Fifth Amendment Guarantees Against Double Jeopardy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Fifth Amendment Guarantees Against Double Jeopardy

Description:

Fifth Amendment Guarantees Against Double Jeopardy Language Defining Same Offense Basic Rules of Double Jeopardy Appeals Dual or Separate Sovereign Doctrine – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: jyatesMyw
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fifth Amendment Guarantees Against Double Jeopardy


1
Fifth Amendment Guarantees Against Double Jeopardy
  • Language
  • Defining Same Offense
  • Basic Rules of Double Jeopardy
  • Appeals
  • Dual or Separate Sovereign Doctrine
  • Collateral Estoppel

2
Language of 5th Amendment
  • No person shall be subject for the same offense
    to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb
  • In Jeopardy meaning
  • Of Life or Limb meaning

3
Defining Same Offense
  • Blockburger v. US (1932)
  • A single act that violates two laws is the same
    offense unless each provision requires proof of
    additional fact that the other does not
  • Two criminal statutes are a single offense if
    they have the same elements or if one is a lesser
    included offense of the other
  • Supreme Court briefly abandons Blockburger in
    1990, in favor of same conduct test, but
    switches back in 1993
  • Examples concerning same offense

4
Same Offense Examples
  • Defendant takes car w/out permission, drives it
    for a week, and returns it to victim.
  • Defendant pleads guilty to the offense of
    joyriding.
  • Subsequently, prosecutor seeks to charge
    defendant w/ auto theft.
  • For double jeopardy purposes, joyriding and car
    theft are the same offense. Joyriding is a
    lesser included offense of car theft, the only
    difference being an intent to permanently deprive
    owner of car (steal) that must be proven in the
    latter, but not the former.
  • See Brown v. Ohio (1977)
  • Note No new facts required to be proven here
  • Defendant is convicted of assault and battery.
  • However, victim later dies from complications
    stemming from the earlier assault and battery.
  • Prosecutor charges defendant w/ manslaughter for
    the same incident that lead to earlier
    conviction.
  • This subsequent prosecution and conviction would
    not violate double jeopardy because the two
    crimes have different factual elements.
  • Manslaughter doesnt require that you prove all
    of the factual elements of Assault Battery.
  • See Diaz v. U.S. (1912)
  • Note New evidence now additional facts are
    proven after 1st prosecution

5
Basic Rules of Double Jeopardy
  • Appeals
  • Dual or Separate Sovereignty Doctrine
  • Collateral Estoppel Ashe v. Swenson (1969)

6
Basic Rules of Double Jeopardy
  • Reprosecutions
  • After Acquittal
  • After Conviction
  • After Mistrial
  • Mistrial with Defendants consent
  • Mistrial over Defendants objection IL v.
    Sommerville (1973)
  • Sentencing Witte v. US (1995)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com