Managing Energy Costs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

Managing Energy Costs

Description:

Mike Ryan. Director of Buildings & Construction Quincy. Quincy Project ... Franklin. Regional Council of Governments. Getting Started ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: eileen91
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Managing Energy Costs


1
MMA Annual ConferenceJanuary 11 12, 2008
  • Managing Energy Costs

2
Introduction to session
  • Eileen McHugh
  • Division of Energy Resources
  • eileen.mchugh_at_state.ma.us
  • (617) 727-4732
  • www.mass.gov/doer

3
Energy Management Services
  • Promote and deliver cost-effective energy
    efficiency outcomes

4
Information
  • www.mass.gov/doer
  • Energy Management Services

5
Speakers
  • Phil Giudice
  • Leo McNeil
  • Doreen Hamilton
  • Mike Ryan
  • Bill Gran

6
Phil GiudiceCommissioner, DOER
7
Very high electric prices
MA
Source EIA
8
Lots of GDP for the BTU and good trend
MA
CA
US
Source EIA/Census
9
Lots of GDP for the BTU
MA
Source EIA/Census
10
Efficiency is low cost option
Spot Wholesale
Efficiency
Source DOER
11
Efficiency provided 4 TWh 2006
GWh
Source DOER
12
Municipal Energy spending
Source US Census building floor space and elec
intensity suggests 1,490,000 MWh W/WW often
equals all other muni electotal muni
consumption inferred 2,980,000 MWh _at_ 0.14 per
kWh 75 million therms natural gas 34 million
gallons oil
13
Municipal electric savings opportunity
Saving 23
Source efficiency savings range from 10 20
depending on vintage 3 million MWh _at_ 60 load
factor 200MW peak capacity providing 100 MW of
DR potential commodity savings range from 10 -20
from traditional practices
14
Better Energy Decision Challenges
  • Status quo too readily accepted
  • Reconsider energy investment screens
  • Payback required go deep and broad for long
    term payback
  • Risk tolerance real time markets
  • New technology/practices DR, Performance Ctc
  • Insufficient data historic, end use and
    projections
  • Insufficient expertise and staffing

15
  • Enable MA PV market to grow 40 per year to
    achieve 250 MW by 2017
  • First installment 68 million over 4 years 16
    for public facilities, 8 for residences 27 MW by
    end of 2011
  • Streamlined non-competitive rolling rebate
  • Rebate level generally 40 of PV system (can be
    20 to 60) up to 500 kW
  • Launch on 1/23

16
Priorities
  • Decouple remove hurdles to efficiency, CHP,
    distributed generation stand by rates, net
    metering
  • Efficiency ramp remove spend cap and tap
    innovation
  • Building codes
  • Appliance performance standards
  • Green communities
  • Accelerate renewables long term contracts,
    siting, CommSolar
  • Make RGGI work
  • Consider rate alternatives real time price,
    public policy

Other suggestions?
17
Leo McNeilRegional Director Comprehensive
Solutions Trane
18
Enabling Legislation
  • Two Options available for Cities, Towns,
    Schools
  • 25A,11C Enacted 1994 Approximately 25
    projects in cities, towns, school districts
    implemented
  • 25A,11I Enacted 2006 1 project completed, and
    at least 7 more in process at this time (several
    others actively evaluating the process currently)

19
Streamline the Process
  • Optimize Infrastructure and Budgets(Over 15B
    nationally since 1990)
  • Eliminate Barriers
  • Local Budgets Strained
  • Aging Infrastructure
  • Scarce Capital Dollars
  • Increased Awareness

20
Old vs. New
  • Old
  • RFP
  • Design Development
  • Ten Year Term
  • Expensive Cumbersome
  • New
  • RFQ
  • Qualifications Experience
  • Twenty Year Term
  • Saves Time Money

21
Sample RFQ Scoring Sheet
22
MMA letter of support
  • This provision is particularly important now
    because performance contracting would allow
    communities to move forward immediately to
    implement these projects in a timely and
    efficient manner reducing energy consumption at a
    time when costs are skyrocketing.
  • Massachusetts Municipal Association 11/7/05

23
Its Easy Being Green
  • Publish Bid
  • Evaluate Responses and Select ESCO
  • Negotiate Agreement
  • Technical Energy Audit
  • Project Scope Guarantee
  • Execute Agreement Proceed
  • Facility Upgrade

24
Doreen HamiltonAccount Executive, Honeywell
25
What is Performance Contracting?
  • Performance contracts install energy efficient
    facility improvements, with no up front cost,
    paid for out of guaranteed energy savings from
    your existing operating budget.

26
Energy Services Company
ESCo
Develop
Maintain
Design
Finance
Construct
27
Performance Contracting
  • A way to finance and implement facility
    improvements and services
  • Energy and operating savings sufficient to cover
    all project costs
  • A bundled set of retrofit, service, OM, and
    Energy Management Services
  • Performance-based Guarantee

28
Performance ContractingCore Components
  • Technical
  • Financial
  • Contractual

29
Technical
  • Lighting
  • Lighting controls
  • Motors replacement
  • Energy management system installation and
    optimization
  • Variable frequency drives
  • Hot water reset
  • Control valves for boilers
  • Water conservation
  • Plug load controls (including PCs)
  • Boiler replacement
  • Green/renewable technologies

30
Financial
  • Where does the money come from?
  • Existing budget neutral
  • Energy
  • Maintenance
  • Capital improvement
  • Rebates and incentives
  • Municipal Lease or Other

31
The Savings Buckets
Maintenance
Technology
Technology Infrastructure Upgrades
Facilities Infrastructure Upgrades
Communications
Utility
Operational Budget
Capital Budget
Project Funding
32
How is it paid for?
33
Contractual
  • How can you buy this?
  • How do we measure success?
  • Guarantees
  • When do you start to pay?
  • What happens if.?
  • Hotter/Colder
  • Energy prices change
  • Add buildings
  • Eliminate buildings
  • Schedule changes

34
Mike RyanDirector of Buildings Construction
Quincy
35
Quincy Project
  • Getting Started-Assembled a Team
  • Decided on the RFQ process
  • Inserted the energy data, buildings, etc. into
    the RFQ
  • Published the RFQ in the Central Register
  • Simplified the Process did not use outside
    consultants

36
What happened next?
  • Received 5 proposals
  • Interviewed 4 vendors on two occasions
  • Rated the proposals based on references, ability
    to implement, service training, based on the
    criteria in the RFQ.
  • Selected Honeywell
  • In-depth engineering study of 42 buildings over 3
    months
  • Resulted in 32M project with numerous
    infrastructure improvements.

37
What did we get?
  • 9 new Boiler Plants
  • Over 18,000 lighting fixtures impacted
  • Water Conservation through toilets, urinals,
    sinks, etc.
  • 1,300 Steam trap repair/replacement
  • Commercial Water meter replacement
  • Window replacements at 6 City buildings
  • Exterior doors at 5 City 2 School Buildings
  • Overhead Doors in all Fire Department Buildings
  • Building re pointing
  • Pool Cover
  • Solar Pool Heating
  • Boiler Controls
  • City Wide Energy Management System
  • New Roofs for 6 buildings
  • Transformer replacements
  • Numerous other mechanical upgrades including unit
    ventilator HVAC replacements, etc.

38
What else did we get?
  • Program is self funding over the 20 year term
  • Energy Savings are 1,007,000 per year
  • Operational Savings of 240,000 per year
  • Water revenue increase
  • Electricity will be reduced by 25, fuel usage by
    27, and water usage by approximately 35.
  • Utility Rebates from Keyspan, MTC and others
  • Financed through a Tax Exempt Lease
  • All buildings will be impacted
  • Provide preventative maintenance
  • Improve the environment

39
Impacts for the Program Term
  • Partnership with the EPA-The City of Quincy is
    also partnering with Honeywell and the EPA to
    provide Energy Benchmarking for all facilities
  • City of Quincy has signed on for the Energy Star
    Challenge
  • Buildings are being analyzed for Energy Star
    Status
  • Emission reduction
  • The electricity saved will reduce carbon dioxide
    emissions by 2,862,600 lbs/yr,
  • The ozone depleting gas emissions will be reduced
    by 16,900 lbs/yr
  • The reduced fuel consumption will reduce carbon
    dioxide emissions by 3,126,400 lbs/yr

40
Impacts for the Program Term

41
Equivalent Impact forProgram Term
  • 440 Passenger Cars off road

42
Equivalent Impact forProgram Term
  • 825 planted acres of trees

43
Bill Gran
44
FranklinRegional Council of Governments
  • Getting Started

45
Municipalities Estimated Financing Potential
46
Population of Participating Towns
47
Chronology of FRCOGs Performance Contracting
Process
  • April 26, 2007 DOER Seminar
  • July 26, 2007 Presentation to FRCOG Governing
    Council.
  • September 13, 2007 STAM Performance Contracting
    Presentation
  • September 25, 2007 FRCOG Performance Contracting
    Presentation
  • November 1, 2007 FRCOG Meeting
  • RFQ Finalized.
  • December 19, 2007 RFQ Advertized
  • January 9, 2008 FRCOG ESCO Meeting.
  • February 8, 2008 ESCO responses to RFQ due.

48
Informational Flier
  • What is Energy Saving Performance Contracting?
  • Statutory Basis
  • What kinds of improvements are allowed?
  • Contract Scope and Duration
  • Financing
  • Guaranteed Savings

49
Statement of Interest Form
  • At the FRCOG Council meeting on July 26, Energy
    Saving Performance Contracting was presented as
    an opportunity for our member municipalities to
    make energy saving improvements to their
    facilities, including schools, without the need
    to take on any debt. The improvements can be
    paid for by the guaranteed savings resulting from
    the energy saving improvements, and the savings
    are guaranteed by the Energy Service Company
    (ESCO) selected to perform the work. See reverse
    side for a brief summary of the program.
  • If your town is interested exploring this
    opportunity, please sign this form and return to
    the FRCOG at 425 Main Street, Suite 20,
    Greenfield, MA 01301 or email to wgran_at_frcog.org.
  • Yes we are interested in Energy Saving
    Performance Contracting.
  • ________________________________
  • Name of Municipality
  • ________________________________
  • Signature of Municipal Official

50
ANNUAL FACILITY ENERGY COST USE FORMS
51
Participating Municipalities
52
Participating RSDs
53
Municipalities Total Energy Costs
54
RSD Schools Total Energy Costs
55
Municipalities Estimated Financing Potential
56
Regional School Districts Estimated Financing
Potential
57
Total of all Municipalities RSDs
58
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com