Title: Leadership and Power in Organizations
1Chapter 13
- Leadership and Power in Organizations
2Objectives
- Define leadership
- Explain the five sources of power and the three
sources of political power - Summarize the major approaches and theories of
leadership - Compare and contrast the major approaches and
theories of leadership - Discuss the barriers to womens advancement in
the workplace
3What is Leadership?
- Leader
- The person in charge or the boss of other people
- Does not mean that others will listen to him or
her or do what he or she says - Leadership involves influencing the attitudes,
beliefs, behaviors and feelings of other people - Within an organization, leaders are associated
with supervisory positions - Being a supervisor does not guarantee that a
person will be able to influence others - Informal leaders arise in work groups and may
have more influence on the behavior of group
members than do the actual supervisors - Individual develops the informal leader role
through interaction with colleagues
4Sources of Influence and Power (I)
- French and Ravens Bases of Power
- Power is the extent to which one person can
influence another to do something - Power bases involve individual and follower, or
between supervisor and subordinate - Power arise from the interaction between
subordinate and supervisor - Expert power
- Based on the knowledge and expertise that the
supervisor has - Subordinate is likely to follow the directives of
person whom he or she believes has special
knowledge or expertise about the issue at hand - Enhance the perceived expert power of an
individual - Titles, College degrees, Certifications and
Distinctions
5Sources of Influence and Power (II)
- Referent power
- The extent to which the subordinate likes and
identifies with the supervisor - Influenced by another whom he or she admires or
likes - Power can be developed through personal
relationships with other people - Legitimate power
- The power inherent in a supervisor's job title
- The legitimate right or authority to be in charge
- This power derives from the subordinates values
about the rights of supervisors - Reward power
- The ability of the supervisor to reward
subordinates with bonus, desirable job
assignments, promotions or raises
6Sources of Influence and Power (III)
- Coercive power
- The ability of the supervisors to punish
subordinates with disciplinary actions, fines,
firing or salary reductions - Supervisors can give out punishments and rewards
- Coercive power was associated with poor relations
- The major limitation of rewards power
- Subordinates might become accustomed to it
- Comply only when the reward is available
- Reward power were associated with good relations
between college professors and their students - Yukls Sources of Political Power
Co-opt the opposition
Gain control of decision processes
Political power
Form coalitions
7Sources of Influence and Power (IV)
- Political action
- The process by which people gain and protect
their power within the organization - Control over decision processes
- Involves controlling and influencing important
decisions in the organization - The power can be achieved by serving on
appropriate committees or taking on the right
tasks - Forming coalitions
- Person enters into agreement with others to
support his or her position in return for his or
her support of the others position - Legislative bodies when different factions agree
to support each other in favored positions - Co-optation
- Involves trying to diffuse another factions
opposition by allowing its members to participate
in the decision
8Abuse of Supervisory Power (I)
- Power can provide tools to enhance the
functioning of organizations - Used to help individuals have positive feelings
about work and perform their jobs well - Ethnic harassment
- The mistreatment of employees based on their
ethnic or racial background - More abusive behavior from supervisors
- Others at work report lower job satisfaction
- Greater burnout, psychological strain and
intention of quitting the job
9Abuse of Supervisory Power (II)
- Sexual harassment
- Is unwanted
- Can adversely affect a persons employment
- Interferes with a persons job performance
- Creates a hostile and intimidating work
environment - Constitute sexual harassment
- Unwelcome sexual advances and requests
- Unwanted physical contact or touching
- Use of offensive language
- Repeated requests for a data
- Threats of punishment for noncompliance with
requests
10Abuse of Supervisory Power (III)
- These behavior only become harassment
- When they are unwanted
- Are reported often enough to create a hostile or
intimidating work environment - Classified as the less serious behaviors of data
requests - Unwanted advances
- Unwanted physical contact (touching)
- Offensive language
11Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership (I)
- The trait approach
- The behavior approach
- The contingency approach
- The leader-member exchange theory and the
Charismatic/transformational approaches
- Who will make a good leader?
- What do good leaders do?
- Under a given condition, who will be a good
leader and what behavior is likely to be
effective? - How does the interaction between subordinate and
supervisor affect the subordinates behavior?
12Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership (II)
- The Trait Approach
- The oldest approach to the study of leadership is
the trait approach - Good leadership is a function of the person
- A person who is a good leader in one situation
will be a good leader in any situation - These might include measures of various
abilities, job experience, motivation and
personality - Relationships between the personal
characteristics and performance are interpreted
as the effects of traits on leader performance - The intelligence, aggressiveness, decisiveness
and dominance were associated with leader
emergence - Being intelligent and trustworthy were
universally seen as positive characteristics
13Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership
(III)
- The Leader Behavior Approach
- Concerned with what leaders do rather than what
their personal chrematistics are - The leadership style is a cluster of related
behaviors that represent an approach to dealing
with subordinates - The style of asking advice and having discussions
about issues is called Participative - Making the decision and announce it to the group
- The subordinates are given little input that
called Autocratic - The Ohio State Leadership Studies (1945) designed
to uncover the effects of specific supervisory
behaviors on subordinates - Developed a 150-item questionnaire on leader
behavior - The employees answered each item about their
supervisors
14Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership (IV)
- Consideration
- The amount of concern that supervisors show for
the happiness and welfare of their subordinates - Friendly and supportive behavior that makes the
workplace pleasant for subordinates - Initiating structure
- The extent to which the supervisor defines his or
her own role - Makes clear what is expected of subordinates
- Assigning tasks to subordinates and scheduling
the work - Leader behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ)
- Completed by subordinates about their supervisor
- The grievance and turnover rates were also
collected for each supervisors work group - Grievances can be considered behavioral measures
of dissatisfaction with conditions of work - Destroy the efficiency of a work group because
people are spending time in unproductive ways
15Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership (V)
- The two major difficulties
- LBDQ might not be a good indicator of supervisory
behavior - May be telling us as much about subordinates as
about their supervisors - Drawing causal conclusions from data collected at
one time in a cross-sectional research design - The supervisor behavior can be affected by
subordinate behavior, particularly job
performance - The subordinates are filing many grievances might
become angry and reduce consideration behavior - More angry and lead them to file more grievances
- Fiedlers Contingency Theory
- States that leadership is a function of both the
person and the situation - Fiedler (1978) refers to as the motivational
structure of the leader - Assessed with a self-report instrument
- Called the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale
16Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership (VI)
- The scale actually measures a characteristics of
the leader - The LPC asks the leader to think about the person
with whom he or she has had the most trouble
working - The co-worker with whom he or she would least
like to work - Consists of 18 bipolar adjective items
- The scales in which a person indicates which of
two words with opposite meanings best describes
someone - Situational control
- Concerns the amount of power
- Influence the leader has over subordinates
- The supervisors actions will predictably lead to
subordinate behavior - Leader-member relations
- Extent to which subordinates get along with and
support their supervisors - Task structure
- The extent to which subordinate job tasks are
clearly and specifically defined
17Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership
(VII)
- Position power
- Refers to the amount of power and influence the
supervisors has - Including the ability to give out rewards and
punishments - Good leader-member relations, highly structured
tasks for subordinates - High position power will be in a situation of
high control - The situation is moderately favorable, relations
are poor - Task structure is high and the leader has
moderate power - The high LPC person should be more effective than
the low LPC person - Low LPC leaders are more concerned with getting
tasks done than with having good relationships
with subordinates - High LPC leaders have the opposite motivations
- More concerned with having good relationships
with subordinates than with getting the job done
18Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership
(VIII)
- Leader Match
- Developed the training program
- Better group performance for the trained
supervisors - Leaders changing the situation
- Leadership involves the complex interaction of
leader characteristics with the leadership
situation - Path-Goal Theory
- Subordinate job performance and job satisfaction
result from the interplay of situational
characteristics, subordinate characteristics and
supervisors style - Based on the expectancy theory
- Supervisors can enhance the motivation and job
satisfaction of subordinates by providing rewards
for good job performance
19Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership (IX)
- The 4 supervisory styles are
- Supportive Style
- consideration
- Involves showing concern for the needs and
welfare of subordinates - Directive Style
- Initiating structure
- Involves structuring job tasks for subordinates
and letting them know what is expected - Participative Style
- Involves seeking input from subordinates and
allowing them to participant in decision making - Achievement Style
- Emphasizing achievement and good performance
- Setting challenging task goals
- Emphasizing high performance standarrds
20Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership (X)
- Locus of control
- Extend to which subordinates believes that they
can control rewards in their lives - Internal locus of control believes that he or she
is able to control rewards - External locus of control believes that rewards
are controlled by others or by outside forces - Self-perceived ability
- Extent to which the subordinate believes he or
she is capable of doing the task well - Different styles within different situations
- Tasks are boring, dangerous, stressful or tedious
- Supportive style will be the most appropriate
- Anxiety lowered and their self-esteem raised by a
supportive supervisor - Tasks are unstructured and subordinates are
inexperienced - Directive style will increase subordinates
effort and job satisfaction
21Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership (XI)
- Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
- Focuses on the subordinate-supervisor dyad rather
than on the supervisor and work group - Supervisor treat individuals subordinates
differently and over time the relationships
between supervisors and subordinates will evolve - The cadre or in-group
- Consists of subordinates who are trusted and
influential members of the work group - Members cadre were more satisfied with their
jobs, better relations with supervisors, were
less likely to quit than were hired hands - The hired hands, or out-group
- Subordinates who are supervised with a directive
style and are given little input into decisions
22Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership
(XII)
- Training was intended to help supervisors improve
their relationships with subordinates - Good relationships with supervisors were less
likely to intend to quit - More likely to be good performance
- Engage in organizational citizenship behavior
- High organizational commitment
- Limitations
- Differential treatment of subordinates within a
work group can be destructive - Equity theory describes how employees can react
negatively to unequal treatment - Make it clear, LMX theory helped to focus
attention on the relationship between subordinate
and supervisor - Understanding that supervisors do not act the
same way with all subordinates
23Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership
(XIII)
- Transformational Leadership Theory
- Deal with leaders who have considerable and
unusual influence over their followers, or in
other words are charismatic leaders - Link traits to performance and attempts to
determine how leaders affect their followers - Specifically on charismatic or transformational
leaders who are unusual in how their followers
become devoted to them - Followers become motivated to make personal
sacrifices to reach the goals set forth by the
leader - They engage in behaviors that make them appear to
be creative, innovative, powerful and trustworthy - Transformational leaders can convince followers
- Make extraordinary efforts to achieve worthwhile
objectives
24Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership
(XIV)
- Producing a superior product
- Providing an important service
- Solving a social problem
- Finding a cure for a disease
- Help provide direction for an organization
through their version - Help motivate employees to pursue that version
- Tend to be high on job performance
- Organizational citizenship behavior
- Organizational commitment
- Satisfaction with supervision
- Vroom-Yetton Model
- Prescriptive model that indicates the supervisory
approach that is expected to be most effective in
a particular situation when making decisions
25Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership (XV)
- The psychological principles that help inform the
best decision making practices based on
characteristics of a particular situation - The following 5 approaches to making a decision
that range from the autocratic to democratic - Independently-Supervisor makes the decision alone
- Sharing the decision from merely soliciting
information-Supervisor gets information for
subordinates and makes the decision alone - Discussing the problem-Supervisor discuss the
problem with some subordinates and then make the
decision - Considering others viewpoints-Supervisors
discuss the problem with all subordinates in a
meeting and makes the decision - Turn over the problem to the group-Supervisors
presents the problem to all subordinates in a
meeting and lets them decide
26Approaches to the Understanding of Leadership
(XVI)
- The decision-making situation is defined by 7
characteristics - Quality requirement for the result
- Sufficiency of information the supervisor has
- Problem structure
- Necessity for subordinate acceptance of the
decision - Subordinate acceptance of the decision if made by
the supervisor alone - Subordinates commitment to solving the problem
- Subordinates conflict over solutions
- Provided decision tools based on their model
- Help choose a decision-making approach
- Minimize the time necessary for a decision
- Maximize the likelihood of group acceptance the
decision - With a paper-and-pencil materials that can use to
follow the answers to all 7 questions to the
recommended decision-making approaches
27The role of expectations The Pygmalion effect (I)
- Leaders expectations about their employees job
performance can influence that performance - Pygmalion effect
- A self-fulfilling prophecy in which managers
expectations about the level of their employees
job performance can influence that performance - It was more prevalent among men than women
- The low-scoring trainees in the experimental
groups improved significantly more than did
low-scoring trainees in the control group - The squad leaders higher expectations led them
to except more and demand more from the trainees
28Problems of leadership (I)
- First-line supervisors
- Supervisors may receive no training at all, and
they are not selected as carefully as people who
began their careers at high-level management
positions - Supervisors promoted from the ranks face
conflicting demands and loyalties - Socialized with co-workers off the job
- Their work group gave them a sense of identity
and belonging that provided a measure of
emotional security - Supervisors are the point of contact between
management and workers, trying to weigh the
conflicting needs of both sides - Self-managing work groups are another threat to
supervisory power and autonomy
29Problems of leadership (II)
- Managers and executives
- Middle-level managers, despite comfortable
salaries and fringe benefits, typically express
considerable discontent - Middle managers also complain about having
insufficient authority and resources to carry out
company policy - Middle managers often experience considerable
frustration as they vie for the few top
management slots in the hierarchy - Middle-level managers reached a plateau and will
receive no additional promotions - Employee participation in decision making is
another source of stress for middle managers
30Problems of leadership (III)
- Massive layoffs create a motivational crisis
among middle-level managers - Mergers and layoffs also mean fewer opportunities
for promotion and more competition for the
available positions - A source of stress more common among high-level
managers is the intense commitment of time and
energy to he organization - Executives can work at home and while traveling,
rarely escaping the demands of the office - Positive aspects to life at the top of
organizational hierarchy - Top executives report high job satisfaction
- The most upper-level executives would remain on
the job even if they were financially independent
31Women in Leadership Positions (I)
- Glass ceiling phenomenon
- Symbolizes womens difficulty in getting beyond
the lower levels of management - Focused on differences between men and women in
their career preparation and their attitudes - Found on gender differences on organizational
commitment or self-ratings of perceived work
competence - The attitudes and stereotypes of those at the top
levels of organizations who make decisions about
hiring - The women executives identified several major
obstacles to successful management careers for
women
32Women in Leadership Positions (II)
- The persistence of male stereotypes and
preconceptions about women - The exclusion of women from informal networks
such as after-hours socializing - The lack of general management or line experience
- An inhospitable corporate culture
- Women were more likely than men to report feeling
they didnt fit with colleagues - Harder time adapting to management ranks
- Finding colleagues and supervisors less accepting
of them - Merely perceive poorer fit is unclear
33Gender and Leadership Style
- Do men and women in leadership positions differ
in their supervisory styles? - Women would be more concerned with the feelings
and emotional well-being of subordinates
(consideration) - Men would be more concerned with getting the job
done (initiating structure) - The stereotypes of men being high in structure
and women being high in consideration - In an organizational setting, environmental
constraints and requirements may force male and
female supervisors to adopt similar styles - Organizations may select women who have
leadership styles similar to mens
34Future Issues and Challenges
- Future of leadership in organizations concerns
- The increasing diversity of the workplace
- Becoming increasingly female and multicultural
- Hiring of increasing numbers of minority members
- The globalization of the world economy
- Effective leadership is partially determined by
culture - Developed for supervisors to deal with a more
varied group of subordinates - Cultures and increased sensitivity to issues that
might not exist in more homogeneous groups - The problem of the glass ceiling which exists for
minorities as well as for women - Achievement-oriented style that holds employees
accountable for results
35Chapter 13