Title: Sellafield
1- Sellafield
- 25 years of quality
2The Car 1986
The Car 2011
3The PC 1986
The PC Now
4The Phone 1986
The Phone Now
5Who were the quality companies in 1986?
- IBM
- Rank Zerox
- Jaguar
- Most Japanese majors
- BMW/Mercedes
6Which qualities did they demonstrate in 1986?
- Value for money
- Reliability?
- Efficiency
- Elegance
- But that was not the norm - still heavy reliance
on inspection
7Who are the quality companies in 2011?
- Grundfos
- Ricoh
- Siemens Healthcare
- Bosch
- BMW
- GE
- Glaxo
8Which qualities do they demonstrate?
- Value for money
- Reliability
- Efficiency
- Elegance
- Plus
- Environmentally friendly
- Socially responsible
- Engaged with staff, stakeholders and customers
9Which standards applied in1986?
- BS 5750
- BS 5882
- Generally set our own standards
- All Primarily inspection focused
10Which standards apply in 2011?
- BS 9001
- GSR3
- WANO
- INPO
- Now comparison is against the best practice
11BNFL in 1986
- Very top down- little involvement of the
workforce - Inefficient (cost plus contracts, silo mentality)
- BUT world leader - others came to see SIXEP, Pond
5, Thorp - Quality circles started
12Quality Tools used from 1986
- TPM
- TQM
- Systematic Approach - Coverdale
- Six Sigma
- Kaizen
- Balanced Scorecard
- PDCA
- SPC
- Brainstorming
13Sellafield Sites in 2011
- Have had many quality improvement initiatives
- TQM
- Self Assessment (Excellence Model)
- Fast Forward
- Standards and Expectations
- Six Sigma
- Currently-
- Excellence ACE Man
- Project Peer Assist Events
- Standard Nuclear Performance Model -INPO
14Pillars of Excellence
15Quality Tools used elsewhere
- European Excellence/Baldridge model-holistic
approach to quality - Process management
- Employee engagement
- Culture Change
16Main changes in 25 years
- Internet,
- Terrorism,
- Compliance and regulation,
- HS
- Environmental awareness
- Medical science
- Facebook
- Reality TV shows!
- Summary-many improvements but.....
17Fukushima 2011
Chernobyl 1986
18- Chernobyl 1986 Fukushima 2011 can never relax
- Quality is not the norm and needs continuous
attention - Main threat - fluctuations in leadership and
direction
19Some Drivers of Change?
Stakeholders
Global Environment
CUSTOMERS
GOVERNMENT
PARTNERS
TECHNOLOGY
SOCIETY
ENVIRONMENT
OWNERS
IMPROVE!!
GLOBISATION
EMPLOYEES
Ambition
Market / Arena
NEW ENTRANTS
VISION
COMPETITORS
MARKET TRENDS
REGULATORS
STRATEGIC THEMES
19
20What has changed?
- Many of the pressures for change have been around
for a while...but - We are managing in times when change happens ever
more quickly - The degree of uncertainly is increasing who can
really predict the future (a Tsunami in Japan
leads to 600 job losses in Cumbria) - The pressure for change can often be mobilised
more quickly in 4 days the News of the World
went from clear market leader for over 40 years
to closure - It is now said that 80 of the value of an
organisation are the intangibles (e.g. Culture,
talent, governance and brand) as these equip
organisations for future success in this
environment. -
21Which Mentality...?
- If it isnt broke dont fix it.
- Or
- However good it is today if it isnt perfect for
tomorrow we can still try to improve it.
PDCA/Radar Thinking is an essential practice and
a habit
Or put another way it is no longer enough to
be a learning organisation the need is to look
forward, learn and act.
22The 8 Fundamental Concepts of Excellence
?
23The Business Excellence Model
?
24The Business Excellence Model incorporates all
company activities
EDD Talent Man. PDJA-Training Strategic
Competence Development 360 feedback Exit
interviews
Shop Floor Excellence Sales Excellence Process
maps IMS Six Sigma ISO 9001, 14001 etc
Employee Motivation Survey 360 feedback Focus
Groups
EDD Talent management PDJA BE training Mission,
vision, values BE-THINK-INNOVATE 360 degree
feedback
?
Controlling Working Capital Growth PBT Cost to
Serve
Strategy Map Balanced Scorecards Action
Plans Core competencies
Ext./Int. Customer Survey Sales Excellence
Survey Customer Compliant System Warranty rate
SRM Activity Based Costing SCM IT systems e.g.
SAP Controlling
Co2 reduction Waste /Safety ISO 14000
25 Analysis of Organisation AA vs. Recession
26The BE Model and RADAR
27The RADAR Concept
Plan and develop Approaches
Assess and Refine Approaches and Deployment
28 Radar/PDCA
An alternative view of Radar
29Excellent Organisations
30Previous Finalists include a....
31Excellent Organisations
- The annual EFQM Excellence Award identifies
leaders in Excellence - These come from many countries, sectors and
backgrounds - The size and type of organisations varies
considerably - Any common features?
32Some Characteristics
- Minimal fire-fighting / recurring problems
- A common understanding and vision
- Constant well managed change
- Engaged people and stakeholders
- An upward flow of ideas
- Efficient and effective use of data
- Innovation is normal
- Pride and the desire that drives further
improvement - A culture that gives a competitive advantage
- Excellent results (for all stakeholders)
33The EFQM Model an Alternative Picture
Vision, Mission, Values
Results
Strategy, Planning, Targets2a, 2b, 2c, 2d
Leadership1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e
Key results 9a, 9b
Value added targets
People3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e
Value stream, value creation
Customer results6a, 6b
Partners, Suppliers 4a
Value Adding Processes, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e
People results 7a, 7b
Society results 8a, 8b
Resources,4b, 4c, 4d, 4e
Systems/Processes, Improvements 5a
34Change Management Model
Pressure for Change
A Clear Shared Vision
Capacity for Change
Actionable First Steps
35 Thank you
- John Carson
- TQMI Ltd
- johnc_at_tqmi.co.uk