2003 ITRS Test Chapter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

2003 ITRS Test Chapter

Description:

2003 ITRS Test Chapter December 2003 Don Edenfeld Test ITWG Chair Intel Corporation Acknowledgements ITWG Members Rochit Rajsuman (Advantest), Yi Cai (Agere), Bill ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: itrsNetLi4
Category:
Tags: itrs | chapter | test

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2003 ITRS Test Chapter


1
2003 ITRS Test Chapter
  • December 2003
  • Don Edenfeld
  • Test ITWG Chair
  • Intel Corporation

2
Acknowledgements
  • ITWG Members
  • Rochit Rajsuman (Advantest), Yi Cai (Agere), Bill
    Ortner (Agere), Rob Aitken (Artisan), Atul Goel
    (Agilent), Peter Maxwell (Agilent), Bernd
    Koenemann (Cadence), Anne Gattiker (IBM), Phil
    Nigh (IBM), Fred Taber (IBM), Jody Van Horn
    (IBM), Don Wheater (IBM), Peter Muhmenthaler
    (Infineon), Phil Burlison (Inoys), Roger Barth
    (Intel), Don Edenfeld (Intel), Mike Rodgers
    (Intel), Chad Wren (Intel), Yasumasa Nishimura
    (Renesas), Jay Bedsole (Motorola), Paul Roddy
    (Motorola), Don Van Overloop (Motorola),
    Toshinobu Ono (NEC), Burnie West (NPTest), Bill
    Price (Philips), Rene Segers (Philips), Tom
    Williams (Synopsys), Lee Song (Teradyne), Yervant
    Zorian (Virage)
  • Contributors
  • Davide Appello (ST Microelectronics), John
    Johnson (Intel), John Matthias (Agere), Lynn
    Schmidt (Agilent), Marc Loranger (Credence),
    Michael Lee (TSMC), Rudy Garcia (NPTest), Bernd
    Laquai (Agilent), Sunil Jain (Intel), Udaya
    Natarajan (Intel), Mike Green (Motorola), Charles
    Ross (Motorola), John Ferrario (IBM), Dennis
    Eaton (Agilent), Paul Nesrsta (Rel Inc), Rich
    Karr (TI), Jim Rhodes (Unisys), Ichiro Fujishiro
    (Yamaichi), Gordon Cowan (High Rel), Ken Heiman
    (MCC), Dave Noddin (3M), Herve Deshayes (ST
    Micro), Dick McClelland (Philips), Carl Buck
    (Aehr Test), Rafiq Hussain (AMD), Dan Weinstein
    (Intel), Bob Totorica (Micron), Bob Zacharis
    (Pycon), John Hartstein (Wells-CTI), Takashi
    Aikyo, Kenichi Anzou, Kouichi Eguchi, Satoshi
    Fukumoto, Kazumi Hatayama, Toshinori Inoshita,
    Shinji Mori, Mitsuyasu Ohta, Akira Ooishi,
    Masayuki Sato, Hidefumi Toda, Masanori Ushikubo,
    Osamu Yamada, Chip Cotton (Intel), Dan Sech
    (Intel), Brett Casey (Intel), Sematech Product
    Analysis Forum (Larry Wagner (IT), Dave Vallett
    (IBM)), Stefan Eichenberger (Philips), Ted
    Lundquist (NPtest), HankWalker (TX AM), Bob
    Madge (LSI Logic), Camelia Hora (Philips
    Research), Maurice Lousberg (Philips Research)

Many Thanks!
3
2003 ITRS Test Chapter Revision
  • Trends described in 2001 have held true
  • High speed interfaces are appearing in a broad
    range of applications in many market segments
  • SOC and SIP dominate new designs
  • Low cost, targeted test platforms emerging
  • 2003 Test Chapter focuses on key challenges
  • Less emphasis on evolutionary trending
  • Increased effort to identify, define, and discuss
    the key challenges facing test

4
Chapter Content Additions
  • Test Technology Requirements
  • Test and Yield Learning
  • Physical Failure Analysis
  • Software-Based Diagnosis and Signature Analysis
  • Defects and Failure Mechanisms
  • Reliability Technology Requirements
  • IDDQ Testing
  • Burn-In Requirements
  • Test Handler and Prober Technology Requirements
  • Test Handlers
  • Wafer Probers
  • Device Interface Technology Requirements
  • Probe Cards

5
2003 Key Challenges
  • High Speed Device Interfaces
  • Highly Integrated Designs, SOCs, SIPs
  • Reliability Screens
  • Manufacturing Test Cost Reduction
  • Failure Analysis and Diagnosis
  • Automated Test Program Generation (not ATPG!)
  • Modeling and Simulation

6
High Speed Serial Interfaces
  • Penetration of high speed interfaces into new
    designs is increasing dramatically
  • Leading edge communications devices data rate
    trend slowing, but
  • High speed links (1.5 to 4 Gbps, 10s to 100s)
    dropping into many other product types / business
    segments / formerly plain vanilla digital
    products
  • Loopback alone may not be sufficient to achieve
    needed product quality
  • Transaction / event driven protocols inconsistent
    with stored response ATE / mfg test
  • Test and DFT methods must be developed to enable
    development and production test of these products

7
SOC and SIP
  • Customer requirements for form factor and power
    consumption are driving a significant increase in
    design integration levels
  • Test complexity will increase dramatically with
    the combination of different classes of circuits
    on single die or within a single package
  • Disciplined, structured DFT is a requirement to
    reduce test complexity
  • Increased focus on KGD and sub-assembly test
    driven by cost for SIP
  • Mems, opticals, and other emerging or newly
    integrated to SIP devices
  • SIP physical FA is much more difficult, test
    diagnostics will be critical
  • Manufacturing repair may be required for
    non-stacked die SIPs

8
Reliability Screens Run Out of Gas
  • Critical need for development of new techniques
    for acceleration of latent defects
  • Burn-in methods limited by thermal runaway
  • Lowered use voltages limits voltage stress
    opportunity
  • Difficulty of determining Iddq signal versus
    normal leakage current noise
  • New materials
  • Rate of introduction increasing Cu, low k, high
    k, SiGe
  • Critical interactions of new materials increasing
    (Cu / low k)
  • Increasing mechanical and thermal sensitivities

9
The Overall Cost of Test
10
Failure Analysis and Diagnosis
  • Enhanced automated software diagnostic
    capabilities to improve physical failure analysis
    ROI
  • Characterization capabilities must identify,
    locate, and distinguish individual defect types
  • Increased accuracy and throughput (days to hours)
  • Failure analysis methods for analog devices must
    be developed
  • DFT is essential to localize failures
  • Improve efficiency and reduce design complexities
    associated with test
  • Defect types and behavior will continue to evolve
    with advances in fabrication process technology
  • Fundamental research in existing and novel fault
    models to address emerging defects will be
    required

11
Automated Test Program Generation
  • Tools for ATE software and test program
    generation are needed to decrease test
    development effort and improve time to market
  • Automated design to manufacturing test program
    flow
  • Correct by construction (pre-silicon)
  • Interoperability standards (STIL, CTL, etc)
  • Enable test content portability among test
    platforms
  • ATE S/W operating environment standards
  • Direct impact on time to market and product
    development cost
  • Driven by product complexity and shorter product
    cycles

12
Modeling and Simulation
  • Signal Integrity and Power Delivery
  • High speed signals, increasing analog content,
    and high power designs drive more rigorous
    interface design
  • Modeling of the complete path
  • Device I/O
  • Probe or Package Socket
  • ATE interface hardware
  • ATE instrumentation or power supply

13
2004 Plans
  • Refine data presented in 2003
  • Address any required clarification
  • Focus on 2003 key challenges and 2004 additions
  • Device Interfaces - Sockets (Test and Burn-in)
  • Reliability Methods
  • High Speed Interfaces
  • Automated Test Program Generation

14
How can we improve manageability of the
divergence between validation and manufacturing
equipment?
Can ATE instruments catch up and keep up with
high speed serial performance trends?
Can DFT mitigate analog test cost as it does in
the digital domain?
What is the cost and capability optimal SOC test
approach?
What happens when high speed serial interfaces
become buses?
How can we make test of complex SIP designs more
cost effective?
Will market dynamics justify development of next
generation functional test capabilities?
Can DFT and BIST mitigate the mixed signal tester
capability treadmill? What other opportunities
exist?
Will increasing test data volume lead to
increased focus on Logic BIST architectures? What
are the other solutions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com