Title: THE FUTURE OF SWIMMING: MYTHS AND SCIENCE
1THE FUTURE OF SWIMMING MYTHS AND SCIENCE
Brent S. Rushall, Ph.D., R.Psy. The full text of
this presentation is available for one week as a
.pdf download from http//coachsci.sdsu.edu/swimmi
ng/ASCA2009.pdf
2FACTS FROM ACCEPTABLE SCIENCE The major source of
reliable information
3FOUR SOURCES OF COACHING INFORMATION
- ARMCHAIR THEORIZING
- Appeal to authority
- Self-evident truths
- Intellectual tenacity
4FOUR SOURCES OF COACHING INFORMATION (continued)
- SCIENTIFIC METHOD
- Verification by replicated objective data.
Distrust anything that contradicts science or
outrages reason." Christopher Hitchens
5A DOWNSIDE OF THE INFORMATION AGE
- Web-based self-appointed authorities
- False claims about research and results
- Easy accessibility
-
6Yet another threatTHE INCURSION OF POOR SPORTS
SCIENCE
- Scientific standards have decreased
- Motives for publication often supplant the quest
for truth
7- EVIDENCE-BASED RESEARCH IS THE MOST VALUABLE
SOURCE OF RELIABLE INFORMATION
8CLUSTERS OF DISCRETE SPORT SCIENCE INFORMATION
EXIST
- Pre-pubertal
- Male adolescent
- Female adolescent
- Male mature
- Female mature
-
9DISCRETE COACHING PRINCIPLES LEAD TO PARADOXES
- Two examples of the scope of paradoxes
- Requirements for conditioning differ between
mature and immature swimmers. - Technical aspects of skills differ between the
genders and swimmers of different maturational
ages. -
10TOPIC 1 PHYSIOLOGY/CONDITIONING
11THE PROPAGATION OF PHYSIOLOGICALCONDITIONING
- Most physiological schemes are simple and easy
to understand but possibly a little more
difficult to implement. - National organizations, swimming experts, and
coaches propagated training systems and provided
belief-based literature and coaching aids for
implementing physiological conditioning.
12THE PROPAGATION OF PHYSIOLOGICALCONDITIONING
(continued)
- Coaches of many high-profile and successful
swimmers attempted to explain swimmers'
achievements in "scientific" terms and usually
resorted to physiological descriptions of
training programs that were based largely on
belief and never on data. - Coaches educated at the tertiary level in
physical education, human movement studies,
exercise science, or kinesiology degrees most
often were exposed to courses of study that
emphasized exercise physiology to a much greater
degree than any other scientific factor involved
in movement. That emphasis reinforced a
perception of exercise physiology being the most
important path for altering human movement.
13WHAT RESEARCH TELLS US
- Prescribed training intensities are not
followed by athletes. What a coach says is
completed at training is not necessarily what
actually is done by the swimmers. - High-yardage training and dryland training
demands are unrelated to or negatively impact
male swimming performances. Current training
theory is unrelated to male competitive
performances. - Muscle fiber use and energy delivery differs
between sprint events. There is no single
energy-oriented method for training sprinters.
14WHAT RESEARCH TELLS US (continued)
- Training effects vary greatly and depend upon
the actual set swum. Just what is achieved
through a program with training "variety" is
unknown but is more than likely unrelated to a
competitive swimming event. - Anaerobic work capacity and indices are
unrelated to swimming performances and are
difficult to determine in swimming. - Physiological capacities have limited (ceiling)
levels of adaptation and after they have been
achieved no further benefits are possible. The
coaching belief that performance improvements
will occur if more or harder training is
experienced has no basis in physiology. The
potential to improve through conditioning effects
stops once growth has ceased.
15WHAT RESEARCH TELLS US (continued)
- Swimmers within a group exposed to the same
training program respond with varied and
different physiological adaptations. It is
erroneous to assume that a swimmer will change in
a particular physiological way because of a
coach's intentions and program content. - Aerobic measures are unrelated to training and
competitive swimming performances. However, some
physiological tests performed during taper are
moderately related to ensuing competitive
performances . Physiological testing during
training yields no predictive value for
competitive performances and could yield
irrelevant directions for training alterations. - Alternative forms of training (e.g., tethered
swimming, swimming with paddles) use different
proportions of energy systems when compared to
free-swimming. Because of specific training
effects, non-specific activities will have no
potential for transferring any form of
conditioning to serious swimming performances,
which normally is the justification for their
use.
16WHAT RESEARCH TELLS US (continued)
- Strength or land training is a false avenue for
swimmer improvement. There still is an emphasis
on developing "strength" in swimmers, despite its
irrelevance. Occasionally, a report of the value
of strength training emerges. - Significant gender differences exist in
physiological factors associated with training.
Mixed gender training groups will produce less
than optimal training responses for both
genders. - The meaningfulness of physiological test
results varies depending upon the performance
standard of the swimmer. Such tests are
irrelevant for guiding training program content.
17THE INDIVIDUALITY OF ADAPTIVE RESPONSES
TRAINING EFFECTS WITHIN SWIMMING GROUPS SUBJECTED
TO THE SAME HEART RATE RANGES AS TRAINING STIMULI
(Howat Robson, 1992)
18RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS
- Laboratory measurements, which are only
partially related to laboratory performance, are
useless for predicting competitive performances. - Training programs based on oxygen and substrate
supply theories are likely to result in incorrect
stimulation and will not yield maximal fitness
adaptation for a specific sport, such as
swimming. - Training with auxiliary activities, such as
weight training, will not produce adaptations
that transfer to competitive performances in
experienced athletes.
19RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS (continued)
- Physiological responses to complicated sporting
activities such as swimming are likely to be
caused by a complicated set of physiological
processes. Limiting training "theory" to one
incomplete physiological model will not result in
maximal fitness adaptation for a specific sport. - It is likely that training programs developed
by incorporating principles from psychology,
biomechanics, and physiology will stimulate the
best training adaptations for a particular sport.
20BIGGEST CHANGES REQUIREDFOR CONTINUALLY ADAPTED
SWIMMERS
- More than two peaks a year.
- Periodization out block periodization in.
- Training emphases should stress stroking economy
and effectiveness and mental skills training. - Individualization of program content.
- Removal of irrelevant and detrimental training
and competition activities. - Increase quantity of race-quality swimming.
21TOPIC 2 ALTITUDE
22WHAT IS KNOWN IN SWIMMING
Intermittent hypoxia (residing in an altitude
tent) does not improve swimming performance
economy or produce any beneficial effects.
Erythropoietin (EPO) changes due to altitude
and intermittent hypoxia are not associated with
total hemoglobin mass. Swimmers' sea level
performances are not associated with total
hemoglobin mass. Swimmers' ventilatory responses
are not improved by intermittent hypoxia although
sedentary individuals do exhibit improvements.
23ALTITUDE WHAT IS KNOWN IN SWIMMING (continued)
Altitude residence does not affect the
ventricular structure of swimmers. Simulated
altitude conditions reduce both swimming
performances and physiological factors. Altitude
residents improve swimming times when they
compete at sea level. Any attributed altitude
training effects are most likely caused by
placebo or training camp/vacation/reduced
workload effects.
24ALTITUDE
The implications of altitude research have
changed over the years, which is a common
phenomenon in science. Some nations still
persist with the folly of altitude training.
25TOPIC 3 LACTATE/LACTIC ACID
26ERROR 1IT IS LACTIC ACID
- CORRECTION
- IT IS ALWAYS LACTATE
27ERROR 2Increases in lactate measures are
indicative of muscles working without oxygen. The
higher the measure, the greater the "anaerobic
capability" of the athlete.
- CORRECTION
- It is a result of (a) processes which produce
and contribute to its appearance, and (b)
processes which catabolize it after its removal
from the blood. ". . . the concentration of
lactate in the blood provides minimal
information" about its rate of production
28ERROR 3Sore muscles are caused by lactic acid
pooling and not being cleared.
- CORRECTION
- Excessive lactic acid is removed from the blood
and muscles usually within one hour after
exhaustive exercise. 15 minutes of recovery
swimming usually clears any accumulation. - Soreness comes from muscle cell
damage.Metabolic acidosis is not caused by
lactate production.
29ERROR 4Lactic acid causes fatigue.
- CORRECTION
- Lactate is actually an important fuel that is
used by the muscles during prolonged exercise. It
mitigates fatigue.
30ERROR 5Anaerobic threshold is a valuable
criterion for programming training activities.
- CORRECTION
- 1) Muscle never becomes anaerobic.
- 2) The so-called disproportionate increase
causing a "turnpoint" is incorrect because the
increase is actually smooth and incremental. - 3) The concept of anaerobic threshold and its
being caused by a few processes is unsupported.
31ERROR 6Anaerobic training is an important
aspect of swimming programs.
- CORRECTION
- Focusing training on changing physiological
functions that have low to no relevance for
competitive performances is baffling. - 2) The capacity of females to do anaerobic
training is less than in males.
32TOPIC 4 PACING
33Get out ahead and hold it"take it out to
lead at the end of the second lap"take it out
fast", etc. are commonplace advices. Among many
coaches, "taking it out" somehow is meant to give
a swimmer a racing advantage.
INITIATING A RACE
341) To all intents and purposes the available
anaerobic and aerobic energy in a race is fixed
and limited.2) Using too much of one energy
resource, particularly anaerobic energy too soon
will cost a swimmer later in a race. 3) The
judicious allocation of these energy sources
should result in the best time possible on any
given day.
ENERGY RESOURCES
351) Even pacing uses energy resources more
efficiently and results in better performances
than going out too fast or too slow in a 2
minute effort.2) Females must pace more
exquisitely than men. There is a gender
difference.3) A short faster start is usually
required until aerobic energy kinetics are fully
functional.4) The execution of swimming skills
(dive, turns, underwater kicking) affect lap
times and possibly stroke velocity.
PACING
361) Pace by power output, not by effort.2)
Coach-imposed pacing does not work.3) Regard
for energy resources is paramount.4) The
even-pacing caveat.
PACING
371) The duration and intensity of early increased
velocity. 2) The consistency and effectiveness
of the skills of turning, the dive, and finish
across all race segments. 3) The overall
stroking velocity in that part of the length
where it is the dominant performance
determinant. 4) The optimization of the
transition from high-velocity skills to
lower-velocity stroking in each length throughout
the duration of a race. A focus on these
factors would likely produce significant
competitive improvements.
FACTORS TO DETERMINE
38TOPIC 5 WHOLE-ARM PROPULSION
39A history of clinging to an incorrect attribution
of the Bernoulli Theory and lift in swimming.
40Fluid-flow distortions about a wing-shape surface
at an angle of attack.
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43(No Transcript)
44TOPIC 6 STRETCHING/FLEXIBILITY
45RANGE OF MOTIONThe terms stretching and
flexibility are often used interchangeably.
Flexibility implies the range of movement that is
accommodated by the physical structure.
Stretching refers to facilitating the achievement
of natural flexibility, that is, the lengthening
of soft tissues (i.e., muscles) to facilitate
attaining one's flexibility.
46Most swimming-related shoulder problems are
caused. Attempts to move beyond natural
flexibility, particularly in post-pubertal
swimmers, usually lead to injury and are not
related to performance improvements. Forms of
flexibility work have reached abusive levels.
47Abusive stretching of a professional
player'shamstrings and hip joints.
48HABITUATION
- Conscientious participation in physical
activities from pre-pubertal ages leads to the
development of sufficient flexibility to
accommodate the many actions practiced in
competitive swimming. - There is no need for a concerted flexibility
program, particularly since there is no evidence
to show such programs facilitate performance
improvement.
49RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS
- Only PNF stretching is acceptable as a formal
stretching protocol. - In particular, long static stretching activities
and abusive stretching are harmful to the athlete
and performance. - Both harmful forms of stretching decrease
performance strength, power, and explosiveness. - Exaggerated stretching routines slow recovery.
- Stretching does not prevent injury, but rather in
many circumstances contributes to it.
50DOS AND DONTS OF STRETCHING
- Do not perform any stretching activities that
stress the joint tissues or structures. - Do no exercises that bounce or force a joint
beyond a natural range of movement. - Only use a partner for stretching activities if
the partner is knowledgeable about and adheres to
the correct execution of 3S (PNF) stretching. - Slow stretching should follow a physical warm-up
but precede any skill and intensity specific
activities. Coaches should be wary of
individuals promoting forms of stretching other
than PNF.
51- No stretched position should be held other than
in the PNF procedure. - Once specific race preparations begin after
warm-up, no further formal and deliberate
stretching should be performed. The stretching of
soft tissues should be achieved through
swimmer-directed activities that are performed to
meet the particular needs of the moment. - If any stretching produces pain or DOMS that
keeps returning after each stretching session,
cease stretching.
52CLOSURETHE 25-YEARS RULE
- Emphasizing conditioning and physiology are so
entrenched in swimming and educational curricula
that complete understanding and re-emphasis
within 25 years is unlikely. - The rejection of altitude/hypoxic training is
likely to take less than 25 years because there
appears to be a semblance of realization that
expected benefits from this class of activity
have not been forthcoming.
53THE 25-YEARS RULE (continued)
- Lactic acid will remain in the swimming coaches'
lexicon until conscientious individuals change
their understanding of the phenomena embraced by
the term and transfer that realization to other
coaches. Change should occur in less than 25
years. - Pacing will be paid lip-service. Unfortunately,
because of the associated false premises of
competing, many potential winners will be turned
into losers over at least the next 25 years.
54THE 25-YEARS RULE (continued)
- The acceptance of whole-arm propulsion could take
25 years. - Excessive and detrimental stretching should
persist for 25 years.
55THE FUTURE OF SWIMMING MYTHS AND SCIENCE
Brent S. Rushall, Ph.D., R.Psy. The full text of
this presentation is available for one week as a
.pdf download from http//coachsci.sdsu.edu/swimmi
ng/ASCA2009.pdf