Issues in Pharmacy Practice: Contracts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Issues in Pharmacy Practice: Contracts

Description:

First Nations Peoples living on Crown lands. Grounds upon which a contract may be impeached ... C's pharmacy is very busy and C refuses to hire a technician. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:258
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: phar152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Issues in Pharmacy Practice: Contracts


1
Issues in Pharmacy PracticeContracts
  • Contract An agreement between parties
    consisting of offer, consideration, acceptance
  • Consideration The price for which the promise
    of another is bought
  • Gratuitous Promise made without bargaining for
    or accepting anything else in return

2
The Offer
  • Legal issues
  • Caveat emptor
  • False promises, fraud, criminal intent or
    behaviour
  • Advertising as free speech, not an offer

3
Adequacy of Consideration
  • Requires personal value judgment
  • Not the role of law (usually)
  • Motive cannot change a gratuitous promise into a
    contract
  • Assumed equality of parties entering into a
    contract

4
Case 1
  • The SS Myrik hit an iceberg and began to sink.
    In an effort to stem the desertion of the crew of
    the ship, the Captain offered to double their pay
    if they stayed with the ship. The ship
    eventually sank, and the Captain refused to pay
    the crew.
  • Relationship between existing legal duty and
    consideration

5
Case 2
  • Eastwood, Keynons guardian, borrowed money to
    finance Kenyons education. On coming of age,
    Kenyons husband promised (in writing) to pay
    Eastwood back but failed to do so. Eastwood sued
    Kenyon.
  • Consideration and moral cause

6
Case 3
  • A owes B a large sum of money (principal
    interest) but cannot pay. A verbally promises,
    and B verbally agrees to accept payment of
    principal only in regular installments. Once A
    has completely paid back principal, B sues A for
    the remainder of the interest.
  • Consideration makes a promise binding

7
Injurious Reliance(Equitable Estoppel)
  • Loss or harm suffered by a promissee who, to
    his/her detriment, relied reasonably on a
    gratuitous promise

8
Case 4
  • A purchases a business from X in premises owned
    by B. Upon moving in, A wants to dispose of
    furnishings. B states the furnishings came with
    the store and were As to do with as A pleased.
    A disposed of the furnishings. Later, X appears
    wishing to claim the furnishings back, which
    rightly belong to her.
  • Estoppel based on fact

9
Case 5
  • Alexei Yashin made a 1 million donation to the
    NAC. After paying 200K, he withdrew his pledge.
    It was revealed that AY had made a deal with NAC
    to have NAC pay AYs parents to act as
    translators, in violation of NACs rules.
  • Injurious reliance
  • Charitable Donation (Promise of a Gift)

10
Services
  • Quantum Meruit the amount a person merits to be
    paid for goods or services provided to the person
    requesting them
  • When one person requests services from another
    and the other performs these services, the law
    implies an obligation to pay. Obligation is
    implied between strangers, friends, and family.

11
Case 6
  • A asks B for technical assistance. B assists.
    Afterwards, A asks B what her fee is. B suggests
    an amount. A refuses to pay it.
  • Existing obligations and quantum meruit

12
Capacity to Contract
  • Competence required to bind oneself
  • Age of majority
  • Capacity
  • Corporations
  • Enemy Aliens
  • First Nations Peoples living on Crown lands

13
Grounds upon which a contract may be impeached
  • Case 7
  • Cecil has land to sell. Cecil refuses Websters
    initial offer of 2000. Later, Cecil writes to
    Webster mistakenly offering the land for 1250.
    After the letter is mailed, Cecil realizes his
    error, and sent a second letter stating the price
    should be 2250, but the second letter arrives
    after Webster posts back acceptance.
  • Mistake about terms/Words used inadvertently

14
Grounds upon which a contract may be impeached
  • Case 8
  • L signs a 5-year lease to rent a shop from Y on a
    busy street. L misread the bus map and thought a
    bus route ran close to the shop. Y was unaware of
    Ls erroneous belief. What if Y was aware of Ls
    erroneous beliefs but did nothing to correct
    them?
  • Mistake in assumptions
  • Injurious Reliance

15
Discharge of Contract
  • Discharge by Performance
  • Discharge by Agreement
  • Discharge by Frustration
  • Discharge by Self-Induced Frustration
  • Discharge by Operation of Law

16
Case 9
  • X is a concert producer who signs a contract to
    rent out Ys hall. Before the concert, the hall
    burns down due to a lightening strike. X is
    forced to cancel the show and refund tickets, and
    would like to sue Y for his losses. What if Y
    had been an arsonist and burned down his own
    hall?

17
The Effect of Breach
  • Either party to a contract may break it
  • By expressly repudiating its liabilities
  • By acting in a way that makes its promise
    impossible to perform
  • By failing to perform at all
  • By tendering a performance that falls short of
    its promise

18
Case 10
  • Y is a pharmacist whose contract contained a
    clause stating she would not work in competition
    with her employer X for two years after
    termination. X dismissed Y without cause. Y
    recovered back salary for wrongful dismissal, and
    then began to work in competition with X. Having
    paid back salary already, X sought an injunction
    to prevent Y from working.

19
Case 11
  • B is a pharmacist hired by A to work as a
    designated manager. A has had difficulty finding
    a DM and cannot operate without one. Now with B,
    A can finally take a long-planned two-month
    vacation. B finds the job very stressful and
    decides to quit. In anger, B announces on Friday
    that he will leave on Monday. What if B
    announces on Friday he will leave in two weeks?
  • Doctrine of substantial performance

20
Case 12
  • Purolator contracted to deliver Cathcarts bid to
    Ontario Hydro. The Contract contained a
    disclaimer clause related to non-performance.
    Purolator lost the bid. Purolator acknowledged
    that, had the bid been delivered, Cathcart would
    likely have won 37 000 business, but claimed
    that the disclaimer clause exempted them from
    liability.
  • Doctrine of Fundamental Breach

21
Remedies for Breaches
  • Damages
  • Equitable remedies (specific performance)
  • Quantum Meruit

22
The Contract of Employment
  • Employer-Employee
  • Relationship established by contract that gives
    one party (employer) authority to direct/control
    work of the other party (employee).
  • Employer is liable for employee

23
The Contract of Employment
  • Employer-Contractor
  • Contractor not subject to supervision by
    employer contract is to produce specified result
    by whatever means are selected
  • Liabilities undertaken by contractors are
    entirely their own

24
Employer-Employee Relationship Liability
  • Case 13
  • Adair is employed by Magnum Computers. While in
    the course of routine business, he uses a Magnum
    product that has a bug, resulting in deletion of
    a customers files. What if this were not in the
    course of routine business?
  • Principle of Vicarious Liability

25
Employer-Employee Relationship Termination
  • Reasonable notice period
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Grounds for dismissal without notice
  • Dismissal for cause
  • Misconduct
  • Disobedience
  • Incompetence
  • Illness
  • Adverse economic conditions

26
Case 14
  • Y is a 4th year student who signs a contract to
    accept 10 000 from A in exchange for an
    agreement to work in As pharmacy for a minimum
    of 2 years. 1 year later, Y falls in love and
    wishes to move away. Y provides 1 months notice
    to A.

27
Case 15
  • X is a 4th year pharmacy student who signs a
    contract to accept 10 000 from B in exchange for
    working in one of Bs pharmacies (all of which
    are currently in the GTA) for two years. Next
    week, B opens a pharmacy in Yellowknife and wants
    X to move there. What if X were a pharmacist
    with several years experience?

28
Case 16
  • Z is a 4th year pharmacy student who signs a
    contract to accept 10 000 from C in exchange for
    working in Cs pharmacy for 2 years. Cs
    pharmacy is very busy and C refuses to hire a
    technician. Z complains about the working
    conditions and threatens to quit. What if Z
    found out about the working conditions in Cs
    pharmacy before actually spending the money, and
    Z then returned it (with interest)?

29
Case 17
  • G is a 4th year pharmacy student who verbally
    accepts a contract of employment from M for a
    salary of 60K/yr. Two days later, P offers G
    75 000/yr to work in Ps pharmacy. What if G
    had actually signed a contract with M?

30
Case 18
  • L is an IPG who contracts to work at Vs pharmacy
    for 30 000/yr for at least two years, based on
    Vs statement that this is the going rate for
    pharmacists. A month later, Ls friend indicates
    that most pharmacists make twice that amount, and
    encourages L to quit and work at another
    pharmacy, despite the fact that L signed a
    contract with V.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com