Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine

Description:

Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Some history and recent developments ... Especially it concerns issue of PPP, tariffs setting, privatization, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:137
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: VLA146
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine


1
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine
  • Some history and recent developments

2
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine
  • Introduction
  • EU WaterTime project was very interesting
    exercise in trying to understand how water supply
    was historically developed in Europe. Selection
    of cities was quite representative and gave good
    view of various so-to-say schools of drinking
    water supply Nordic, French, German, British,
    Eastern Europe, Western Europe

3
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine
  • Unfortunately, WU from cities of the former
    USSR were not represented at this project (except
    of Baltic republics) though their recent history
    is quite an indicative as to what political
    changes, economic upheavals and stagnation may
    cause to efficiency and reliability of operation
    of WU utilities of big, but especially small
    towns.

4
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine
  • In my presentation I will try to review some
    historical and recent developments in water
    utilities activities and situation in Ukraine.
  • Historical aspect is concentrated on the city
    of Kharkov from which I am and about which I have
    better idea and understanding! It is also
    concentrated on sanitation, because of
    specialization of my institute water pollution
    control and prevention

5
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine
  • General data
  • Main source of water supply in Ukraine is surface
    water about 80 .
  • The total production capacity of the entire
    centralized water supply systems amounts to 25.7
    million m3/day. Of that, 14.9 million m3/day is
    the capacity of municipal utilities.
  • The total length of municipal water distribution
    networks is 78.8 thousand km. The capacity of
    waste water treatment facilities is 15.4 million
    m3/day, while the length of municipal waste water
    collection networks is 43.9 thousand km.
  • On a daily basis, 9.6 million m3 of waste water
    is treated at the municipal facilities. 4.5
    million m3 of insufficiently treated waste water
    and 176.5 thousand m3 of untreated waste water is
    being discharged into receiving water bodies.

6
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine
  • After independence , the previously state-owned
    utilities in Ukraine have been decentralised and
    transferred to municipalities, and the central
    government has ended subsidies to these
    utilities
  • In 2004, municipalities owned 61 utilities,
    while 4 remained owned and run by central
    government . Municipalities now set utility
    tariffs, in accordance with rules defining which
    costs can be covered and acceptable profit margin
    .
  • Municipalities have legal right to transform WU
    into autonomous communal production enterprises
    operations of which can be given into concession
    or leased, but main assets (infrastructure)
    still remain municipal property!

7
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine
  • Majority of water utilities are communal
    enterprises which operate water supply and
    sanitation systems which are property of
    municipalities. Number of private WU is negligent
    and they are small.
  • Problem
  • There are no formal agreements (contracts)
    between water utilities and municipal authorities
    defining mutual obligations as to management,
    funding and quality of service (no rule of law
    and economic principles, but predominantly
    administratively and politically motivated
    relations)

8
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine
  • Coverage - rather high (about 85 )
  • Drinking water quality average (often below WHO
    norms)
  • Infrastructure deteriorating
  • - pipe breaks 2.5 per km/year
  • - sewerage collectors clogs 2.4 per
    km/year
  • Water losses increasing (32 on average)
  • Reliability of supply average 18 hrs/day
  • Water consumption tends to decrease (now 350
    l/pc/day)

9
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • General data Sanitation - what we have to-day
  • Population 1.850 mln
  • Length of sewers 900 km
  • Main pump station 1.5 mln m3/day
  • Treatment plants 2, total capacity 700.000
  • m3/day
  • BOD total 15 mg/l , suspended solids 12-15
    mg/l

10
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • Water consumption
  • Average 2- 4 annual decrease due to economic
    stagnation, higher water tariffs, water metering,
    decrease of water availability and access to it.
  • In the past (before 1992) in Kharkiv 60 of water
    was consumed by population, 20 by industry.
  • Currently industry 2, population 80.

11
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • Water consumption norms (Kharkiv, 2005)
  • Drinking (cold) water - 8.1 m3/day/per capita
  • Heating water 3 m3 /day/per capita
  • Water Losses
  • Water losses are leaks in distribution networks
    and understated bills to households residing in
    five- and nine-storey apartment buildings, which
    account for 80 of the city population.
  • It means that these households consume more water
    than their bills show.)
  • But very often actual consumption may be far less
    then the water bill shows (8.1 3 m3/month
    Kharkiv ) which is of great benefit to WU

12
  • Typical household utilities bill (in UAH)
  • (Kiev, September, 2005, for 1 person in a flat
    with area of 38.7 m3)
  • - Drinking (cold water) 4.51
  • Hot (bathing) water 13.05
  • District heating 28.56
  • Cooking gas 1.89
  • House maintenance fees 22.45
  • Minor repairs 3.57
  • Electricity 7.96 (51 Kw/hour/month/person
  • Telephone connection 7.56 (per month)
  • Total (VAT incl.) 89.55 USD 20.0

13
Part 1 History of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • General data Sanitation - what we have to-day
  • Population 1.850 mln
  • Length of sewers 900 km
  • Main pump station 1.5 mln m3/day
  • Treatment plants 2, total capacity 700.000
  • m3/day
  • BOD total 15 mg/l , suspended solids 12-15
    mg/l

14
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • City of Kharkov founded in 1656
  • 1835 becomes center of a province
  • Development of industry since XIX century
  • Opening of centralized water supply system 1880
  • Main causes need for drinking water source close
    to housing, need for clean water, fire
    protection, fashion (Moscow had it, St.Petersburg
    also), improvement of well-being of people
    resulting in demand, business opportunity
  • Due to poor water quality death rate was at the
    beginning of the XIX century 60.2 /1000/year
  • After opening of centralized water supply it went
    down to 24.8/1000/year

15
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • Decision to build sewerage system was taken only
    in 1908 and designed to serve population of
    600.000 people to be reached in 1950 (in 1912
    239.000) city area 30 km2, 9,359 households,
    length of street network 260 km
  • But in 1939 population already was 833.000 !!!
  • Sewerage production rate 7 buckets per capita
    (Warsaw 6, Moscow 7) 1 bucket 10 liters
  • Industrial wastes share 20 of total design
    figure of 5 mln. buckets per day
  • Treatment - biological

16
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • Minimum pipe diameter 200 mm to minimize
    clogging.
  • Material ceramic
  • Main collector 2.13 x 1.44 brick with concrete
    casing due to location in water bearing layer
    (depth 10 m). In operation now 80 years
  • Gravity flow from 7/8 of the territory served

17
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • Official opening August 1914
  • Total sewers length 49 km
  • Treatment capacity 4.000 m3/day
  • System development
  • Network length 206 km in 1941 (49km in 1914)
  • In 1952 more than 25 of waste water was
    discharged untreated
  • In 1952 design for reconstruction of the system
  • Capacity increase up to 400.000 m3/day

18
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • Minimum pipe diameter 200 mm to minimize
    clogging.
  • Material ceramic
  • Main collector 2.13 x 1.44 brick with concrete
    casing due to location in water bearing layer
    (depth 10 m). In operation now 80 years
  • Gravity flow from 7/8 of the territory served

19
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • Estimation of waste water production in
    thous.m3/day
  • From population 429 (1970)741(1980)
  • 1.100 (2010)
  • From industry 267 (1970) 483 (1980) 250 (2010)
  • Total 696 (1970) 1.224 (1980), 1.350 (2010)

20
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine History
of Water Supply in Kharkov
  • Water supply
  • Municipal 360.000 m3/day
  • Industrial supply 30.000 m3/day (from bore
    wells)
  • and 10.000 m3/d (directly from rivers)
  • Water consumption norm 550 l/day/capita (1980)

21
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Recent
developments
  • Technical conditions of water supply and
    sanitation systems
  • 26 of water supply and sewerage networks are in
    an emergency state,
  • 40 of pump stations require major repair or
    replacement.
  • High number of pipe bursts 2.5 per 1 km/year

22
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Recent
developments
  • WU expenses coverage National average -70
  • Only in Odessa and Chernigiv water production and
    delivery costs are fully covered by existing
    tariffs
  • For Ukraine as a whole rate of coverage is in the
    range of 23 (Crimea) up to 96 (Lviv)
  • To compensate losses for WU cross-subsidies are
    widely used water tariffs for industry are
    typically 2-3 times higher than for population.
  • Population pays water bills much better now
  • 1993 - 92
  • 1994 - 97 (though there still is back payment
    problem)
  • Water tariff for population in on average in the
    range of 1UAH (0.20 USD cent)
  • and for industry it may reach - 7 UAH

23
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Recent
developments
  • Very often WU have to use their depreciation
    funds to cover routine operational costs.
  • As a result, annual rate of main assets wear-out
    at WU makes up on average 6- 8 but only 2 3
    of these assets are annually renewed. As a result
    the length of water and sewage pipelines in
    emergency state increased from 2.500 km in 1985
    to 37.500 km in 2004

24
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Recent
developments
  • Following USAID-funded project on Tariffs
    reform and restructuring of municipal utilities
    in Ukraine such performance contracts were
    introduced in 6 medium-sized towns and in cities
    of Lviv, Donetsk and Zaporizhizhia
  • Actions are also taken to give WU in
    concessions (e.g. in Odessa) or establishment of
    JSC (e.g. in Kiev). Majority of shares belong to
    Kiev city state administration.
  • However, concession often serves as hidden
    privatization. According to the law after expiry
    of the concession period assets acquired during
    concession period should be returned to the
    municipal authority

25
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Recent
developments
  • Serious problem is posed by lack of unified,
    standard and compulsory guidelines for water
    tariffs setting.
  • As a result water tariffs are results of
    administrative pressure, political considerations
    and without due care for their economic and
    financial aspects
  • Concerning capital investments into WU situation
    starts to improve. So during 2002 2004 volume
    of capital investments doubled up to 243.5
    million UAH (from the state budget) and 16.3
    million UAH from local budgets. This amount is
    still very low and is only used to eliminate hot
    spots
  • But for reconstruction of centralized water
    supply and sanitation systems ( mainly to meet
    ecological requirements) only UAH 50 mln are
    allocated for the period of 2004 2010 by the
    State Programme budget

26
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Recent
developments
  • Another recent trend establishment of regional
    WU (e.g. in Lugansk, Kiev,Rovno, Donetsk). This
    is rather complicated process, often requiring
    governmental decisions
  • Availability of approved business-plans of a WU
    development is an important step to wider
    introduction of concessions. Now only 5 of WU
    have integrated capital investment programmes
  • Only starting from 2004 water tariffs include
    investment component (e.g. in Odessa ), though
    by law it was possible since 2001.

27
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Recent
developments
  • International funding
  • A number of projects are being implemented or
    planned
  • World Bank in Lviv (USD 3.39 mln plus 4.66 mln
    SK (Sweden)
  • EBRD Zaporizhizhia (USD 27.4 mln)
  • EBRD Dnepropetrovsk (started in 2005)
  • EBRD Lugansk, Vinnytsia planned)

28
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Recent
developments
  • Investments are mainly used for
  • Energy and water resources saving
  • Improvement of pumps operation and automation
  • Pipelines pressure optimization
  • Rehabilitation of pipelines
  • Water metering (which progresses slowly only
    37.9 of houses have cold water meters (January,
    2005)
  • Hot water meters 8.52
  • Thermal power meters 11.6
  • Water temperature regulators 2.5

29
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine Recent
developments
  • Performance Agreement for Provision of
  • Water Supply, Wastewater Disposal and Heat
    Supply.
  • This a contract signed between municipal
    authorities and municipal utilities, including WU
  • Improvement of service provision
  • Tariff policy
  • Level of capital investment and how to finance
    it
  • The role of the city authorities in implementing
    the enterprises strategic action plans
  • Regulating the role of ZHEKs (house maintenance
    company) in the provision of communal services to
    customers and in the maintenance of in-building
    pipe networks
  • Policy on metering services to customers.

30
Water supply and sanitation in Ukraine WaterTime
project history and recent developments in
Ukraine - conclusions
  • Analyses of conclusions and GRPs (44 0f them!)
    prepared under this project show that in general
    they are well considered and presented. Nearly
    all of them would be appropriate to Ukrainian
    situation. There is one good advise not to
    blindly copy some GRPs or approaches to
    conditions existing in that or another country.
    Especially it concerns issue of PPP, tariffs
    setting, privatization, subsidies

31
WaterTime project history and recent
developments in Ukraine GRPs Conclusions
  • 2 TABLE OF GPRS
  • 2.1 Background constraints history, actors and
    factors
  • GPR 1 Understand the existing structure and its
    development
  • GPR 2 Analyse impact of present developments on
    the future
  • GPR 3 Clarify responsibility for ancillary
    services
  • GPR 4 Clarify responsibility for water resources
  • GPR 5 Clarify fiscal problems
  • GPR 6 Reviewing external experience
  • GPR 7 Make sure relevance of international
    context is understood
  • GPR 8 Take EC laws and rules into consideration
  • GPR 9 Identify the actors and their interests and
    objectives
  • GPR 10 Identify the relevant factors
  • GPR 11 Take steps to avoid corruption
  • GPR 12 Select consultants and experts carefully

32
2.3 Public sphere participation and
transparencyGPR 24 Improve decision-making
through public participationGPR 25 Be aware of
the role of representative democracy and
electionsGPR 26 Be aware of the role of
courtsGPR 27 Strengthen information rightsGPR
28 Information and public participationGPR 29
Need for clear definitions and transparencyGPR
30 Avoid secrecy of contractsGPR 31 Create
system for monitoring performanceGPR 32 Ensure
annual reports and public discussionGPR 33
Encourage participation in implementation and
monitoringGPR 34 Strengthen the role of auditors
  • 2.2 Decision-making process
  • GPR 13 Identify the problem
  • GPR 14 Distinguish common and distinct problems
    of private and public operations
  • GPR 15 Identify which public interests are being
    addressed
  • GPR 16 Identify the objectives of reform
  • GPR 17 Identify the options
  • GPR 18 Consider alternative solutions to fiscal
    problems
  • GPR 19 Review charging policies
  • GPR 20 Assess risks of all options
  • GPR 21 Undertake a comparative review of
    developed options
  • GPR 22 Identify the criteria for evaluation
  • GPR 23 Adopting the final decision

33
WaterTime project history and recent
developments in Ukraine GRPs Conclusions
  • 2.3 Public sphere participation and transparency
  • GPR 24 Improve decision-making through public
    participation
  • GPR 25 Be aware of the role of representative
    democracy and elections
  • GPR 26 Be aware of the role of courts
  • GPR 27 Strengthen information rights
  • GPR 28 Information and public participation
  • GPR 29 Need for clear definitions and
    transparency
  • GPR 30 Avoid secrecy of contracts
  • GPR 31 Create system for monitoring performance
  • GPR 32 Ensure annual reports and public
    discussion
  • GPR 33 Encourage participation in implementation
    and monitoring
  • GPR 34 Strengthen the role of auditors

34
WaterTime project history and recent
developments in Ukraine GRPs Conclusions
  • 2.4 Future risks and opportunities
  • GPR 35 Consider using fines to finance wastewater
    treatment plants
  • GPR 36 Optimise the use of public finance for
    infrastructure investment
  • GPR 37 Assess risks of guarantees and other
    finance schemes.
  • GPR 38 Risk of losing public capacity in water
  • GPR 39 Contracts may be incomplete and
    unenforceable
  • GPR 40 Risks of revision of contract terms
  • GPR 41 Risks of underinvestment in treatment
  • GPR 42 Risks of exit strategies
  • GPR 43 Risks of low competition for contracts
  • GPR 44 Monitor company status
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com