Project Management in Our Contemporary Society - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Project Management in Our Contemporary Society

Description:

Project Management in Our Contemporary Society Chapter One The definition of a Project A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: imscience2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Project Management in Our Contemporary Society


1
Project Management in Our Contemporary Society
  • Chapter One

2
The definition of a Project
  • A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a
    unique product or service.
  • It is sometimes useful to make distinction
    between terms as project , program, tasks, and
    work packages.
  • program? projects ? tasks? work packages? work
    units.
  • The project is characterized through its
    attributes.

3
Attributes of a project
  • Importance
  • The most crucial attributes of a project is that
    it must be important enough in the eyes of a
    senior management to justify setting up a special
    organizational unit outside the routine structure
    of the organization.
  • If the rest of the organization senses, or even
    suspects, that it is not really important, the
    project is generally doomed to fail.

4
Attributes of a project
  • Performance
  • A project is usually a one-time activity with a
    well-defined set of desired end results.
  • It can be divided into subtasks that must be
    accomplished in order to achieve the project
    goals.
  • The project is complex enough that the subtasks
    require careful coordination and control in terms
    of timing, precedence, cost and performance.

5
Attributes of a project
  • Life cycle with finite due date
  • Like organic entities , projects have life
    cycles.
  • From a slow beginning they progress to a buildup
    of size, then peak, begin to decline and finally
    must be terminated by some due date.( also like
    organic entities, they resist termination)

6
Attributes of a project
  • Interdependencies
  • Projects often interact with other projects being
    carried out simultaneously by their parent
    organization.
  • Typically these interactions take the form of
    competition for scarce resources between
    projects.
  • Although the functional departments of an
    organization interact with one another in
    regular, patterned ways, the patterns of
    interaction between projects and these
    departments tends to be changeable.
  • PM must keep all these interactions clear and
    maintain the appropriate interrelationships with
    all the external groups.

7
Attributes of a project
  • Uniqueness
  • Though the desired end may have been achieved
    elsewhere, they are at least unique to the
    organizations.
  • Moreover, every project has some elements that
    are unique to that organization. no 2
    construction or RD projects are precisely
    similar.
  • The degree of customization, and the presence of
    risk can alter characteristics in similar
    projects.
  • Projects by their nature cannot be completely
    reduced to routine
  • The PMs is emphasized because , as a devotee of
    management by exception, the pm will find there
    are a great exceptions to manage by.

8
Attributes of a project
  • Resources
  • Projects have limited budgets, both for personal
    as well as other resources.
  • Often the budget is implied rather than detailed,
    particularly concerning personnel, but it is
    strictly limited.

9
Attributes of a project
  • Conflicts
  • More than the mangers, the PM lives in a world of
    characterized by conflicts. Projects compete with
    functional departments for resources and
    personnel.
  • More serious, with the growing proliferation of
    projects, is the project-versus-projects
    conflicts for resources within multi project
    organizations.
  • The 4 partiesat-interest or stakeholders
    (clients, parents organization, projects team and
    the public) in any project even define success
    and failure in different ways.

10
Non projects and Quasi-projects
  • The use of manufacturing line to produce a flow
    of standard products is a non project.
  • They are all routine
  • Quasi projects are those which have a
    Resembling or having a likeness to projects but
    the terms as performance, scheduling and budgets
    are implied in different manner.

11
The Project Life Cycle
  • Most projects go through similar stages on the
    path from origin to completion.
  • There are following for phases in a project,
    collectively called Project life cycle.
  • In the initial phase one that is the start-up
    phase or formation ( conception)
  • The second stage is the build-up stage or the
    selection stage
  • The third is the main program stage or the
    implementation phase which includes all the
    planning, scheduling, monitoring and control
  • The final stage is the phase-out stage or the
    termination phase.

12
(Figure 1)
  • The pattern for the slow-rapid-slow progress
    towards the project goal is common.
  • It is the result of the changing levels of
    resources used during the successive stages of
    the life cycle.
  • Minimal efforts is required at the beginning ,
    when the project concept is being developed and
    subjected to project selection process.
  • Activity increases as planning is completed and
    the real works of the projects gets underway.
  • This rises to the peak and then begins to taper
    off as the project nears completion, finally
    ceasing when evaluation is complete and the
    project is terminated

13
Figure 2
  • While the rise and fall of efforts always occurs,
    there is no particular pattern that seems to
    typify all projects, nor any reason for the
    slowdown at the end of the project to resemble
    the buildup at its beginning.
  • Some projects end without being dragged out. That
    is it gradually slows down until one is almost
    surprised to discover that project activity has
    ceased.
  • In some cases the effort may never fall to zero
    because the project team may be maintained for a
    next project that comes along.
  • The new project will then rise, phoenix- like,
    from the ashes of the old.

14
Time-cost Performance in PLC
  • The ever-present goals of meeting performance,
    time and cost are the major considerations
    throughout the PLC
  • It was generally thought that performance took
    precedence at early phase where planners focus on
    finding the specific methods required to meet the
    projects performance goals.
  • At times team members are so consumed with
    improving performance that result in delayed
    schedules and ultimately higher costs.
  • At the same time technology of project is
    defined, the project schedule is designed and
    project costs are estimated.
  • It is assumed that project cost are of prime
    importance in the high activity stages and
    schedule becomes paramount in the final stages,
    when the client demands delivery
  • But recent researches indicate that the above
    assumptions are untrue.
  • Performance and scheduling are more important
    than cost during all stages.

15
Figure 3
  • A particularly important alternative life cycle
    shape can be captured by the analogy of baking a
    cake
  • A number of such actual projects prevail in
    computer software projects and chemical
    industries.

16
Risk during the life cycle
  • It would be a great source of comfort if one
    could predict with certainty, at the start of the
    project, how performance ,cost and scheduling
    would be met.
  • Figure 4 as we see the uncertainty can be seen
    at the beginning of the project
  • Figure 5 this diagram shows how uncertainty
    decreases as the project moves towards completion
  • From the project start point t o, the band of
    uncertainty grows until it is quiet wide by the
    estimated end of the project. As the project
    actually develops, the degree of uncertainty
    about the final outcome is reduced. t1 .
  • A later forecast made at t2 , reduces the
    uncertainty further.
  • It is common to make new forecasts about project
    performance, time and cost either at fixed
    intervals in the life of the project or when
    specific milestones are reached.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com