Title: Establishing the right environment for cessation campaigns
1(No Transcript)
2Establishing the right environment for cessation
campaigns
3Goals
- 1. Overview David Newton, AMV BBDO, UK
- Changes in the changing smoke free and cessation
environment - 2. Helen Glasgow, The Quit Group, New Zealand
- Update on the role of communication within other
policy initiatives - 3. Imogen Sharp, Dept of Health, UK
- The need for campaigns to work against different
policy backdrops
4Time of incredible change
- Environment De-normalisation strategies outside
of mass media - Smoking Bans
- From New York to Vietnam
- Tobacco taxes
- Significant increases in excise taxes
- Partnerships
- New joined up ways of working
5Further pressure on smokers
Organic cigarette is the latest 'health' fad
Cigarette companies slash price of cigarettes
following ban
Fag Breaks Add Up To Month Off In A Year
Syria water pipe concern amongst women and youth
But tobacco companies and the Worlds media
continue to counter some of the benefits
6Variation across geographies
- But significant disparities in the number, scale
and implementation of these initiatives between
countries and states - Europe vs States
- Germany vs Sweden
These disparities mean no single approach is
right across markets, but there are transferable
learnings emerging
7What we know already
8Key findings WHO report 2001
- Overall
- De-normalisation workslegislation, education,
taxation and pricing is effective in reducing
smoking prevalence - Synergistic efforts work best
- They achieve results that are greater than
those achieved individually because they knit
together every resource in a community and
surround citizens with reasons to quit and
support on how to quit. - Communications can lay the ground work
- Media messages can help create the environment
that supports smoking cessation, becoming the
stimulus for new thought and perspective on
tobacco policies and change
9Continued success of bans / tax increases
-
-
- NYC
- The city and state raised cigarette taxes by 3
- bringing the cost of a pack to about 7 - and
banned smoking in workplaces in 2003. - One year report showed a positive picture in
terms of compliance, public support and positive
impact on economy - In the two years since, the number of adults who
smoke fell 15 -
NYC Depts March 2004 NY Department of
Health and Mental Hygiene 05
10Continued success of bans
- Ireland
- Public places ban March 2004
- 2 drop in prevalence from 28 to 26
- 46 reported more likely to quit because of
law - 83 smokers supportive of new legislation and
increased support for total ban - Positive knock on effect - an increase in number
of smokers who dont smoke at home - 97 of pubs and restaurants compliant
Geoffrey Fong,Tobacco Control report May 05
11Different initiatives work better against
certain targets
- Tobacco taxes do deter smokers of all ages, but
work best on the youngest smokers, who have the
least disposable money - A 2001 study found that raising cigarette prices
by 10 reduces the rate of youth smoking by 7
and adult smoking by 4
Legislative pressures are only a part of the
broader requirement for a cessation campaign
12Observations from NRT category perspective
Total NRT Millions
Total NRT Millions
Ireland
France
Effects of legislation on the category are
dramatic, but suggest the importance need for
sustain environmental pressure
13Questionnaire Responses- Synergies between
communications environment- Impact of tax
increases- Collaborative initiatives
14Communications / Environment balance considered
important
- Q . What have you learned about the synergies
between the cessation mass media campaign and the
overall tobacco control program? -
- Changing societal norms is critical to moving
the needle on cessation.creating (smoker)
discomfort is important for spurring change
Arnold, USA MA
- - All respondents emphasised the importance of
the legislative environment and synergies with
their mass media campaigns
15Impact of environment on communications
- Q. How much consideration do cessation campaigns
require to the environment they will run in? - - Some markets emphasised the importance of mass
media to prepare for legislation (UK). Others
getting the environment right first (Norway) - - Clearly this depends on the specific
environmental context (Syria) - - But a sense that sometimes being unpopular in
legislation and communication is necessary to
ensure its effective
- A campaign has to be fine-tuned to what the
public, the media and the policy-makers are
actually ready for Directorate of Health and
Social Affairs, Norway
Could we do more to understand how to plan
balanced campaigns that effectively marry
changes in legislation with mass media?
16Balancing environmental Push and Pulls with
media campaign
- Communication Why to quit How to quit
- PUSH PULL
- Legislation Smoking Ban Support
services Tobacco Tax Stop Smoking
Aid - Pack warnings
17Impact of tax increases
Effectiveness of tax legislation evaluated in
call uplift
Calls to quitline doubled in the two weeks
following the .75 tax increase Blue Cross
Blue Shield of Minnesota
Ohio passed a 70 tax increase on cigarettes
increasing the tax to around 1.20 that went into
affect in July. Call volumes jumped from around
80 intakes per day to 130 190 Ohio Tobacco use
prevention control foundation
- Tax increases looked at through through call
volumes suggest their short term effectiveness in
driving quit attempts
A need to better understand their longer term
impact on cessation?
18Part of a bigger question
- Is it more effective to introduce legislation
steadily to create a sustained push
(California) or better to deliver significant
change over night (Ireland)? - Understanding how smokers tackle their habit
suggests gradual legislation better reflects the
likely quitting journey - About 70 want to
quit - - 35 try each year
- - Fewer than 5 of smokers succeed
- - Av smoker tries 5 7 times before
succeeding - Introducing legislation in a way that provides
sustained triggers to quit and stay quit could be
a more effective approach - Particularly for markets where media funds are
limited?
19Overall importance of working collaboratively
- Smoking cessation is everyones business- the
more the stakeholder activity the more quit
attempts Health Canada
- Having partners buy-in to the service
(Helpline) at the beginning was the best way to
promote sustainability and longevity Canadian
Cancer Society, Nova Scotia
20Variety of partnerships
- State Co-op Program
- Created a coalition
- Community Organisations and Schools (Social
capital) - Doctors others providing smoking cessation
services - Stop Smoking Services
- Health professionals and providers teachers and
educators army media - Medical community
- Faith Groups, Imams and Mosques
- Bars, colleges, and radio stations
- Media
- Funded partners of the tobacco program
21Collaboration with corporate partners
- Collaboration cited to overcome specific issues
- Health Canada insufficient funds for year round
media campaign - - Suggestion that in some cases, collaborative
initiatives outside of mass media can be more
effective in ROI terms
- We did a collaborative agreement with Wal-Mart
and Readers Digest as a cost effective way to
sustain audience reach. This was an effective
high-reach, low cost opportunity to extend the
social marketing campaign and promote cessation
Health Canada
- We are currently working on data that shows free
NRT is cheaper than paid advertising at getting
people to call the Quitline Oregon
22Could we be doing more?
- Most smokers quit in the least effective way,
without support - One of the biggest barriers to greater NRT usage
is based in the misunderstanding around nicotine - 80 believe its nicotine that is responsible for
cancer - NRT brands lack credibility in promoting benefits
of safe nicotine - Collaborative education about nicotine likely to
be mutually beneficial in driving more successful
quit attempts
Could partnerships be better exploited to produce
more effective overall cessation campaigns?
23Case Studies
- Helen Glasgow. New Zealand
- Environment and Communications - the impact of
sustained pressure in cutting prevalence - Imogen Sharp - UK
- The need for campaigns to work against different
policy backdrops