Memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Memory

Description:

Memory An explanation of the Working memory model. A diagram...what the hell is this??? Psychologist All as one! – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: virtualpsy
Category:
Tags: memory

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Memory


1
Memory
  • An explanation of the Working memory model.

2
A diagram...what the hell is this???
3
Psychologist
The information needs Visual skills that only
psychologists have.

Central executive assigns the information to the
relevant dept/person for the job. But it can only
do this one piece of information at a time- It
has a limited capacity (like the STM!)
Counsellor
Politician
This information needs a good listener someone
with auditory skills..
This information requires phonological attention.
4
All as one!
  • All of the centres work together to process the
    information.
  • But the central executive has overall
    responsibility for control processes e.g.
  • Setting tasks
  • Planning co-ordinating the activity that needs
    to e carried out.
  • Switching attention between tasks.
  • Thus you could name the central executive the fat
    controller.

5
Phonological Loop
  • Known by some as the inner voice-

It has a limited capacity with only temporary
storage for holding verbal information (spoken).
6
Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad.
  • Also known as the inner eye again like the
    phonological loop it has a limited capacity a
    temporary storage system for holding visual
    (seen) and spatial
    information.

7
Working memory model
  • Therefore we have established the Phonological
    loop and Visuo spatial Sketchpad are slave
    systems that support the central executive.
  • Their space can be used and freed up, thus
    supporting the demands of information processing
    tasks.
  • However it is important to remember the slave
    systems have separate responsibilities and work
    independently of one another.

8
Is there any evidence to support the different
stores?
  • In short...there have been a number of studies
    that have strived to support the model. What is
    needed is
  • An understanding of the research.
  • Methodological Issues.
  • Ethical Issues.

9
Evidence- Visuo scratchpad.
  • Conrad (1964)- When presenting Ps with visual
    letters they become muddled when asked to recall
    similar sounding letters immediately e.g. s
    f.
  • Baddeley (2003)-Visualising American football
    game whilst driving. He found the car began to
    swerve.
  • McClelland et al (2006)-Imagine fav foods whilst
    forehead tracking (tapping an imaginary line
    across the forehead follow fingers with eyes.)
  • Each of the above found the tasks difficult as
    two things at once on one store impairs
    performance!

10
Evidence-Central Executive.
  • Imbo et al (2007)- Changing difficulty of sums.
    He changed the carry over to make the sums more
    difficult e.g. 17 x 17(easy) 17x 21(more
    difficult). Having more sums makes it difficult
    on the working memory and uses both the
    Phonological loop central executive.

11
Evidence- Phonological loop.
  • Baddeley et al (1975)-Word length was
    investigated. Ps were asked to write down 5 words
    in serial order immediately after presentation.
    Simultaneously they were prevented via
    interference from rehearsing the information.
  • Articulatory suppression fills the phonological
    loop and removes the advantage of rehearsing. The
    central executive takes over recall as some words
    are recalled!!

12
In summary
  • Within the WWM certain systems are crystallized
    (i.e. They remain unchanged/ the same) Whilst
    other systems are fluid i.e. They have the
    potential to be more flexible.

Central Executive
crystallized
Visuo-Spatial Scratchpad
Episodic Buffer
Phonological Loop
Visuo-spatial Episodic LTM
Language Semantics.
fluid
13
The good, The bad, The ugly!
  • The existence of the phonological loop and
    visuo-spatial sketchpad is well documented.
  • Practical Implications. (Reading skills)
  • WWM influential and still being developed
    expanded.
  • Not much is known about the Central executive
    (the most integral store!) no one has been able
    to quantify it scientifically.
  • Furthermore what is the role of the central
    executive. Language is vague i.e. We find
    ourselves in a circular argument.
  • Contradicting evidence VSSP Phonological loop
    working together causes interference (Conrad
    1964) measuring brain activity should show
    this.it does not.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com