Framework for Intellectual and Ethical Maturity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Framework for Intellectual and Ethical Maturity

Description:

Framework for Intellectual and Ethical Maturity From: Dimensions of Ethical Decision Making Anna Witter-Merithew & Kellie Mills Stewart For Ethics of Interpreting, SCCC – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: seattlece
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Framework for Intellectual and Ethical Maturity


1
Framework for Intellectual and Ethical Maturity
  • From Dimensions of Ethical Decision Making
  • Anna Witter-Merithew Kellie Mills Stewart
  • For Ethics of Interpreting, SCCC
  • B. Aron

2
Models of Intellectual and Ethical Maturity
Terminology
  • Critical Reflection the ability to reflect on
    life experiences and analyze them for the purpose
    of isolating important principles and learning
    that emerges and continues to unfold over time.
  • Ethics derived from the Greek word ethos,
    meaning custom, usage, or character. Ethics is
    the science of ideal human character or the
    science of moral duty.
  • Ethical Fitness the capacity to recognize the
    nature of moral challenges and respond with a
    well-tuned conscience, a lively perception of the
    difference between right and wrong and an ability
    to choose the right and live by it. Kidder
  • Ethical and Intellectual Maturity a state of
    understanding and knowledge that enables an
    individual to consistently and responsibly
    function in a n ethically fit manner.

3
Case Study Creating a Life to Save a Life
  • In England, the Whitaker family faced a terrible
    situation their son, Charlie, suffered from a
    rare disorder that prevented his body from
    producing red blood cells. Without daily
    medications and frequent transfusions, Charlie
    would simply die. With them, he continues to
    live, but under close medical care. For a while,
    it looked as though Charlies parents had figured
    out an answer to this dilemma. They proposed to
    use in vitro fertilization to have another child,
    but with an added twist. They would, as is usual
    in this procedure, have the eggs fertilized
    outside the womb in a laboratory dish, but they
    would then include an additional step. Using new
    screening techniques, they would screen the
    embryos to see which would be most able to donate
    blood-making cells to Charlie. That would be the
    one that they would choose to implant and bring
    to term. In contrast to the United States and
    many other countries, in England someone
    proposing such a procedure must obtain government
    permission- In this case, from the Human
    Fertilization and Embryology Authority. The
    Authority rejected the request by the Whitaker
    family, saying that it was not right to create a
    human life with the express intent of saving
    another life.
  • Contributed by Lawrence Hinman, University of San
    Diego _at_http//ethics.acusd.edu/

4
Discussion Questions
  • Do you agree with the Authoritys decision, why
    or why not?
  • What are the significant moral considerations in
    this case? What consideration is decisive for
    you?
  • Who should make these decisions? Who should have
    the right to make the final decision in such
    cases?
  • What personal values and beliefs contribute to
    your thinking?

5
4 Stages of Intellectual and Ethical Development
William Graves Perry Jr. 1970, 1999
  • William Graves Perry Jr. , a psychology professor
    advisor to college students and researcher at
    Harvard University etc developed and outlined
    four distinct stages of intellectual and ethical
    development of college students, which we can
    build to understand ethical development within
    the field of interpreting. In the following slide
    is a description of the 4 stages.

6
4 Stages of Ethical and Intellectual Maturity
  • Basic Dualism
  • Multiplicity
  • Relativism Subordinate
  • Relativism

7
First Stage
  • Basic Dualism The student views the world in
    polarities. The student is dependent on
    authorities to hand down the truth and to teach
    him right from wrong. Students or learners in
    this stage of ethical development look toward
    teachers, friends, rules, or colleagues to
    provide the direction for decision-makingtell
    me the right answer.

8
Second Stage
  • Multiplicity The student begins to carve out his
    or her own opinions and desires. He or she
    develops the personal freedom due to recognition
    of diversity of opinion and multiple perspectives
    that exist in society. Students begin to test the
    beliefs and values taught to them by parents and
    family. In a college or educational environment,
    the students acquired beliefs are challenged and
    begin to cement or reform.

9
Third Stage
  • Relativism Subordinate The student begins to
    develop an analytical and evaluative approach to
    ethical choices because the teacher insists on
    evidence and support of the students opinions.
    Students begin to develop the skills to answer
    the question, Why do you believe that? They
    begin to develop the necessary analytical skills
    to determine ethical choices based on a rationale
    supported by evidence and reasoning.

10
Fourth Stage
  • Relativism The student comprehends that truth
    is relative. Students recognize that the meaning
    of an event depends on the context in which the
    event occurs and the framework the knower uses
    to understand that event. The individual has
    learned and developed the skills to look beyond
    his or her own truth to determine the available
    ethical choices appropriate for the people
    involved in a particular setting and context. The
    individual now realizes there is no one rule
    fits all approach to ethical decision-making.
    Individuals learn to take responsibility for the
    way situations are viewed and interpreted which
    leads to different choices.

11
Can You apply ethical maturity?
  • How would an individual in each of Perrys four
    phases respond to the situation in the case of
    the ?
  • Basic Dualism
  • Multiplicity
  • Relativism Subordinate
  • Relativism

12
Intellectual and Ethical Maturity Continuum
HIGH
Stage FourFull Relativism/State of Constructed
Knowledge
Experiential Learning Critical Reflection
Stage ThreeRelativism Subordinate
Stage TwoMultiplicity
Stage OneBasic DualismState of Received
Knowledge
LOW
13
Factors Impacting Ethical ReasoningCsongradi,
2004
  • Moral/ Ethical Problem

Facts Media Economy Data
Information
Data Economy Information SOCIETY
Ethical Theories
Institutions
Others
Media Facts VALUES
Perspective
PRINCIPLES
SELF
Laws Rules Codes Obligations
Reflection
Reflection
Data Media Facts Information economy
School Family Friends Religion
Data Facts Economy Media Information
Moral/ Ethical Action
MORAL/ETHICAL KNOWLEDGE
14
Ethical Fitness A Part of Competent Autonomy
  • Competent Autonomy vs. Default Autonomy
  • The difference between competent autonomy which
    is based on professional merit and
  • default autonomy which is without merit and
    results from isolation, insufficient training,
    and market trends and conditions.

15
Competent Autonomy
  • Autonomy an individuals ability to
    independently carry out the responsibilities of
    the position without close supervision.
    Blanchfield Biordi, 1996
  • Autonomy means the freedom to act on what you
    know Kramer and Schmalenberg, 1993
  • Autonomy is linked to competence because
    competence involves not only knowing, but also
    knowing that you know.

16
Awareness of Five Factors
  • Complexity of communication demands
  • Predictability of outcome
  • Cognitive requirements necessary to provide the
    tasks
  • Technical requirements associated with the tasks
  • Level of risk/liability and potential for a
    negative outcome

17
Ethical Fitness
  • Ethical Fitness is the capacity to recognize the
    nature of moral challenges and respond with a
    well-tuned conscience, a lively perception of the
    difference between right and wrong, and an
    ability to choose the right and live by it.
    Kidder, 1990

18
Right vs. Right Dilemmas (6 scenarios)
  • It is right for D/deaf people to have the highest
    skilled interpreters available and it is right
    for novice/student interpreters to have
    opportunities to get real-world interpreting
    experience in an effort to become highly skilled
    one day.
  • It is right for the privacy of consumers to be
    protected and it is right for interpreting
    practitioners to learn from our professional
    experiences by discussing situations from time to
    time in an attempt to avoid future conflicts.

19
Right vs. Right Dilemmas
  • 3. It is right for D/deaf people to have access
    to interpreters 24 hours a day and it is right
    for interpreters to take time off from work or
    have a personal life.
  • 4. It is right for D/deaf children to be among
    their D/deaf peers and to develop a common
    identity with other D/deaf children and it is
    right for parents to want their children to be
    educated in local public schools and live at
    home.

20
Right vs. Right Dilemmas
  • 5. It is right for interpreters to prepare for
    assignments well in advance and it is right for
    D/deaf people to have the choice to participate
    in events spontaneously on short notice.
  • 6. It is right for interpreters to charge a fee
    commensurate with their training, experience and
    national certification and it is right for those
    hiring interpreting services to seek the most
    cost effective option available.

21
Right vs. Wrong
  • It is right for interpreters to desire financial
    success and work hard to achieve it, but it would
    be wrong for interpreters to take advantage of
    consumers for financial gain.
  • It is right for interpreters to want to advance
    themselves personally or professionally, but it
    would be wrong to personally benefit from or use
    information obtained from an interpreting
    assignment for self-interest.

22
Right vs. Wrong
  • 3. It is right for interpreters to seek
    opportunities for growth and to further develop
    their interpreting skills, but it would be wrong
    to take an assignment without being qualified to
    handle it.
  • 4. It is right for interpreters to attempt to
    maximize their time and billable hours during a
    workday, but it would be wrong to schedule
    assignments so close together that consumers were
    not well-served.

23
Right vs. Wrong
  • 5. It is right for interpreters to want to work
    certain types of highly desirable assignments,
    but it would be wrong for interpreters to
    undercut colleagues or referral services when
    soliciting these high profile assignments.
  • 6. It is right for interpreters to believe they
    are qualified for certain assignments, but it
    would be wrong for interpreters to misrepresent
    his or her credentials in order to be hired.

24
4 Right Vs. Right Paradigms Kidder
  • Individual vs. Community
  • Short-term vs. Long-term
  • Justice vs. Mercy
  • Truth vs. Loyalty

25
Individual versus Community
  • 1. This paradigm refers to those situations in
    which the interests of an individual are in
    conflict with the interests of a community.
  • Example the rights of a criminal in the justice
    system vs. the rights of the community to be
    informed about the actions of criminals within
    the community.

26
Short-term vs. Long-term
  • 2. This paradigm refers to those situations when
    the short-term goal is inn conflict with the
    long-term goal.
  • Example interpreters who choose to begin working
    before completing an ITP because the job is
    available now, vs. completing their training in
    order to enter the field as a more qualified
    practitioner. The immediate goal of employment is
    in conflict with the long-term goal of a
    qualified workforce.

27
Justice versus Mercy
  • 3. This paradigm refers to those situations when
    the desire to be fair and judicious is in
    conflict with the human capacity for forgiveness
    and mercy.
  • Example a journalist who plagiarizes someones
    work and whether that person should lose the
    ability to work as a journalist forever, or does
    he deserve a second chance to do the right thing?

28
Truth versus Loyalty
  • 4. This paradigm refers to those situations where
    the importance of telling the truth may conflict
    with the desire to remain loyal to someone or
    something.
  • Example an employee who knows their employer is
    acting unethically about an important matter and
    the struggle with whether to tell the truth to
    the authorities or to remain loyal to their
    employer.

29
Summary on Ethical Maturity
  • Ethical maturity comes from experience in
    reflecting and evaluating various perspectives
    related to what constitutes appropriate and
    ethical behavior.
  • Ethical fitness is a pre-requisite for competent
    autonomy.
  • Individuals move from basic duality which focuses
    on right vs. wrong paradigms to constructed
    relativism which involves consideration of a
    broad range of factors when deciding what is the
    most appropriate response to a situation.

30
  • FINI
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com