Title: WIC EBT – The Retailer Perspective
1WIC EBT The Retailer Perspective
- Presented by
- Gary Huddleston, Director of Consumer Affairs
- The Kroger Company Dallas, Texas
2WIC The Retailer Perspective
- How big is WIC business?
- WIC is relatively small, approximately 1.5 total
food sales, annually - In 2006, WIC represented approximately 3.6
billion in food sales nationwide - The importance of WIC is not limited to WIC food
sales, it extends well beyond, to total food
sales - When shopping, WIC participants buy much more
than WIC food items - Nutrition education classes teach WIC
participants to purchase and prepare nutritious,
healthy foods - Families with healthy babies and children spend
more money on food at home - WIC customers are often part of a stores loyal
customer base - Use a loyalty card
- Use vendor coupons
- May use food stamps
3WIC The Retailer Perspective
- Generally, all retailers base major decisions on
a profit-centered business model. - Since 2004, WIC vendors in Texas and New Mexico
have experienced a positive return on investment
(ROI) in offline WIC EBT, the Smart Card
Technology. - Based on our experience, we would consider the
WIC EBT system model deployed by Texas and New
Mexico a best practice business decision, a
smart and cost effective way to increase food
sales while lowering the high costs of WIC food
sale transactions.
4Retailer Profit-Centered Business Model
Considerations
- Increase sales
- Reduce operating/overhead costs
- Maintain/increase profit
- Efficient checkout for the customer
5Increase Sales
- Product selection/availability
- Price accuracy
- Speed of checkout
6Reduce WIC Operating/Overhead Costs
- Avoid/reduce loss
- Increase efficiency
7Maintain/Increase Profit
- Demonstrate a positive Return on Investment
(ROI) related to WIC - Maintain/improve the overall profit/loss (PL)
ratio or net income (profit)
8Efficient Checkout For The Customer
- Transaction similar to credit/debit transaction
- Utilize any checkout lane
9WIC EBTIn the Beginning....
10Top Three (3) Retailer Concerns
- Technology Choice
- Cost
- Future Implications
111 Concern Technology Choice
- Proven but evolving technology
- Lack of technology standards
- Limited retail use
- Limited technical support
- Introduction/maintenance of dual technologies
- Lack of FNS WIC EBT system design requirements
- Lack of national WIC EBT policy guidance for
states
122 Concern Cost
- High front end costs
- No federal regulations governing system design,
system performance, technology deployment or
adherence to industry standards. - Shift of costs from government to retailers
without a proven ROI for either
13Response WIC Positive ROI
- WIC Strategy Texas WIC modified proprietary
electronic cash register (ECR) and point-of-sale
(POS) systems to accept smart cards in-lane in
exchange for long-term retailer commitment. - Execution
- WIC EBT enabled ECR and POS systems representing
75 of WIC vendor lanes nationwide have been
certified by USDA/FNS and Texas as meeting
design, performance and accuracy standards
ICL-Fujitsu, IBM-ACE, IBM-SA, NCR, ACR, Wal-Mart
(IBM), JPMA, Sweda - ECR/POS representatives provide WIC EBT
enhancements to WIC vendors with qualifying
systems at no cost - Texas WIC vendors with non-qualifying systems are
reimbursed for their purchase of USDA/FNS and
Texas certified ECR/POS systems in accordance
with the USDA/FNS approved reimbursement policy.
14Concern 3 Future Implications
- Potential for change in direction,
technology(ies) - No national strategy or regulations for WIC EBT
- Inter-operability
15Response National Standards
- Ability for customers to use their WIC card in
other states - Multi-state retailers ability to spread cost over
more stores
16WIC EBT Today...
17WIC EBT Milestones
- Wyoming Offline WIC EBT Demonstration (1994)
- Proof of concept offline smartcard technology
works - Proprietary, stand-alone/stand-beside, WIC-only
ECR - USDA/FNS funded (100)
- Texas Offline WIC EBT Pilot (2004)
- National industry technology, performance and
policy standards - WIC fully integrated at the point-of-sale (POS)
- WIC EBT ECR/POS System Options
- Small store solution government-owned,
stand-alone/stand-beside, WIC-only ECR (kWICpos),
similar to the proprietary system in Wyoming - Large store/supermarket solution
retailer-owned/modified, multi-tender ECR
(ICL-Fujitsu, ACR, IBM SA, IBM-ACE, NCR,
Wal-Mart) - Government-owned system (kWICpos) was replaced in
mid-2005 with WIC certified commercial ECR/POS
systems, with retailer reimbursement of
WIC-authorized lanes based on a ratio of WIC
sales to total sales. - Texas Offline WIC EBT Cost Effective Source
USDA/FNS WIC EBT Evaluation (February 2005)
18Technology Choice
19Retailer PerspectiveAdvantages of Offline
- Avoids third party transaction processing charges
- Avoids additional in-lane time for repeat of
transactions due to communications loss - Increases transaction speed no required user
authentication/benefits download to store upon
entry - Avoids installation/maintenance of additional
store EBT host or modifications to store host for
interim benefits download/storage - No wait time central host authorization
dialup/return - Furthers interoperability for WIC and other
nutrition/health programs - Eliminates/avoids transaction processing and
interchange fees - Eliminates/avoids added telecommunications costs
(batch file transmission) - Public advantages reduced government costs
through use of single card for multiple benefit
programs (Medicaid, Food Stamps, TANF, Child
Support, State Employee Pay and many others).
20Retailer PerspectiveAdvantages of Integrated
ECR/POS
- Eliminates double scan
- Eliminates separate WIC transaction, separate of
WIC and non-WIC - products
- Price and inventory management in store ECR
- Eliminates manual changes to product pricing for
WIC items - Avoids increased costs to maintain, accommodate
separate, stand-beside (closed) system
21Cost
22WIC is Expensive, Labor Intensive
- Eliminating Paper is a High Priority
- The cost to complete a WIC food sale can be 6
times higher than the cost to complete a cash or
credit/debit sale - Young, inexperienced sales clerks must police
WIC food sales - Only WIC allowable products are sold
- Price controls are enforced traditionally least
expensive brand, maximum/not-to-exceed - Valid food instruments presented between
first/last dates to spend - Fully executed with proper signatures
- Accurate entry of item and price information
- Backroom processes are costly, complicated,
labor-intensive - Claim processing, packaging and mailing
- Errors/mistakes cause delays in claim processing
and settlement - Settlement delays make it necessary to
monitor/track claims submitted for payment and
reconcile differences between the claim and
settlement totals.
23WIC is Expensive, Labor Intensive (Continued)
- WIC is high risk, with a lower profit margin than
non-WIC sales - WIC regulations and policies, particularly those
designed to control WIC food costs, are
complicated, difficult to learn and subject to
change - It is not a matter of if a store will suffer
WIC loss, it is a question of how much a store
will lose - Whether a store remains a WIC vendor in good
standing is almost entirely based on the actions
of its youngest, most inexperienced employees. - Mistakes are common common mistakes are costly
- Monetary penalties/fines
- Suspension
- Disqualification, removal from WIC
- In order to keep its customer base, suspended and
disqualified stores often continue to accept WIC,
then write-off WIC food sales as losses
24Top Five (5) Reasons Retailers Support EBT
- EBT significantly reduces the risk of store loss
as a result of WIC violations, sanctions and
disqualification - EBT reduces store overhead costs related to WIC
food sales - EBT eliminates most payment delays
- EBT normalizes WIC food sales
- EBT increases customer and employee satisfaction
251 Reduced Store Losses
- EBT systematically enforces WIC regulations,
policies price controls - UPC scanning ensures only WIC allowable products
are sold - Unit price controls are strictly enforced
- Access limited to current month benefits
- No signatures are missing signatures are no
longer required - WIC-allowable identifier accuracy ensured by
Authorized Product List (APL) - Unit price accuracy ensured through store
inventory and pricing database - Price controls enforced through item-level claim
adjustments - EBT eliminates most opportunities for violations,
sanction and disqualification - In Texas, avoid losses of 1.3 million solely
attributable to clerk error (2004).
262 Reduced Store Costs, Improved Efficiency
- Reduces time in-lane
- Eliminates time spent confirming first/last dates
to spend - Eliminates manual entry of item price, except for
unreadable UPC codes - Eliminates time for customer signature and
signature-matching reduced space and
administrative costs for paper storage, problem
resolution - Eliminates labor costs of handling paper vouchers
- Eliminates postage and handling costs
- Avoids loss of sales due to transaction breakdown
- Reduced training costs for clerks
273 Reduces Payment Delays
- EBT reduces most payment delays
- Automatic (systematic) item-level adjustments to
WIC claims - No delays for WIC food instrument handling and
processing errors - No delays for WIC claim preparation and accuracy
errors - No delays due to postal or private courier
schedules - Reduces float (45 days lt x lt 60 days) to 2 days
average
284 Normalizes WIC Sale Transactions
- EBT normalizes WIC food sales at the
point-of-sale (POS) - Integrates WIC EBT into the store electronic cash
register (ECR) system at the POS, adding WIC as a
type of tender - Enables mixed basket purchases, without the
need to separate WIC and non-WIC foods at
checkout - Reduces the time in-lane for WIC food purchases
to that of cash and credit/debit customers - Participant able to purchase part, not all of WIC
prescribed foods - Increases the number of WIC participant shopping
trips, total food sales - Increases product availability
- Normalizes Product Orders, Shelf Maintenance
295 Increases Customer and Employee Satisfaction
- EBT increases overall WIC customer satisfaction,
store loyalty - EBT reduces a customers time in lane for WIC
checkout - EBT reduces customer stigma
- EBT improves customer-employee communications
- Increases customer store visits, purchases
- Reduces customer/participant peer pressure
- EBT increases employee satisfaction, reduces
turnover - EBT eliminates the need for clerks to police
WIC sales at the POS - EBT reduces employee-customer confrontations at
the POS - EBT reduces employee errors, personnel corrective
actions - EBT modifies (reduces) training needs for cashiers
30Future Implications
31Texas and New Mexico Have Paved the Way Other
States Should Follow
- Technology and conversion costs are significantly
lower today - Texas and New Mexico have already paid for
ECR/POS systems modifications/enhancements on
behalf of other states they are free. - Funding should be prioritized to encourage states
to implement the Texas and New Mexico model at
NO/REDUCED COST - If implemented nationwide, the Texas-New Mexico
model can represent. - Cost savings to retailers
- Cost savings to states
- Cost savings to the federal government
-
32Prepaid Costs for Integrated ECR/POS
- Retailers with qualified ECR/POS systems and
software are entitled to EBT-enabled enhancements
at no cost and - State costs are limited to the cost of upgrading
terminals in-lane from single to dual technology
(Texas 200/terminal)
33Next Steps for Future States
- State activities
- Establish timeline for eliminating paper WIC
- Complete/submit feasibility study
- Cost-benefit analysis
- Determine baseline costs for WIC paper
- Use FNS WIC EBT Model Evaluation
- Calculate baseline costs (State, Grocer)
- Determine EBT costs and return on investment
(ROI) - EBT System Design/Implementation Alternatives
- Texas offline model
- Key considerations cost savings, cost avoidance
34From the Retailer Perspective.....
- Texas-New Mexico WIC EBT is the only system,
online or offline, proven to be 1) a measured
improvement over the paper voucher system and 2)
cost effective and affordable.
We want to know, Where will the TX-NM model be
implemented next?