Why is Pancreatic Cancer so Thrombogenic? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Why is Pancreatic Cancer so Thrombogenic?

Description:

Why is Pancreatic Cancer so Thrombogenic? M. DICATO M.D., FRCP Hematology- Oncology Centre Hospitalier L- 1210 Luxembourg Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), such as ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: elconImed
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why is Pancreatic Cancer so Thrombogenic?


1
Why is Pancreatic Cancer so Thrombogenic?
  • M. DICATO M.D., FRCP
  • Hematology- Oncology
  • Centre Hospitalier
  • L- 1210 Luxembourg

2
Total VTE Mortality per Year. (Extrapolated to 25
EU Countries)
EU 25
DVT 684,019
PE 434,723
Mortality following VTE 543,454
  • Deaths due to VTE 543,4541
  • More than double the combined deaths due to
  • AIDS 5,8602
  • breast cancer 86,8312
  • prostate cancer 63,6362
  • transport accidents 53,5992

1Cohen AT. Presented at the 5th Annual Congress
of the European Federation of Internal Medicine
2005. 2Eurostat statistics on health and safety
2001. Available from http//epp.eurostat.cec.eu.i
nt.
Adapted from Dr A.T. Cohens presentation at the
ISTH July 7,2007
3
Risk of DVT in Hospitalized Patients
  • No prophylaxis routine objective screening for
    DVT

Patient group DVT incidence
Medical patients 10 -
20 Major gyne/urol/gen surgery 15 - 40
Neurosurgery 15
- 40 Stroke
20 - 50 Hip/knee surgery
40 - 60 Major trauma
40 - 80 Spinal cord injury
60 - 80 Critical care
patients 15 - 80
4
Risk Factors for VTE
  • Previous venous thromboembolism
  • Increased age
  • Surgery
  • Trauma - major, local leg
  • Immobilization - bedrest, stroke, paralysis
  • Malignancy and its treatment (CTX, hormonal..)
  • Heart or respiratory failure
  • Estrogen use, pregnancy, postpartum, SERMs
  • Central venous lines
  • Thrombophilic abnormalities

5
Risk Factors for VTE
  • Previous venous thromboembolism
  • Increased age
  • Surgery
  • Trauma - major, local leg
  • Immobilization - bedrest, stroke, paralysis
  • Malignancy and its treatment (CTX, hormonal..)
  • Heart or respiratory failure
  • Estrogen use, pregnancy, postpartum, SERMs
  • Central venous lines
  • Thrombophilic abnormalities

Most hospitalized patients have at least one risk
factor for VTE
6
Thrombophilia Mutations
  • In cancer patients with VTE, testing for
    mutations VLeiden, PT, (MTHFR ) is only
    useful if there is a previous personal or family
    history of VTE


(M. Dicato et al. Blood 2001,S1 3984)
7
Relative Risk of VTE in Cancer Patients
Stein, Am J Med, 2006
8
VTE Risk and Cancer
  • Rate of growth and spread
  • Sites pancreas (rate 8.1), kidneys ovaries
    (5.6), stomach (4.9)..
  • Therapy thalidomide, lenalidomide (?),
    bevacizumab (2 fold arterial thrombosis p 0.031,
    VTE none, posthoc analysis, Scapatacci
    meta-analysis VTE RR 1.33, plt 0.001, Nalluri)
  • ESA RR 1.7
  • RBC Transfusions vs none 7.2 vs 3

9
(No Transcript)
10
Risk factors for VTE in patients with cancer
(2) G. Lyman, Cancer 2011, 117 1334- 49
11
MM SHAH JOP, 2010,11331
12
  • Patient- disease- treatment related risk factors
  • Is there are Biomarker?
  • ?Biomarkers Recent risk factors
  • - Platelet count gt 350.000
  • - WBC gt11.000
  • CRP
  • TF expression
  • D-dimers

Khorana et al. ASCO Ed. Book, 2008
13
L. Plawny, M. Dicato Thrombosis in Cancer in
Mellar Davis, p275-283
14
Physiopathology
Pathways of activation of coagulation in cancer
TF (tissue factor) and CP (cancer procoagulant)
activate factors VIIa and Xa. TNF (tumour
necrosis factor), IL-1 (interleukin-1) induce TF
expression on monocytes and on endothelial cells.
15
Possible roles of TF activity in cancer
  • initiation of a hypercoagulable state and
    thrombosis
  • primary tumor growth angiogenesis
  • secondary tumor spread - metastasis

16
ASCO 2010 JCO 2010,28(suppl 15)4126
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
RISK FACTORS FOR VTE IN CANCER PATIENTS
  • Patient related
  • Age
  • Comorbidity
  • Prior history of VTE
  • High platelet count
  • Cancer related
  • Primary (GI, brain,)
  • Initial 3-6 mo of diagnosis
  • Current metastatic disease
  • Treatment related
  • Major surgery (factor 3)
  • Hospitalisation
  • Chemo-or hormonal therapy (factor 6,5)
  • Anti-angiogenic Rp (thalidomide, lenalidomide,
    ?bevacizumab?)
  • ESAs
  • Central venous catheter

21
(No Transcript)
22
GWAS in VTE (www.genome.gov/gwastudies/)
  • aPTT decrease is risk of VTE GWAS Ile582Thr
    (in KNG1gene encoding HMWK)
  • KNG1 Knock out mice have an increase aPTT and
    arterial thrombosis
  • PS any SNP contributing to plasma variability,
    C and others role of inflammation in VTE
  • vWF increase
  • Other GWAS data
  • Prot C level interference
  • Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), MPV
    SNPs variability on ABO VTE, lipids,
    inflammatory markers, DM type 2 and CHD.
  • Overall these risk are 1- 1.5. Multiple SNPs with
    modest effect and rare variants with stronger
    impact add DNA methylation modif, histone
    modifications

23
Physiopathology
Pathways of activation of coagulation in cancer
TF (tissue factor) and CP (cancer procoagulant)
activate factors VIIa and Xa. TNF (tumour
necrosis factor), IL-1 (interleukin-1) induce TF
expression on monocytes and on endothelial cells.
24
Why is Pancreatic Cancer so Thrombogenic?
  • Location retroperitoneal, bedridden..
  • Thrombophilic stateTF, Thrombin, GWAS
  • Decrease in inhibitors AT, Prot CS,
    thrombomodulin..
  • Platelet aggregation increase..Mucin
  • Inflammation TGF, TNF,
  • KRAS- mdm2/p53

25
(No Transcript)
26
ASCO 2010, Riess H. et al. Prospective
randomised trial of simultaneous pancreatic
cancer treatment with enoxaparin and
chemotherapy Final results of the CONKO-004
trial, JCO 2010, 28( Suppl.15) 4033
27
Limitations of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)
  • Unpredictable pharmacology
  • Narrow therapeutic window
  • Difficult to keep within therapeutic range
  • Multiple drugdrug and fooddrug interactions
  • Dosing problems in the initial phase of therapy
  • Increased risk of major and minor bleeding

Warfarin thrombosis
Warfarin bleeding
Narrow therapeutic window
Thrombosis
Bleeding
Dose
Ansell et al., Chest 2004 Hirsh et al., Chest
2004
28
What is New?
  • Clinic
  • Prevention of VTE Semuloparin
  • Real life VTE
  • Research
  • Genome wide association studies

29
Oral Anticoagulants
  • Coumarinics
  • Pharmacogenetics CYP2C9
  • VKORC1
  • Antithrombins
  • Ximelagatran hepatotoxicity, off market EMEA
    2008
  • Dabigatran
  • Anti Xa
  • Rivaroxaban (Xarelto) marketed 2008/2009 VTE
    med. 2011
  • Dabigatran (Pradaxa)
  • Apixaban

30
Thank You
31
1/3
32
2/3
33
3/3
34
Back- up slides
35
ASCO Guideline Recommendations for Venous
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in
Patients with CancerG.H. Lyman et al. JCO
2007, 255490 - 5505
36
1. Should hospitalized patients with cancer
receive anticoagulation for VTE prophylaxis?
  • Recommendation hospitalized patients with cancer
    should be considered candidates for VTE
    prophylaxis in the absence of bleeding or other
    anticoagulant contraindications

JCO 2007
37
2. Should ambulatory patients with cancer
receive anticoagulation for VTE
prophylaxis during systemic chemotherapy?
  • Routine prophylaxis not recommended
  • Thalidomide or lenalidomide with chemotherpy or
    dexamethasone is a high risk and warrants
    prophylaxis
  • Randomised controlled studies needed
  • Research identifying better risk markers needed

JCO 2007
38
3. Should patients with cancer undergoing
surgery receive perioperative VTE prophylaxis?
  • All patients should be considered for prophylaxis
  • Laparotomy, laparoscopy or thoracotomy of gt30
    should receive prophylaxis unless contraindicated
  • Prophylaxis should be started preoperatively or
    as soon as possible postoperatively
  • Mechanical methods may be added
  • Prophylaxis to be continued for at least 7-10
    days, up to 4 weeks to be considered in major
    abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer with
    high-risk (residual malignant disease, obesity)
    and with a history of previous VTE

JCO 2007
39
4.What is the best treatment for patients with
cancer with established VTE to prevent recurrent
VTE?
  • LMWH for initial 5-10 days
  • LMWH for at least 6 months is preferred. VKA with
    a target INR of 2-3 is acceptable, when LMWH not
    available
  • After 6 months consider indefinite
    anticoagulation for selected patients with active
    cancer
  • Vena cava filter is only indicated for patients
    with contraindications to anticoagulant therapy
    and recurrence needing long term treatment
  • For patients with CNS malignancies
    anticoagulation is recommended as for other
    cancer patients. To be avoided in active
    intracranial bleeding, recent surgery, bleeding
    diathesis
  • For elderly patients as for other patients with
    close monitoring

JCO 2007
40
5. Should patients with cancer receive
anticoagulants in the absence of established VTE
to improve survival
  • Anticoagulants are not recommended to improve
    survival in patients with cancer without VTE
  • Patients with cancer should be encouraged to
    participate in clinical trials designed to
    evaluate anticoagulant therapy as an adjunct to
    standard anticancer therapy

41
(No Transcript)
42
G. Lyman, Cancer 2011, 117 1334
43
Acquired APC Resistance (1/2)
  • ASCO 2006 ? 8563 adriamycin and epirubicin
    downregulate endothelial Protein C receptor and
    impair the APC (activated protein C) pathway. The
    conversion of Protein C to APC is hampered.
  • After the treatment with these anthracyclins 25
    of patients had a low APC.
  • Conclusion This might be one of the
    contributing factors of chemotherapy induced
    thrombophilia.

44
Acquired APC Resistance (2/2)
  • -62 patients with MM (Blood Coag.
    Fibrinolys.2002,13 187)
  • 23 APC resistance at baseline 50 developed
    VTE. Increase of VTE with thalidomide, Dexa
    ADR
  • -1178 patients (Br. J. Haem. 2006, 134 399)
  • 109 patients APC resistance, 36 V Leiden
  • 30/31 acquired APC resistance normalised after Rp

45
G. Lyman, Cancer 2011, 117 1334
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com