Title: Framework for Intellectual and Ethical Maturity
1Framework for Intellectual and Ethical Maturity
- From Dimensions of Ethical Decision Making
- Anna Witter-Merithew Kellie Mills Stewart
- For Ethics of Interpreting, SCCC
- B. Aron
2Models of Intellectual and Ethical Maturity
Terminology
- Critical Reflection the ability to reflect on
life experiences and analyze them for the purpose
of isolating important principles and learning
that emerges and continues to unfold over time. - Ethics derived from the Greek word ethos,
meaning custom, usage, or character. Ethics is
the science of ideal human character or the
science of moral duty. - Ethical Fitness the capacity to recognize the
nature of moral challenges and respond with a
well-tuned conscience, a lively perception of the
difference between right and wrong and an ability
to choose the right and live by it. Kidder - Ethical and Intellectual Maturity a state of
understanding and knowledge that enables an
individual to consistently and responsibly
function in a n ethically fit manner.
3Case Study Creating a Life to Save a Life
- In England, the Whitaker family faced a terrible
situation their son, Charlie, suffered from a
rare disorder that prevented his body from
producing red blood cells. Without daily
medications and frequent transfusions, Charlie
would simply die. With them, he continues to
live, but under close medical care. For a while,
it looked as though Charlies parents had figured
out an answer to this dilemma. They proposed to
use in vitro fertilization to have another child,
but with an added twist. They would, as is usual
in this procedure, have the eggs fertilized
outside the womb in a laboratory dish, but they
would then include an additional step. Using new
screening techniques, they would screen the
embryos to see which would be most able to donate
blood-making cells to Charlie. That would be the
one that they would choose to implant and bring
to term. In contrast to the United States and
many other countries, in England someone
proposing such a procedure must obtain government
permission- In this case, from the Human
Fertilization and Embryology Authority. The
Authority rejected the request by the Whitaker
family, saying that it was not right to create a
human life with the express intent of saving
another life. - Contributed by Lawrence Hinman, University of San
Diego _at_http//ethics.acusd.edu/
4Discussion Questions
- Do you agree with the Authoritys decision, why
or why not? - What are the significant moral considerations in
this case? What consideration is decisive for
you? - Who should make these decisions? Who should have
the right to make the final decision in such
cases? - What personal values and beliefs contribute to
your thinking?
54 Stages of Intellectual and Ethical Development
William Graves Perry Jr. 1970, 1999
- William Graves Perry Jr. , a psychology professor
advisor to college students and researcher at
Harvard University etc developed and outlined
four distinct stages of intellectual and ethical
development of college students, which we can
build to understand ethical development within
the field of interpreting. In the following slide
is a description of the 4 stages.
64 Stages of Ethical and Intellectual Maturity
- Basic Dualism
- Multiplicity
- Relativism Subordinate
- Relativism
7First Stage
- Basic Dualism The student views the world in
polarities. The student is dependent on
authorities to hand down the truth and to teach
him right from wrong. Students or learners in
this stage of ethical development look toward
teachers, friends, rules, or colleagues to
provide the direction for decision-makingtell
me the right answer.
8Second Stage
- Multiplicity The student begins to carve out his
or her own opinions and desires. He or she
develops the personal freedom due to recognition
of diversity of opinion and multiple perspectives
that exist in society. Students begin to test the
beliefs and values taught to them by parents and
family. In a college or educational environment,
the students acquired beliefs are challenged and
begin to cement or reform.
9Third Stage
- Relativism Subordinate The student begins to
develop an analytical and evaluative approach to
ethical choices because the teacher insists on
evidence and support of the students opinions.
Students begin to develop the skills to answer
the question, Why do you believe that? They
begin to develop the necessary analytical skills
to determine ethical choices based on a rationale
supported by evidence and reasoning.
10Fourth Stage
- Relativism The student comprehends that truth
is relative. Students recognize that the meaning
of an event depends on the context in which the
event occurs and the framework the knower uses
to understand that event. The individual has
learned and developed the skills to look beyond
his or her own truth to determine the available
ethical choices appropriate for the people
involved in a particular setting and context. The
individual now realizes there is no one rule
fits all approach to ethical decision-making.
Individuals learn to take responsibility for the
way situations are viewed and interpreted which
leads to different choices.
11Can You apply ethical maturity?
- How would an individual in each of Perrys four
phases respond to the situation in the case of
the ? - Basic Dualism
- Multiplicity
- Relativism Subordinate
- Relativism
12Intellectual and Ethical Maturity Continuum
HIGH
Stage FourFull Relativism/State of Constructed
Knowledge
Experiential Learning Critical Reflection
Stage ThreeRelativism Subordinate
Stage TwoMultiplicity
Stage OneBasic DualismState of Received
Knowledge
LOW
13Factors Impacting Ethical ReasoningCsongradi,
2004
Facts Media Economy Data
Information
Data Economy Information SOCIETY
Ethical Theories
Institutions
Others
Media Facts VALUES
Perspective
PRINCIPLES
SELF
Laws Rules Codes Obligations
Reflection
Reflection
Data Media Facts Information economy
School Family Friends Religion
Data Facts Economy Media Information
Moral/ Ethical Action
MORAL/ETHICAL KNOWLEDGE
14Ethical Fitness A Part of Competent Autonomy
- Competent Autonomy vs. Default Autonomy
- The difference between competent autonomy which
is based on professional merit and - default autonomy which is without merit and
results from isolation, insufficient training,
and market trends and conditions.
15Competent Autonomy
- Autonomy an individuals ability to
independently carry out the responsibilities of
the position without close supervision.
Blanchfield Biordi, 1996 - Autonomy means the freedom to act on what you
know Kramer and Schmalenberg, 1993 - Autonomy is linked to competence because
competence involves not only knowing, but also
knowing that you know.
16Awareness of Five Factors
- Complexity of communication demands
- Predictability of outcome
- Cognitive requirements necessary to provide the
tasks - Technical requirements associated with the tasks
- Level of risk/liability and potential for a
negative outcome
17Ethical Fitness
- Ethical Fitness is the capacity to recognize the
nature of moral challenges and respond with a
well-tuned conscience, a lively perception of the
difference between right and wrong, and an
ability to choose the right and live by it.
Kidder, 1990
18Right vs. Right Dilemmas (6 scenarios)
- It is right for D/deaf people to have the highest
skilled interpreters available and it is right
for novice/student interpreters to have
opportunities to get real-world interpreting
experience in an effort to become highly skilled
one day. - It is right for the privacy of consumers to be
protected and it is right for interpreting
practitioners to learn from our professional
experiences by discussing situations from time to
time in an attempt to avoid future conflicts.
19Right vs. Right Dilemmas
- 3. It is right for D/deaf people to have access
to interpreters 24 hours a day and it is right
for interpreters to take time off from work or
have a personal life. - 4. It is right for D/deaf children to be among
their D/deaf peers and to develop a common
identity with other D/deaf children and it is
right for parents to want their children to be
educated in local public schools and live at
home.
20Right vs. Right Dilemmas
- 5. It is right for interpreters to prepare for
assignments well in advance and it is right for
D/deaf people to have the choice to participate
in events spontaneously on short notice. - 6. It is right for interpreters to charge a fee
commensurate with their training, experience and
national certification and it is right for those
hiring interpreting services to seek the most
cost effective option available.
21Right vs. Wrong
- It is right for interpreters to desire financial
success and work hard to achieve it, but it would
be wrong for interpreters to take advantage of
consumers for financial gain. - It is right for interpreters to want to advance
themselves personally or professionally, but it
would be wrong to personally benefit from or use
information obtained from an interpreting
assignment for self-interest.
22Right vs. Wrong
- 3. It is right for interpreters to seek
opportunities for growth and to further develop
their interpreting skills, but it would be wrong
to take an assignment without being qualified to
handle it. - 4. It is right for interpreters to attempt to
maximize their time and billable hours during a
workday, but it would be wrong to schedule
assignments so close together that consumers were
not well-served.
23Right vs. Wrong
- 5. It is right for interpreters to want to work
certain types of highly desirable assignments,
but it would be wrong for interpreters to
undercut colleagues or referral services when
soliciting these high profile assignments. - 6. It is right for interpreters to believe they
are qualified for certain assignments, but it
would be wrong for interpreters to misrepresent
his or her credentials in order to be hired.
244 Right Vs. Right Paradigms Kidder
- Individual vs. Community
- Short-term vs. Long-term
- Justice vs. Mercy
- Truth vs. Loyalty
25Individual versus Community
- 1. This paradigm refers to those situations in
which the interests of an individual are in
conflict with the interests of a community. - Example the rights of a criminal in the justice
system vs. the rights of the community to be
informed about the actions of criminals within
the community.
26Short-term vs. Long-term
- 2. This paradigm refers to those situations when
the short-term goal is inn conflict with the
long-term goal. - Example interpreters who choose to begin working
before completing an ITP because the job is
available now, vs. completing their training in
order to enter the field as a more qualified
practitioner. The immediate goal of employment is
in conflict with the long-term goal of a
qualified workforce.
27Justice versus Mercy
- 3. This paradigm refers to those situations when
the desire to be fair and judicious is in
conflict with the human capacity for forgiveness
and mercy. - Example a journalist who plagiarizes someones
work and whether that person should lose the
ability to work as a journalist forever, or does
he deserve a second chance to do the right thing?
28Truth versus Loyalty
- 4. This paradigm refers to those situations where
the importance of telling the truth may conflict
with the desire to remain loyal to someone or
something. - Example an employee who knows their employer is
acting unethically about an important matter and
the struggle with whether to tell the truth to
the authorities or to remain loyal to their
employer.
29Summary on Ethical Maturity
- Ethical maturity comes from experience in
reflecting and evaluating various perspectives
related to what constitutes appropriate and
ethical behavior. - Ethical fitness is a pre-requisite for competent
autonomy. - Individuals move from basic duality which focuses
on right vs. wrong paradigms to constructed
relativism which involves consideration of a
broad range of factors when deciding what is the
most appropriate response to a situation.
30