Title: Cultural Differences Global Negotiation Who negotiates
1Cultural DifferencesGlobal Negotiation
2Who negotiates better?
- Different nationalities negotiating within
national boundaries - Similar outcomes across nations
- Different processes (Americans increase profits
by making opponent uncomfortable, Japanese
opposite is true Brazilians increase profit by
power and deception tactics Chinese ask more
questions, say no less, interrupt more - True cross-cultural negotiations
- Poorer outcomes for Japanese and English-Canadian
- No harm for American (more satis.) or
French-Canadian (more coop)
Little is really known
3American negotiators from an international
perspective
- STRENGTHS
- Preparedness
- Pragmatism
- Candor, honesty, friendliness
- Cooperative and fair
- Win-win orientation
- Willingness to make concessions
- WEAKNESSES
- Cultural insensitivity
- Impatience
- Lack of unified constituencies
- Poor listening skills
- Too quick to concede
- Dont understand small talk
4What are some shared American values?
What are some assumptions underlying American
culture?
How would these affect how we negotiate with
other cultures and how others view us?
5Levels of cultural understanding
- Observable behavior
- Can learn a lot, but likely to focus on dos and
donts - Often leads to superficial understanding
- Shared values
- Requires inferences from observed behavior and
learning about a culture - More powerful, because values drive (partially)
behavior - Shared assumptions
- Very abstract these drive our values but are
very hard to determine - Very powerful, helps truly understand a culture
6Hofstedes Dimensions and Negotiation
- Power Distance
- extent to which power differentials are expected
and honored - Low Anglo/Germanic/Scandanavian
- High Developing Nations, particularly Pacific
Rim - Effect As power distance increases, more
approval from higher ups and less involvement
from lower levels. Also, can expect more
formality in Ns with people from high PD
cultures, and they may be upset if you do not
appear to be of sufficient status. - Individualism/Collectivism
- extent to which society is organized by
individuals vs. groups - Ind. Western European - based societies
- Coll. Latin America, Pacific Rim
- Generally, wealthier societies tend to be more
individualist - Effect Relationship stability over time
emphases, individual negotiators vs. group of
negotiators, importance of consensus, value
placed on individual winner, emphasis on group
vs. individual goals, rewards, communication in
Ns, etc.
7Hofstedes Dimensions and Negotiation 2
- Masculinity/Feminity
- extent to which values fit traditional
gender-based stereotypes - M Japan, Anglo/Germanic
- F Scandinavia.
- Effect Masculinity associated with
competitiveness vs. empathy compromise should
expect strong relationships with distributive vs.
integrative styles. - Uncertainty Avoidance
- degree of discomfort with unstructured situations
- High no strong pattern, but many Hispanic
nations - Low no strong pattern, but Anglo/Scandinavia
- Effect High prefers stable rules and procedures,
less adaptive. High also tends to be more
risk-averse risk aversion has played into many
N. dynamics. High tends to do business
ritualistically formally.
8Other cultural variables
- Time
- present vs. future vs. past orientation
- Time as linear vs. time as circular
- Can affect timing/urgency of Ns, and also what
sorts of time-related objectives (short-term vs.
long-term) are valued more - Americans often seen obsessed with time.
- Universalism vs. particularism
- Can ideas/practices be applied everywhere every
time, or do circumstances dictate application? - Use of precedent vs. adapting styles/processes/agr
eements to situations - Emotionality
- Great potential for misunderstandings here!!!
- Achievement vs. ascription
- Is status conferred by what youve done or who
you are? - How will a person be viewed in a N situation?
9Some communication differences
- Verbal communication
- Is message conveyed in context, or is it
explicitly what is stated? - Americans often believed to be blunt, even to
point of rudeness. - Non-verbal
- Handshakes
- Conversational distance
- Facial bodily expressiveness animation,
gestures, etc. - Very difficult to interpret because subtle and
great differences across cultures - Look for patterns in order to interpret
- The concept of face
10Example of communication patterns
11Negotiation process/timing for Americans in
domestic vs. international negotiations
Domestic 1 2
3 4 5 6
International 1
2 3 4
5 6
Key 1- orientation fact-finding 2-
resistance 3- reformulation of strategies
4- hard bargaining decision-making 5-
agreement 6- follow-up
12Negotiating Strategies in Other Countries
- Opening offer
- Close to final settlement where haggling is not
customary (e.g. Australia, Sweden) - Expect lots o haggling in some nations (e.g.
Russia, Egypt, China) - Rule of thumb (that wont always work, so apply
with caution) if a culture has a long history of
bartering bargaining, expect to haggle. - Detail vs. big-picture in presentation
- Detail where culture emphasizes formality, logic,
data, organization (e.g. Germany, UK, Swiss,
Japan) - Broad concepts preferred in some other areas
(e.g. Latin America, Middle East)
13More Negotiation Strategies in Other Countries
- Dealing With Disagreement
- Subtle, quiet vs. demonstrative
- In Pacific Rim, no is almost a dirty word
- In Middle East, histrionics (to our eyes ears)
are normal - Patterns of concessions
- In some nations, given grudgingly (US, S.Afr.,
Brazil, e.g.) - In others, declining pattern is norm (Australia,
NZ, Taiwan, Thailand, e.g.) - Escalating in others (Indonesia, Philippines,
India, Kenya, e.g) - Calling other on dirty tricks
- Be EXTREMELY cautious where face is important
(Pacific Rim, Middle East)
14Cultural Differences affecting other Negotiation
Processes
- Relationships orientation
- Lack of trust across cultural differences ? trust
building essential - Some cultures are standoffish (e.g. British,
Germanic), so get down to business before too
long - Emotional Aspects
- Sensitivity is low for US, high for Latin America
- Loyalty to self in US, to organization in many
other cultures - Decision Making Frame
- In US change is acceptable, even encouraged,
decisions made quickly - In many other nations, status quo is the normal
frame of reference - US is relatively prone to using agendas, may be
restrictive to some others
15More Cultural Differences
- Contracts
- Advisable to use more paper, since cultural
misunderstandings more likely - Bureaucracy
- You think US businesses/organizations are
bureaucratic? - Womens issues
- US is relatively progressive regarding womens
roles - Rule of thumb less developed nations, greater
disparity - Women negotiating in these countries should be
introduced by a very high-status person - Because you look different than local women, you
may be viewed as executive - Demonstrations of expertise critical
- Women can and do often perform well even where
cultures do not give women status
16Negotiating in Specific Regions
- The next 4 slides are FYI only and far from
complete - There are important differences across nations
within regions (e.g., Israel vs. Iran in Middle
East) - Remember you are negotiating with an
individual(s) who may or may not fit cultural
norms to a T!!!
Source How to Negotiate Anything with Anyone
Anywhere in the World, Frank Acuff
17Negotiating in Western Europe
- Timing punctual, relatively fast-paced
- Individualistic, status-conscious,
slow-developing friendships, emphasis on
initiative achievement - Loyalty hard work are valued
- Greater hierarchy than in US
- Speakers s/b articulate intellectual, formal,
logical, and subtle - Low emotionality, reserved
- Moderate initial demands, issues sequentially
processed, slow concessions
18Negotiating in the Middle East/North Africa
- Bargaining is a way of life Youre
supposed to haggle! Monty Python - Time not punctual or planning-oriented (too
much attempt to control the future invites
trouble). Ramadan is especially slow for
business. - Group oriented, and very deferential to those of
status - Much time upfront spent in developing
relationships - Masculine Arabs read poetry, use intuition, and
are emotional. Feminine Arab qualities are
coolness and pragmatism. - Israelis are direct, Arabs indirect, vague
expressive, often to point of exaggeration
filled with fantastic metaphors - No is uncommon look for a hesitant yes
instead white lies common form of courtesy - Saying I dont know ? you are of little account
- Strong eye contact, close personal space, touchy
- High initial demands, slow concessions, issues
sequential, extreme face orientation, truth is
revealed very slowly because it is considered
dangerous
19Negotiating in the Pacific Rim
- Old cultures, socially stratified, Confucian
ethic - Courtesy rituals, formality, politeness, modesty,
loyalty to group and deference to elderly,
non-confrontational - Negotiations slow, relationship orientation
group negotiation style with team consensus
critical implementation usually quick, though - Very collectivist
- Words mean little, conversation very indirect
- he who speaks doesnt know, he who knows doesnt
speak - No uncommon might get a well study this
further instead - Reserved body language, average-to-close personal
space, not touchy - Sensitivity valued but not overstated
- Moderate-high initial offers, multiple issues
presented at once, slow concessions, logical
decisions - Face is critical
20Doing as the Romans do
- This is common advice when negotiating
internationally - BUT
- Negotiators may not be able to modify their
approach effectively - Other side may also try to modify
- Knowing how a given nationality negotiates with
its peers may be misleading for your negotiations
with them - SO
- Moderate adaptation may be better
- May be able to adapt completely or transcend
culture entirely when very familiar with a
country - Consider cultural brokers when very unfamiliar
with a country - Articulate the cultural difference, agree in
advance to work through it. - BEST ADVICE
- Prepare, prepare, prepare.
21BOOZE NEGOTIATION
- Avoid when
- wanting to use impression management
- professional boundaries are important
- social pressure is a big concern
- negotiation involves many issues
- negotiation involves calculations
- diplomacy, tact, and careful communication are
crucial - interpersonal conflict is likely to escalate
- May be OK when
- social norms favor drinking
- opportunities for social exchange gt alcohols
risks - value of developing bonds gt alcohols risks
- focus is long-term relationship
- appealing to emotional criteria
- learning information about the other party is
crucial - your relative tolerance level is high
Note There are important cultural aspects to
this, too!!!