Title: Purposes of Prison
1Purposes of Prison
- Mission statement of Federal Bureau of Prison
- to protect society by confining offenders in the
controlled environments of prisons and
community-based facilities that are safe, humane,
cost-efficient, and appropriately secure, and
that provide work and other self-improvement
opportunities to assist offenders in becoming
law-abiding citizens. - Implies rehabilitation
2Goals of Incarceration
- Retribution taking out societys vengeance
against a defendant - Rehabilitation help defendant mend his/her
criminal ways and encourage to adopt a lawful
lifestyle
- Deterrence threat of prison is in place to deter
people from committing crimes - Punishment lock up bad people to punish and get
off our streets - Politics tough on crime campaigning gets votes
3History of Prison Systems in the United States
- Can be traced to 2 systems in the 19th century
- New Yorks Auburn Prison (1817)
- Eastern State Penitentiary _at_ Cherry Hill (1829)
- Judge Morris Lasker
- How should society deal w/ people who violate its
rules and customs? - Punishment and sequestration of the offender in
the hope of deterring him and others from
committing futher offenses, or - Redeeming the prodigal son so that, w/ a new set
of values, he will internalize conformity w/
societys rules.
4History of Executions in the U.S.
- Prior to 19th Century, hanging was the most
common method. - Inexpensive and easily carried out
- Painful, often taking 20 minutes for death to
occur, and often resulted in decapitation - Long-drop introduced in late 19th century.
- Hanging later fell out of favor in most
jurisdictions. - Illegal Lynching-hanging that took place w/out
authority permission - Delaware, New Hampshire, and Washington still
offer hanging as a method of execution.
5History of Executions in the U.S.
- Electrocution
- New York 1888
- William Kemmler
- 1st man executed via electrocution (1890)
- Firing Squad
- Utah 1854
- Nevada 1911
- Lethal Gas
- Nevada 1921
- Seen as an improved method of execution because
did not disfigure or mutilate the body.
6Abolishment of Execution
- After WWII, many factors contributed to a
movement against the death penalty. - Atrocities witnessed during the war
- Civil Rights movement
- ACLU and NAACP attempts to appeal death penalty
cases - Abolition of death penalty in a number of Western
countries - Weakening in public support for the death penalty.
7Abolishment of Execution
- Prior to 1920
- Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Dakota abolish
death penalty. - 1950s and 1960s
- 10 states abolish death penalty
- Alaska, Hawaii, Delaware, Oregon, Iowa, Michigan,
West Virginia, Vermont, New York, and New Mexico - By 1968, executions have ceased.
8Cruel and Unusual Punishment
- 1969 Boykin v. Alabama
- 1970 Maxwell v. Bishop
- 1971 People v. Anderson
- 1972 Furman v. Georgia
- Reinstatement
- After Furman v. Georgia
- 1976 35 states enacted new death penalty
statutes - July 2, 1976, Gregg v. Georgia
- Not Cruel and Unusual
9Some Federal Capital Crimes
- Homicide related crimes
- 1st degree murder
- Genocide
- Retaliatory murder of a member of the immediate
family of law enforcement - Murder
- Of a Federal judge or law enforcement official
- During a kidnapping or hostage-taking
- Of a court officer or juror
- Related to rape or child molestation
- Non-homicide crimes
- Espionage
- Treason
- Drug trafficking in large quantities
10Capital Punishment 2001 Stats
- 15 states and the Federal Government executed 66
prisoners during 2001. - Under sentence an average of 11yrs and 5 months.
- 63 men and 3 women
- 48 whites, 17 blacks, and 1 American Indian
- Youngest death row inmate was 19 and oldest was
86. - All lethal injection
- 3,581 prisoners were on death row
- California (603), Texas (453), Flordia (372), and
Pennsylvania (241). - 19 prisoners were on Federal death row
11Capital Punishment 2002 Stats
- 71 persons executed in 13 states
- 53 white and 18 black
- 69 men and 2 women
- Lethal injection accounted for 70 of the
executions and 1 was carried out by
electrocution. - 3,557 prisoners on death row
- All had committed murder.
12Capital Punishment 2003 Stats
- 65 inmates were executed in 11 states and the
Federal system - 41 were white, 20 black, 3 Hispanic, and 1
American Indian - All 65 were men
- 47 women were on death row, but none executed
- Â Lethal injection accounted for 64 of the
executions - 1 execution was carried out by electrocution.
- James Neil Tucker chose electrocution in South
Carolina and was executed on May 28, 2004.
13More Execution Info
- Last state execution
- November 4, 2004
- Robert Morrow, white male, age 47
- Crime
- On April 3, 1996, Morrow abducted and murdered a
21-year old white female. - Texas by Lethal Injection
- Robert Morrow
- Last federal execution
- March 18,2003
- Louis Jones, black male, decorated Gulf War
veteran - Crime
- Kidnap/Murder of young white female soldier, Pvt.
Tracie Joy McBride - Links
- Federal Death Row Prisoners 2004
- United States Executions 2004
14State Methods of Execution
- Lethal Injection
- Used my almost all states and also most
frequently used method - Electrocution
- Still offered by 9 states as an option
- Lethal Gas
- Still offered by Arizona, California, Missouri,
and Wyoming as an option - Hanging
- Still offered by Delaware, New Hampshire, and
Washington as an option - Firing Squad
- Still offered by Idaho, Oklahoma, and Utah as an
option
15Since 1977
- Three inmates have been executed by hanging.
- 2 in Washington and 1 in Delaware
- The last hanging was in 1996 in Delaware.
- Two inmates have been executed by firing squad.
- Both took place in Utah, and the last was in
1996. - Nine inmates have been executed by lethal gas
- The last taking place in North Carolina in 1994.
16(No Transcript)
17Why is it an Issue?
- Cost
- Executions as Entertainment
- Violence on Television
- Botched Executions
- We are Killing in Our Name
- Deterrence
- First Amendment Rights
18Both Sides Confused
- Supporters of death penalty oppose public
executions for fear of arousing sympathy, make
public forget the crimes commited - Opponents believe the quick TV death would convey
that execution is quick ,in reality long years of
mental anguish spent on death row
19Arguments Against
- Cost
- Both a financial and emotional cost involved
- Financial Executing an individual costs twice
what incarcerating an inmate would, even more if
made a media event - Emotional victims families not only now dragged
through court systems, but now must be made to
endure increased public exposure
20Executions as Entertainment
- Last U.S. public execution in 1920, people
crowded watched - An event which people came to watch for fun
- Another example Roman Gladiators
21Violence on Television
- Many studies have been conducted to show the
affects of violence on television - Huesmann (1982)
- Children create and store in their memories
problem-solving algorithms that are based in part
on observation of others behavior.
22Bobo Doll Study
- Bandura conducted study, 72 children participated
- Children placed in room with adult who both
physically and verbally abused an inflated Bobo
dolls - When placed in a room alone, after being
frustrated by not being allowed to play with
toys, children who observed adults showing
violence were much more likely to imitate their
actions - Both physical and verbal abuse on the dolls
23Teaching Violence
- Our culture tries to teach our youth that
violence is not an answer - Public executions would show that we approve of
meeting violence with violence - Numerous experimental studies, many static
observational studies, and a few longitudinal
studies all indicate that exposure to dramatic
violence on TV is related to violent behavior - Exposure to violence in mass media could cause
both short and long term increases in a childs
aggressive and violent behavior (Berkowitz, Eron)
24Botched Executions
- Some believe that executions should not be
televised because something may go wrong. - April 22, 1983. Alabama. John Evans. After the
first jolt of electricity, sparks and flames
erupted from the electrode attached to his leg.
The electrode then burst from the strap holding
it in place and caught on fire. Smoke and sparks
came out from under the hood. Two physicians
entered the chamber and found a heartbeat. The
electrode was reattached to his leg. More smoke
and burning flesh. Again doctors found a
heartbeat. Ignoring the pleas of Evan's lawyer,
Russ Canan (202-292-7676), a third jolt was
applied. The execution took 14 minutes and left
Evan's body charred and smoldering.
25Botched Executions
- Sept. 2, 1983. Mississippi. Jimmy Lee Gray.
Officials had to clear the room eight minutes
after the gas was released when Gray's desperate
gasps for air repulsed witnesses. His attorney,
Dennis Balske of Montgomery, Alabama, criticized
state officials for clearing the room when the
inmate was still alive. Says David Bruck, "Jimmy
Lee Gray died banging his head against a steel
pole in the gas chamber while reporters counted
his moans (eleven, according to the Associated
Press)"
26Botched Executions
- December 12, 1984. Georgia. Alpha Otis Stephens.
After the first jolt of electricity failed to
kill him , Stephens struggled for eight minutes
before a second charge finished the job. The
first jolt took two minutes, and there was a six
minute pause so his body could cool before
physicians could examine him (and declare that
another jolt was needed.) During that six-minute
interval, Stephens took 23 breaths. - March 13, 1985. Texas. Stephen Peter Morin. Had
to probe both arms and legs with needles for 45
minutes before they found the vein.
27Not What You Expect
- Many family members who watch executions leave
feeling let down. - Executions are now clean, sterile, quick
- As quoted from a grandmother who watched Timothy
McVeigh die - It was so quick and so sterile and so serene, it
left me feeling angry - Many dont find the closure which they expect
28Well-Publicized Executions
- Most studies have found no effect in decline of
homicides after well publicized executions, while
some discover homicides increase after the
execution. - Known as brutalization effect.
- Effect of desensitizing people to the immorality
of killing, increasing likelihood that some
individuals will make decision to kill.
29Arguments For..
- Capital punishment is by nature public.
- It is killing by the state. Executions are done
in our name. - Public executions allow society to take
responsibility and acknowledge this. - Capital punishment is now an easily ignored act
and just a matter of administration. - Lets us off the hook.
30Out of sight, out of mind?
- If the death penalty is legal then why hide it?
Why be ashamed? - It is the legal and just way society responds to
murder. - Albert Camus author of Reflections on the
Guillotine - One must kill publicly or confess that one does
not feel authorized to kill.
31How is it different?
- It is no worse than what has already been aired
- Film of JFK assassination
- Tape of Jack Kevorkian injection Thomas Youk
airing on 60 minutes in 1998 - Live murder of Lee Harvey Oswald by Jack Ruby on
live TV Nov. 24th, 1963
32Deterrence
- The most effective way to promote these are to
make the execution public. - Maximize the level of deterrence
- Deterrence is only as good as the degree to which
it is publicized.
33Why the other side advocates publicity
- Opponents of the death penalty support public
executions and believe that if it were made
public it would not survive. - It would force the system to justify each
execution if done publicly. - Must weigh out and evaluate every aspect
- Done both by the public and administration
34- It would raise questions regarding the merit and
terms of the death penalty - Why is a black man who kills a white man executed
more often? - Before America decided to abolish it, the death
penalty would become more humane. - Authorities could not afford a botched execution.
35First Amendment Issues
- It is the publics right to know governmental
proceedings, especially executions. - Capital punishment is the most severe form of
punishment in our laws. - Americans can make up their mind on the capital
punishment if given real knowledge and evidence.
(Understand true workings of capital punishment) - This freedom of information keeps democracies
healthy. - This is why the First Amendment is so important.
- Media discrimination pen/paper vs. camera
36U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (2002)
- The court struck down a Californian
administrative rule which forbids the public
viewing of the initial process of an execution.
(California First Amendment Coalition v.
Woodford) - The court ruled that the First Amendment right
which allows access to governmental proceedings
outweighs the states concern for the security of
the execution staff.
37Two Rationales
- First Rational
- Eighth Amendment (Cruel Unusual Punishment)
interpretation - The constitutionality for the death penalty
depends on whether or not it is in accordance
with - the evolving standards of decency which mark
the progress of a maturing society - Therefore, citizens must evaluate whether or not
lethal injection (for example) is a standard of
decency.
38- In order to do this, the court stated that
citizens must have full access to the process and
method of the death penalty. - Allows citizens to make a meaningful assessment
which in turn the courts can rely on to interpret
the Eighth Amendment. - Second Rationale
- Public viewing promotes a communal expression of
moral outrage.
39Our Position
- We believe that executions should be televised
based on the fact that if we, as America,
continue to use the death penalty we should not
feel ashamed and hide the act from the public eye.
40Resources
- www.ojp.usjoj.gov
- www.fcc.state.fl.us./fcc/reports/methods/emushist.
html - www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
- http//usgovinfo.about.com
- www.nolo.com/lawcenter.com
- www.penalrehab.org
- http//people.howstuffworks.com/lethal-injection5.
htm - Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin - Capital
Punishment 2001, 2002, and 2003