Slobodan Mitric - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Slobodan Mitric

Description:

Slobodan Mitric Strategic Urban Transport Issues in Belgrade Presentation on July 21, 2003 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:14
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: lnweb90Wo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Slobodan Mitric


1
Slobodan Mitric
  • Strategic Urban Transport Issues
  • in Belgrade
  • Presentation on July 21, 2003

2
Generic structure of an urban transport strategy
  • What is to be done?
  • Routine matters
  • Policies (regulations)
  • investments
  • How will it be paid for? (funding)
  • Who is going to do it? (institutions)

3
What is to be done? (1)
  • Routine matters
  • Road maintenance
  • Traffic management
  • Parking management
  • Traffic law enforcement
  • Public transport operations

4
What is to be done? (2)
  • Public transport policies
  • Network/service design
  • Fare policy
  • Operating arrangements (public, private)
  • Regulatory instruments (contracts, concessions,
    ..)
  • Road use policies
  • Restraint, pricing
  • Parking policies
  • Supply policy
  • Restraint, time control, pricing
  • Operating arrangement

5
What is to be done (3)
  • Investments (links, interchanges, bridges)
  • Road investments
  • Terminals and parking structures
  • Public transport fleet equipment
  • Public transport infrastructure

6
Financing
  • User fees (transfers, locally-generated)
  • Public budgets (transfers, locally-generated)
  • Private investments
  • Borrowing

7
Institutions
  • Organizations (local, regional, national)
  • Jurisdiction (systemic laws, regulations, local
    ordinances, )
  • Staffing
  • Funding
  • Processes
  • Instruments (budgets, studies, plans, ..)

8
Belgrade (1)
  • 1.3m population, 1.8m region
  • low natural growth, but in-migration due to wars,
    much illegal construction
  • 225 people/ha density in central core, but
    socialist density pattern
  • located on a t-intersection of two major rivers
    (dependence on bridges)

9
Belgrade (2)
  • High unemployment
  • Average monthly wage 175
  • Poverty (Serbia) 11 under EU 2.4 expenditure
    per HH/day
  • Another 22 close to the threshold
  • Huge rise in inequality due to war, unruly
    transition

10
Belgrade ()
  • Motorization rate 180 cars per 1,000 population
    in the region, 200-250 in the inner city
  • Modal split
  • 40 public transport
  • 35 walk
  • 19 cars

11
Belgrade (4)
  • Road network
  • low-capacity
  • TM effort in disarray
  • little parking control
  • little law enforcement
  • Parking
  • little-off street capacity
  • chaotic on-street, on-pavement parking

12
Belgrade (4)
  • Public transport system
  • Municipal Transport Company (1,100 street-based
    buses and trolley-buses, and trams on mainly
    protected track 870 in peak service)
  • 350 buses privately owned and operated under
    contract to the City Govt (fixed fare, no
    subsidy)
  • Beovoz low-frequency regional rail service on a
    100-km network, underground inside city

13
Belgrade diagnostic
  • Fierce competition for scarce street space
  • Routine institutions in disarray
  • Presence of low-income and poor people constrains
    fare policy (30-35 cost recovery)
  • Large size choice market calls for high-quality
    PT services
  • Weakness of regional road network implies much
    through traffic, but collapse of road funding on
    national level, and transfer mechanisms, means
    little action

14
Belgrade strategic issues
  • Management of street space not effective
  • Municipal company an outdated organizational
    form
  • Regulation of private operators incomplete
  • Inadequate pricing policies
  • Investment decisions weak processes, out-of-date
    instruments, absence of economic and financial
    criteria

15
Belgrade metro vs. light-rail controversy
  • Long history of debate, interrupted by decade of
    wars
  • Update of Urban General Plan leans towards
    light-rail in 2-3 major corridors
  • SYSTRA Study leans towards near-classical metro
    in 3 corridors price tag EU2,800m (2003-2021)
    for a 42-km system, but ..

16
Belgrade metro vs. light rail
  • but
  • No recent demand surveys, models
  • No thorough comparison of options SYSTRA used a
    multi-criteria approach to eliminate all but
    do-nothing and metro options
  • Pressure to take a build decision without
    further planning studies

17
Belgrade paradox
  • Bus and tram vehicles received as gifts from
    governments of Japan, Switzerland,..
  • City Government is starting to lean towards
    starting the first metro line
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com