Policy Advice and the Singapore Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Policy Advice and the Singapore Issues

Description:

Cancun Ministerial Declaration in 2003. December 15th 2003 'deadline. ... Despite the Cancun Ministerial, demand for advice on Singapore Issues is likely ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: simone1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Policy Advice and the Singapore Issues


1
Policy Advice and the Singapore Issues
  • Simon J. Evenett
  • Oxford University and Brookings
  • simon.evenett_at_sbs.ox.ac.uk

2
Objectives of this presentation
  • Brief description of the four Singapore Issues.
  • Summary of views about them.
  • Presentation of a neutral means of assessing the
    case for including such issues in trade
    agreements.
  • Discuss implications for regional as well as
    multilateral trade negotiations.

3
What are the Singapore Issues?
  • Investment.
  • Competition law.
  • Transparency in government procurement.
  • Trade facilitation.

4
WTO discussions on the Singapore Issues
  • Singapore Ministerial Declaration in 1996.
  • Creation of Working Groups.
  • Doha Ministerial Declaration in 2001.
  • Modalities.
  • Timing of decisions.
  • Cancun Ministerial Declaration in 2003.
  • December 15th 2003 deadline.

5
Often-heard arguments pro and con
  • Pro
  • Complementarities with trade reform and other
    reforms.
  • Preserving the existing bargain.
  • Rules would be of distinct intrinsic value.

6
Often-heard arguments pro and con
  • Pro
  • Complementarities with trade reform and other
    reforms.
  • Preserving the existing bargain.
  • Rules would be of distinct intrinsic value.
  • Con
  • Generic concerns about the WTO

7
Often-heard arguments pro and con
  • Pro
  • Complementarities with trade reform and other
    reforms.
  • Preserving the existing bargain.
  • Rules would be of distinct intrinsic value.
  • Con
  • Generic concerns about the WTO
  • Mission creep.
  • Grievances about Uruguay Round.
  • DSU.

8
Often-heard arguments pro and con
  • Pro
  • Complementarities with trade reform and other
    reforms.
  • Preserving the existing bargain.
  • Rules would be of distinct intrinsic value.
  • Con
  • Generic concerns about the WTO.
  • Case for collective action at the WTO.
  • Market access only.

9
Often-heard arguments pro and con
  • Pro
  • Complementarities with trade reform and other
    reforms.
  • Preserving the existing bargain.
  • Rules would be of distinct intrinsic value.
  • Con
  • Generic concerns about the WTO.
  • Case for collective action at the WTO.
  • Costs and benefits of implementation.
  • Analogy to SPS and TRIPS agreements.

10
Often-heard arguments pro and con
  • Pro
  • Complementarities with trade reform and other
    reforms.
  • Preserving the existing bargain.
  • Rules would be of distinct intrinsic value.
  • Con
  • Generic concerns about the WTO.
  • Case for collective action at the WTO.
  • Costs and benefits of implementation.
  • Constraining policy space.

11
Deeper questions raised by Singapore Issues
  • What are the boundaries of the WTO?
  • Should it be confined to market access issues?
  • Membership and content of future agreements.
  • To what extent have the benefits of prior reforms
    depended on presence or absence of complementary
    policies?
  • What economic and political-economy factors
    motivate international collective action in these
    four areas?

12
Guiding principles for good policy advice on the
Singapore Issues
  • Understanding the policy proposals is critical
    few bother to read the relevant proposals and
    many mischaracterize what is on the negotiating
    table.
  • Even though there is little empirical research on
    these issues, an over-reliance on first
    principles is unhealthy.
  • Country heterogeneity mitigates against sweeping
    conclusions be suspicious of them.

13
A step-by-step approach to analyses of the
Singapore Issues
  • 1. What is the key development issue at stake?
    (This is not necessarily the key negotiating
    issue).
  • 2. What rationale, if any, is there for different
    types of international collective action (ICA) in
    a given policy arena?
  • Cross-border spillovers and externalities.
  • Political economy of reciprocal reform.
  • 3. From an economic perspective, which type of
    ICA is preferable?

14
A step-by-step approach to analyses of the
Singapore Issues
  • 4. What is the economic case for undertaking the
    preferred type of ICA in the WTO?
  • 5. What proposals have actually been advanced in
    this policy area at the WTO?
  • 6. How do those proposals stack against the
    arguments advanced in 2.-4. above?
  • 7. Are there other initiatives in this policy
    area that might better advance development than
    those currently proposed at the WTO?

15
Implications for Bank policy advice
  • Despite the Cancun Ministerial, demand for advice
    on Singapore Issues is likely to be high given
    their inclusion in many preferential trade
    negotiations.
  • An inadequate research base, plus variation in
    country circumstances, will limit the amount of
    papers that are directly relevant to the country
    that you are responsible for.
  • Beware of generic policy conclusions.

16
Implications for Bank policy advice
  • However, all is not lost.
  • Hopefully this presentation has demonstrated that
    there is a neutral step-by-step method for
    assessing proposals for the Singapore Issues.
  • Even though weve talked a lot about trade
    negotiations, dont forget that countries can
    unilaterally reform.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com