Critical and Strategic Thinking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Critical and Strategic Thinking

Description:

Critical and Strategic Thinking Browne & Keeley s Cr.Th. Q s What are the issues and the conclusions? What are the reasons supporting the conclusions? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:222
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: csunEduh9
Learn more at: http://www.csun.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Critical and Strategic Thinking


1
Critical and StrategicThinking
2
Browne Keeleys Cr.Th. Qs
  • What are the issues and the conclusions?
  • What are the reasons supporting the conclusions?
  • Which words or phrases are ambiguous?
  • What are the value conflicts and assumptions
    about value priorities?
  • What are the descriptive assumptions?
  • How good is the evidence?
  • What significant information is omitted?
  • Are the statistics deceptive or misleading?
  • Are there any fallacies in the reasoning?
  • Are there rival causes, i.e., other explanations
    or interpretations of the evidence or these
    findings?
  • What other reasonable conclusions are possible?

3
Some Un-critical Thinking
  • Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible.
  • Lord Kelvin-British mathematician, physicist, and
    president of the British Royal Society, c. 1895.
  • A severe depression like that of 1920-21 is
    outside the range of probability.
  • Harvard Economic Society-Weekly Letter November
    16, 1929

4
More Un-critical Thinking
  • Gone with the Wind is going to be the biggest
    flop in Hollywood history.
  • Gary Cooper, 1937, after turning down the role of
    Rhett Butler
  • They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist_____
  • General John B. Sedgwick-Union Army Civil War
    officer's last words, uttered during the Battle
    of Spotsylvania, 1864

5
Some Common Fallacies
  • Slippery Slope assuming that a proposed step
    will set off an uncontrollable chain of
    undesirable events
  • Searching for Perfect Solution unwilling to
    solve part of a problem
  • Equivocation using a key word with two or more
    meanings in an argument
  • Appeal to Popularity falsely assumes that
    something favored by a large group is desirable
  • Appeal to Questionable Authority citing an
    authority who lacks special expertise on the
    issue at hand
  • Appeals to Emotions using emotionally charged
    language to distract from relevant reasons and
    evidence
  • Straw Person Distorting ones opponents point
    of view so that is it easy to attack
  • Attacks Attacks a person or a persons
    background, instead of the persons ideas
  • Either-Or assuming only two alternatives
  • Wishful Thinking assuming that, because we wish
    X were true or false, then X is indeed true or
    false
  • Explaining by Naming assuming that a name for
    some event or behavior adequately explained the
    event
  • Glittering Generality Use of vague emotionally
    appealing virtue words
  • Red Herring An irrelevant topic is presented to
    divert attention from the original issue
  • Begging the Question an argument in which the
    conclusion is assumed in the reasoning.
  • Hasty Generalization drawing a conclusion about
    a large group based on experiences with only a
    few members
  • Faulty Analogy using an analogy in which there
    are important relevant dissimilarities
  • Causal Oversimplification explaining an event
    by relying on causal factors that are
    insufficient
  • Confusion of Cause and Effect confusing the
    cause with the effect of an event
  • Neglect of a Common Cause failure to recognize
    that two events may be related because of a 3rd
    factor

6
  • The Socialist Democrat Establishment of America
    wants to shut Pro-American Voices Up!
  • (2008, on a tee-shirt, with this
    capitalization)

7
  • The history of forcing fluoride on humans through
    the fluoridation of drinking water is wrought
    with lies, greed and deception. Governments that
    add fluoride to drinking water supplies insist
    that it is safe, beneficial and necessary,
    however, scientific evidence shows that fluoride
    is not safe to ingest The lies of the benefits
    of water fluoridation will continue to be fed to
    the public, not to encourage health benefits to a
    large number of people, but to profit the
    military-industrial complex. (2007)

8
  • The number one economic threat to our nation and
    our well-being is the price of a gallon of gas.
    We as individuals and our nation are at risk. We
    have watched the price of gas sharply increase
    and to this day our Congress has done nothing or
    even indicated they have a plan. The quickest and
    most helpful thing Congress can do to reduce the
    price of gas right now is to lift the moratorium
    on drilling for oil in the U.S. and offshore.
    Drilling offshore can be done safely now! Other
    nations are doing it now! (2008)

9
Strategic Thinking
  • Identify focus on important issues
  • Select key, relevant information
  • Recognize systemic properties
  • Understand through
  • Distinguishing causes from effects
  • Clarifying (tacit) underlying assumptions
  • Considering issue in a larger context
  • Maintaining a long-term view

10
Strategic Thinking (cont.)
  • Appreciate implications consequences
  • Generate alternatives evaluate objectively
  • Integrate logical/rational
    creative/generative thinking
  • Remain flexible
  • Act in the face of emotional discomfort

11
Strategic Thinking (1 page)
  • Identify focus on important issues
  • Select key, relevant information
  • Recognize systemic properties
  • Understand through
  • Distinguishing causes from effects or symptoms
  • Clarifying (often tacit) underlying assumptions
  • Considering the issue or situation in a larger
    context
  • Maintaining a long-term view
  • Appreciate implications consequences
  • Generate alternatives evaluate objectively
  • Integrate logical/rational creative/generative
    thinking
  • Remain flexible
  • Act in the face of emotional discomfort

12
Another View of Strategic Thinking
  • Thinking more deeply to distinguish underlying
    causes and issues from more obvious symptoms
  • Thinking more broadly to recognize systemic
    linkages, interactions, and patterns
  • Thinking long-term as well as short-term about
    implications and consequences

13
Strategic Thinking Case
  • Apply strategic thinking to the case, making
    notes for yourself
  • Discuss in groups
  • Report out with total class discussion

14
Southwest Airlines Strategies
  • Be a short-haul niche player (initially)
  • Fly frequently between pairs of cities not too
    far apart (not hub-and-spoke system)
  • Use uncongested secondary airports
  • Fly only one type of aircraft (737 family)

15
SW Strategies (cont.)
  • Fierce cost controls no frills (no assigned
    seats, no onboard food, direct ticket sales,
    ticketless travel)
  • Differentiate through focus on operations,
    service, people, culture
  • Foster good labor-management relations
  • Expand later, including in East
  • Aggressive fuel hedging

16
Southwest Airlines Performance
  • Started 1971
  • Profitable in 1973 and 36 consecutive years since
  • Only one of top ten profitable after 9/11
  • 2001-2005 2.1 B profit while ten largest lost
    59 B
  • 2008 267, 11 B sales, 178 M profit while ten
    largest lost 4 B

17
  • Highest market cap of any airline
  • 64 cities in 32 states
  • 481 planes (various 737 versions)
  • Strike-free after 36 years of operations
  • High on Fortunes best to work for lists and
    various lists re customer satisfaction

18
  • SP report 7/22/09 said We believe LUV is the
    financially strongest U.S. airline. It has posted
    36 consecutive years of profitable operations,
    and we see the quality of those earnings as high.
    In addition, LUV has ample cash, and its debt to
    total capitalization is significantly below peer
    levels, by our analysis. We think these measures
    warrant a premium valuation to peers and the SP
    500.

19
Strategic Management Process
20
Strategic Management Process
21
St. Mgt. Process Diagnosis
  • Identify critique current mission, objectives,
    strategies
  • Analyze external internal environments to
    evaluate performance plus identify SWOT CIs
  • External competitive environment (5-force model)
    societal environment (political/legal,
    technological, economic, sociocultural)
    stakeholders

22
Process Diagnosis (cont.)
  • Internal functional areas financial marketing
    production/operations technology organizational
  • No set protocol. Do what is necessary to
    understand develop CIs. Analysis is a means to
    this end
  • Both immediate and long-range problems. ID
    causes rather than symptoms

23
Process Formulation
  • Formulate rich range of alternatives
  • Evaluate alternatives
  • Select a set
  • Need clear recommendations with supporting
    justification
  • May revise mission, objectives, strategies
  • Three levels of recommendations corporate,
    competitive, and "other"

24
Process Formulation (cont.)
  • Recommendations should be
  • Effective in solving problems
  • Practical
  • Feasible
  • Cost-effective
  • Acceptable to key stakeholders
  • Is vital to ensure that all CIs have been
    addressed adequately

25
Process Implementation
  • Plan is a set of basic action steps addressing
    what, how, who, where, when why - is necessary
    to make the strategy work
  • Resources (financial, human, physical,
    technological)
  • Obtaining maintaining support for changes
  • Reward systems
  • Timing (especially sequencing constraints)
  • Organization structure
  • Tracking control systems
  • Leadership, managing change

26
Strategic Management Process
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com