Chapter 7: Education (and positive externalities from Chapter 5) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 7: Education (and positive externalities from Chapter 5)

Description:

chapter 7: education (and positive externalities from chapter 5) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * arguments against vouchers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: facultyW4
Learn more at: http://faculty.wiu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 7: Education (and positive externalities from Chapter 5)


1
Chapter 7 Education (and positive externalities
from Chapter 5)
2
Positive externalities
  • Positive externality
  • Ex fence between your and neighbors yard
  • Ex research and development (RD)
  • Ex. Flu shots, education
  • The market failure with positive externalities
    occurs
  • because people consider only their private
    benefits
  • (MPB) and not the full social benefits (MSB) of
    their
  • decisions.

3
Consider a Research and Development example
  • Firms in investing in RD consider private
    benefits and costs.
  • Their costs of production (MC) will be upward
    sloping as usual.
  • _________________________________________________
    (assuming there are significant returns to
    initial dollars placed into RD and that benefits
    are eventually diminishing with additional
    dollars)
  • In an effort to maximize profits, firms will
    allocate resources such that ______________
    resulting in an equilibrium quantity of research,
    Re
  • Graph on next slide

4
Positive Externalities--rosen
MC
MPB
Re
Researchper year
5
External benefits of RD
  • However, there are marginal external benefits
    (MEB) to RD. Examples include
  • Creation of new production technology that allows
    all firms to produce more efficiently (ex
    mechanization or computerization).
  • One medical breakthrough (equipment, drugs, new
    methods) often leads to a series of new
    developments or new branches of science.
  • _________________________________________________
    with increasing amounts of RDdiminishing
    returns and thus will be downward sloping.
  • Show the firms situation graphically (MC), MPB
    and MEB.

6
Positive Externalities--rosen
MC
MPB
MEB
Re
Researchper year
7
Marginal Social Benefit (MSB)
  • The true social benefit of allocating dollars to
    RD is given by marginal social benefit (MSB)
    curve.
  • Add together as done previously for negative
    externalities.
  • The socially efficient allocation of resources
    occurs where______________________________.

8
Positive Externalities--rosen
MC
MSB MPB MEB
MPB
MEB
R
R1
Researchper year
9
Market failure and solution
  • The free market results in ______________________
    __________________________________________________
    _________________________
  • Prices or valuations of RD are__________________
    __________________________________________________
    _________________________________________________
  • one solution is to subsidize activities that
    have positive externalities called
    _____________________________
  • The subsidy should be equal in dollar value to
    the marginal external benefit (MEB) at the
    efficient level (R). (Exactly as we did for
    taxes!)
  • Commonly done for flu immunizationsshots are
    free or subsidized by government to encourage
    greater participation.
  • Empirical evidence suggests that the private
    (firms) rate of return on RD is roughly
    __________. The social rate of return is
    approximately __________ Clearly, there are
    significant external benefits.

10
Public education and positive externalities
  • A stable and democratic society is impossible
    without a minimum degree of literacy and
    knowledge on the part of most citizens and
    without widespread acceptance of some common set
    of values. Education can contribute to both. In
    consequence, the gain from the education of a
    child accrues not only to the child but also to
    other members of the society.

11
Positive externalities in Public education
  • _________________________________ educated
    persons are more actively involved in their
    communities (including volunteerism) and have
    higher voter participation rates and may help
    improve the quality of the democratic process.
  • _______________________________ higher literacy
    is negatively related to crime rates (or at least
    violent crimes). More educated less crime.
  • ________________________________ an educated work
    force is a more productive workforce education
    is thought to be necessary for the creation of
    new technologies that may increase economic
    growth.
  • The presence of spillover benefits suggests that
    education should be subsidized in accordance with
    its external benefits. However, the US has free
    and compulsory K-12 education which cannot be
    justified on efficiency grounds alone!

12
Should there be public education? At what level?
Typical arguments
  • 1. Strongest rationale for public education vs.
    private education revolves around
    __________________________________________________
    __________________________________________________
    _
  • The suggestion is that if all education were
    privatized that schools would focus on the
    productivity skill set which increases wages for
    students and not necessarily place emphasis on
    the social conventions, citizenry, etc that often
    have small marginal benefits to individuals but
    have significant external benefits to society.
  • Evidence suggests these the citizenry benefits
    accrue early in education and may provide
    rationale for public education at the primary
    (elementary) level but less so at the secondary
    level or higher education

13
Arguments continued
  • 2. ___________________________________________
    assuming that education is a normal good (as
    income increases, demand increases) families with
    higher incomes will provide more education than
    families with lower income.
  • ____________________________refers to situations
    in which low-income persons have a chance to
    raise their incomes (be upwardly mobile in terms
    of income).
  • This is a widely held belief in democratic
    societiesthat all persons should have access to
    opportunities for income mobility.
  • lack of public education reduces income mobility
    resulting in a larger gap between the rich and
    the poor. Public education should theoretically
    level the playing field among its citizens by
    providing equal access to all families.

14
Arguments for public education continued
  • 3. Another argument in favor of public education
    focuses on financial ability to pay for education
    and __________________________________________
  • In the absence of public education, families
    would have to self-finance all education
    resulting in large inequities between the rich
    and the poor
  • if a family had a talented child and they wanted
    to make sure their child had access to the best
    education they would need to borrow money to
    finance her education. Credit markets are
    unlikely to lend such funds (asymmetric
    informationbanks cannot tell if a given child is
    a good investment or not)
  • .

15
Arguments for public education
  • 4. _______________________________________
  • Even if such credit existed, would a family
    necessarily choose to pay for education for a
    child if it meant sacrificing consumption for the
    rest of the family. Optimal provision of private
    education is not likely.
  • As we will discuss later, a similar argument is
    used to against public education suggesting that
    public education crowds out private education
    and families will opt to send their kids to the
    free public school instead of investing in a
    better-quality, private school.

16
Arguments against public education
  • 1. Government provision of K-12 education is
    inefficientcosts are too high given educational
    attainments (outcomes)
  • the single largest expenditure item for state and
    local governments is education.
  • They spend on average __________of their budgets
    to provide this government service.
  • The US spends more than any other nation per
    pupil around ______________ for K-12 education.
  • The US spends more than ______________per pupil
    when including higher educationmore than any
    other nation in the world.

17
Real Annual Expenditure Per Pupil in Public
Elementary and Secondary Schools (K-12)
Source US Bureau of the Census 2009, p. 151
18
US spending vs. international spending
Real Annual Expenditures on Private and Public
Schools, All Levels of Education (2007)
SOURCE Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2007a.
19
Arguments against Public Education-continued
  • 2. Although US spending levels on education are
    the highest in the world, US educational outcomes
    (K-12) are only average internationally and in
    some cases are much lower than countries which
    far less wealth.
  • Scientific Literacy The United States
    ________________ OECD countries in scientific
    literacy, and the U.S. score of 489 fell below
    the OECD average of 500 (OECD 2007).
  • _________________________ of U.S.
    fifteen-year-olds do not reach the baseline level
    of science achievement. This is the level at
    which students begin to demonstrate the science
    competencies that will enable them to use science
    and technology in life situations (OECD 2007)

20
US education statistics continued
  • Mathematics Literacy The United States ranks
    _________________of OECD countries in mathematics
    literacy, and the average score of 474 fell well
    below the OECD average of 498. Scores have not
    measurably changed since 2003, when the United
    States ranked 24th of 29 countries (OECD 2007b).
  • ____________________________of American
    fifteen-year-olds performed below the baseline
    level of mathematics proficiency at which
    students begin to demonstrate the kind of skills
    that enable them to use mathematics actively in
    daily life (OECD 2007b)
  • Reading Literacy The United States ranked of
    __________________ OECD countries in reading
    literacy, and with a score of 495, came in near
    the OECD average of 500

21
Arguments against public education
  • 3. _______________________________________________
    ___________________________________
  • _________________________refers to situations in
    which public provision of a good substitutes for
    private provision of a good (reducing demand for
    privately provided goods).
  • Such crowding out may result in lower educational
    outcomes.

22
How does crowing out occur?
A
x
Quantity of all other goods
ii
i
B
Quantity of Education
e0
ep
23
Graph summary
  • In the absence of public education each person
    maximizes utility by selecting the highest
    indifference curve attainable resulting in Eo
    education purchased.
  • If public education is provided at a fixed level,
    Ep, then the consumer re-evaluates his utility
    maximization and can now reach a higher
    indifference curve by going to public school.
  • Private education is crowded out by the
    existence of public education.
  • This doesnt have to be the case, depending on
    preferences, individuals may not reduce private
    education and no crowding out may occur.

24
No Crowding Out occurs if there is a strong
preference for larger quantities of education
A
x
Quantity of all other goods
ii
i
B
Quantity of Education
e0
ep
25
ARGUMENTS AGAINST PUBLIC EDUCATION CONTINUED
  • 4. _______________________________________________
    ___________________________________________
  • This results in tremendous inequity between
    rich and poor geographic areas.
  • Many believe states should find alternative
    mechanisms, such as income taxes (as done in
    Iowa), to more fairly distribute funds to
    schools.
  • PBS video

26
What factors are used to measure educational
outcomes?
  • Difficulty is that test scores alone do not tell
    you much. Students in different school districts
    may have other family/socioeconomic
    characteristics that impact learning.
  • Evidence suggests there is no direct relationship
    between spending and outcomes.

27
what are the leading determinants in educational
success of students
  • Clearly, money is not the answer. Spending per
    pupil has more than doubled in the last 25 years
    and educational outcomes are no better (and in
    many cases worse) on average.
  • Information here can be biased. Sometimes
    wealthier school districts have smaller classes
    and better educational outcomes. However, this
    could be because of different socioeconomic
    factors and not necessarily small class size.
  • Information may be biased in the other direction
    too. Sometimes we have small classes for students
    with learning disadvantages. Their test scores
    may be lower suggesting small class size has a
    negative impact on learning.
  • Literature suggests that to reduce the
    teacher-student ratio by 10 (go from 30 students
    to 1 teacher to 27 students to 1 teacher) costs
    an additional 700 per student.
  • Costs are very high and sometimes reduces the
    experience level of teachers (hire on more new
    teachers)
  • Within the literature, the single most important
    factor for a childs educational success is
    _________________________________________

28
School vouchers
  • In essence, a school voucher is money given to
    parents of a child attending a K-12 school that
    may be applied to private education instead of
    going to the school to which the child is
    assigned.
  • The notion of school vouchers were first
    introduced (in a modern way) in the 1950s by
    Milton Friedman.
  • Friedman, a Nobel Prize Economists (1976) created
    a book series entitled Free to Choose in 1980.
    The series examined how free markets encourage
    prosperity and included an entire section on
    school vouchers. PBS created a series based on
    Free to Choose with Friedman narrating. This
    started the modern trend toward usage of school
    vouchers.
  • www.ideachannel.tv (you can view the original
    broadcast as volume 6 What is wrong with our
    schools?)

29
Friedman and school vouchers
  • According to Friedman, school vouchers would
    increase competition among school and improve
    cost efficiency.
  • Schools would have incentives to
  • Schools would have incentives to
  • Parents would be free to choose where there
    children went to school increasing incentives for
    parents to become more involved in the
    educational process.
  • Friedman suggests in 1980 that the centralized
    school system is run by bureaucrats that may have
    different goals than those of parents and that
    parents do not have power in the system to make
    significant changes.

30
Graph of how vouchers work
31
Arguments from Proponents of school vouchers
  • _____________________________ vouchers allow
    parents the freedom of choice so they may more
    closely match their educational choices with
    their tastes.
  • ____________________________________________
    suggests that people already individually
    determine this through their location decision.
    Families locate in certain areas that have the
    proper mix of property taxes (for education) and
    educational quality.
  • However, property taxes are used to supply an
    array of government services and people make
    their location decision based on many attributes,
    not just schooling therefore this self-sorting
    mechanism may not work perfectly
  • _______________________________ results in
    greater cost efficiency and better educational
    outcomes (quality).
  • This includes greater educational outcomes of
    public schools which must now improve to keep
    their funding.
  • Remember, school funding per pupil has doubled
    since 1980 but test scores have not improved.
  • Further, administrative staff in public schools
    has grown by 65 since 1970 and the number of
    students has only grown by 2 (US Dept of
    Education 2006).

32
Proponents of vouchers continued
  • 3. Vouchers allow students in failing schools an
    escape hatcha way to improve their educational
    quality and income mobility
  • 4. Vouchers provide parents a stronger voice in
    their childrens education (curriculum,
    methodology, etc). Since they may easily move
    their child away from one school to another
    better option, schools are more likely to be open
    to parental input.

33
Argumentsopponents of school vouchers
  • ___________________________________________the
    positive externalities associated with civic
    engagement, etc may be minimized by schools to
    focus on specialty skill sets (tastes) and
    undercuts the benefit of common programming.
  • With private education there is no educational
    standard or way of enforcing standards across
    schools
  • Opponents cite examples of schools focusing on
    the arts and not having comprehensive
    programming such as basic reading and math
    skills.
  • Proponents of vouchers say this could easily be
    handled by setting minimum standards and giving
    standardized tests.
  • ______________________________________________as
    the best students leave failing schools for
    better opportunities the worst students remain
    reducing educational quality.
  • cream skimming
  • Private schools have many school voucher
    applicants but will only take the good students
    and not all students

34
Arguments against vouchers continued
  • 3. __________________________________________ if
    motivated parents differ from disinterested
    parents along income, race, or ethnic lines you
    will observe a sorting of students along these
    lines.
  • proponents of vouchers say the educational
    freedom will result in less segregation as lower
    income students can move to better school
    districts.
  • 4. _______________________________________________
    ______________________________________ there are
    cost efficiencies in current school districts and
    much like a monopoly, if you increase competition
    by providing lots of smaller schools the
    economies of scale are foregone resulting in
    higher costs.
  • how can a rural area support enough schools for
    adequate competition when there is not sufficient
    demand (children).

35
Opponents of vouchers continued
  • 5. _______________________________Vouchers are
    based on per pupil spending but this
    disadvantages families with children requiring
    special education
  • students with developmental and learning
    disabilities require additional monitoring,
    diagnostic testing, and accommodations. The per
    pupil spending level is not enough to provide
    adequately for these children.
  • 6. ___________________________________ many
    private schools have a religious affiliation.
    Many people believe it is unfair and/or
    unconstitutional to spend government dollars on
    religious education.

36
School vouchers in practice today
  • School vouchers have been used in other countries
    for many years (including Chile, Hong Kong,
    Sweden, Norway, Ireland).
  • In most cases, the voucher is
  • In some states, it is the average spending
    level per child in the state.
  • The school voucher can be used at any qualifying
    private school to fully or partially cover
    tuition expense.
  • Much controversy over what schools should
    qualify.
  • Heated debate over religious private education
    such as Catholic private schools and separation
    of church and state.

37
US Vouchers
  • In the US, the first school voucher system was
    done in Milwaukee, Wisconsin in 1990.
  • This was a small scale voucher system in which
    families earning income no more than 175 of the
    poverty line could receive a voucher worth 3200
    that could be used at any non-religious private
    school.
  • As of 2007, the program has expanded and 15,000
    students in Milwaukee are using vouchers.
  • Other areas with vouchers include
  • Washington D.C. (called the DC Opportunity
    Scholarship Program)
  • Cleveland, Ohio (after much legal battling over
    constitutional issues)
  • Florida (Florida Opportunity Scholarship
    Program)allowed students in failing schools to
    attend other schools of their choicedeclared
    unconstitutional in 2005. Still facing legal
    issues and back on the political agenda currently

38
Evidence on effectiveness of vouchers
  • Evidence is mixed with regard to effectiveness of
    vouchers (measured in terms of educational
    success or higher scores on exams, dropout rates,
    etc).
  • Part of the problem is accounting for intangible,
    and often, immeasurable differences among
    students such as ambition, parental influence,
    etc.
  • Students that use vouchers are probably more
    motivated than those that do not.
  • Also, in some states or voucher areas, private
    school select admits from an applicant pool most
    likely taking the best students.

39
Milwaukee voucher program data
  • Much of the empirical evidence is based on the
    Milwaukee pilot program for a few reasons
  • participating private schools had to accept any
    voucher
  • If the private school was oversubscribed
    meaning that there were more applicants than
    open spots then they had to determine admission
    via random lottery
  • This means that empirically you could now compare
    those that wanted to use vouchers in two
    different environments private school vs. public
    school without bias
  • Control group
  • Treatment group

40
Early Findings by rouse (1998) and others
  • Rouse There was an increase in educational
    success within the treatment group
  • An increase in math scores by ____________________
    __that students were in private school relative
    to the control group
  • Other measures in reading, etc were not
    statistically different
  • Findings in Colombia Voucher Program which has
    over 125,000 students (Angrist et al 2002)
  • Students that won vouchers via lottery were
    _____________________________________.
  • Students scored higher on standardized tests
  • The cost to government was ___________________and
    wages for the winners increased between
    ____________________

41
Other types of programs and policies that provide
public school incentives
  • _______________________________ schools must
    measure performance of students to ensure they
    are meeting or exceeding educational standards
  • (Handshek and Raymond 2004) evidence
  • As of 2002, 25 states in US directly linked
    student promotion to the next grade of graduation
    to performance on state and local assessment
    tests
  • 18 states rewarded teachers and/or administrators
    for successful student performance on exams
  • 20 states penalized teachers and administrators
    for subpar student performance
  • Found a direct link between rewards/penalties and
    school performancesizeable improvements in test
    scores

42
No child left behind (NCLB)
  • This idea of school accountability was formalized
    into US law in 2001 with the No Child Left
    Behind Act of 2001 (President Bush)
  • Based on the idea of standards-based educational
    reform
  • Each state sets its own standard (assessment test
    and minimum compliance)
  • States that do not submit assessment plans and
    outcomes will have their federal funding
    rescinded
  • Federal funding for education NCLB increased
    initially from 17.4 billion in 2001 to 24.4
    billion in 2007 (40 increase) in part to pay for
    assessment, to pay for new and improved school
    programming, and to fund reward programs, etc.

43
Proponents of nclb
  • Suggest that NCLB
  • Schools must provide detailed reports to
    parenting on the teacher qualifications in the
    school where their child attends
  • Creates common standards among all school
    districts in a state
  • Forces schools identify at risk populations and
    target programs at those students
  • provides school choice for students in failing
    schools (schools receiving a grade of Fstudents
    can move to a new district)

44
Criticisms of no child left behind
  • Implication is that teachers narrowly focus
    education on the tested items enabling students
    to perform well on test and not a broad education
  • There is empirical evidence which suggests that
    this is the casestudents do well on the
    standardized test but when given an alternative
    test, scores are significantly reduced.
  • Jacob (2002) found that in both Chicago and
    Florida school systems many low performing
    students were reclassified as special education
    students or disabled so scores would not be
    counted in the school average.
  • Jacob and Levitt (2003) found evidence that
    teachers may cheat (providing answers) if they
    are rewarded financially for improved student
    performance.

45
Criticisms of NCLB
  • 3. States may actual lower standards to ensure
    school districts meet standards to maintain their
    federal funds
  • 4. Talented students may receive less funding and
    funding is shifted to at risk populations
  • 5. Less funding for arts and elective courses as
    more resources are focused on the basics of math,
    science, and reading.
  • 6. NCLB requires military recruiter access to
    schools facilitating military enrollment

46
Charter schools and magnet schoolsschool choice
alternative
  • ______________________ are small, independent
    schools that are not subject to many of the
    regulations imposed on traditional public
    schools.
  • Operated by private enterprises with own internal
    regulations
  • They do not have to follow same restrictive
    hiring procedures for teachers
  • More flexibility in curriculum, hiring and firing
    of administrative staff.
  • Charter schools often have a particular
    focuseither in terms of the learning objectives
    or the student demographic
  • Ex Beardstown, IL Charter School for English as
    a Second Language Students

47
Magnet schools
  • _______________________ special public schools
    set up to attract talented students or students
    interested in a particular subject or teaching
    style
  • School of the arts
  • Schools of Science and Technology
  • Magnet schools are still public schools and must
    abide by administrative procedures and policies.
  • Empirical evidence of educational improvement in
    magnet schools is mixed or inconclusive.
  • Most studies find no improvement or no
    statistically significant improvement
  • Where small gains in improvement exist is when
    there is a large degree of competition.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com