Publiclyfinanced education

About This Presentation
Title:

Publiclyfinanced education

Description:

On Monday, we went through topics related to direct and indirect ... Real annual spending per pupil on elementary and ... out for cheerleading at age ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: JohnHa
Learn more at: https://econ.ucsb.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Publiclyfinanced education


1
Publicly-financed education
  • Today
  • Why is K-12 education provided by the government
    for free?

2
Important announcements
  • Test 1 on Monday
  • Reminder on calculators
  • Basic or scientific calculator only
  • No memory
  • Exception One- or two-number memory is okay
  • No graphing ability
  • No calculators with communicative ability
  • No blue book needed

3
Timeline
  • On Monday, we went through topics related to
    direct and indirect governments
  • Today
  • We finish Unit 2 by looking at Chapter 7
  • Topics in education
  • Time for review
  • Your questions

4
Publicly-provided education
  • Real annual spending per pupil on elementary and
    secondary schooling has increased by 68 from
    1980 to 2004
  • Why is this so?
  • Citizen preferences?
  • Positive externalities of education?
  • Generates more taxes as adults
  • Socialization reasons

5
Citizen preferences
  • Some people believe that each person has a right
    to a minimum level of education
  • Recall social utility function
  • At low levels of education, social welfare could
    be mineduci
  • Basic education needed to be functional in
    society
  • Equitability issues
  • Prevention of de facto caste system if only the
    rich can afford education

6
Positive externalities
  • An economist would go further, claiming that
    there are positive externalities in education
  • Less likely to have civil unrest
  • More income to tax later in life
  • Ability to understand public policy
  • Debate exists as to the level of positive
    externalities
  • Empirical findings are not conclusive

7
What about higher education?
  • In-state students at Californias public colleges
    and universities have their educations
    substantially subsidized
  • Are there positive externalities from higher
    education?
  • Argument against
  • Diminishing externalities from education
  • Arguments in favor
  • Research externalities
  • Inefficient loan market for students

8
Diminishing marginal returns argument
  • The diminishing marginal returns argument claims
    that the positive externalities are greatest for
    the early years of education
  • With this argument, the amount of subsidized
    higher education may be above the optimal quantity

9
Research externalities
  • Higher education in some fields provides
    substantial amounts of externalities
  • Research that benefits many people in society
  • This leads to the question Should different
    fields of study in college have different
    subsidization levels?
  • Hard sciences may deserve a higher subsidy
  • Fields with no research externalities would get
    small subsidy by this argument

10
Potential negative consequences
  • Although there may be positive externalities with
    college education, there is another consequence
  • Increased income inequality
  • Subsidized education results in the rich getting
    richer, leading to increased income inequality
  • With increase in income inequality, social
    instability can occur

11
Government provision of education
  • It appears that the government is justified in
    subsidizing education
  • How should education be provided?
  • Public
  • Private
  • Some public and some private

12
Public provision of education
  • Assume a simple model of education
  • Each student goes to public or private school
    (but not both)
  • Parents try to maximize utility
  • Public school quantity is fixed
  • Public school price is free
  • Per-hour quality of public and private school is
    equal
  • This assumption will be relaxed later on
  • Total taxes collected on each family does not
    change with publicly-provided education
  • See Figure 7.1, Panel A, p. 139
  • Total education could decrease when public
    education is introduced

13
Reality check on education
  • In reality, most people maximize utility by
    sending their kids to public school
  • If desired education level is above ep, parents
    can supplement education with after-school and
    weekend activities
  • Music lessons
  • Learning a second language
  • Private tutoring

See also Figure 7.1, Panels B and C, p. 139
14
Quality of public education
  • Quality of education is hard to quantify
  • Besides the obvious aspects of class size and
    total spending, there are different criteria that
    affect education
  • Unionization of teachers
  • Parents choices of their kids curriculum
  • Size of school
  • School-sponsored sports and activities

15
Unionization of teachers
  • Many public school districts have unionized
    teachers
  • Pro
  • Keep standards of educators high
  • Cons
  • Higher wages than in competitive market
  • Less money for other spending
  • Layoff order
  • Usually based on seniority, not quality, of
    educator

16
Parents choices of their kids curriculum
  • Parents are heterogeneous in the wants for their
    kids education
  • Private schools often provide more specialized
    choices
  • Religion
  • Montessori
  • More challenging curriculum than public school
    (in some cases)

17
Parents choices of their kids curriculum
  • Pros of private school
  • More choices
  • No big bureaucracy to deal with
  • Cons of private school
  • Less public oversight
  • Additional cost

18
Size of school
  • Pros of big schools
  • Lower administrative cost per student
  • Ability to offer more classes
  • Example Tagalog class in a school with a
    significant Filipino population
  • Fewer school sites needed
  • Cons of big schools
  • Some students have longer distances to travel
  • Getting lost in the crowd

19
School-sponsored sports and activities
  • Pros of big schools
  • More sports and activities offered
  • Higher quality for spectators
  • Cons of big schools
  • Fewer students make the team
  • Competition to make the team can be fierce
  • Wanda Holloway
  • Daughter tried out for cheerleading at age 13
  • Asked brother-in-law to kill another girls
    mother
  • Convicted of solicitation of capital murder

20
Total spending
  • The United States is near the top of per-pupil
    spending
  • Test scores of US students is not near the top in
    many internationally-administered tests
  • See also Figure 7.2, p. 140

21
Class size and total spending
  • A common assumption is that as more money is
    spent, school quality goes up
  • Is this always the case?

22
Class size and total spending
  • Example Increased spending to reduce class size
  • Pro
  • Fewer students per teacher
  • Con
  • New teachers ? Lower average quality than current
    teachers

23
Class size and total spending
  • Does increased spending actually lead to higher
    school quality?
  • Evidence is mixed
  • Some programs in some schools appear to use
    additional resources well
  • There is evidence that some schools may not use
    additional resources well

24
Empirical work on education
  • Be careful while reading through the Empirical
    Evidence subsections in the textbook
  • Make sure that you understand the difference
    between correlation and causation
  • Refer to Chapter 2, if needed

25
Example of empirical work
  • How much does education increase earnings?
  • Recall diminishing marginal returns
  • Greatest returns to disadvantaged children in
    early years
  • Justification for programs like First 5
    California and Head Start
  • Low returns from increased K-12 educational
    spending on the margin
  • Each year of schooling increases earnings by an
    estimated 5-11 percent

26
Cost-benefit analysis of spending
  • We can calculate the direct costs and benefits of
    additional school spending
  • Card and Krueger (1996) estimate that a 10
    percent reduction in class size results in
    increased earnings between 0.4-1.1 percent
  • Peltzman (1997) uses Card and Kruegers results
    to do a cost-benefit analysis
  • Various assumptions made
  • 3 percent and 7 percent discount rates used

27
Results from Peltzman (1997)
  • Net present value of costs are higher than the
    benefits
  • Are there other benefits that are not measured
    here?
  • Only increased earnings are accounted for below

28
How are schools changing?
  • By many measures, public school quality in the US
    is decreasing
  • Three ways to try to reverse this trend
  • Charter schools
  • School vouchers
  • School accountability

29
Charter schools
  • Increased independence in spending and hiring
  • Allows for competition between charter and
    regular public schools
  • Some evidence shows that the introduction of
    charter schools increases quality of ALL public
    schools

30
School vouchers
  • Each parent or guardian of a child receives a
    voucher
  • The voucher is redeemed by the school in exchange
    for providing education

31
School vouchers
  • Pro
  • Competition
  • Poor public schools ? Improve or go out of
    business
  • Cons
  • Information gathering of schools is costly
  • Reduction of positive externalities of education
  • Rich families may use vouchers more than poor
    families
  • Some poor families may not be able to afford
    private school with vouchers
  • Vouchers effectively increase income of
    middle-class and rich families that already send
    their kids to private schools

32
School vouchers
  • Replies to cons
  • Vouchers can be geared toward low-income students
  • Private schools would still need to meet
    curriculum guidelines ? Positive externalities
  • Current research will help shape the debate on
    vouchers
  • The main question Who benefits and who loses
    from school vouchers?

33
School accountability
  • Schools are monitored
  • No Child Left Behind (2001)
  • Some schools get report cards evaluating their
    performance
  • Some schools have financial incentives linked to
    test outcomes

34
School accountability
  • Pros
  • Reduction in bureaucracy
  • Increased focus on core learning
  • Gives easy access of each schools performance to
    the entire population

35
School accountability
  • Cons
  • No incentive for certain types of learning
  • Art, music, physical education, emotional
    development
  • Teaching to the test
  • Arbitrary mandates make some good schools look
    bad
  • Gaming the system
  • Increased suspensions
  • Increased use of special education
  • Cheating

36
Education and employment
  • There are different theories about the direct
    effectiveness of education
  • Direct learning
  • Screening
  • Employers need to try to determine how much of
    education is direct learning, and how much is
    screening

37
Education and employment
  • Various messages are sent to employers by
    finishing a certain level of education
  • I have learned everything needed to finish this
    level of education
  • I am intelligent enough to finish this
    education, which probably means I am smarter than
    somebody without my level of education
  • I am using this level of education to send a
    signal that I have other good qualities that you
    are looking for others that do not finish this
    level of education can say the same thing

38
Education and employment
  • Many jobs require a minimum level of education to
    be considered for a job
  • M.D. degree to be hired as a medical doctor
  • License for many specialized fields
  • Real estate
  • Pilot
  • High school or college diploma for many
    entry-level jobs

39
Summary Publicly-provided education
  • There are arguments in favor of providing basic
    education to all children free of charge
  • Crowding out predicted for some families
  • Public spending on education has increased in
    recent decades, but some indications of student
    performance have decreased
  • Recent proposals for reform try to increase
    public school performance
  • Financial incentives and competition

40
Timeline
  • This concludes Unit 2
  • Monday Test 1
  • Wednesday, April 29 Snyder lecture
  • Meet here at 200
  • I will return Test 1 if graded
  • We will go to Corwin Pavilion together about 210
    pm
  • Monday, May 4 Begin Unit 3
  • The role of insurance in health care, part 1
  • Read pages 179-196
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)