Title: Periodic Reporting and the Questionnaire
1Periodic Reporting and the Questionnaire
- A preliminary analysis
- Second Meeting of the Reflection Year
- on Periodic Reporting
- Paris, 2-3 March 2006
2(No Transcript)
3(No Transcript)
4Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Insufficient planning at the start of the
periodic reporting process - How the data would be used and hence what data
should be requested -- was not analyzed - the time (and budget) necessary to examine each
report was not considered - no procedure was put in place to evaluate Section
II reports against the original nomination
dossiers
5Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Insufficient planning at the start of the
periodic reporting process - Poor institutional memory at all levels
6Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Insufficient planning at the start of the
periodic reporting process - Poor institutional memory at all levels
- Definition of Baseline data
- Geographic identification
- Criteria and statements of significance (SP
proposed, Advisory Body recommended Committee
decisions) - Legal protection
- Management tools
- Statistical indicators at the time of nomination
- Baseline data does not exist in any consistent,
easily retrievable form for most World Heritage
sites
7Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Insufficient planning at the start of the
periodic reporting process - Poor institutional memory at all levels
- Baseline data does not exist in any consistent,
easily retrievable form for most World Heritage
sites - No uniform approach was adopted by the
Secretariat either to the questionnaire or to the
analysis of the returns
8Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Recommendations
- Pre-fill the questionnaire with data already
available in the Centre - Pre-fill the questionnaire with data provided in
Cycle 1 - Section II questionnaire should include
provisions for serial, mixed, and transnational
properties - Most non-European States will need to complete
the form in an off-line mode
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
112012
12(No Transcript)
13Lines 126a 127a
14Some questions to consider in revising the
questionnaire
15Some questions to consider in revising the
questionnaire
- How will the answers be used? By whom and for
what purpose?
16Some questions to consider in revising the
questionnaire
- How will the answers be used? By whom and for
what purpose? - If statistical indicators are used, are the
specific needs of each site being considered?
17Some questions to consider in revising the
questionnaire
- How will the answers be used? By whom and for
what purpose? - If statistical indicators are used, are the
specific needs of each site being considered? - What mechanism is being put in place to respond
to requested changes in the status of the site?
What is the timeframe envisaged and budget
implications?
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Recommendations
- Simplify the questionnaire
23Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Recommendations
- Simplify the questionnaire
- Make greater use of statistical indicators
24Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Recommendations
- Simplify the questionnaire
- Make greater use of statistical indicators
- respond to questions raised in Cycle 1 before
beginning on Cycle 2
25Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Recommendations
- Simplify the questionnaire
- Make greater use of statistical indicators
- respond to questions raised in Cycle 1 before
beginning on Cycle 2 - requested changes to names. boundaries, criteria
- new or revised statements of significance /
outstanding universal value
26Summary Retrospective Inventory Berlin mtg
- Recommendations
- Simplify the questionnaire
- Make greater use of statistical indicators
- respond to questions raised in Cycle 1 before
beginning on Cycle 2 - put in place a process to address these issues
27Circular Letter N1 (2006)