Lufthansa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Lufthansa

Description:

Lufthansa Is it Hedging or Speculating? Case synopsis In January 1985, Lufthansa, under the chairmanship of Heinz Ruhnau purchased twenty 737 jets from Boeing. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1931
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: ubishopsC
Category:
Tags: lufthansa

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lufthansa


1
Lufthansa
  • Is it Hedging or Speculating?

2
Case synopsis
  • In January 1985, Lufthansa, under the
    chairmanship of Heinz Ruhnau purchased twenty 737
    jets from Boeing.
  • The agreed upon price was 500 million, payable
    in US on delivery of the aircrafts in one year,
    that is in January 1986.

3
Case synopsis
  • The US had been rising steadily and rapidly
    since 1980, and was approximately DM3.2/ in
    January 1985.
  • Worst case scenario US continues to appreciate.

4
Herr Ruhnaus expectations
  • Like others at that time, he believed that the
    US had risen about as far as it was going to go,
    and would probably begin to fall by the time
    January 1986 rolled around.

5
Hedging alternatives
  • Remain uncovered
  • Full forward cover
  • Option hedging
  • Money market hedge
  • Some combination of the above alternatives

6
Remain uncovered
  • It is the maximum risk approach.
  • If e DM 2.2/ by January 1986, the purchase of
    the jets would be only DM 1.1 billion.
  • If e DM 4/ the total cost would be DM 2
    billion.
  • Many firms believe that
  • uncovered position currency speculation.

7
Full forward cover
  • This approach would have locked in an exchange
    rate of DM 3.2/, with a known final cost of DM
    1.6 billion.

8
Foreign currency options
  • A put option on the DM at DM 3.2/, could locked
    in DM 1.6 billion plus the cost of the option
    premium (DM 96 million).
  • The total cost of the purchase in the event the
    put was exercised would be DM 1.696 billion.

9
Money market hedge
  • Obtain the 500 million now and hold those funds
    in an interest-bearing account or asset until
    payment was due.
  • What ultimately eliminated this alternative for
    consideration was that Lufthansa had several
    covenants that limited the types, amounts, and
    currencies of denomination of the debt it could
    carry on its balance sheet.

10
Heinz Ruhnau's decision
  • Ruhnau covered forward half of the exposure (250
    million) at DM 3.2/, and left the remaining half
    uncovered.

11
Expected cost as of January 1985
12
Expected cost as of January 1985
13
Expected cost as of January 1985
14
Expected cost as of January 1985
15
Expected cost as of January 1985
16
Outcome
  • The dollar weakened from DM 3.2/ to DM 2.3/.

17
Outcome Perfect hindsight
18
Outcome Perfect hindsight
19
Outcome Perfect hindsight
20
Outcome Perfect hindsight
21
The Aftermath
  • On February 14, 1986, Heinz Ruhnau was summoned
    to meet with Lufthansa's board and with Germany's
    transportation minister to explain his supposed
    speculative management of Lufthansa's exposure in
    the purchase of Boeing jets.
  • Herr Ruhnau was accused of recklessy speculating
    with Lufthansa's money, but the speculation was
    seen as the forward contract, not the amount of
    the exposure left uncovered for the full year.

22
Herr Ruhnau was accused of making the following
mistakes
  • Purchasing the Boeing aircraft at the wrong time.
  • Choosing to hedge half of the exposure when he
    expected the dollar to fall.
  • Choosing forward hedging over options
  • Purchasing Boeing jets at all

23
What went wrong?
  • Lufthansas board should have chosen DM1.6 b as a
    benchmark (DM3.2/)
  • Herr Ruhnau expected the dollar to fall hence,
    he should have used option hedging

24
Concept check 1
  • If you believe there is a 80 probability that
    your house will be destroyed by floods, would you
    buy insurance or move to another location?

25
Concept check 2
  • You want your exams to be assessed based on
  • a. a pre-determined, objective exam key
  • b. instructors inspiration at the time of grading

26
Conclusions
  • Expect the exchange rate to move against you? Use
    forward hedging.
  • Expect the exchange rate to move in your favor?
    Use option hedging.
  • The benchmark has to be ex-ante not ex-post.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com