B-CLL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

B-CLL

Description:

B-CLL DIAGNOSIS PROGNOSIS CLINICAL MANAGEMENT MRD MONITORING THERAPY CLL Therapy General Considerations Treat only patients with symptomatic or progressive disease ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: medicinato
Category:
Tags: cll

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: B-CLL


1
B-CLL
  • DIAGNOSIS
  • PROGNOSIS
  • CLINICAL MANAGEMENT
  • MRD MONITORING
  • THERAPY

2
CLL TherapyGeneral Considerations
  • Treat only patients with symptomatic or
    progressive disease
  • Treatment based on biological factors not
    justified
  • Include patients in trials whenever possible
  • Never forget that the ultimate goal of therapy is
    to prolong survival
  • Treat the patient, not the disease

3
CLL TherapyIndici di attività
  • Sintomi B (febbre, sudorazione notturna, perdita
    di peso)
  • Insufficienza midollare (-Hb, -Plt, -Neu)
  • Splenomegalia progressiva
  • Adenomegalie progressive
  • LDT lt 6 o 12 mesi

4
CLL TherapyCriteri di Risposta (NCI WG, 1996
  • Remissione Completa
  • assenza di adenopatie, splenomegalia ed
    epatomegalia
  • assenza di sintomi sistemici
  • linfociti inferiori a 4000/µL
  • neutrofili superiori o uguali a 1500/µL
  • piastrine superiori a 100000/ µL
  • Hb uguale o superiore a 11g/dL
  • alla biopsia osteomidollare normale cellularità e
    infiltrato linfatico inferiore al 30
  • Remissione Parziale
  • riduzione delle adenopatie pari o superiore al
    50
  • riduzione della splenomegalia o dell'epatomegalia
    pari o superiore al 50
  • riduzione della linfocitosi pari o superiore al
    50
  • gtpiù uno o più dei seguenti
  • - neutrofili pari o superiori a 1500/µL, o
    miglioramento del 50 rispetto ai valori di
    base- piastrine superiori a 100000/µL o
    miglioramento del 50 rispetto ai valori di
    base- Hb superiore a 11 g/dL o miglioramento del
    50 rispetto ai valori di base- assenza di
    sintomi sistemici
  • Malattia Stabile
  • Non RP nè progressione

5
CLL CR rate and treatment goals over the years
? Cure
Fludarabine-combined regimens
MRD (-) ? Prolonged survival
CR
Fludarabine
Prolonged FFP
COP, CHOP
Higher response rate (vs. Chlorambucil)
Chlorambucil
Symptoms palliation
Year
E. Montserrat - Inside Blood 2005
6
CLL Treatment in a Nutshell
  • RANDOMIZED STUDIES
  • Fludarabine (Cladribine) gt Chlorambucil
  • Fluda Cyclophosphamide gt Fluda
  • Fluda Cyclo (oral) Fluda Cyclo (i.v)
  • SINGLE ARM STUDIES
  • Fluda Rituximab
  • FCR
  • FCM

7
Risultati CLB I linea
8
RISULTATI CLB I linea IGCI CLL-01 trial
9
Risultati CLB mantenimento
10
Risultati CLB II linea
11
HD-CLB versus CHOP mod.
  • Arruolati 228 pazienti in stadio avanzato
  • OR HD-CLB 89,5 CHOP 75 plt0,001
  • CR HD-CLB 59,5 CHOP 30,4
  • OS HD-CLB 68 m. CHOP 47 m. Plt0,005
  • Jaksic et al.
    Cancer,1997

12
CHOP versus COP
  • French Cooperative Group on CLL Long- term
    results of the CHOP regimen in stage C chronic
    lymphocitic leukaemia.
  • Br J Haematol, 1989
  • OS mediana 22 mesi COP
  • OS mediana 62 mesi CHOP
  • ( p 0,001 )

13
ANALOGHI PURINICI
  • Fludarabina (9-b-arabinosil-2-fluoroadenina)
  • 2CdA (2-cloro-2-deossiadenosina)
  • dCF (2-deossicoformicina)

14
MECCANISMO DI AZIONE
  • effetto inibitorio su enzimi implicati nella
    riparazione e sintesi del DNA
  • DNA primasi, ligasi e polimerasi
  • Reduttasi ribonucleotidica
  • danno diretto della membrana dei mitocondri
  • inibizione della sintesi di RNA

15
FAMP IN PAZIENTI PRETRATTATI

16
2-CDA IN PAZIENTI PRETRATTATI

17
FAMP FRONT-LINE
18
FAMP FRONT-LINE
OS by response
OS by treatment

PFS by response
Keating MJ et al. Blood 921998
19
2-CDA FRONT-LINE
p0.04
Robak T et al. Br J Haem 1082000
20
FAMP vs CHL
21
FAMP vs CHL
RFS plt0.001
PFS plt0.001

OS plt0.21
Rai et al. NEJM, 343 24, 2000
22
FAMP CY (non comparativi)
non pre-trattati
23
TTP FAMP vs FAMPCY

FAMPCY TTP mediano n.r.
FAMP TTP mediano 30 mesi
O Brien S et al. JCO 19 2001
24
FAMP ORALE
Pretrattati con alchilanti (recres)
25


26
MoAbs citotoxic mechanisms
Effector cells/ Complement
Apoptosis
Radionuclide
Toxin/Antibiotic
27

MoAbs for CLL
28
Alemtuzumab (anti-CD52) antibody
  • IgG1 humanised antibody
  • Low immunogenicity
  • CD52 antigen
  • Highly expressed on
  • all lymphocytes
  • monocytes and macrophages
  • spermatozoa
  • eosinophils
  • Not expressed on haemopoietic stem cells
  • Does not modulate/shed
  • Also expressed on the majority of malignant
    lymphocytes

29
Alemtuzumab in B-CLL with p53 mutations and
deletions
  • Number of fludarabine-refractory pts 36
  • Pts with p53 mutations or deletions 15
    (42)
  • Clinical responses in p53 mutated/deleted 6/15
    (40)
  • Clinical responses in pts without 4/21 (19)
  • Median duration of response 8 months
  • - Alemtuzumab is active in CLL pts with p53
    mutations or deletions

Lozanski G et al, Blood,2004
30
CAMPATH-1H AS FIRST LINE TREATMENT OF
CLL subcutaneous
  • patients
  • number 41 38 evaluable for Response
  • age 66 (44-75)
  • Rai I 10 II 21 III 54 IV 15
  • B-symptoms yes 63 no 37
  • therapy
  • Dosis escalation from 3-10-30 mg s.c. Campath-1H
    in week 1
  • 30 mg 3x /week s.c. (week 2 - 18)
  • duration 12-18 weeks
  • prophylaxis Cotrimoxazol, Acyclovir,
    Fluconazol

Lundin et al, Blood,2002
31
First line treatment of CLL with CAMPATH-1H
results
  • Response 87 (19 CR, PR 68)
  • Rai stage I-II 100
  • lt65 y 83 gt 65 y 90
  • TTF 18 months (7 - 44 months)
  • side effects
  • -fever 70 (68 Gr. 1-2 2 Gr. 3)
  • -skin reactions 90 (88 Gr. 0-II 2 Gr. 3)
  • -infections 4x CMV-reactivation, no severe
    bacterial infection

Lundin et al,Blood, 2002
32
Eradication of MRD in B-CLL after alemtuzumab
(ALZ) therapy is associated with prolonged
survival
  • Patients 91 pretreated (44 refractory to
    purine analogs)
  • Treatment 30 mg i.v. TIW, 9 weeks
  • Response 32 CR (36), 17 PR (19), 42 NR (46)
  • 22/44 (50) refractory to PA responded
  • Longer median survival in MRD-negative pts
  • Longer TFS in MRD-negative pts, not reached
    MRDCRs, 20
  • months PRs, 13 months NR, 6 months (Plt0.0001)
  • OS in 18 pts MRD- CR was 84 at 60 months.
  • MRD-negative CR in CLL is achievable with ALZ,
    leading to an improved OS and TFS

Moreton P, et al,JCO, 2005
33
CMV infection during alemtuzumab treatment
  • Monitoring for CMV
  • Usually fever without pneumonitis, rapidly
    responding to ganciclovir
  • Incidence CLL 10-40
  • If patient is well and CMV test is positive
  • Confirm CMV test
  • If second CMV test is positive it is recommended
    that alemtuzumab is stopped and patient is
    treated with ganciclovir
  • If patient is symptomatic
  • Treat at once if patient is CMV PCR positive
  • Perform bronchoscopy and broncho-alveolar lavage
    if patient is CMV PCR negative

34
MabThera a chimeric murine/human MoAb
Variable murine regions bounding CD20 on B cells
Human kappa costant regions
Human domain IgG1 Fc, synergistic with human
effector mechanisms
Chimeric IgG1
35
Rituximab monotherapy in CLL (375mg/m2/wk x 4)
36
Rituximab monotherapy in CLL (schedules other
than 375mg/m2/wk x 4)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Summary of response data in Phase II studies of
rituximab plus chemotherapy
39


Keating et al, JCO 2005
40


Keating et al, JCO 2005
41
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS I
  • Observation time 1998-2004
  • N of patients 60
  • M/F 30/30
  • Median age (range) 59 (37-74)
  • Modified Rai stage
  • Low risk (0) 5
  • Intermediate risk (I II) 52
  • High risk (III IV) 3
  • ECOG (Performance Status)
  • 0 37
  • 1 19
  • 2 4

42
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS II
  • B symptoms 17
  • Time since first diagnosis
  • ? 1 year 17
  • 2-5 years (I II) 29
  • gt 5 years 14
  • Infiltration pattern BM
  • Nodular 4
  • Mixed 10
  • Diffuse 46

43

FLUDARABINE RITUXIMAB FOR PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED
CLL

Fludarabine 25mg/m2
MabThera 375mg/m2
40 days Range 30- 155
1 2 3 4
1 5 9 13 17 21
Weeks
Weeks
patients with CR, PR, or stable disease received
Rituximab (375mg/m2 weekly x 4)
44
MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • ZAP-70 protein TK and CD38 antigen were
    determined by multicolor flow cytometric methods
    (Crespo et al, 2003 Del Poeta et al,2001).
  • A cut-off of 20 was used for ZAP-70 and CD38.
  • The threshold for MRD positivity was set at gt5
    CD19CD5CD79b- CLL cells in bone marrow.

45
TOXICITY (WHO)

46

FLUDARABINE AND RITUXIMAB
(47/60)

NCI criteria
(9/60)
(4/60)
47

CLINICAL OUTCOME I
  • Median follow up duration was 27 months (9/56
    pts 16 have experienced a relapse).
  • Median duration of CR and PR was not reached.


48

CLINICAL OUTCOME II
  • Among the 60 pts enrolled, 6 have died 1 in CR
    (fulminant B hepatitis), 2 resistant to
    fludarabine for PD, 3 for PD after protocol
    therapy).


49




INCIDENCE OF ZAP-70, CD38 AND MRD
31.7
25
46.7

MRD
CD38
ZAP-70
50




CR () BY ZAP-70 AND CD38





P 0.0009
P 0.02
51


52
PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL BY ZAP-70, CD38 and
MMR
53
OVERALL SURVIVAL BY ZAP-70, CD38 and MMR
54
CONSIDERATIONS
  • The addition of MoAbs, such as rituximab, to
    chemotherapy, allowed us a better outcome in
    B-CLL exerting a key role to eradicate MRD.
  • The stratification of patients in different risk
    classes using ZAP-70 and CD38, allowed us to
    distinguish different clinical outcome subsets
    we can offer more tailored treatment strategies
    based on this approach.
  • Transplantation procedures or experimental
    therapies should be specifically reserved to
    high risk (ZAP-70 or CD38) B-CLL subsets.

55
Stem-cell transplants in CLL - EBMT
250
CLL Autologous
200
150
Number
100
50
CLL Allogeneic
0
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Year
56
Allogeneic SCT for CLLWhy?
  • Increasing number of patients treated with best
    chemo- chemo/immunotherapies upfront
  • ? difficult to be rescued with conventional
    therapies
  • Autologous transplantation
  • not indicated (patients do not achieve CR)
  • all patients relapse
  • risk of MDS/AML

57
Stem-cell transplants in CLL
Auto Allo Upper age limit 70 50 -
60 TRM (4 yrs) 10 25-50 RR (4
yrs) 50 10-25 Survival (4 yrs) 40-70 40-60
Survival (8 yrs) 30-40 35-55 Plateau no yes

58
Overall survival after stem cell transplantation
1
0.8
AlloSCT (n 46)
0.6
Probability
AutoSCT (n 139)
0.4
0.2
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Years
Montserrat E, Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 2004
18915926.
59
Relapse rate after stem cell transplantation
Auto - SCT (n122)
Allo - SCT (n38)
Montserrat E, Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 2004
18915926.
60
CLL Treatment Goals/Interventions
Palliation Chlorambucil, Epo, etc.
Response Fludarabine Cycloph.
MRD - FCR, FCM (R-FCM)
Cure Allogeneic SCT
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com