Title: Pemberton’s Dilemma
1Pembertons Dilemma
2Introduction This exercise creates a situation
in which you and the others will be making
separate decisions about how to manage your firm.
The outcomes (profits and losses) are determined
not only by what you do, but also by a number of
other factors such as the goals and motives that
you and the other party have and the
communication that takes place between you and
them.
3- Procedure
- Divide your groups into two management teams
(Country Market Corner Store) - Prepare sheets of paper for each management team
one ½ crosswise (tally sheet) and two ¼ sheets
(decision cards) - Represent your store in discussions with the
other store about the decision to operate (or
not) during Sundays
4- Procedure
- There will be 12 one-minute rounds where stores
will simultaneously decide whether they will open
or not - You execute your decision by revealing to the
other team the appropriate card (open or
closed) at the same time that the other team is
revealing their card to you.
5- Procedure
- Each round represents one Sunday every 4th
Sunday is part of a long weekend - A two-minute confidential planning session
separates each Sunday - The two teams may, if they so desire, negotiate
with each other for 3 minutes IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING WEEKS 4 AND 8 ONLY.
6- Relevant Information
- Commercial activity in Pemberton has been
prohibited during Sundays - Sunday shopping has been permitted in the
metropolitan center just 30 minutes away - Both Country Market and Corner Store have been
consistently losing potential profit as Sunday
shopping becomes more popular
7- Relevant Information
- If both stores remain closed on a Sunday, each
will have the usual 20,000 weekly profit - If only one store opens on a Sunday, it will earn
a 40,000 profit for that week while the other
store will incur a 40,000 loss - If both stores decide to open on a Sunday, each
will incur a 20,000 loss for that week
8- Building Your Team Strategy
- After reading the instructions/relevant
information, answer 2 questions with your team - What are your objectives for this game? (what
for) - What are the moves that you will make to meet
these objectives? (how)
9Pay-off Chart
10Sample Tally Sheet
11Debrief Review the outcomes from summary table-
what do we see? a/Both high and positive
scores-usually a strong cooperative pair b/Both
moderate scores-often a group that learned to
cooperate c/ Both low scores-usually a
competitive pair d/ Groups with large difference
between scores-one group took advantage of the
other
12- Dilemma Characteristics
- Individual choices reflected in joint outcomes
- Interdependence affects outcomes Payoff to self
is the only reward (lack of concern for the
other) - Mutual Adjustment Influence on negotiating
partner- change over time - Value Claiming and Value Creating which is the
more prominent goal - Lack of Direct communication, ability to make
binding agreements, trust
13- Can the Dilemma be avoided?
- Lengthen the shadow of the future (repeated
rounds) - Use Sophisticated Strategies
- Use knowledge of the other- probability of the
others move - OR
14- Can the Dilemma be avoided?
- Interdependent When the parties depend on each
other to achieve their own preferred outcome they
are interdependent they are characterized by
interlocking goals. - Recognize that negotiation is a process that
transforms over time, and mutual adjustment is
one of the key causes of the changes that occur
during a negotiation- Revenge - Realize successful coordination of
interdependence has the potential to lead to
synergy, which is the notion that the whole is
greater than the sum of its parts. In effect we
can increase the size of the pie. - Manage conflict whether it is inter-group,
intra-group, interpersonal, or intrapersonal
15- Overview
- Viewed as a fixed pie situation we lose-they
gain - Non verbal communication
- Choices based on previous moves
- Gestures
- Emotion around losses betrayal, revenge
- Loss of focus on strategy and goals
- Intra-group challenges
- Agreeing on goal strategies
- Backing representatives
16Negotiators Dilemma
17- Negotiators Dilemma
- How to cooperate and create value at the table
without being taken advantage of or becoming
hostage to the relationship - How to compete or claim value at the table
without damaging the relationship or blocking the
negotiation - How to maximize value while minimizing risk
18The End
19Prisoner Dilemma Two men suspected of
committing a crime are arrested by the police and
placed in separate cells. Each is told that he
may either confess to the crime or remain silent.
Each is told that if he confesses and his partner
does not, the one who confesses turns state's
evidence against the other and goes free while
the other will go the jail for a long time (e.g.,
10 years) if both confess, they both go to jail
for a moderate term (e.g. 5 years) but, if
neither confesses, then the police will have them
found guilty of a lesser charge - - carrying
concealed weapons - - and sent to jail for 1
year.
20PrisonerDilemma