Title: Thunderstorm environment
1Thunderstorm environment
2Sample supercell environment hodographs
3Streamwise vorticity and helicity(Davies Jones,
Lilly)
- Streamwise vorticity component of 3D vorticity
along the storm-relative horizontal flow
- ws (v-c). w/v-c
- Helicity vertical integral of (v-c). w, usually
over the lowest 3 km
- Longevity of supercells may be due to large
helicity of environment (Lilly)
4m/s2
F2-F5 tornado environments Johns (1993)
J/kg
5Thompson Edwards, 2000 An Overview of
Environmental Conditions and Forecast
Implications of the 3 May 1999 Tornado Outbreak.
Wea. Forecasting, 15, 682699
The 3 May 1999 outbreak included two prolific
supercells that produced several violent
tornadoes, with ambient parameters of stability
and shear comparable to those of past tornado
outbreaks in the Great Plains. However, not all
aspects leading to the evening of 3 May
unambiguously favored a major tornado outbreak.
The problems included subtle processes
contributing to convective initiation, the roles
of preexisting boundaries, and storm-relative
flow. This work reveals several specific aspects
where conceptual models are deficient.
http//www.spc.noaa.gov/publications/thompson/3may
99/waf.htm
6(No Transcript)
712 Z 3 May 99
800 Z 4 May 99
9Lines 300 mb divergence (convergence dashed)
Colors conditional symmetric instability (Pe
CAPE CIN 20 Z 3 May
10(No Transcript)
11Meso-analysis 20 Z 3 May
1212 UTC 3 May 1999
00 UTC 4 May 1999
Blue qw Potential instability??
1300 UTC 4 May 1999
00 UTC 4 May 1999
14Purcell (Norman)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19Storm cell A formed along this roll, in between
the 2 drylines
20x
21Storm A right mover
photographer
22dryline
23(No Transcript)
24Errors in prediction 24 h ETA for 00Z 4 May,
compared to observed winds (barbs) _at_ 500 mb
Trof location seems right but wind speeds undere
stimated (the X marks are local speed maxima)
25Errors in prediction 24 h ETA for 00Z 4 May,
and obs (barbs) _at_ 300 mb There seems to be a s
harper trof over the TX Panhandle
wind speeds are underestimated
2624 hr forecast
27(Purcell is 20 km south of OUN. The 00 Z OUN
balloon failed at 9 km)
Observed - more shear in all layers - double the
helicity
28m/s2
F2-F5 tornado environments Johns (1993)
Environs of tornadoes in this study
J/kg
29Conclusions (Thompson and Edwards 2000)
- Severe storms subtly depend on ambient shear and
CAPE, both of which are difficult to predict
- Shear models may miss mesoscale aspects of jet
and mesoscale low-level flow
- CAPE is very sensitive to surface conditions and
uplift along shallow convergence lines
- The outbreak, or lack thereof, depends on the
presence and strength of shallow boundaries,
which are generally not predicted
30Triggering deep convection
- (Wilson Scheiber 86, Koch and Ray 1997,
Kingsmill 1995) CI along radar fine-lines.
- land surface variations
- helical rolls in the sheared, convective BL
(HCR)
- density-current-like flows
- outflow boundary of a convectively-generated cold
pool.
- sea breezes
- bores/solitary waves
- topography (anabatic convergence)
31Why convection first develops over mountains
Anabatic flow Less diurnal heating required
G,C CCL E,A convection temperature
Denver sounding, 12 Z before severe storm
32Synoptic aspects of severe weather breakouts
Severe storm area (sometimes MCCs)
33Synoptic conditions for severe wx developing over
Laramie Range or Front Range
34Miller type-I sounding (loaded gun of the souther
n Great Plains
strong CAP- lots of CAPE)
35Upper-trope flow
Low-level, capped moist air
Elevated mixed layer
Miller type-I sounding trajectories
36Miller type-II sounding A more moist tropical
sounding
little CIN little-moderate CAPE
37Miller type-III sounding cold-air aloft low tro
popause little CIN little CAPE strongly forc
ed synoptically thunderstorms along strong conve
rgence line, may be severe
38Miller type-IV sounding desert storm deep, dry,
well-mixed ABL high-base TS little CAPE may
produce strong microbursts