Jennifer Choi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Jennifer Choi

Description:

Lufthansa Cargo AG is the leading cargo air carrier ... Key Competitors: Air France-KLM, AMR Corp, and British Airways. 6. Agenda ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:368
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Tom3129
Category:
Tags: air | choi | france | jennifer

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jennifer Choi


1
Group 4
  • Jennifer Choi
  • Tommy Fermin
  • Luz Pacheco
  • Ibrahim Shaikh

2
Agenda
  • Company Background - Tommy
  • Case Details - Jennifer
  • Defining the Issues - Luz
  • Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
  • Recommendation - Tommy
  • Q A

3
Company Background
  • Deutsche Lufthansa AG (DLAKY.PK) - founded 1926
    in Berlin following merger of Deutsche Aero Lloyd
    and Junkers Luftverkehr
  • Luft Air Hansa Company
  • Symbol of flying and technical expertise
  • 1927 first flights to China
  • 1934 first trans-Atlantic flights
  • 1945 to 1955 air traffic suspended due to war
  • 1960 enters the jet aircraft age

4
Company Background (cont.)
  • Sixth largest airline in the world (Second
    largest in Europe)
  • Lufthansa Cargo AG is the leading cargo air
    carrier
  • Divisions in aircraft maintenance, catering, IT,
    and leisure/travel businesses
  • Approx. 23.6 billion 2006 Fiscal YE Revenue

5
Company Background (cont.)
  • Operations in Europe, North/South America,
    Africa, Middle East, and Pac Rim regions (45
    million passengers/year)
  • Main hubs in Frankfurt and Munich
  • 437 aircraft fleet approx. 60 Airbus, 40
    Boeing
  • Key Competitors Air France-KLM, AMR Corp, and
    British Airways

6
Agenda
  • Company Background - Tommy
  • Case Details - Jennifer
  • Defining the Issues - Luz
  • Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
  • Recommendation - Tommy
  • Q A


7
Case Details Overview
  • In January 1985, Lufthansa Chairman Herr Heinz
    Ruhnau purchased twenty Boeing 737 jets
  • Total Price 500 million USD, payable January
    1986
  • USD upward trend against the Deutschmark since
    1980
  • 3.2 DM / 1
  • Ruhnau believed the trend had reached a plateau
    and would soon decline
  • Hedge to mitigate exchange rate risk / purchase
    cost

8
Case Details X/C Rate Trend
DM3.2/ Jan-85
Sourced by www.oanda.com
9
Inflation Rate US 1980s
  • Deregulation - know as Reagonomics
  • Low corporate tax rates low inflation rates
  • US Dollar appreciated from 1981-1985.
  • PPP U.S low inflation rate made it a good place
    to invest

10
Case Details - Decision Criteria
  • Ruhnaus belief that the dollar would depreciate
    against the Deutschmark
  • Tolerable level of risk using companys funds
  • Limited capital on hand
  • Balance sheet currency debt restrictions

11
Case Details - Outcome
  • 250 million forward contract _at_ 3.2 DM / 1 (250
    million uncovered)
  • USD upward trend against the Deutschmark
    continued through February 1985 and then
    plummeted
  • 2.3 DM / 1 spot rate in January 1986 (3.2 DM /
    1 January 1985)
  • Total Cost of Boeing Deal

12
Case Details X/C Rate Trend
Apr-85
DM2.9/ Jul-85
DM3.2/ Jan-85
Sourced www.oanda.com
13
Case Details Outcome (cont.)
  • February 1986, Ruhnau summoned to meet with
    Lufthansa board of directors over management of
    exchange rate exposure for the Boeing deal
  • Criticized by the board for the use of forward
    contracts as exposure not for leaving half of
    the deal uncovered

14
Agenda
  • Company Background - Tommy
  • Case Details - Jennifer
  • Defining the Issues - Luz
  • Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
  • Recommendation - Tommy
  • Q A

15
Defining the Issues
16
Defining the Issues Exchange Rate Risk
  • Importance
  • Increased cost of doing business
  • Negative impact to bottom line
  • Urgency
  • Timing is critical
  • Volatile movement

17
Defining the Issues Hedging Methods
  • Importance
  • Need to control costs
  • Mitigate exchange rate risk
  • Urgency
  • Method selection is critical
  • Method needs to provide flexibility and tolerable
    level of risk

18
Defining the Issues - Hedging Methods (cont.)
  • Remain Uncovered maximum risk largest
    gain/loss possible
  • Full Forward Cover minimum risk
  • Partial Forward Cover medium risk uncovered
    exposure
  • Foreign Currency Option low risk sunk cost
    (premium) fairly new tool
  • Buy Dollars Now zero risk, cash availability,
    balance sheet currency debt restrictions

19
Cause and Effect
ExchangeRate
Economy
People
Partial Forward Cover 3.2DM/ 250,000 2.2DM/
250,000
Risk level/Constraints
Hedging Method
20
Agenda
  • Company Background - Tommy
  • Case Details - Jennifer
  • Defining the Issues - Luz
  • Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
  • Recommendation - Tommy
  • Q A

21
Alternative Analysis
22
Net Cost by Hedging Alternatives
Remain Uncovered
Put Option Cover
Full Forward Cover
Billions of DM
Partial Forward Cover
Ending DM/ Exchange Rate (Jan 1986)
23
Alternative Analysis
- 900 million variance too risky
24
Alternative Analysis
- Negates risk legal obligation forego
favorable movements
25
Alternative Analysis
- Legal obligation forego favorable movements
uncovered at risk
26
Alternative Analysis
- Flexible cost ceiling premium
27
Alternative Analysis
- Limited capital on hand forego favorable
movements
28
Agenda
  • Company Background - Tommy
  • Case Details - Jennifer
  • Defining the Issues - Luz
  • Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
  • Recommendation - Tommy
  • Q A

29
Recommendation
  • CURRENCY OPTION
  • Flexibility option to walk away
  • Limited downside risk
  • Maximum total cost is determinable whether
    exchange rate remains unchanged or increases
    (1,696,000,000 DM)
  • Cost difference between a fully uncovered
    position at a decreasing exchange rate and option
    is the premium (96,000,000)

30
Recommendation - Implementation
  • Negate forward contract executed by Ruhnau
  • Once exchange rate hit 3.3 DM/, execute sell
    forward contract
  • Net money gain 25 million USD (10,869,565 DM _at_
    2.3 DM/)
  • Purchase currency option for full 500 million
    USD exposure
  • Reduce option premium cost to 85,130,435 DM

31
Recommendation Alternative Solution
  • Examine the alternative of purchasing planes from
    Airbus
  • Airbus is a primary European competitor of Boeing
  • Bidding war creates leverage for Lufthansa
  • Highly subsidized by European countries lower
    operating costs lower price
  • Common currency no exchange rate risk
  • .

Airbus 320 which competes with Boeing 737
32
THANK YOU
QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com