Unidimensional spatial model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Unidimensional spatial model

Description:

Unidimensional spatial model Stewart, Chapter 1 Plan of presentation Why do we care about theory or explanation at all? History of studying Congress Politics of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:9
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: PaulG102
Learn more at: http://people.reed.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unidimensional spatial model


1
Unidimensional spatial model
  • Stewart, Chapter 1

2
Plan of presentation
  • Why do we care about theory or explanation at
    all?
  • History of studying Congress
  • Politics of Lineland

3
I.Why do we care about theory or explanation at
all?
  • Thats what social scientists do
  • Thats what politicians do
  • Thats what citizens do
  • Think about the current campaign and ideological
    polarization

4
Different professions have different ways of
theorizing about legislatures
  • Activists good guys and bad guys
  • Reporters individual stories about good guys
    and bad guys
  • Political scientists The general, generic, and
    predictable

5
II.Brief history of political science
  • Early days 1880 formalism
  • 1900 to 1950 Progressivism
  • 1950-1980 Sociology
  • 1980 to present Economics

6
What are they?
  • Formalism understand Congress by the written
    rules.
  • Progressivism understand Congress by comparing
    to normative standards
  • Sociology
  • The group is what is important
  • Congress is a group, made up of other groups
  • Economics
  • The individual is what is important
  • Collective behavior derives from individual
    interests, preferences, and behaviors

7
Congress and intelligence reform
  • Formalist
  • What does the Constitution say about the role of
    Congress and the Executive in intelligence?
  • Progressive
  • Does the Constitution actually govern the
    exercise of intelligence?
  • Is intelligence gathering a war making power?
  • Sociology
  • Who are the actors? What (social) roles do they
    play?
  • What factors constrain the actors to stay within
    their roles (e.g. what is the committee
    environment)?
  • Economics
  • Who are the relevant actors, what are their goals
    (election, power, policy)
  • What are the strategic moves that the individuals
    make in order to optimize over the policy space?

8
Advancements in legislative studies
  • Our understanding of legislatures has become more
    precise over time
  • Modern legislative analysis focuses on the
    interaction between individuals and institutions
  • Without institutions, decision making is chaotic
  • Heritability problem
  • Theoretical primitives
  • Preferences
  • Rules

9
Logic of this style of analysis
  • Begin with simple preferences
  • How does decisionmakingproceed without
    institutions?
  • How does decisionmakingproceed withinstitution?
  • Add complexity and stir

10
The politics of lineland
  • Think of the world as a single dimensional policy
    space
  • Harold Hotellings grocery store problem
  • Downsian model of competition converge on the
    median voter
  • No matter the shape of the underlying
    distribution!

C1
C2
11
More formally
  • We care about
  • Preferences
  • Alternatives
  • Rules

12
Preferences
  • Dimensionality (1,2,many)
  • Location and characteristics of preferences
  • Ideal points
  • Utility curves

13
Different curves
14
Alternatives
  • Plain English motions, amendments, etc.
  • Expressed in same coordinate system as
    preferences
  • Heresthetics (Riker) The art/science of trying
    to alter the dimensionality of a policy debate
  • Clinton impeachment (private sex vs. perjury)
  • 9/11-related detainees (civil liberties vs.
    security)
  • Framing of Bush/Kerry campaign

15
Framing in Bush/Kerry Campaign
16
The importance of the reversion point or status
quo
  • The point where we end up if nothing happens. It
    is an outcome.
  • The most important alternative
  • Taxing vs. spending may have different reversion
    points
  • E.g. Public schools in Pacific N.W.

17
Rules Matter
  • Majority requirement
  • Simple or supermajority?
  • Agenda setting
  • Which alternatives and in which order?
  • Pure majority rule does it ever happen?
  • Example Oleszek pg. 231 (6th edition)

18
The median voter theorem drives this analysis
  • IF
  • The issue is unidimensional
  • Voters decide based on their preferences
  • Preferences are single-peaked
  • Voting proceeds under pure majority rule
  • THEN
  • The median voters ideal point will prevail
  • Or the median is the dictator

19
Reminders symmetry does not matter, only single
peakedness
20
Example of a lack of a single peak
21
The politics of flat land
PA(SQ)
PB(SQ)
A
SQ
B
C
Pc(SQ)
Ic(SQ)
22
Who was the median voter in Congress in 2003?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com