Provides design design computations
  • Participates in bridge ratings
  • Makes availability Payments
  • Negotiate ROW price
  • Review/approve third-party agreements
  • Obtain environmental permits
  • Verifies completion of milestones
  • Performs program wide Public relations
  • Conducts bridge inspections ratings

15
Port Access ProjectThe Port of Miami Tunnel
16
Port AccessImportance of Port
  • POM is top international cruise terminal, 10th
    international cargo port based on containerized
    shipments, and top seaport in Florida based on
    dollar volume
  • 20.7 billion in imports/exports
  • 81,800 jobs
  • 5 billion in wages
  • 12 billion in economic output

17
Port Access Existing truck routes through
Downtown Miami
  • Must go through 6 to 7 signals inbound and
    outbound

18
Port AccessTruck traffic will increase
  • Nearly 5,500 trucks buses travel to/from POM
    through downtown streets
  • By 2030, estimated truck traffic
    will nearly double

19
Port AccessYears of Planning
  • Since 1979, improved access to Port of Miami seen
    as necessity
  • Nearly every option explored
  • In 1989, FDOT analyzed eight alternatives in
    Project Development Environmental (PD E) study

20
Port AccessOption Selected
  • Tunnel under main channel of Government Cut
  • Roadway work on Dodge and Watson Islands
  • MacArthur Causeway Bridge widening

21
Port AccessBuilding the Tunnel
  • Involves specially-constructed Tunnel Boring
    Machine approx. 42 ft. high
  • TBM consists of cutter head and trailing support
    gear
  • Excavation will take just over one year6 months
    in each direction

22
Port Access FDOT Procurement Schedule
  • December 5, 2005 Industry Forum (D-B-O-M-F)
  • February 17, 2006 Releases Request for
    Qualifications
  • April 12, 2006 Receives Statement of
    qualifications from potential bidders
  • April 28, 2006 Announces short-list of bidders
  • November 1, 2006 Publishes Request for Proposals
  • March 5, 2007 Receives proposals from
  • 3 short-listed bidders
  • May 2, 2007 Best Value Proposal named MAT
    under intent to award subject to local
    funding
  • Next Step MAT (Miami Access Tunnel)
  • Contract execution

23
Port AccessTunnel PPP Agreement
  • 35-year agreement between FDOT concessionaire
  • FDOT begins availability payments once tunnel
    opens, adjusted for inflation
  • Estimated to be 2012
  • Payment subject to reduction if tunnel not
    operational during required hours
  • Tunnel will be returned to FDOT in first-class
    condition at end of contract

24
Port Access Project Capital Cost
  • Top Ranked Proposal capital and related cost -
    665 million
  • 150 million for risk reserve for geology risk
    and related items
  • 50 million for project inspection
  • Total capital cost - 865 million (FDOT cost
    estimate at 1.2 billion)

25
Port Access Construction Schedule
  • Upon execution of Concession Agreement, FDOT will
    issue a Notice to Proceed design
  • MAT will have nine-month period to begin
    construction
  • In RFP response, MAT stipulated a 47-month
    construction schedule
  • MAT must meet defined construction period


26
Port Access Construction Schedule

27
Port AccessFunding the POMT
  • FDOT contributing 50 of capital cost (432.5
    million) from Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)
    funds
  • Local partners must match capital costs
  • FDOT funding tunnel Operations Maintenance from
    statewide maintenance funds (about 200 million
    over 30 years)

28
Port AccessFunding the POMT
  • Cash Flow
  • 100 million during construction
  • 350 million upon POMT completion
  • Remaining in annual availability payment
  • Covers both remaining capital and annual
    operations and maintenance costs
  • Proposal at 33 million in 2007 dollars (FDOT
    estimate at 68 million)
  • Amount will adjust based on annual inflation

29
In Summary
  • USDOT SAFTEALU support PPP
  • PPP is not for every Project
  • Educate the Public
  • www.fhwa.dot.gov/ppp
  • Manuel for using PPPs
  • PPP Toolkit

30
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com