Lexical Retrieval Processes: Semantic Field Effects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lexical Retrieval Processes: Semantic Field Effects

Description:

(dog/cat, cat/dog, lion/tiger, whale/shark, squirrel/turtle) Colors ... 'Just buy a fifty pound dog of bag food' 'Say the languages from 1 to 10 in your native ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:287
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: annatin
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lexical Retrieval Processes: Semantic Field Effects


1
Lexical Retrieval ProcessesSemantic Field
Effects
  • Garrett, 1992a
  • Anna Tinnemore
  • April 26, 2006

2
Objective
  • Examine some patterns of
  • normal word substitution errors
  • Support claims for semantic fields
  • to find distributional patterns that provide
    evidence for the structure of the general
    cognitive and linguistic processes that underlie
    language production

3
Data
  • Errors made by normal speakers in the course of
    regular conversation
  • Collection of gt12,000 speech errors using diary
    method (much smaller segment used)
  • Shattuck and Garrett

4
Multiple Location Error Examples
  • a sot hoddering iron
  • (hot soddering)
  • It just sounded to start
  • (started to sound)
  • We completely forgot to add the list to the
    milk
  • (milk to the list)

5
Single Location Error Examples
  • It looks as though you are making considerable
    process.
  • (progress)
  • Looking at deep freeze structure
  • (phrase)

6
Meaning-based Lexical Errors
  • He rode his bike to school tomorrow.
  • (yesterday)
  • What Ive done here is torn together three . . .
    uh, torn apart three issues that . . . .

7
Notice
  • Important distinction between
  • form-mediated errors (phonological-ish)
  • and
  • meaning-mediated errors
  • (concept mix-ups)

8
Movement Errors
  • Reveal a distinction between abstract logical and
    syntactic processes
  • and
  • surface phrasal structure processes
  • in sentence processing
  • These two levels correspond directly with two
    major types of lexical processing!

9
  • A conceptually driven process
  • A form-driven process

10
Lots of types of errors
  • Use only those errors with no apparent discourse
    or environmental source
  • (best candidates for errors in lexical retrieval)
  • These can be divided into two groups you guessed
    it! - form-based and concept-based

11
Form-Related
  • Youll earn her eternal grapefruit.
  • (gratitude)
  • I gave you my undevoted attention.
  • (undivided)

12
Meaning Related
  • The picture on the front was the whale from
    Jaws.
  • (shark)
  • Ask me whether you think itll do the job.
  • (tell)

13
Semantic Constraints on Errors
  • Substantial proportion of word-substitution
    errors involving meaning-related pairs can be
    grouped into natural categories!

14
Semantic Fields
  • The body part field
  • Subfields head, torso, and limb

15
Semantic Fields
  • Strong constraints within the body-part field
    (28 in / 4 out)
  • Exceptions plausibly explained as actually
    form-based errors
  • Ex soldier/shoulder
  • Subfields too! (22 in / 6 cross)

16
Interesting Notes
  • Top three free-associates
  • 13 yes / 15 no
  • No parallels between word frequency and word
    substitution errors

17
More Interesting Notes
  • No lexically mediated substitution pairs
  • (guns/arms, coconut/palm, inch/foot)
  • From conceptual space to lemmas
  • Comprehension multiple activation of lexical
    interpretations of phonological input (Swinney,
    and others)

18
Therefore
  • It is reasonable to look for methods/processes
    that map from conceptual space to lemmas.

19
Substitution pairs
  • Animals
  • (dog/cat, cat/dog, lion/tiger, whale/shark,
    squirrel/turtle)
  • Colors
  • (pink/green, yellow/red, red/yellow, blue/black)
  • Temporals
  • (seconds/minutes, minute/second, year/week,
    day/year)

20
Do you know the difference?Now, can you say it?
21
  • Field integrity is strong, but not all fields
  • are of equal strength
  • Something more general than lexical relatedness
    semantic relatedness?
  • (foot/wheel, speed/temperature, year/yard)

22
Effects on grammatical classes
  • Nouns conceptual oppositions
  • Contradictories
  • (end/beginning, top/bottom)
  • Functional Contrasts
  • (husband/wife, answer/question)
  • (number names, letter names, proper names)

23
Effects on Grammatical Classes
  • Adjectives antonymy vs. synonymy
  • Antonyms Win!!
  • but not just any antonyms
  • only the base-form polar opposites

24
Gross, Fisher, and Miller (1989)Semantic Space
for Adjectives
25
Effects on Grammatical Classes
  • Verbs
  • very similar to adjectives with strong tendency
    toward opposites (30/48)
  • (go/come, start/stop, remember/forget, ask/tell,
    love/hate, heard/said)
  • -- (looks/sounds, drink/eat)

26
Topic switch
  • BLEND ERRORS
  • in word substitution the competition is won by
    the wrong word,
  • in blending they both win, and a phonetic
    compromise is reached!

27
(No Transcript)
28
Examples
  • stummy
  • (tummy/ stomach)
  • perple
  • (person/people)
  • slickery
  • (slick/slippery)
  • evoid
  • (evade/avoid)
  • kwierd
  • (queer/weird)
  • editated
  • (edited/annotated)
  • everybun
  • (everyone/everybody)
  • dentars
  • (dentals/velars)
  • smever
  • (smart/clever)
  • corallel
  • (corollary/parallel)

29
What?
  • SYNONYMY
  • not
  • ANTONYMY

30
Conclusions
  • If substitutions are errors in the mapping
    between concepts and lemmas
  • If blends are the result of multiple lemma
    activations for one concept
  • They are different and the same!

31
Early stages of mapping from concept to lemma
representation
32
Conclusions
  • There are semantic field constraints.
  • There may be some feature of the mechanism we
    use that makes antonym relations prevalent in
    word substitution errors across grammatical
    classes

33
Further questions
  • How does the relationship between concept and
    lemma representations control lexical retrieval?
  • Are lemmas in semantic fields?
  • Or are conceptual representations what cause
    these field effects?

34
Your questions
  • I can neither confirm nor deny the veracity of
    any answer I give to any question posed at this
    time. There may or may not be evidence to
    contradict any statement I might make. I may
    claim no knowledge of a subject but do not
    acknowledge any deficiencies regarding my mental
    state or education that may seem apparent from
    these claims.
  • Void where prohibited. Must be 18 or older
    to play. Offer expires 4/26/2006.

35
Lyssa, cute and scruffy
36
More examples
  • WASP - white Anglo-Saxon prostitute
  • I thought Westerns were where people rode horses
    instead of cows.
  • I was so tired I couldnt get off my foot.
  • Rewrite your thesis to your hearts dissent.
  • I just banged my finger with a hanger.
  • transpised
  • (transposed/transcribed)
  • stougher
  • (stiffer/tougher)
  • swifting
  • (shifting/switching)
  • dreeze
  • (draft/breeze)
  • grastly
  • (grizzly/ghastly)

37
More fun
  • When you apply the underlying string to the
    P-rule
  • Im going to mainly point about
  • (Im going to talk about three main points)
  • When you key in your KIN number, ah PIN number
  • Use e-mail to handle it in
  • Just buy a fifty pound dog of bag food
  • Say the languages from 1 to 10 in your native
    language.
  • I think Your Honor has really put the finger on
    it (your finger)
  • Theres a branch falling on the tree (roof)
  • I have a tongue on my sore
  • John shaves John is not ambigual
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com