The Emerging Role of Standards in Utility Metering Practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

The Emerging Role of Standards in Utility Metering Practice

Description:

The Emerging Role of Standards in Utility Metering Practice Daniel E. Nordell, PE Sr. Consultant Northern States Power Company d.nordell_at_ieee.org – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: trilliantn
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Emerging Role of Standards in Utility Metering Practice


1
The Emerging Role of Standards in Utility
Metering Practice
  • Daniel E. Nordell, PE
  • Sr. Consultant
  • Northern States Power Company
  • d.nordell_at_ieee.org

2
Reasons for standards
  • Safety - Standards specify minimum behavior of
    systems.
  • Accuracy - Standards can specify system accuracy.
  • Reliability - Standards can specify system
    reliability.
  • Security - Standards can help to ensure
    information and system security.
  • Openness - Standards give users options.
    Standards also give vendors the ability to
    specialize rather than build the entire system.

3
Reasons not to do standards
  • Every clever engineer loves to invent. It is
    easier to invent than to discover what already
    exists.
  • Vendors may not want to be constrained to
    externally-imposed specifications. They limit
    creativity.
  • It is in the proprietary interest of the vendor
    to keep his customers captive.
  • It is difficult to document technology (create a
    standard) and to read and understand standards.

4
Standards specify external behavior, not
internal design
5
Systems built without standards look like this.
6
Weve had metering standards with us for a long
time
  • Standard meter base
  • Standard electrical ratings
  • Standards for meter accuracy

7
New challenges for Meter Standards
  • Opening marketplace requires more customer
    information
  • Electronic meters can provide lots of information
  • Creative engineers can deliver that information
    in proprietary ways
  • New standards needed for meter communication

8
Meter Standards include the following areas
  • Physical
  • Electrical
  • Performance
  • Communications
  • Data models
  • Application protocols

9
Who Makes Standards, Anyway?
International Standards ( ISO, IEC )
National Standards ( ANSI, NIST, IEEE )
Industry Standards - formalized practice
Industry Practice - informal practice
Proprietary Systems - vendor specific
10
Standards Groups
  • ANSI C.12
  • Traditional Electricity Metering standards group
    in North America
  • Owns the meter base standards
  • Developed Utility Industry End Device Data
    Tables (ANSI C12.19-1997 / IEEE 1377-1998) with
    IEEE SCC31 and Industry Canada
  • Developed handheld meter reader communication
    standards
  • Now working on modem and network communication
    interfaces

11
Standards Groups (continued)
  • IEEE SCC31
  • Roots in the AMR community
  • Represents Water, Gas, and Electric communities
  • Standards for system topology, telephone access,
    and security
  • Collaborated with ANSI C.12 on End Device Data
    Tables

12
Standards Groups (continued)
  • IEEE SCC36
  • EPRI-developed Utility Communication
    Architecture specifies standards for electric,
    water, and gas communication infrastructure.
  • Points to existing standards from the computer
    industry.
  • Adds end device behavior and information
    definitions.

13
Standards Groups (continued)
  • IEC TC13
  • Equipment for Electrical Energy Measurement and
    Load Control
  • One of the first Technical Committees of IEC
  • Original charter has been expanded from measuring
    equipment to include load control and electronic
    meters
  • Coordinates with TC57

14
Standards Groups (continued)
  • Object Management Group
  • OMG / CORBA is based on best industry practice
  • CORBA provides a consistent Application Program
    Interface which is not addressed by data
    communication standards
  • CORBA provides object interfaces

15
Why do communication standards?
  • Imagine Personal computing without standards..
  • Imagine hard disk drives without standards..
  • Imagine an Internet without standards.

Lower cost, more flexibility, more opportunity.
16
An analogy Disk Drive Interfaces
  • Originally required proprietary controllers
  • Standard interfaces developed, manual setup
  • Self-describing drives
  • Smart plug-and-play operating systems

17
Data Communications Standards
  • Required for communication of information from
    meters to other systems.
  • Required to support mixed meter vendor
    environment.
  • Issue Information security

18
Modern communication standards
  • Traditional SCADA protocols combine datalink,
    network, and application layer functionality into
    a single package. Typically cannot be routed.
  • Modern communication protocols divide the
    responsibility so that the payload can change
    physical media and can route through a network.

19
What standards are required to achieve
Interoperability
Application Protocols Data/Object Models
Application Presentation Session Transport Network
Data Link
Physical Electromechanical
Extended layer ISO standard layers
20
Security Issues (SCC31)
  • Authorization Violation
  • Eavesdropping
  • Information Leakage
  • Intercept/Alter
  • Masquerade (Spoofing)
  • Replay

21
Security Principles
  • Security by obscurity is no security.
  • Obscurity may protect for a while but will
    eventually be broken by clever intruders or
    revealed by an insider.
  • Good security systems incorporate well-known (and
    secure) principles of operation along with
    protected keys.
  • Avoid clever proprietary schemes. Most can be
    easily broken by cryptographers.
  • Two types of systems
  • Symmetrical (single) key - harder to protect
  • Public / Private (two) key - more complex

22
Security Key Concepts
Single Key One key both encrypts and decrypts.
Dual Key Either key encrypts. The other one
decrypts.
23
Security Architecture must provide
  • Authentication
  • Encryption
  • Access Control

24
Qualities of a good security system
  • Publicly Available
  • Keys Can Be Changed Faster Than Broken
  • Cracking Time gt Useful Life Of Message
  • Assure Message Is Unaltered (Integrity)
  • Verifies Originator (Authenticates)
  • Permits Broadcast/Multicast

25
Security for Electric Meters
  • Must meet security criteria.
  • Must fit on small computing platform.
  • Must fit in protocol suite.
  • Security is part of UCA protocol suite.
  • SCC31 Security Subcommittee is developing
    recommendations for meters and contributing to
    ANSI C.12 protocol work.

26
Several Candidate Security Algorithms considered
  • DES
  • Diffie-Hellman
  • RSA (PGP)
  • IDEA
  • CAST
  • Skipjack
  • Blowfish
  • SAFER
  • RC5
  • ODS
  • Rabin
  • ElGamal

No Single Of Algorithm Met All Criteria, So A
Suite Was Needed
27
SCC31 Recommendation Use a Three Algorithm Suite
for Flexible Encryption
  • RSA Public Key
  • Slow, used for session key exchange
  • DES / Triple DES Symmetric Key
  • Fast, used for session encryption
  • Diffie-Hellman
  • Slow, used only for changing RSA key

28
Conclusion
  • Standards are being developed not only for the
    measurement element but also for the meter
    register and for communications.
  • These standards will play an increasingly
    important role in the emerging open marketplace.
  • Security must be given serious consideration.

29
Security Contributions
  • UCA Security Specifications (SCC31)
  • Recommended Suite of Security Algorithms (Bill
    Rush / SCC31)
  • Security Transformations Application Service
    Element for MMS (STASE-MMS)
  • Based on ANSI T1.259-1997
  • Draft report of the IEC TC57 AHWG06 on Security
  • Integrating the best US and international
    security practices for use by IEC committees
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com