Title: Ge 277-
1Ge 277- From rock mechanics to seismotectonics
- Objective of seminar
- Review major results form rock mechanics
laboratory experiments and discuss how these
results shed light on seismotectonics processes.
2Motivation
- A major goal in seismotectonics is to develop
some mechanical model of fault behavior that
would reproduce the various phase over the
seismic cycle (co-seismic rupture, afterslip
and postseismic relaxation, interseismic stress
and strain build up, preseismic deformation and
nucleation).
3Organization
- During each seminar students will present
selected papers (20 minutes per presentations). - Pleas pick your choice within a week from now.
- Interact with me ahead of the presentation.
- The selected papers will be posted on JPA webs
page. - Students are required to have read, ahead of
time, the papers to be presented
4Experimental Rock mechanics
(Dieterich, Tullis, Marone, Blanpied,
Lockner,Kholstedt, Byerlee, )
- Frictional sliding can be stable or unstable,
depending on the lithology, water content,
confining pressure and temperature. - For quartz and granite the transition occurs
around 300C, probably in relation to thermally
activated ductility. - Some clay minerals and serpentinite undergo
stable sliding at low temperature but (may)
undergo unstable sliding at higher temperature. - Olivine? There are no data on frictional
properties of olivine. Far less ductile than
quartzofeldspathic rocks (the transition to fully
plastic flow occurs at a temperature of the order
of 700C). Presumably the transition from
unstable to stable sliding occurs at a
temperature much higher than for Quartz, hence
above 300C. - Fluid contents favors ductility through the
effect of temperature on crystalline plasticity
and on pressure-solution deformation
(dissolution-precipitation)
5Rate and state friction laws
Dc
from Marone, 1998.
- t/smma ln(V/V)b ln(q/q)
- dq/dt1-Vq /Dc (Dieterich, Ruina)
- Stationary state qss Dc /V? mss m(a-b)
ln(V/V)
6mss m(a-b) ln(V/V)
- a-blt0
- slip is potentially unstable
- stick-slip
- a-bgt0
- stable slip
- creeping fault
- post-seismic relaxation
a-b
a
Correspond to T350 C
from Blanpied et al, 1991.
7Depth distribution of EQ, flexural rigidity and
the strength of the Lithopshere
(Watts and Burov, 2003)
Transition to stabe sliding or to ductile
creep? Why do we have EQ in the oceanic Upper
Mantle but few in the Continental Upper
Mantle? Where is the strength of the continental
lithosphere?
8(No Transcript)
9The rheological laws behind the seismic cycle
- Elastic behavior of the medium surrounding the
fault. - Rate-weakening or slip-weakening friction
behavior on a portion of the fault, - Viscous behavior in parallel to the Seismogenic
fault zone.
10Co-seismic Static Deformation
Coseismic deformation due to the 1992, Ms 7.3,
Landers Earthquake
This case-example validates that co-seismic
deformation can be modeled assuming that
deformation is localized on a fault plane
embedded in an elastic half space.
(Hernandez et al, 1999)
11What is the rheology behind dynamic fault rupture?
Probably a frictional process, but are
seismological observations consistent with
Laboratory derived friction laws?
(Aochi etal, 2003)
12Slip weakening friction
stress
slip
Aochi et al, (2003)
13- Stress Field
- Rotation of direction
- One parameter for its level
-
- Fracture Criterion
- Uniform Horizontally
14SSE
Emerson
Kickapoo
Camp Rock
Johnson Valley
Homestead Valley
NW
slip distribution
15Simulation Result
Aochi et al (2003)
Wald and Heaton (1994)
16Mechanics interseismic loading?
- Most faults slip only during episodic slip
events. - Geodetic measurements generally indicate that a
fault portion is locked (LFZ ), to depths of
40-50km for subduction zones, and 15-20km for
intra-continental faults. - At greater depth aseismic deformation occurs all
along the seismic cycle (creeping zone).
(Simoes et al, JGR,2004)
17(Chlieh et al, 2004)
18(Chlieh et al, 2004)
19What controls Postseismic relaxation and
afterschocks?
? Postesimic record suggests a combination of
frictional afterslip and broader scale and longer
term postseismic viscous relaxation.
Displacement at AREQ relative to stable South
America, before and after the 2001 Mw 8.4 peru
Earthquake.
(Perfettini, Avouac and Ruegg, submitted)
20Current Paradigm for Subduction zone
(Oleskevich et al, 1999)
21A conceptual Fault Model
(Perfettini and Avouac, 2004)
22Stress transfer during the seismic cycle
Fh gtgt DFfr
F Driving Force (assumed constant) DFfr
Co-seismic drop of frictional resistance Fh
Viscous resistance
Fh ? DFfr
23Some questions in seismotectonics
- What controls the transition from fully locked to
a fully unlocked plate interface? Is it
lithology, temperature, pressure, fluids? - Is this transition stable with time?
- How does coseismic slip distribution during the
very large earthquakes compare with the LFZ? - What controls the co-seismic rupture? (fault
geometry? prestress? lithology?)
24- 1- Brittle deformation, friction laws and
semi-brittle processes - Lockner, 1998 Marone, 1998 Scholz, 1998
Blanpied et al, 1991, 1995, Moore et al., 1997. - 2- Ductile Creep
- Kohlstedt et al, 1995 Karato and Wu, 1993
Shimizu, 1995 Molnar, 1991 Hirth and Kolhstedt,
1996. - 3- Static friction, fluids and crustal stress
- Brudy et al, 1997 Townend and Zoback, 2000
Hardebeck and Hauksson 1999 Bollinger et al,
2004. - 4- Seismicity and the depth dependent rheology of
the lithosphere. - Chen and Molnar, 1983 Sibson, 1982 Magistrale,
2002 Blanpied et al, 1991, 1995. - 5- Fluids and seismicity.
- Sibson, 1985 Sleep and Blanpied, 1992.
25- 6- Friction laws and seismic rupture
- Bouchon et al, 1998 Aochi et al, 2003 Guatteri
and Spudich, 2000. - 7- Postseismic relaxation, afterslip and
lithosphere rheology. - Marone et al, 1991 Moresi, 2004 Perffetini
and Avouac, 2004a Khazaradze et al, 1998
Melbourne et al, 2002. - 8- Afterschocks and triggered seismicity
- King and Cocco, 2001 Dieterich, 1994 Deng et
al, 1999 Bosl and Nur, 2002 Perfettini and
Avouac, 2004a Perfettini et al, 2003. - 9- Rheological model of fault zones.
- Sibson, 1982 Chester, 1995.
- 10- Observation and Models of the seismic cycle.
- Chlieh et al, 2004 Tse and Rice, 1981 Hyndman
et al, 1997, Perfettini and Avouac, 2004b