Title: Jennifer Choi
1Group 4
- Jennifer Choi
- Tommy Fermin
- Luz Pacheco
- Ibrahim Shaikh
2Agenda
- Company Background - Tommy
- Case Details - Jennifer
- Defining the Issues - Luz
- Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
- Recommendation - Tommy
- Q A
3Company Background
- Deutsche Lufthansa AG (DLAKY.PK) - founded 1926
in Berlin following merger of Deutsche Aero Lloyd
and Junkers Luftverkehr - Luft Air Hansa Company
- Symbol of flying and technical expertise
- 1927 first flights to China
- 1934 first trans-Atlantic flights
- 1945 to 1955 air traffic suspended due to war
- 1960 enters the jet aircraft age
4Company Background (cont.)
- Sixth largest airline in the world (Second
largest in Europe) - Lufthansa Cargo AG is the leading cargo air
carrier - Divisions in aircraft maintenance, catering, IT,
and leisure/travel businesses - Approx. 23.6 billion 2006 Fiscal YE Revenue
-
-
-
-
5Company Background (cont.)
- Operations in Europe, North/South America,
Africa, Middle East, and Pac Rim regions (45
million passengers/year) - Main hubs in Frankfurt and Munich
- 437 aircraft fleet approx. 60 Airbus, 40
Boeing - Key Competitors Air France-KLM, AMR Corp, and
British Airways -
-
6Agenda
- Company Background - Tommy
- Case Details - Jennifer
- Defining the Issues - Luz
- Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
- Recommendation - Tommy
- Q A
-
7Case Details Overview
- In January 1985, Lufthansa Chairman Herr Heinz
Ruhnau purchased twenty Boeing 737 jets - Total Price 500 million USD, payable January
1986 - USD upward trend against the Deutschmark since
1980 - 3.2 DM / 1
- Ruhnau believed the trend had reached a plateau
and would soon decline - Hedge to mitigate exchange rate risk / purchase
cost
8Case Details X/C Rate Trend
DM3.2/ Jan-85
Sourced by www.oanda.com
9Inflation Rate US 1980s
- Deregulation - know as Reagonomics
- Low corporate tax rates low inflation rates
- US Dollar appreciated from 1981-1985.
-
- PPP U.S low inflation rate made it a good place
to invest
10Case Details - Decision Criteria
- Ruhnaus belief that the dollar would depreciate
against the Deutschmark - Tolerable level of risk using companys funds
- Limited capital on hand
- Balance sheet currency debt restrictions
11Case Details - Outcome
- 250 million forward contract _at_ 3.2 DM / 1 (250
million uncovered) - USD upward trend against the Deutschmark
continued through February 1985 and then
plummeted - 2.3 DM / 1 spot rate in January 1986 (3.2 DM /
1 January 1985) - Total Cost of Boeing Deal
12Case Details X/C Rate Trend
Apr-85
DM2.9/ Jul-85
DM3.2/ Jan-85
Sourced www.oanda.com
13Case Details Outcome (cont.)
- February 1986, Ruhnau summoned to meet with
Lufthansa board of directors over management of
exchange rate exposure for the Boeing deal - Criticized by the board for the use of forward
contracts as exposure not for leaving half of
the deal uncovered
14Agenda
- Company Background - Tommy
- Case Details - Jennifer
- Defining the Issues - Luz
- Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
- Recommendation - Tommy
- Q A
15Defining the Issues
16Defining the Issues Exchange Rate Risk
- Importance
- Increased cost of doing business
- Negative impact to bottom line
- Urgency
- Timing is critical
- Volatile movement
17Defining the Issues Hedging Methods
- Importance
- Need to control costs
- Mitigate exchange rate risk
- Urgency
- Method selection is critical
- Method needs to provide flexibility and tolerable
level of risk
18Defining the Issues - Hedging Methods (cont.)
- Remain Uncovered maximum risk largest
gain/loss possible - Full Forward Cover minimum risk
- Partial Forward Cover medium risk uncovered
exposure - Foreign Currency Option low risk sunk cost
(premium) fairly new tool - Buy Dollars Now zero risk, cash availability,
balance sheet currency debt restrictions
19Cause and Effect
ExchangeRate
Economy
People
Partial Forward Cover 3.2DM/ 250,000 2.2DM/
250,000
Risk level/Constraints
Hedging Method
20Agenda
- Company Background - Tommy
- Case Details - Jennifer
- Defining the Issues - Luz
- Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
- Recommendation - Tommy
- Q A
21Alternative Analysis
22Net Cost by Hedging Alternatives
Remain Uncovered
Put Option Cover
Full Forward Cover
Billions of DM
Partial Forward Cover
Ending DM/ Exchange Rate (Jan 1986)
23Alternative Analysis
- 900 million variance too risky
24Alternative Analysis
- Negates risk legal obligation forego
favorable movements
25Alternative Analysis
- Legal obligation forego favorable movements
uncovered at risk
26Alternative Analysis
- Flexible cost ceiling premium
27Alternative Analysis
- Limited capital on hand forego favorable
movements
28Agenda
- Company Background - Tommy
- Case Details - Jennifer
- Defining the Issues - Luz
- Alternative Analysis - Ibrahim
- Recommendation - Tommy
- Q A
29Recommendation
- CURRENCY OPTION
- Flexibility option to walk away
- Limited downside risk
- Maximum total cost is determinable whether
exchange rate remains unchanged or increases
(1,696,000,000 DM) - Cost difference between a fully uncovered
position at a decreasing exchange rate and option
is the premium (96,000,000)
30Recommendation - Implementation
- Negate forward contract executed by Ruhnau
- Once exchange rate hit 3.3 DM/, execute sell
forward contract - Net money gain 25 million USD (10,869,565 DM _at_
2.3 DM/) - Purchase currency option for full 500 million
USD exposure - Reduce option premium cost to 85,130,435 DM
31Recommendation Alternative Solution
- Examine the alternative of purchasing planes from
Airbus - Airbus is a primary European competitor of Boeing
- Bidding war creates leverage for Lufthansa
- Highly subsidized by European countries lower
operating costs lower price - Common currency no exchange rate risk
- .
Airbus 320 which competes with Boeing 737
32THANK YOU
QUESTIONS?