Government IP Rights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Government IP Rights

Description:

A 'High Tech' Start-Up. TDC's Chief Scientist figuratively invented pulsed ... [M]uch of the commercial technology sector remains skeptical of the government's ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: jga5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Government IP Rights


1
Government IP Rights
  • Perspective Of A High Tech Start-Up
  • Jerome S. Gabig
  • General Counsel
  • Time Domain Corporation

2
Time Domain Corporation Industry Leader In Pulsed
UWB
  • Pulsed Ultrawide Band is a radical technology
    that will enable entirely new products and
    industries in communications, positioning, and
    radar sensing.
  • Pulsed UWB might be as important as the
    transistor or electric light bulb. U.S.A.Today,
    April 9, 1999

3
Time Domain Corporation A High Tech Start-Up
  • TDCs Chief Scientist figuratively invented
    pulsed UWB technology in his garage
  • From 1996-2001, the CEO, COO, and CTO were sons
    of Von Brauns RD Chief
  • In 2000, TDC was selected as Red Herrings Best
    Of Venture Market South
  • TDC has raised approximately 90 million through
    angel investors and venture capitalists

4
Patent Protection Is Vital To TDC
USA
Foreign
Total
Awarded
70
28
42
Allowed
5
3
8
Pending
108
65
173
Total
141
251
110
TDCs patents are as important as a farmers
interest in protecting his or her seed corn.
5
High Tech Start-Ups Have A Legacy Of Innovation
  • Studies show that small businesses introduce
    roughly 2.5 times as many technological
    innovations per employee as large businesses, and
    also a disproportionately large share of the
    breakthrough innovations forming the foundation
    of U.S. military and economic strength.
  • Tim Foreman, June 17, 1999
  • Deputy Director, DOD OSDBU

6
Start-Ups Are The Most Likely Source For
Radically New Technologies
  • There is a general rule of thumb that radically
    new technologies are usually developed, marketed
    and matured by new companies.
  • Executive Summary to RAND Study
  • DRR-2274-A February 2000

7

8
Even though the industry is dominated by
Mega-Primes, there are many large multi-industry
companies in the sector
Multi-Industrial Firms with Defense Sales
Dedicated Multi-Platform Primes
Non aerospace/defense revenues for GE total 119
Billion
(millions)
Smaller Defense Firms
Source Defense News Top 100 Flight
International Top 100 company annual reports
9
High Tech Start-Ups Have A Legacy Of Avoiding
DOD Contracts
  • The Government is having difficulty in
    attracting truly commercial business to research
    Government problems, whether in research programs
    or in weapons systems development. This is
    largely due to the use of traditional IP clauses
    and procurement methods.
  • Under Secretary of Defense (AT L)
  • IP White Paper, Version 1.1, Oct. 15, 2001

10
High Tech Start-Ups Have A Legacy Of Avoiding
DOD Contracts
  • Much of the commercial technology sector
    remains skeptical of the governments commitment
    to reform, do not need the governments RD
    business and distrusts government contracting in
    general.
  • Executive Summary to RAND Study
  • DRR-2274-A February 2000

11
FAR Part 12 Assuaging The Distrust
  • Much has been done to assuage the distrust
  • FAR Part 12
  • OSD(ATL) letter, Sept. 5, 2000
  • Where industry has performed a substantial
    amount of research and development (sometimes
    over decades), we must create contract
    relationships in commercially friendly terms.
    Because the intellectual property rights of these
    companies represent their lifeline to future
    success, we must make every effort to abide by
    their protection and secrecy concerns.

12
FAR Part 12 Topics of Discussion
  • Patents
  • Trade Secrets
  • Computer Software
  • Suggested Improvement

13
FAR Part 12 -- Patents
  • In light of the Christian Doctrine, the
    Commercial Sector should be cautious of the
    Bayh-Dole Act even though FAR Part 12 does not
    require the solicitation to include a patent
    rights clause.
  • If there is a large potential commercial market
    for inventions that are likely to be conceived
    or actually reduced to practice in the
    performance of work under a government contract,
    allowing the Government to pay for the
    development could be prudent for the vendor.
  • Using FAR Part 12 or a GSA Schedule, if a C.O.
    were to acquire a commercial item which contains
    a subject invention, it is unlikely that the
    Governments royalty-free license to the patent
    would impact the price paid by the C.O.

14
FAR Part 12 Patents (continued)
  • According to FAR 2.101, commercial items include
  • Minor modifications of a type not customarily
    available in the commercial marketplace made to
    meet Federal Government requirements. Minor
    modifications means modifications that do not
    significantly alter the nongovernmental function
    or essential physical characteristics of an
    item. Dollar values and percentages may be used
    as guideposts, but are not conclusive evidence
    that a modification is minor.

15
FAR Part 12 Patents (continued)
  • If the commercial vendor can persuade the
    contracting officer to determine that the
    governments requirements can be accomplished by
    a minor modification to a commercial item,
    arguably the vendor can avoid the Bayh Dole Act
  • Arguably FASA trumps the Bayh-Dole Act
  • Honeywell, ASBCA 39974, 92-2 BCA 24,966 (C.O.
    determination that product fell under commercial
    product exception for TINA binding on govt.)

16
FAR Part 12 Patents (continued)
  • Actually Reduced To Practice
  • Whether an invention was actually reduced to
    practice prior to contract award can be a matter
    of contention. Technical Development Corp. v.
    U.S., 597 F.2d. 733
  • Practically speaking, if a contracting officer
    has made a judgment that he or she is acquiring a
    minor modification to a commercial item, the
    C.O. is less likely to assert that the Government
    is entitled to a royalty-free license to
    inventions actually reduced to practice in the
    performance of the minor modification.

17
FAR Part 12 Patents (continued)
  • Tip 1 To Vendors
  • A contracting officer is only required to insert
    a patent rights clause in solicitations for
    experimental, developmental, or research work.
    FAR 27.303.
  • To the maximum extent possible, influence the
    drafting of the statement of work to avoid terms
    such as develop, experiment, and research.
  • Similarly, contractor reports to the government
    should avoid using developed, experimented or
    researched.
  • Alternative terms might include improve,
    modify, optimize, upgrade, maximize, evolve,
    extend, augment or advance.

18
FAR Part 12 Patents (continued)
  • Tip 2 To Vendors
  • The parties should carefully craft the statement
    of work to preclude the actual reduction of
    previously conceived inventions from occurring
    under, and being charge to, the Government
    contract. Intellectual Property Navigating
    Through Commercial Waters, USD(ATL), Oct. 15,
    2001 at 4-7.
  • However, see Mayman v. Martin Marietta Corp, 894
    F. Suppl. 218 (D. Md. 1995) where this approach
    did not withstand judicial scrutiny during a qui
    tam law suit.

19
FAR Part 12 Technical Data
  • To state the obvious -- the best way to protect
    against a trade secret from being compromised by
    the government is not to provide it to the
    Government.
  • Ostensibly, FAR 12.211 allows the commercial
    vendor to limit what technical data it will
    provide the Government
  • Except as provided by agency-specific statutes,
    the Government shall acquire only the technical
    data customarily provided to the public with a
    commercial item or process.

20
FAR Part 12 Technical Data
  • Except as provided by agency-specific statutes,
    the Government shall acquire only the rights in
    that data customarily provided to the public with
    a commercial item or process. FAR 12.211
  • The contracting officer shall presume that data
    delivered under a contract for commercial items
    was developed exclusively at private expense.
    FAR 12.211
  • DFARS 252.227-7015 Technical DataCommercial
    Items is a fair allocation of rights.
  • There is no prescribed legend for commercial
    technical data.

21
FAR Part 12 Computer Software
  • Commercial computer software or commercial
    computer software documentation shall be acquired
    under licenses customarily provided to the public
    to the extent such licenses are consistent with
    Federal law and otherwise satisfy the Government
    needs. FAR 12.212(a).
  • The Government shall only have those rights
    specified in the license contained in any
    addendum to this contract. FAR 12.212(d).
  • C.O. should consider inserting FAR 52.227-19
    Commercial Computer Software Restricted Rights.
  • Except for FAR 52.227-19, there is no prescribed
    restrictive legend for commercial computer
    software.

22
FAR Part 12 Suggested Improvement
  • FAR 12.207 only allows firm fixed-priced
    contracts or fixed-price contracts with economic
    price adjustment for the acquisition of
    commercial items.
  • FAR 12.207 is not mandated by statute.
  • Delete FAR 12.207. It is an impediment to the
    FAR Guiding Principle of the Acquisition Team is
    to exercise personal initiative and sound
    business judgment in providing the best product
    or service to meet the customers needs. See
    FAR 1.102(d).

23
Concluding Comments
  • For commercial companies, the economy benefit of
    having DOD pay for a large portion of the costs
    for developing new technologies typically
    outweighs the disadvantages of contracting with
    the government.
  • Time Domains corporate experience has been that
    it is better to accept the Kings shilling (at
    the cost of providing a royalty-free license to
    some patents) than to deal with vulture
    capitalists.
  • Unfortunately, commercial companies generally
    continue to distrust govt contracts because many
    of these companies remain unaware of how to
    astutely use FAR Part 12 and the recent USD/ATL
    guidance.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com